{"title":"The management of psychological casualties from large-scale attritional combat: shell shock, British military doctors and generals in the First World War.","authors":"Edgar Jones","doi":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag036","DOIUrl":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A significant challenge faced by the British Army during the First World War was how to manage large-scale psychological casualties in a context of increasing manpower shortages. The high numbers threatened to undermine the fighting strength of the British Expeditionary Force and prompted the introduction of standardized regulations and treatment programmes. Fundamental disagreements about their design arose between three groups: senior regular medical officers, civilian specialists who had volunteered for Territorial or wartime service, and the generals responsible for the conduct of the war. A fierce debate arose between those who believed that medical expertise should drive casualty policy and those who thought that military goals were paramount. With growing shortages of replacement troops, shell shock was increasingly framed as a manpower issue in France to retain as many soldiers as possible on the frontline, reducing the authority of specialist clinicians. A growing realism of what could be endured in the trenches and what could be achieved by the treatment of severe cases informed different policies overseas and at home. The War Office Committee of Inquiry set up in 1920 was a tacit admission that the challenges created by the recognition of shell shock had not been solved during the conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":520090,"journal":{"name":"Modern British history","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148721973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How warm should the welfare state be? The evolution of Britain's heating benefit and the challenge of defining adequate heat, 1948-1988.","authors":"Rebecca Wright","doi":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tcbh/hwag039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines how warmth has been a central, but previously overlooked feature of the welfare state. Mapping the internal debates that surrounded the development, extension, and application of the Heating Addition (HA), the foremost benefit for heat between 1948 and 1988, the article traces how the state tried to define a social standard for warmth at a time when Britain's heating infrastructure was in flux. Heating practices changed radically over these decades, as households moved away from the traditional coal fire and adopted new electric, gas, and solid fuel central heating systems. This article considers how the state made sense of this complex, changing, and uneven energy transition through its welfare policies, and in doing so, grappled with the question: 'how warm should the welfare state be?' This was not straightforward to answer but involved assumptions about bodies, lifestyles, and comfort that were subjective, elastic, and evolving. Moreover, as a service, heat was relational, and proved particularly hard to quantify and standardize, challenging the welfare state's professed desire for a fair and comprehensive welfare model. By exploring the debates surrounding the HA, this article will capture the challenges posed by extending a specific-heat-related benefit and why its focus on a commodity, such as energy, would never translate into the equitable provision of warmth across the welfare state.</p>","PeriodicalId":520090,"journal":{"name":"Modern British history","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149067056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"'All the Marks of a Swindle': Walter Sidney Bromhead and the dividends of whiteness.","authors":"Calvin Scott Paulson","doi":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag024","DOIUrl":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Between his birth in 1873 and his death in 1944, Walter Sidney Bromhead lived an eventful life. He owned land on four continents, sat on the board of several fraudulent insurance companies, published in the Eugenics Review, was mocked in Australia's parliament, briefly ran colonial Kenya's largest white veterans' association, and claimed he met nearly every notable person of the twentieth century from Shackleton to Lenin. Yet his life's work centred around his obsession with starting a global social movement he dubbed 'Fedrity'. By binding Britain's colonies into a global federation of farming cooperatives, Bromhead claimed that Fedrity would inaugurate a new supranational currency, abolish wage labour, and ensure global white supremacy. A closer study of this globetrotting confidence trickster's life and lies expands the boundaries of British imperial history, revealing how those who lived at the margins of legality generated new understandings of law, space, and race. His life demonstrates how Britain's colonial frontier served as a laboratory for new understandings of whiteness, developed in response to the exigencies of Britain's chaotic interwar years. He synthesized Victorian settlerism, interwar radicalism, and eugenics into a demand that the British Empire's political economy be reoriented around the reproduction of whiteness. His ideas, and the tricks he used to sell them, are uniquely reflective of the tensions that ran through the late British Empire, and which led eventually to its collapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":520090,"journal":{"name":"Modern British history","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148298667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Blood parenthood and the hierarchies of dispossession in English adoption cases, 1946-70.","authors":"Emma