Social Epistemology最新文献_第4页

Reflexive Research Practice in Women’s Prison Research in Uganda 乌干达女子监狱研究中的反思性研究实践

IF 1.7 2区哲学

Social Epistemology Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2023.2237921

M. Kiconco

引用次数: 0

Credibility Trouble: When ‘I Believe You’ is an Epistemic Wrong 信誉问题：当“我相信你”是一个认识错误

IF 1.7 2区哲学

Social Epistemology Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2023.2239753

Eliana Luxemburg-Peck

{"title":"Credibility Trouble: When ‘I Believe You’ is an Epistemic Wrong","authors":"Eliana Luxemburg-Peck","doi":"10.1080/02691728.2023.2239753","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2239753","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article defends the counterintuitive conclusion that public assignments of credibility – including statements, by hearers, of ‘that’s right’, ‘she is credible’, or ‘I believe you’ – can actually constitute a pernicious form of epistemic wrong. Sometimes referred to colloquially as ‘lip service’, the wrong occurs when, owing to ethically poisonous epistemic failures, hearers outwardly validate testifiers’ credibility despite not fully or duly believing them. To explain this wrong, I introduce a distinction between performed and internal credibility assignments (PCA and ICA) and describe an epistemic dysfunction in which they misalign. I focus on cases in which misaligned PCA of ‘credible’ falsely – although sometimes non-deliberately – signal to testifiers and bystanders that testifiers have been believed; Republican hearers’ positive reception of Christine Blasey Ford’s 2018 testimony serves as a central case. Although some misaligned PCA are not wrongful, when epistemic and ethical failures including forms of identity prejudice and pernicious ignorance lead PCA of ‘credible’ to misalign, the PCA wrong testifiers in their capacities as knowers. These epistemic wrongs are particularly pernicious because the PCA conceal that testimony has not been efficacious, inflicting and exacerbating distinct harms.","PeriodicalId":51614,"journal":{"name":"Social Epistemology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45032596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Towards a Clear and Fair Conceptualization of Empathy 走向一个清晰而公平的移情概念

IF 1.7 2区哲学

Social Epistemology Pub Date : 2023-07-26 DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2023.2227963

Caroline Bollen

{"title":"Towards a Clear and Fair Conceptualization of Empathy","authors":"Caroline Bollen","doi":"10.1080/02691728.2023.2227963","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2227963","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Empathy is operationalised and measured in various different ways in research. I have identified several trends in empathy research that have resulted in what I refer to as neurotypical gatekeeping of the concept of empathy. Narrow assumptions on the relationship between experiences and expressions have made the concept exclusive to those who are perceived as neurotypical. In several ways, this has biased our knowledge of empathy, especially regarding autism. This does not only invalidate autistic empathy, but also sustains a harmful and stigmatizing narrative of autism. In this paper, I expand on the neurotypical gatekeeping of empathy as a matter of epistemic injustice and argue why and how neurodiversity calls for a reconceptualization of empathy. I continue by building a proposal for a clear and fair notion of empathy. I argue that we need to settle the dispute on empathy and morality by accepting the value associated with empathy in society, and use an anti-discriminatory normative conceptualization accordingly. I propose to understand empathy as appropriately attending to experiential differences and similarities, balancing between – what I introduce as - distantism and proximism. I discuss conceptual and methodological implications of this approach to empathy, as well as its application to neurodiversity.","PeriodicalId":51614,"journal":{"name":"Social Epistemology","volume":"37 1","pages":"637 - 655"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41989088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Lessons from Reckwitz and Rosa: Towards a Constructive Dialogue between Critical Analytics and Critical Theory 雷克维茨和罗莎的经验教训：走向批判性分析与批判性理论的建设性对话

IF 1.7 2区哲学

Social Epistemology Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2023.2201578

