Substance use & addiction journal最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Perceiving E-Cigarettes as Safe and Safer Alternative to Cigarettes Among Young Adults. 青少年认为电子烟是安全和更安全的香烟替代品。
Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-28 DOI: 10.1177/29767342231218533
Rachel Carmen Ceasar, Jessica L Braymiller, Afton Kechter, Kelsey A Simpson, Sara J Schiff, Naosuke Yamaguchi, Jessica L Barrington-Trimis
{"title":"Perceiving E-Cigarettes as Safe and Safer Alternative to Cigarettes Among Young Adults.","authors":"Rachel Carmen Ceasar, Jessica L Braymiller, Afton Kechter, Kelsey A Simpson, Sara J Schiff, Naosuke Yamaguchi, Jessica L Barrington-Trimis","doi":"10.1177/29767342231218533","DOIUrl":"10.1177/29767342231218533","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Young adults are using e-cigarettes at high rates. While the literature on the health risks associated with e-cigarettes is extensive and growing, little is known about young adults' thoughts and perceptions of the safety and harms of e-cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted one-on-one interviews with young adults aged 18 to 25 years in Los Angeles, California between June 2018 and June 2019. We interviewed and audio-recorded young adults (N = 62) who consented to the study and self-reported to have used e-cigarettes on a weekly basis or more for at least 5 months prior to study enrollment. Interviews examined participants' thoughts, feelings, and experiences related to e-cigarette use. We audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded the interviews using grounded theory analysis methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Young adults often believed that e-cigarettes were safer than cigarettes and were safe to use, especially following positive vaping experiences. Young adults were skeptical of the available science on e-cigarette use and felt there was not conclusive data on the harms of e-cigarettes. In their selection of e-cigarettes over cigarettes, young adults felt they were making a conscious and healthier choice. Because young adults viewed e-cigarettes to be better for them based on their personal experiences with vaping, they felt e-cigarettes were a superior alternative to combustible tobacco.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Young adults in our study believed that the long-term health effects of e-cigarette use are not clearly understood and were generally skeptical of the research on e-cigarette harms. Policy, education, and anti-smoking campaigns need to clarify the negative health-related consequences of e-cigarette use for young people.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139572458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Systematic Review of State Office-Based Buprenorphine Treatment Laws Effective During 2022: Counseling, Dosage, and Visit Frequency Requirements. 2022 年生效的州办公室丁丙诺啡治疗法系统回顾:咨询、剂量和就诊频率要求。
Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-30 DOI: 10.1177/29767342231223721
Barbara Andraka-Christou, Olivia K Golan, Michelle Williams, Scott Buksbaum, Adam J Gordon, Bradley D Stein
{"title":"A Systematic Review of State Office-Based Buprenorphine Treatment Laws Effective During 2022: Counseling, Dosage, and Visit Frequency Requirements.","authors":"Barbara Andraka-Christou, Olivia K Golan, Michelle Williams, Scott Buksbaum, Adam J Gordon, Bradley D Stein","doi":"10.1177/29767342231223721","DOIUrl":"10.1177/29767342231223721","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Buprenorphine is among the most effective treatments for opioid use disorder. Even though the federal government recently eliminated the waiver requirement and patient limits applicable to office-based buprenorphine treatment (OBBT), among other settings, some states may still have policies imposing requirements on OBBT providers not required by federal law.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected statutes and regulations from 50 US states and the District of Columbia (ie, 51 jurisdictions) between August 11 and November 30, 2022 using the Nexis Uni legal database and search terms related to OBBT counseling, dosage, and/or frequency of visits. We then used template analysis, a mixed deductive-inductive qualitative method, to analyze legal content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten jurisdictions (20%) in 2022 had an OBBT counseling, dosage, and/or visit frequency requirement. Four jurisdictions had at least one law in each OBBT policy category examined. One-fifth of jurisdictions have OBBT policies not required under federal law. Five of these jurisdictions are among those with the highest overdose death rates per capita, according to publicly available data from 2021. Some OBBT requirements could potentially limit clinician interest in offering buprenorphine treatment or result in inadequate care (eg, if dosage limitations are too low.).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even though a federal waiver is no longer required for OBBT, our results suggests that at least some jurisdictions have other OBBT requirements, such as counseling, dosage, and/or frequency requirements. Given the severity of the ongoing opioid overdose crisis, policymakers should carefully consider the extent to which OBBT requirements are evidence based.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139577267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The FASTER-BUP Study, Extended-Release Injectable Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder Among Individuals at High Risk of Overdose: Protocol for an Observational Prospective Study. FASTER-BUP 研究,用于治疗过量高危人群阿片类药物使用障碍的缓释注射用丁丙诺啡:观察性前瞻性研究方案》。
Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-22 DOI: 10.1177/29767342231222103
Jenna Langlois, Seonaid Nolan, Piper Dickhout, Zishan Cui, Josh Paterson, Nadia Fairbairn, M Eugenia Socías
{"title":"The FASTER-BUP Study, Extended-Release Injectable Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder Among Individuals at High Risk of Overdose: Protocol for an Observational Prospective Study.","authors":"Jenna Langlois, Seonaid Nolan, Piper Dickhout, Zishan Cui, Josh Paterson, Nadia Fairbairn, M Eugenia Socías","doi":"10.1177/29767342231222103","DOIUrl":"10.1177/29767342231222103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>North America is facing an unprecedented public health emergency of opioid-related morbidity and mortality. The mortality benefits of oral medication treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD), such as methadone or buprenorphine, are well documented. However, barriers to access and long-term engagement have prevented maximizing their benefits. Long-acting injectable buprenorphine formulations were developed to address some of the challenges associated with oral MOUD. The \"Pilot study to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of extended-release injectable buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder among individuals at high risk of overdose\" (FASTER-BUP) was developed to explore this treatment option in populations at high risk of overdose in a real-world Canadian setting. FASTER-BUP is a 24-week observational prospective study evaluating the feasibility and clinical utility of extended-release injectable buprenorphine (XR-BUP) for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) among 40 adults at high risk of overdose (ie, lifetime history of overdose or a positive urine drug test (UDT) for fentanyl within 30 days prior to screening) in Vancouver, BC. The primary outcome is retention in treatment and secondary outcomes include: use of unregulated opioids, safety, overdose events, treatment satisfaction, changes in drug-related problems, changes in quality of life, opioid cravings, health service utilization, and criminal activity. FASTER-BUP is the first study to explore XR-BUP among individuals at high risk of overdose in a real-world Canadian setting. This commentary provides a brief narrative about the study thus far and presents insights on key adaptations to the study protocol, including those adopted to mitigate recruitment challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139522383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The IMPOWR Network Divided or Single Exposure Study (DOSE) Protocol: A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Once Versus Split Dosing of Methadone for the Treatment of Comorbid Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder. IMPOWR 网络分次或单次给药研究 (DOSE) 协议:美沙酮一次给药与分次给药治疗合并慢性疼痛和阿片类药物使用障碍的随机对照比较。
Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI: 10.1177/29767342241239167
Greer McKendrick, Will Davis, Michael Sklar, Nicole Brown, Emma Pattillo, Patrick H Finan, Denis Antoine, Vickie Walters, Kelly E Dunn
{"title":"The IMPOWR Network Divided or Single Exposure Study (DOSE) Protocol: A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Once Versus Split Dosing of Methadone for the Treatment of Comorbid Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Greer McKendrick, Will Davis, Michael Sklar, Nicole Brown, Emma Pattillo, Patrick H Finan, Denis Antoine, Vickie Walters, Kelly E Dunn","doi":"10.1177/29767342241239167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241239167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Divided or Single Exposure (DOSE) trial is a double-blind, placebo-controlled examination of once versus split dosing of methadone for comorbid pain and opioid use disorder (OUD) among persons receiving methadone for OUD treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multisite trial consists of a 12-week active intervention phase and 6-month follow-up period. Persons receiving methadone who endorse clinically-significant chronic pain are randomized into once-daily dosing or split dosing that is managed remotely via an electronic pillbox. Clinical pain is assessed weekly and using ecological momentary assessments. Experimentally-evoked pain is assessed using a quantitative sensory testing battery. Additional outcomes related to OUD, including withdrawal and craving, are also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study hypothesizes that persons assigned to the split dosing condition will report lower pain and opioid withdrawal relative to persons assigned to the traditional once-daily dosing strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Split dosing is a relatively common technique in OUD treatments; therefore, if data support this hypothesis, there is high potential for implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140290141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Connecting Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder Clinical Trials Through Data Harmonization: Wake Forest IMPOWR Dissemination, Education, and Coordination Center (IDEA-CC). 通过数据统一连接慢性疼痛和阿片类药物使用障碍临床试验:维克森林 IMPOWR 传播、教育和协调中心(IDEA-CC)。
Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI: 10.1177/29767342241236287
Meredith C B Adams, Robert W Hurley, Umit Topaloglu
{"title":"Connecting Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder Clinical Trials Through Data Harmonization: Wake Forest IMPOWR Dissemination, Education, and Coordination Center (IDEA-CC).","authors":"Meredith C B Adams, Robert W Hurley, Umit Topaloglu","doi":"10.1177/29767342241236287","DOIUrl":"10.1177/29767342241236287","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has developed the NIH HEAL Integrative Management of chronic Pain and OUD for Whole Recovery (IMPOWR) network to address the interconnected nature of chronic pain (CP) and opioid use disorder (OUD), which are influenced by mental health. The network aims to develop integrated treatment pathways across multiple sites in the United States. The IMPOWR Dissemination, Education, and Coordination Center (IDEA-CC) is proposed to support the NIH HEAL IMPOWR network by developing a CP- and OUD-focused infrastructure that includes measures of stigma, trauma, and quality of life. This includes deploying a data framework to link clinical sites, developing an educational infrastructure to address stigma and health disparities, and disseminating research findings. The IDEA-CC will standardize data collection processes, develop web-based data commons, and facilitate data sharing opportunities. The IDEA-CC will support the development and validation of composite CP and OUD measures and will develop educational materials to address stigma and health disparities. Overall, the IDEA-CC will create a research community and data commons that connect NIH HEAL IMPOWR centers to translate findings and develop a key CP-OUD research data, and education infrastructure.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140186770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Addressing the Intersections of Chronic Pain and OUD: Integrative Management of Chronic Pain and OUD for Whole Recovery (IMPOWR) Research Network. 解决慢性疼痛和 OUD 的交叉问题:慢性疼痛和 OUD 综合管理促进整体康复(IMPOWR)研究网络。
Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI: 10.1177/29767342241236592
Zu-In Su
{"title":"Addressing the Intersections of Chronic Pain and OUD: Integrative Management of Chronic Pain and OUD for Whole Recovery (IMPOWR) Research Network.","authors":"Zu-In Su","doi":"10.1177/29767342241236592","DOIUrl":"10.1177/29767342241236592","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The appearance of both chronic pain (CP) and opioid use disorder (OUD)/opioid misuse is common, can bidirectionally affect treatment outcomes, and can be challenging to treat. The successful treatment of these conditions can be further complicated by co-occurring hazardous alcohol use, general anxiety disorder, and/or major depressive disorder, and calls for the need to attend to the whole health of the patient. Health systems providing care for these individuals are often fragmented, and suffer from limited resources, expertise, and communication. The National Institute on Drug Abuse, with support from the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) Initiative, funded the Integrative Management of chronic Pain and OUD for Whole Recovery (IMPOWR) network in 2021 to address the needs of this complex population. With continuous collaboration with community partners, the network supports 11 unique clinical trials and a Coordination and Dissemination Center which are described in this commentary. This article introduces the scientific rationale and structure of the network and highlights the themes connecting the trials together to collectively create data-driven and actionable solutions for individuals with co-occurring CP and OUD/opioid misuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140133741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pain Care at Home to Amplify Function: Protocol Article. 居家疼痛护理,增强功能:协议条款。
Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI: 10.1177/29767342241236032
Anne C Black, Sara N Edmond, Joseph W Frank, Audrey Abelleira, Jennifer L Snow, Danielle M Wesolowicz, William C Becker