Melody Bradley","doi":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag022","DOIUrl":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article charts shifting judicial and medical framings of child welfare in adoption legislation and practices from 1946 to 1970, illuminated through adoption cases, press coverage, and sociological, medical, and law case reports. Adoption legislation illuminated post-war state paternalism and societal anxieties to reemphasize a moral order within the domestic private sphere. Extramarital parental rights were deprioritized in the courts, reframed as oppositional to child psychological welfare. Under the Adoption Acts of 1950 and 1958, a 'successful adoption' was redefined as the permanent legal, physical, and emotional separation of mothers and babies to ensure the stability of life-long 'substitute' parenthood. Statutory interpretations of the Acts granted judges broader powers to dispense with parental rights if mothers were deemed to be 'unreasonably' refusing their consent to the adoption of their children. In the 1950s and 1960s, 'evidence' deployed in court to illustrate 'unreasonable' refusal of adoption was often pathologizing and disadvantageous to extramarital mothers. By the mid-1960s, the judicial definition of 'unreasonable' refusal of parental consent to adoption now included a parent's refusal to adhere to medical opinion that the child's psychological welfare would be damaged if they left the custody of the married prospective adoptive parents. The opinions of doctors became judicial grounds for dispensing with parental rights. Nevertheless, these new statutory grounds for removing parental rights in the 1950s and 1960s were not wholly accepted in British society, and dissenting legal and philanthropic voices expressed concern about financial, emotional, and administrative coercion in adoption cases experienced by unsupported mothers.</p>","PeriodicalId":520090,"journal":{"name":"Modern British history","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148102433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Family stories: retirement, old age, and generational thinking in Britain since the 1970s.","authors":"Helen McCarthy","doi":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag021","DOIUrl":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When we look for everyday understandings of retirement and old age in the recent past, what we frequently find are family stories: of a grandfather who died 'in harness'; of a widowed aunt who travelled the world; of parents who moved to the seaside and regretted it. Intimate others, including the deceased, have offered Britons subjective resources for facing what Susan Sontag has called the 'ordeal of ageing'. In this lecture, I trace this kind of generational thinking through life-writing, oral history, and archived social science sources across the later twentieth century, when old age was being remade in Britain in important ways. Moving beyond the millennium, I show how a new mode of generational thinking emerged, centring the ageing 'baby boomer' cohorts, whose collective experience of welfare universalism, social mobility, and capital accumulation became a theme for polemical commentary. Here, family stories became entangled with potent public narratives of intergenerational unfairness, creating a tense equilibrium observable in our present moment of fracture in the social contract between old and young.</p>","PeriodicalId":520090,"journal":{"name":"Modern British history","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148008371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to the following two papers.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag017","DOIUrl":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":520090,"journal":{"name":"Modern British history","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13182720/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147978424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"'Stop this horror': protest imagery, exposure tactics, and the media campaign to end British counterinsurgency violence in Malaya, 1948-53.","authors":"Rio Creech-Nowagiel","doi":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag037","DOIUrl":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines how leftist writers and editors in Britain employed photography as a tool for challenging the legitimacy of the so-called Malayan 'Emergency', which was a twelve-year counterinsurgency campaign engineered to counter uprisings in colonial Malaya after the Second World War. By circulating protest imagery in anti-war pamphlets, newsletters and newspapers, the activists in focus here demanded an end to counterinsurgency violence and the Malayan campaign. The British government's response-denying the images' authenticity and discrediting their sources-illustrates how imperialism was defended in the decolonization era. This article places leaked atrocity imagery within a wider context of protest imagery mobilized by the anti-colonial, communist Left. It explores the complexities and challenges of working with atrocity imagery as a vehicle for exposing and resisting state-sanctioned colonial violence. It highlights the variety and scope of editorial strategies that anti-war campaigners turned to in their efforts to unite struggles against imperial power, capitalist exploitation, and state-imposed 'emergencies' in Britain and Malaya.