{"title":"Multiple Source Left Branch Extraction in Bosnian-Croatian-Serbian","authors":"Sandra Stjepanović","doi":"10.1353/jsl.2022.a923077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2022.a923077","url":null,"abstract":"<small>abstract</small>\u0000<p>This paper is concerned with multiple source left branch extraction in Bosnian-Croatian-Serbian, where left branch elements of multiple NPs are extracted. It shows that while multiple source left branch extraction is possible, it exhibits ordering restrictions. It demonstrates that these locality effects are based on an important fact that has also been noticed on completely different grounds for Case in left branch extraction by Dadan (2020): left branch elements enter feature-sharing with the elements they modify not in their base position, but after they undergo movement. It is argued that the observed locality effects can be accounted for in a system based on Bošković's (2007) proposal that movement is driven by the presence of an uniterpretable <em>u</em>K feature on the moving element, as well as Bošković's (2020, 2021) proposal that <em>u</em>K disrupts labeling (Chomsky 2013).</p>","PeriodicalId":52037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Slavic Linguistics","volume":"300 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140599657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Understanding the Nature of 'Self': Binding and the OVS Word Order in Russian","authors":"Asya M. Pereltsvaig","doi":"10.1353/jsl.2022.a923071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2022.a923071","url":null,"abstract":"<small>abstract</small>\u0000<p>Anaphor binding is a broadly-studied and widely-used diagnostic for syntactic structure across languages: since anaphors (which are subject to Principle A of the Binding Theory) require an antecedent that is local, c-commanding and in an A-position, the possibility of anaphor binding is commonly used as a diagnostic for both c-command (e.g. Barss & Lasnik 1986) and A- vs. A'- distinction. This use of anaphor binding as a syntactic diagnostic is not without problems, however, as evidenced from the debate surrounding the structure of OVS sentences in Russian. The goals of this paper are, thus, three-fold: (a) to gain a better understanding of anaphor binding as a syntactic diagnostic, (b) to shed new light on the long-standing and hotly-debated puzzle of OVS sentences in Russian, and (c) to explore the interaction of syntax and semantics, as concerns binding and thematic roles.</p>","PeriodicalId":52037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Slavic Linguistics","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140599665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Se middles in the evolution of predication: Is Serbian a split-accusative language?","authors":"Ljiljana Progovac","doi":"10.1353/jsl.2022.a923072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2022.a923072","url":null,"abstract":"<small>abstract</small>\u0000<p>This paper builds on the proposal that human languages reconstruct back to an intransitive (one argument) absolutive-like grammar. Such grammars are arguably still found in a variety of constructions across languages, including in verb-noun compounds in e.g. English and Serbian, and in Serbian <em>se</em> \"middles.\" Given the highly productive nature of <em>se</em> middles in Serbian, and given their specialization for low elaboration of events, and for the inanimate end of the Animacy Hierarchy, the proposal is that Serbian is best analyzed as a split-accusative language, on analogy with split-ergative languages, in that its dominant/default grammar is accusative, but the absolutive grammar (ergativity) occupies a significant niche.</p>","PeriodicalId":52037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Slavic Linguistics","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140599336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Experimenting with single-pair vs. pair-list interpretations in Russian multiple wh-clauses","authors":"Natalia Zevakhina, Elina Sigdel","doi":"10.1353/jsl.2022.a923078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2022.a923078","url":null,"abstract":"<small>abstract</small>\u0000<p>The paper reports on an experiment that shows the preference of pair-list interpretations over single-pair interpretations in Russian multiple coordinated and non-coordinated wh-interrogatives and wh-exclamatives. Moreover, the paper points out that neither the Superiority effect nor the distinction between argument and adjunct wh-phrases determines the choice of an interpretation in interrogatives and exclamatives. In general, the results challenge the existing theories of multiple wh-interrogatives and open a new page in investigating multiple wh-exclamatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":52037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Slavic Linguistics","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140599857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Approaches