{"title":"Pain Care at Home to Amplify Function: Protocol Article.","authors":"Anne C Black, Sara N Edmond, Joseph W Frank, Audrey Abelleira, Jennifer L Snow, Danielle M Wesolowicz, William C Becker","doi":"10.1177/29767342241236032","DOIUrl":"10.1177/29767342241236032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guidelines recommend strategies to optimize opioid medication safety, including frequent reassessment of the benefits and harms of long-term opioid therapy. Prescribers, who are predominantly primary care providers (PCPs), may lack the training or resources to implement these guideline-concordant practices. Two interventions have been designed to assist PCPs and tested within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Telemedicine Collaborative Management (TCM) provides primarily medication management support via care manager-prescriber teams. Cooperative Pain Education and Self-Management (COPES) promotes self-management strategies for chronic pain via cognitive behavior therapy techniques. Each intervention has been shown to improve prescribing and/or patient outcomes. The added value of combining these interventions is untested. With funding and central coordination by the Integrative Management of Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder for Whole Recovery (IMPOWR) Network of the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) Initiative, we will conduct a multisite patient-level randomized hybrid II effectiveness-implementation trial within VHA to compare TCM to TCM + COPES on the primary composite outcome of pain interference and opioid safety, secondary outcomes of alcohol use, anxiety, depression, and sleep, and other consensus IMPOWR Network measures. Implementation facilitation strategies informed by interviews with healthcare providers will target site-specific needs. The impact of these strategies on TCM implementation will be assessed via established formative and summative evaluation techniques. Economic analyses will evaluate intervention cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140103148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Study Protocol for the Healing Opioid Misuse and Pain Through Engagement Trial: Integrated Treatment for Individuals With Co-occurring Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder. 通过参与治疗阿片类药物滥用和疼痛试验的研究方案:慢性疼痛和阿片类药物滥用并发症患者的综合治疗。
Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI: 10.1177/29767342241228126
Margo C Hurlocker, Megan Kirouac, Christina Gillezeau, Donia Hijaz, David I K Moniz-Lewis, Hannah A Carlon, George Cameron Coleman, Mark A Ilgen, Matthew R Pearson, Kevin E Vowles, Katie Witkiewitz
{"title":"Study Protocol for the Healing Opioid Misuse and Pain Through Engagement Trial: Integrated Treatment for Individuals With Co-occurring Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Margo C Hurlocker, Megan Kirouac, Christina Gillezeau, Donia Hijaz, David I K Moniz-Lewis, Hannah A Carlon, George Cameron Coleman, Mark A Ilgen, Matthew R Pearson, Kevin E Vowles, Katie Witkiewitz","doi":"10.1177/29767342241228126","DOIUrl":"10.1177/29767342241228126","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pain and opioid use disorder (OUD) are public health crises and their co-occurrence has led to further complications and public health impacts. Provision of treatments for comorbid chronic pain and OUD is paramount to address these public health crises. Medications for OUD (MOUD) are gold standard treatments for OUD that have also demonstrated benefit in pain management. However, clinics that provide MOUD for chronic pain or OUD often lack behavioral treatments to address the challenges experienced by individuals with both conditions. Developing and implementing a behavioral treatment that complements MOUD may better equip clinics to provide comprehensive care to the growing proportion of clients who present with comorbid chronic pain and OUD. In the Healing Opioid misuse and Pain through Engagement (HOPE) Trial, we are using an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design to examine the benefits of an integrated behavioral treatment and to determine the feasibility of implementing the integrated treatment into clinics that provide MOUD. The treatment integrated 2 evidence-based treatments-Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention-to target the emotional, behavioral, and physiological sequelae of OUD and chronic pain. Implementation feasibility will include assessing changes in implementation readiness and identifying facilitators and barriers to implementing the integrated treatment among all personnel employed in clinics that provide MOUD. This commentary offers an overview of the study and design and details adaptations we made to our study protocol, based largely on clinic personnel time constraints and variable clinic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11289162/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139643755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in Normative Beliefs and Tobacco Product Use by Age Among Adults Who Smoke: Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Nationally Representative Sample. 不同年龄段吸烟成人的规范信念和烟草制品使用情况的差异:全国代表性样本的横断面分析》。
Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/29767342231210554