</p>","PeriodicalId":520090,"journal":{"name":"Modern British history","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148901852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Experiencing British Nationality Law in Twentieth-Century China: extraterritoriality, marriage, and 'legitimacy' on the edges of empire.","authors":"Catherine Ladds","doi":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag001","DOIUrl":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The twentieth-century codification of British nationality, beginning with the 1914 British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act, had a profound impact upon British settler communities on the edges of empire, where the loss or acquisition of British status determined access to passports and extraterritorial protection. Although the 1948 British Nationality Act has often been privileged as a watershed moment in the intertwined histories of national belonging and post-war migration to Britain, this study instead draws attention to the longer genealogy of this political dialogue by positioning the inter-war period as a time when the parameters of British nationality were defined and refracted through the circumstances of putative Britons overseas. Consular responses to applications for British status in the Chinese treaty ports suggest that the parameters of British legal belonging, which required more careful definition against the backdrop of extraterritorial rights and protections, were worked out in detail in jurisdictional borderlands on the edges of empire. Petitions from individual constituents grappling with an evolving statutory landscape demonstrate that nationality became increasingly meaningful in concrete ways in the lives of ordinary settlers and sojourners in the twentieth century. The formal exclusion from this legal category of specific groups of people living beyond the boundaries of British territory, particularly 'illegitimate' children, married women, and children born to British mothers, had sharply felt effects upon the mobility, personal freedoms, and family cohesion of scores of settlers.</p>","PeriodicalId":520090,"journal":{"name":"Modern British history","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147505966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"'All the Kids Wanna Sniff Some Glue': glue-sniffing, deindustrialization, and moral panic in 1980s Britain.","authors":"Malcolm Russell","doi":"10.1093/tcbh/hwaf025","DOIUrl":"10.1093/tcbh/hwaf025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article analyses anxieties surrounding glue-sniffing in 1980s Britain and their entanglement with the era's accelerated deindustrialization. A vibrant 'New Drug History' has overlooked glue-sniffing, despite its prevalence and prominent media coverage during the 1980s, which placed it at the vanguard of a renewed concern about drugs. Concurrently, scholarship on deindustrialization has largely neglected related anxieties surrounding drug use. This article addresses these lacunae by arguing that glue-sniffing offers a potent lens through which to examine the emotional dimensions of accelerated industrial decline during the early 1980s. Drawing upon popular media, expert discourse, and subcultural artefacts, it contends that the figure of the glue-sniffer became emblematic of broader societal fears regarding diminished opportunities for youth amidst unprecedented unemployment. This perceived crisis of youth futurity saw glue-sniffing become entwined with concerns surrounding not only joblessness, but also dereliction, juvenile crime, and youth subcultures. As such, this article helps take the notion of foreclosed futurity beyond the realm of theory through historicizing it as an everyday structure of feeling intensified by Thatcherite political decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":520090,"journal":{"name":"Modern British history","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145937331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Migration memories of sexual and reproductive health in late twentieth-century London.","authors":"Caroline Rusterholz, George J Severs","doi":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag009","DOIUrl":"10.1093/tcbh/hwag009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the sexual and reproductive health experiences of eight people who migrated to London in the late twentieth century from Kenya, Zambia, Nigeria, Sudan, and Uganda. Their experiences were captured through an oral history partnership with NAZ, a sexual health charity run by and for racialized people in London. They illuminate the informal processes of sexual and reproductive health knowledge production before migrating to London, such as jokes and gossip, in the face of minimal formal education on these topics. All of the interviewees studied in this article are living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and moved to London in their early twenties. In this article, we pay close attention to their experiences of sexual and reproductive health services and HIV and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), which provide novel understandings of the ways in which such services were experienced by those who migrated to London. By listening attentively to the interviews and deploying oral history theories around memory and narrative, we argue that migration and the generational shifts of the interviewees acted as major turning points in their sexual and reproductive health journeys by increasing exposure to such services. While often empowering, such encounters were, at times, also experienced as alienating or racist. In addition, the interviews reveal how British public health campaigns resonated internationally and were closely entangled in migration narratives. The interviewees' experiences of HIV/AIDS demonstrate the multiplicity of HIV/AIDS histories, offering new perspectives on HIV/AIDS experiences in Britain.</p>","PeriodicalId":520090,"journal":{"name":"Modern British history","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147825889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}