{"title":"The fire before the flames: State omissions, deregulation and the limits of the Grenfell Tower public inquiry","authors":"KHADIJAH NA'EEM","doi":"10.1111/jols.70044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Grenfell Tower Public Inquiry investigated the causes of a West London residential fire that killed 72 people. Its Final Report makes some headline-grabbing criticisms about how post-2010 deregulation contributed to regulatory failures preceding the fire. Although the Final Report's criticisms are direct, they are also understated and limit the longer term role of the neoliberal project. Using the Public Inquiry's own data, this article supports the bereaved and survivors’ view that the government operationalised explicit acts of omission to sustain an inadequate testing regime of cladding materials for decades before 2010. Adopting a critical criminological lens, the motivations for doing so are not obscure, but were embedded within neoliberal structures that require interrogation if the Grenfell Tower fire is to be understood and addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"53 S1","pages":"S56-S72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.70044","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Cloistered justice: The opposing trends of barricade and respective secrecy","authors":"LYDIA MORGAN","doi":"10.1111/jols.70040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70040","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two recent reports illustrate contrasting trends in open justice exceptions conceptualised as respective and barricade secrecy. Respective secrecy protects the parties involved and their constitutive social ties and, as evaluation report into the Family Court Transparency Pilot indicates, has been shrinking. In contrast, barricade secrecy conceals actions and determinations of the state, and the greatly delayed government response to the Ouseley Review of Closed Material Procedures indicates its use will continue to spread. Taking seriously the demand that justice must be seen to be done, the article applies a secrecy studies lens to the dynamics of respective and barricade secrecy and argues that the friction between them conveys the vernaculars of disorder that operate in place of consistency, stability and certainty expected in democratic society.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"53 S1","pages":"S93-S112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.70040","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The unheard ‘scandal’: Covid-19 vaccine-injured people's perceptions of the national redress scheme and trust in the government in the United Kingdom","authors":"FANNI GYURKO Dr, SONIA MACLEOD Dr","doi":"10.1111/jols.70047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70047","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines 218 Covid-19 vaccine-injured people's experiences of the process of seeking redress from the UK Government's Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS). Moreover, it engages with the wider topic of how we can understand the government(s)’ role in dealing with an ‘emergency’ (the Covid-19 pandemic) and the consequent (global) health crisis. Vaccine-injured individuals and communities perceive suffering health problems after Covid-19 vaccination as a ‘tragedy’, which requires an adequate response. However, the VDPS often does not meet their expectations, which fuels the vaccine-injured community's narratives around an emerging ‘scandal’ over inadequate redress provision for those who suffered adverse effects following Covid-19 vaccines. These perceptions and meaning-making are in stark contrast to the fact that the wider population is unaffected by these issues and are generally not aware of the harms suffered or of the VDPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"53 S1","pages":"S151-S166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.70047","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The housing crisis goes to law","authors":"DAVE COWAN, ALEX MARSH","doi":"10.1111/jols.70046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70046","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper considers how constructions of a ‘housing crisis’ have impacted on judicial consideration of the rights of applicants for social housing and homelessness assistance. Drawing on Bacchi's framework for appreciating problematisations (What's the problem represented to be?) and understandings of housing crisis, we examine how crisis is translated into three elements of the passage of homelessness law: decision letters, witness statements and judgements. This can lead to narrowing of interpretations of the rights of homeless people. Even when that is not the outcome, crisis is accepted as a ‘fact’ and embedded as the context for decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"53 S1","pages":"S113-S130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.70046","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
SALLY DAY, RICHARD MOORHEAD, KAREN NOKES, REBECCA HELM