Dana Rubenstein, Dana M Carroll, Rachel L Denlinger-Apte, Jennifer Cornacchione Ross, F Joseph McClernon
{"title":"Differences in Normative Beliefs and Tobacco Product Use by Age Among Adults Who Smoke: Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Nationally Representative Sample.","authors":"Dana Rubenstein, Dana M Carroll, Rachel L Denlinger-Apte, Jennifer Cornacchione Ross, F Joseph McClernon","doi":"10.1177/29767342231210554","DOIUrl":"10.1177/29767342231210554","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of combusted cigarette (CC) smoking among older adults is stagnant, with 0 declines attributable to e-cigarette (EC) use. Given that normative beliefs are associated with quitting and switching to ECs, we assessed cross-sectional associations between age, CC, and EC descriptive and injunctive norms and potential interactions with tobacco use behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from people with current, established (≥100 lifetime CCs) CC use (n = 8072) at Wave 5 (2018-2019) of the adult Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. We used adjusted multivariable logistic regressions to model social norms as a function of age (18-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, ≥65 years). We also dichotomized age (≥55 vs 18-54) to investigate interactions between age and social norms on past 12-month CC quit attempts and past-month EC use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older age was positively associated with pro- and anti-CC norms and anti-EC norms. Significant interactive effects revealed that being advised to quit smoking by a healthcare provider was more strongly associated with CC quit attempts among adults ≥55 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI]: 2.12 [1.66, 2.71]) than adults <55 years (aOR: 1.63 [1.34, 2.00]). Reporting people close to you use ECs was also more strongly associated with EC use among adults ≥55 years (aOR: 4.37 [3.35, 5.69]) than among adults <55 years (aOR: 3.43 [2.89, 4.08]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified modifiable risk factors for tobacco use that may be particularly beneficial for older adults. Behavioral and communication interventions that target normative beliefs may maximize smoking cessation, or harm reduction when cessation is not possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139522470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perceptions and Attitudes Related to Driving after Cannabis Use in Canadian and US Adults. 加拿大和美国成年人对吸食大麻后驾车的看法和态度。
Substance use & addiction journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/29767342231208521
William Davis, Brandon P Miller, Michael Amlung
{"title":"Perceptions and Attitudes Related to Driving after Cannabis Use in Canadian and US Adults.","authors":"William Davis, Brandon P Miller, Michael Amlung","doi":"10.1177/29767342231208521","DOIUrl":"10.1177/29767342231208521","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examined the risk perceptions related to driving after cannabis use (DACU) among Canadian and US adults who used cannabis in the past six months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Perceptions of danger, normative beliefs, perceived likelihood of negative consequences, and other driving-related variables were collected via online surveys in Canadian (n = 158; 50.0% female, 84.8% White, mean age = 32.73 years [SD <i>=</i> 10.61]) and US participants (n = 678; 50.9% female, 73.6% White, mean age = 33.85 years [SD <i>=</i> 10.12]). Driving cognitions and DACU quantity/frequency were compared between samples using univariate analyses of variance, and Spearman's (ρ) correlations were performed to examine associations between driving cognitions and DACU quantity/frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two samples did not significantly differ in self-reported level of cannabis use, lifetime quantity of DACU, or the number of times they drove within two hours of cannabis use in the past three months (<i>P</i>s <i>></i> .12). Compared to US participants, Canadians perceived driving within two hours of cannabis use as more dangerous (<i>P</i> <i><</i> 0.001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.013) and reported more of their friends would disapprove of DACU (<i>P</i> <i>=</i> 0.03, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.006). There were no differences in the number of friends who would refuse to ride with a driver who had used cannabis (<i>P</i> = 0.15) or the perceived likelihood of negative consequences (<i>P</i>s > 0.07). More favorable perceptions were significantly correlated with greater lifetime DACU and driving within two hours of use (ρ <i>=</i> 0.25-0.53, <i>P</i>s < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings reveal differences in distal risk factors for DACU between Canada and the US and may inform prevention efforts focusing on perceptions of risk and social acceptance of DACU.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139522448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信