S. Susen

{"title":"Lessons from Reckwitz and Rosa: Towards a Constructive Dialogue between Critical Analytics and Critical Theory","authors":"S. Susen","doi":"10.1080/02691728.2023.2201578","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2201578","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It is hard to overstate the growing impact of the works of Andreas Reckwitz and Hartmut Rosa on contemporary social theory. Given the quality and originality of their intellectual contributions, it is no accident that they can be regarded as two towering figures of contemporary German social theory. The far-reaching significance of their respective approaches is reflected not only in their numerous publications but also in the fast-evolving secondary literature engaging with their writings. All of this should be reason enough to take note of their collaborative work, which, most recently, has culminated in the publication of their co-authored book Spätmoderne in der Krise: Was leistet die Gesellschaftstheorie? (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2021). The main purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that the latest exchange between Reckwitz and Rosa contains valuable insights into recent and ongoing trends in society in general and social theory in particular. The first part comprises an outline of the central matters at stake in, and the core lessons learnt from, the constructive dialogue between Reckwitz’s critical analytics and Rosa’s critical theory, before moving, in the second part, to an assessment of the most significant limitations of their respective views and propositions.","PeriodicalId":51614,"journal":{"name":"Social Epistemology","volume":"37 1","pages":"545 - 591"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46827024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

What Would It be Like to be Bohmians? Experiencing a Gestalt Switch in Physics as an Effect of Path Dependence 成为波西米亚人会是什么样子？路径依赖对物理学格式塔转换的影响

IF 1.7 2区哲学

Social Epistemology Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2023.2212372

Léna Soler

引用次数: 0

The Applied Epistemology of Official Stories 官方故事的应用认识论

IF 1.7 2区哲学

Social Epistemology Pub Date : 2023-07-06 DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2023.2227950

T. Hayward

引用次数: 1

‘Conspiracy Theory’ as a Tonkish Term: Some Runabout Inference-Tickets from Truth to Falsehood “阴谋论”作为一个英国术语:一些粗略的推论——从真理到谬误的门票

IF 1.7 2区哲学

Social Epistemology Pub Date : 2023-06-15 DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2023.2212379

C. Pigden

引用次数: 6

On the Inconsistency between Practice and Reporting in Science: The Genesis of Scientific Articles 论科学实践与报道的不一致：科学文章的成因

IF 1.7 2区哲学

Social Epistemology Pub Date : 2023-06-12 DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2023.2209536

T. Diaz Gonçalves

引用次数: 0

A Philosophical Explanation for the Islamization of Philosophy: How Can Mullā Ṣadrā’s Transcendent Philosophy Contribute to the Islamization of Philosophy in Iran? 哲学伊斯兰化的哲学解释:毛拉Ṣadrā的先验哲学对伊朗哲学伊斯兰化有何贡献?

IF 1.7 2区哲学

Social Epistemology Pub Date : 2023-05-08 DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2023.2196520

Amir Rastin Toroghi, Vahideh Fakhar Noghani

引用次数: 0

Producing ME/CFS in Dutch Newspapers. A Social-Discursive Analysis About Non/credibility 在荷兰报纸上制作脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征。关于不可信的社会话语分析

IF 1.7 2区哲学

Social Epistemology Pub Date : 2023-04-05 DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2023.2171748

Marjolein Lotte de Boer, J. Slatman

{"title":"Producing ME/CFS in Dutch Newspapers. A Social-Discursive Analysis About Non/credibility","authors":"Marjolein Lotte de Boer, J. Slatman","doi":"10.1080/02691728.2023.2171748","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2171748","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME)/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is a highly contested illness. This paper analyzes the discursive production of knowledge about, and recognition of ME/CFS. By mobilizing insights from social epistemology and epistemic injustice studies, this paper reveals how actors, through their social-discursive practices, attribute to establishing, sustaining, and disregarding their own and others’ epistemological position. In focusing on the case of the Dutch newspaper reporting about ME/CFS, this paper shows that the debate about this condition predominantly revolves around the ways in which people who make truth claims are represented. In being portrayed as gendered, affectatious, formerly very able, fanatical, or benevolent, people with ME/CFS are constructed as non-/credible. In the debate about what causes ME/CFS, by contrast, the production of non-/credible knowledge focuses more on the content of epistemic positions. Actors in this debate argue that they know the (clear) causes for the illness, something which functions as a discursive strategy to establish and enhance their credibility. This paper contends, however, that since this discursive demarcation of causes is consistently infused with uncertainty – with multi-interpretability, with diffuse explanations, and absence of current knowledge – the credibility of these actors’ epistemic position is undercut rather than established.","PeriodicalId":51614,"journal":{"name":"Social Epistemology","volume":"37 1","pages":"592 - 609"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49377447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0