to Predicative Possession: The View from Slavic and Finno-Ugric ed. by Gréte Dalmi, Jacek Witkoś, and Piotr Cegłowski (review)","authors":"Ljuba Veselinova","doi":"10.1353/jsl.2022.a909908","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2022.a909908","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Approaches to Predicative Possession: The View from Slavic and Finno-Ugric</em> ed. by Gréte Dalmi, Jacek Witkoś, and Piotr Cegłowski <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Ljuba Veselinova </li> </ul> Gréte Dalmi, Jacek Witkoś, and Piotr Cegłowski, eds. <em>Approaches to Predicative Possession: The View from Slavic and Finno-Ugric</em>. London/New York/Oxford/New Delhi/Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020. viii + 228 pp. ISBN 978-1-3500-6246-7 (hardback), 978-1-3500-6249-8 (online), 978-1-3500-6247-4 (epdf) <p>It is widely acknowledged that possession is a universal domain in the sense that all known human languages have conventionalized expressions for it, such as (1) and (2) below (cf. Heine 1997: 2). Like most abstract notions, the domain of possession defies a generally accepted definition. Yet, as pointed out by Stassen (2009: 10–11), most linguists and laymen would agree that the expressions in (1) and (2) illustrate cases of \"real\"/prototypical possession, while intuitions and views would differ on whether sentences such as (3–6) would count as examples of possession.</p> <p>(1) Tom has a car.</p> <p>(2) his car</p> <p>(3) Frank has a sister.</p> <p>(4) A spider has six legs.</p> <p>(5) Mandy has a basket on her lap.</p> <p>(6) Bill has the flu.</p> <p>The domain of possession has been construed in terms of judicial ownership, belonging, and spatial proximity. Perhaps one of the most accepted analyses sees possession as a relation between two entities, a <small>possessor</small> and a <small>possessee</small> (Langacker 1991; Stassen 2009; Heine 1997). There are authors, such as Miller and Johnson-Laird (1976), who see possession as a social construct; this understanding has been subject to debate. A number of scholars (Seiler 1973; Hagège 1993; Heine 1997; Evans 1995; Stassen 2009, among others) bring up the aspect of <small>control</small><sup>1</sup> in the relation <small>possessor-possessee</small>. That is, in the prototypical case, the <small>possessor</small> controls the relation over the <small>possessee</small>. This, in turn, entails that a prototypical <small>possessor</small> is a high-ranking animate, usually <strong>[End Page 353]</strong> a human, and a prototypical <small>possessee</small> is an inanimate object, as is the case in the predication shown in (1). Analyses of kinship relations, as well as encodings of body parts versus the body they belong to, as in (3) and (4), bring out aspects of durability and part-whole relations that contribute to the semantic complexity of the domain of possession. Thus, <small>possessees</small> that can be detached from the <small>possessor</small> without any physical/other kind of damage instantiate <em>alienable possession</em>, while <small>possessees</small> whose detachment leads to permanent destruction, for instance, the removal of one","PeriodicalId":52037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Slavic Linguistics","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138531312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Binding of Reflexives in Polish as Agree, Move, and Late Spell-Out","authors":"Jacek Witkoś","doi":"10.1353/jsl.2022.a909906","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2022.a909906","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This paper considers components necessary for a successful account of A-binding relations in Polish, a language with subject-oriented reflexives and a binding domain delimited by the Tensed Sentence Condition. Following the presentation of major relevant data points in Polish, two comprehensive theories of binding—the Agree-based theory, presented in Reuland 2011, and the Move-based theory, presented in Boeckx et.al. 2008—are briefly outlined and applied to said data. It turns out that the two theories, in their most orthodox forms, fall short of achieving empirical adequacy. Subsequently, a positive theory of A-binding is proposed which combines upward Agree, movement (and copy pronunciation) of the bound element, similar to movement of clitic/weak pronoun in Polish, and a lexicalization algorithm modeled upon the proposals in Safir 2014 and Nikolaeva 2014. It is shown in a number of derivations with possessives how both the subject and the object engage in binding relations as antecedents and how their dependents become lexicalized as either reflexive or pronominal.