Forum: The Past, Present, and Futures of Modern British History.

Erik Linstrum, Peter Clarke, Adrian Bingham, Lawrence Black, Claire Langhamer, Lucy Delap, Jessica Meyer, Guy Ortolano, Susan Pedersen, Jordanna Bailkin, Divya Subramanian
{"title":"Forum: The Past, Present, and Futures of Modern British History.","authors":"Erik Linstrum, Peter Clarke, Adrian Bingham, Lawrence Black, Claire Langhamer, Lucy Delap, Jessica Meyer, Guy Ortolano, Susan Pedersen, Jordanna Bailkin, Divya Subramanian","doi":"10.1093/tcbh/hwae004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For the first issue of the renamed journal, Modern British History co-editor Erik Linstrum convened a group of scholars to reflect on the past, present, and possible futures of the field. The resulting contributions make no claim to provide a comprehensive or representative survey. Rather, they offer a variety of perspectives on where modern British history has been and where it might be going. Several contributions, written by former editors of Twentieth Century British History, drawn on the history of the journal as a way of thinking about the direction of the field and its subfields. Others consider the place of modern Britain in the wider discipline of history, grappling with questions of temporality and embodiment; the institutional and material contexts of scholarship; the role of national histories in a transnational world; and the response of historical writing to epidemiological, humanitarian, and ecological crisis. The sequence of contributions mirrors the evolution of the journal since its founding in 1990, beginning with political history and gradually encompassing a much broader range of subjects and methodologies as well as an expanded geographical ambit. Here are archive stories, pleas for new subjects, roadmaps for new approaches to old subjects, and attempts to identify master narratives. Taken together, these contributions demonstrate that modern British history has many houses-which is both a sign of intellectual vitality and a challenge for anyone wishing to generalize about the 'state of the field'. If British modernity remains an abundant resource for 'thinking with', its contours and frontiers are tantalizingly up for grabs.</p>","PeriodicalId":520090,"journal":{"name":"Modern British history","volume":"35 1","pages":"7-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern British history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tcbh/hwae004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the first issue of the renamed journal, Modern British History co-editor Erik Linstrum convened a group of scholars to reflect on the past, present, and possible futures of the field. The resulting contributions make no claim to provide a comprehensive or representative survey. Rather, they offer a variety of perspectives on where modern British history has been and where it might be going. Several contributions, written by former editors of Twentieth Century British History, drawn on the history of the journal as a way of thinking about the direction of the field and its subfields. Others consider the place of modern Britain in the wider discipline of history, grappling with questions of temporality and embodiment; the institutional and material contexts of scholarship; the role of national histories in a transnational world; and the response of historical writing to epidemiological, humanitarian, and ecological crisis. The sequence of contributions mirrors the evolution of the journal since its founding in 1990, beginning with political history and gradually encompassing a much broader range of subjects and methodologies as well as an expanded geographical ambit. Here are archive stories, pleas for new subjects, roadmaps for new approaches to old subjects, and attempts to identify master narratives. Taken together, these contributions demonstrate that modern British history has many houses-which is both a sign of intellectual vitality and a challenge for anyone wishing to generalize about the 'state of the field'. If British modernity remains an abundant resource for 'thinking with', its contours and frontiers are tantalizingly up for grabs.

论坛:英国现代史的过去、现在和未来。
在更名后的期刊创刊号上,《英国现代史》联合编辑埃里克-林斯特伦(Erik Linstrum)召集了一批学者对该领域的过去、现在和可能的未来进行反思。这些文章并没有声称提供了全面或具有代表性的调查。相反,它们对英国现代史的过去和未来提供了各种视角。有几篇文章是由《二十世纪英国史》的前任编辑撰写的,他们从该杂志的历史出发,思考该领域及其子领域的发展方向。其他文章则考虑了现代英国在更广泛的历史学科中的地位,探讨了时间性和体现的问题;学术研究的制度和物质背景;国家历史在跨国世界中的作用;以及历史写作对流行病、人道主义和生态危机的回应。稿件的顺序反映了该期刊自 1990 年创刊以来的发展变化,从政治史开始,逐渐涵盖了更广泛的主题和方法,并扩大了地理范围。这里有档案故事、对新主题的呼吁、对旧主题的新方法路线图,以及确定主叙事的尝试。总之,这些文章表明,英国现代史有很多 "房子"--这既是知识活力的标志,也是对任何希望概括 "领域现状 "的人的挑战。如果说英国现代性仍然是 "思考 "的丰富资源,那么它的轮廓和疆域则是诱人的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信