Characterizing the Use of Healthcare Access Supports Among People Who Use Drugs in Vancouver, Canada, 2017 to 2020: A Cohort Study.

Kanna Hayashi, Gabrielle Rabu, Zishan Cui, Sukhpreet Klaire, Fahmida Homayra, Michael-John Milloy, Bohdan Nosyk
{"title":"Characterizing the Use of Healthcare Access Supports Among People Who Use Drugs in Vancouver, Canada, 2017 to 2020: A Cohort Study.","authors":"Kanna Hayashi, Gabrielle Rabu, Zishan Cui, Sukhpreet Klaire, Fahmida Homayra, Michael-John Milloy, Bohdan Nosyk","doi":"10.1177/29767342241249870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For structurally marginalized populations, including people who use drugs (PWUD), equitable access to healthcare can be achieved through healthcare access supports. However, few studies characterized utilization of formal (eg, outreach workers, healthcare professionals) and informal (eg, friends/family) supports. Therefore, we sought to estimate the prevalence of and factors associated with receiving each type of support among PWUD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from 2 prospective cohort studies of PWUD in Vancouver, Canada, in 2017 to 2020. We constructed separate multivariable generalized linear mixed-effects models to identify factors associated with receiving each of the 3 types of supports (ie, healthcare professionals, outreach workers/peer navigators, and informal supports) compared to no supports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 996 participants, 350 (35.1%) reported receiving supports in the past 6 months at baseline, through informal supports (6.2%), outreach workers (14.1%), and healthcare professionals (20.9%). In multivariable analyses, HIV positivity, chronic pain, and avoiding healthcare due to the past mistreatment were positively associated with receiving supports from each of healthcare professionals and outreach workers. Men were less likely to receive any types of the supports (all <i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Utilization of healthcare access supports was relatively low in this sample. However, formal supports appeared to have reached PWUD exhibiting more comorbidities and experiencing discrimination in healthcare. Further efforts to make formal supports more available would benefit PWUD with unmet healthcare needs, particularly men.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241249870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For structurally marginalized populations, including people who use drugs (PWUD), equitable access to healthcare can be achieved through healthcare access supports. However, few studies characterized utilization of formal (eg, outreach workers, healthcare professionals) and informal (eg, friends/family) supports. Therefore, we sought to estimate the prevalence of and factors associated with receiving each type of support among PWUD.

Methods: We used data from 2 prospective cohort studies of PWUD in Vancouver, Canada, in 2017 to 2020. We constructed separate multivariable generalized linear mixed-effects models to identify factors associated with receiving each of the 3 types of supports (ie, healthcare professionals, outreach workers/peer navigators, and informal supports) compared to no supports.

Results: Of 996 participants, 350 (35.1%) reported receiving supports in the past 6 months at baseline, through informal supports (6.2%), outreach workers (14.1%), and healthcare professionals (20.9%). In multivariable analyses, HIV positivity, chronic pain, and avoiding healthcare due to the past mistreatment were positively associated with receiving supports from each of healthcare professionals and outreach workers. Men were less likely to receive any types of the supports (all P < .05).

Conclusions: Utilization of healthcare access supports was relatively low in this sample. However, formal supports appeared to have reached PWUD exhibiting more comorbidities and experiencing discrimination in healthcare. Further efforts to make formal supports more available would benefit PWUD with unmet healthcare needs, particularly men.

2017 年至 2020 年加拿大温哥华吸毒者使用医疗服务支持的特点:队列研究。
背景:对于结构上被边缘化的人群,包括吸毒者(PWUD),可以通过医疗服务支持来实现公平的医疗服务。然而,很少有研究对正规(如外联工作者、医疗保健专业人员)和非正规(如朋友/家人)支持的使用情况进行描述。因此,我们试图估算在残疾人中接受各类支持的普遍程度和相关因素:我们使用了 2017 年至 2020 年在加拿大温哥华对 PWUD 进行的两项前瞻性队列研究的数据。我们构建了单独的多变量广义线性混合效应模型,以确定与未接受任何支持相比,接受 3 种支持(即医护人员、外联工作者/同伴导航员和非正式支持)的相关因素:在 996 名参与者中,有 350 人(35.1%)报告在过去 6 个月中接受过基线支持,分别是非正式支持(6.2%)、外展工作者(14.1%)和医疗保健专业人员(20.9%)。在多变量分析中,HIV 阳性、慢性疼痛和因过去的虐待而避免接受医疗服务与接受医疗专业人员和外展工作者的支持呈正相关。男性接受任何类型支持的可能性都较低(均为 P):在该样本中,医疗保健服务支持的使用率相对较低。不过,正式的支持似乎已经惠及了表现出更多合并症和在医疗保健方面遭受歧视的残疾人。进一步努力提供更多的正规支持将使那些有医疗保健需求但未得到满足的残疾人受益,尤其是男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信