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":52037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Slavic Linguistics","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138531310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Derivational Affixes as Roots Across Categories","authors":"Marko Simonović","doi":"10.1353/jsl.2022.a909904","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2022.a909904","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>Several recent accounts (Lowenstamm 2014; Nevins 2015; Creemers, Don, and Fenger 2017) couched in the framework of Distributed Morphology (Halle and Marantz 1993, 1994) argue for extending the separation between roots and categorial heads to derivational affixes. Such approaches offer a straightforward account of affixes that surface under different categorial embeddings (e.g., -<i>ant</i>, both in the noun <i>defendant</i> and in the adjective <i>defiant</i>) by viewing these affixes as roots. In this article, the affixes-as-roots approach is applied to Slovenian affixes. An account is proposed of the variable prosodic behavior of Slovenian derivational affixes, which behave as either stress-attracting or stress-neutral. It is shown that Slovenian derivational affixes have no lexical stress and all their prosodic effects follow from the structures in which they occur. Specifically, stress-attracting behavior is a result of the fact that sequences of roots with no intermediate functional structure (the so-called radical cores) are spelled out to phonology without any prosodic specification. Phonology then assigns the default final prosody to such sequences, creating the illusion of accented derivational affixes. The proposed account is applied to two affixes, -<i>av</i> and -<i>ov</i>, which occur across categorial embeddings (nominal, verbal, adjectival).</p></p>","PeriodicalId":52037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Slavic Linguistics","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138531339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Grammatika prilagatel′nogo: Tipologija ad′′jektivnosti i atributivnosti by P. V. Graščenkov (review)","authors":"Egor Tsedryk","doi":"10.1353/jsl.2022.a909907","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2022.a909907","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Grammatika prilagatel′nogo: Tipologija ad′′jektivnosti i atributivnosti</em> by P. V. Graščenkov <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Egor Tsedryk </li> </ul> P. V. Graščenkov. <em>Grammar of the adjective: Typology of adjectivity and attributivity</em>]. Moscow: Izdatel'skij dom JaSK, 2018. 432 pp. <h2>1. Introduction</h2> <p>It seems inconceivable to describe syntactic properties of a given language without reference to parts of speech (noun, verb, adjective, adverb, preposition, and so on). They are inherited from traditional grammars of well-known languages and are usually taken for granted. Nonetheless, one may wonder whether or not they are universal and how languages encode them in their systems. Focusing on the adjective, Graščenkov (hereafter: G) in his book scrutinizes the morphosyntactic properties of this category from a crosslinguistic perspective, with Russian being the most representative (in addition to being the language of the book). As the author points out from the outset, Russian embraces a large \"zone of grammatical phenomena typologically related to adjectives\" (p. 10).<sup>1</sup> Nevertheless, the reader avid for crosslinguistic data will find a wealth of examples from many other typologically unrelated languages; next to Russian, these are Ossetic, Altaic, and Nakh-Daghestanian languages. Overall, the book covers an impressive array of languages, listed at the end of the book (pp. 427–29), with a total of 73 tokens. It is clear that such a volume of data is impossible to cover without the use of secondary sources, but the author also reports data collected during his own fieldwork, including expeditions dating back to his work under the supervision of Aleksandr Evgenievič Kibrik. In the preface, the author acknowledges Kibrik's influence on his broader typological view of adjectives. He also mentions Ekaterina Anatolievna Lyutikova, who influenced his choice of syntax as a main field of interest. In fact, G's keenness for syntactic analysis emerges through the book (selected structures from chapters 2 and 3 will be presented in sections 2.2 <strong>[End Page 329]</strong> and 2.3). The book has four chapters, which I will report on sequentially in §2. Starting from chapter 2, the material presented in the book is quite dense (and sometimes it goes beyond the realm of adjectives in their strict understanding). For this reason, I have to limit myself to selected highlights. For expository purposes, I will mostly focus on Russian, with only a couple of examples taken from Altaic and Nakh-Daghestanian languages (see §2.4). In §3 I revisit the extended projections that G proposes for the adjectives in Russian, and I briefly conclude in §4.</p> <h2>2. Summary</h2> <h3>2.1. Chapter 1</h3> <p>The book starts with an overview of approaches to parts of speech, presenting both functional","PeriodicalId":52037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Slavic Linguistics","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138531313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"On the Syntax of the Russian Control Verbs Pomoč' 'Help' and Pomešat' 'Hinder'","authors":"Irina Burukina","doi":"10.1353/jsl.2022.a909903","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2022.a909903","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>This paper examines sentences with the verbs <i>pomoč'</i> 'help' and <i>pomešat'</i> 'hinder' in Russian and demonstrates that, although they are usually listed among object control predicates, these verbs appear in a wide range of constructions that cannot be accounted for by a straightforward control analysis. To explain the distribution of <i>pomoč'</i> and <i>pomešat'</i>, I argue that they are, in essence, ditransitive, similarly to 'give' or 'send': they require a Goal (a person or a situation that will be helped/hindered) and a Theme headed by a silent noun HETP/HINDRANCE. A dative DP, either [+sentient] or eventive, a subjunctive <i>čtoby</i>-clause, or a non-finite clause with an overt subject, when present, should be analyzed as a Goal. A controlled infinitival clause is merged as a modifier within the Theme NP. The approach is extended to control collocations such as 'give a chance'. It further offers an opportunity to develop a uniform structural representation for various verbs of object control that will reduce the differences between them to particular properties of the Theme.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":52037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Slavic Linguistics","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138531314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From the Editors","authors":"Franc Marušič, Rok Žaucer","doi":"10.1353/jsl.2022.a909902","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2022.a909902","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> From the Editors <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Franc Marušič and Rok Žaucer </li> </ul> <p>This is the second issue of volume 30, and it marks a significant moment for <em>JSL</em> in its goal to become open access. New regular issues are now available on JSL's website in delayed open access—one year after publication—and extra issues are available on JSL's website in immediate open access.</p> <p>The issue also marks some changes in the editorial team. We welcome Boban Arsenijević, who joined the <em>JSL</em> team as an Associate Editor, and Laura Janda, who joined the <em>JSL</em> Editorial Board. We also thank our Associate Editor Catherine Rudin, who now also helps with language editing for the FASL extra issues of <em>JSL</em>, as well as Wayles Browne, Steve Franks, Laura Janda, and again Catherine Rudin, who have helped with pre-prepping accepted articles.</p> <p>Furthermore, we thank everyone who has served as a reviewer for <em>JSL</em> submissions. This is a list of people who contributed reviews between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2022 (listed in alphabetical order): Bistra Andreva, Andrei Antonenko, Boban Arsenijević, John Bailyn, Fyodor Baykov, John David Benjamin, Vladimír Benko, Štefan Beňuš, Maša Bešlin, Adam Bialy, Petr Biskup, Maria Bloch Trojnar, Andreas Blumel, Tatiana Bondarenko, Anna Bondaruk, Lena Borise, Krzysztof Borowski, Željko Bošković, Wayles Browne, Irina Burukina, Pavel Caha, Patricia Capredo-Hofherr, Malgorzata Ćavar, Božena Cetnarowska, Barbara Citko, Lada Dutkova Cope, Karen De Clercq, Marcel Den Dikken, Rick Derksen, Miloje Despić, Stephen M. Dickey, Tom Dickins, Mila Dimitrova Vulchanova, Mojmir Dočekal, Galina Dukova-Zheleva, Dominika Dziubala Szrejbrowska, Anna Endresen, Christine Ericsdotter, David Erschler, Maria Esipova, Daniel Finer, Steven Franks, Valerie Freeman, Ljudmila Geist, Maria Gouskova, Anna Grabovac, Jadranka Gvozdanović, Boris Harizanov, Ivona Ilić, Tania Ionin, Khalil Iskarous, Lukasz Jadrzejowski, Katarzyna Janic, Gaja Jarosz, Olga Kagan, Magdalena Kaufmann, Darya Kavitskaya, Mikhail Knyazev, Agata Kochanska, Anna Kohari, Ivona Kučerova, Anton Kukhto, Yuriy Kushnir, Mark Richard Lauersdorf, Jakob Lenardič, Alexander Letuchy Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Beccy Lewis, Jad-wiga Linde-Usiekniewicz, Tatiana Luchkina, Paulina Lyskawa, Ekaterina Lyutikova, Nerea Madariaga, Marek Majer, Anastasia Makarova, Marijana Marelj, Maja Marković, Franc Marušič, Ora Matushansky, Krzysztof Migdalski, Petra Mišmaš, Andrew Murphy, Tore Nesset, Stefan Michael Newerkla, Roumyana Pancheva, Andrija Petrović, Tatiana Philippova, Hagen Pitsch, Mariia Privizentseva, Ljiljana Progovac, Tijmen C Pronk, Zorica Puškar-Gallien, Ekaterina Rakhilina, Tom Roberts, Božena Rozwadowska, Marta Ruda, Catherine Rudin, Pawel Rutkowski, Amanda Saksida, Milan Sečujski, Irina Sekerina, Tamah Sherman, Vesela Si","PeriodicalId":52037,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Slavic Linguistics","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138531315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}