{"title":"From agnosis to accidental activism: Infinite regress and the Post Office Scandal","authors":"SALLY DAY, RICHARD MOORHEAD, KAREN NOKES, REBECCA HELM","doi":"10.1111/jols.70042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70042","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper explores the lived experiences of victims/survivors affected by the UK Post Office Scandal, drawing on 28 in-depth interviews and critical legal analysis. It uses the concept of ‘accidental activism’ to explore how victims, initially isolated and disempowered, became central agents of justice reform. The authors examine how institutional agnosis and legality illusions—mechanisms of ignorance-making and legal manipulation—enabled systemic harm and prolonged injustice. Despite legal victories such as the Bates litigation and the Horizon IT Inquiry, the paper highlights the cyclical nature of legal processes and logics reasserting the system-norms the victims/survivors are resisting. This is experienced as an ‘infinite’ regress of revictimisation. In mapping the transformation of personal trauma into collective resistance, we see how survivor-led activism can challenge state-corporate power and foster broader structural change but also how the system will work to protect itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"53 S1","pages":"S25-S41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.70042","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Political Economy of Emergency: Postcolonialism, Crisis Governance and Decolonial Alternatives","authors":"HOPE JOHNSON","doi":"10.1111/jols.70043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70043","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The political rhetoric surrounding the Horn of Africa is perpetually framed through narratives of crisis, tragedy and emergency. These labels, rather than simply being used to describe instability, function as tools of governance to normalise dysfunction and entrench cycles of dependency. Drawing on postcolonial frameworks, the discourse interrogates how such crisis narratives obscure and ignore structural issues. Further, this sustains and promotes external authority, often rooted in colonial narratives of the region. The exploration of case studies, Somalia and South Sudan, highlighting how international interventions, often framed as peacebuilding or humanitarian efforts, reinforce the very ‘crisis’ it aims to address. The solution to decolonise this paradigm created by western interventionist economies lies in alternatives grounded in African epistemologies of governance that centre local sovereignty. In doing so, reimagining governance beyond ‘emergency’, towards sustainable political autonomy, rooted in localised political power, emerges as the primary, if not only, viable solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"53 S1","pages":"S73-S92"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.70043","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Dysfunctional governance: Crisis, scandal, tragedy, emergency","authors":"VICTORIA M. BASHAM, DAVE COWAN","doi":"10.1111/jols.70038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70038","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"53 S1","pages":"S3-S5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
JAMIE M. JOHNSON, VICTORIA M. BASHAM, OWEN D. THOMAS
{"title":"Prefiguring truth: The limits of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry","authors":"JAMIE M. JOHNSON, VICTORIA M. BASHAM, OWEN D. THOMAS","doi":"10.1111/jols.70045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70045","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Public inquiries operate as privileged instruments of sense-making, defined by a series of epistemological and methodological commitments. The Grenfell Tower Inquiry was established to uncover the truth of the fire in which seventy-two people died. This article interrogates the truth-seeking and truth-producing practices of the Inquiry. These shape the contours of the account of the fire that it has produced, predisposing it to particular forms of explanation whilst excluding others. We describe this as a process of <i>prefiguration</i> in which the scope and form of the Inquiry circumscribes and foreshadows its findings. This invites us to see the Inquiry as productive of the social reality it seeks to describe, raising important questions about how the Inquiry operated and its role in shaping public understanding of truth, accountability and justice in the aftermath of the fire.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"53 S1","pages":"S6-S24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.70045","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147668741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"(Dis)obeying the law: corporate tax morale in developing countries","authors":"RITA DE LA FERIA, TU ANH TRAN","doi":"10.1111/jols.70051","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jols.70051","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ensuring high tax compliance is one of the key objectives of every tax system. Yet, while tax non-compliance is known to be significant among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), the motivations underlying it remain surprisingly underexplored, particularly in the context of developing countries. This article introduces a novel theoretical framework for understanding the tax morale of corporate taxpayers, identifying five endogenous and six exogenous motivations for tax (non-)compliance. The proposed framework is informed by an innovative methodological approach using a triangulation of primary data, including 42 interviews and 86 court cases, with a focus on value-added tax and corporate income tax. This article addresses for the first time a crucial question: why is compliance with tax law among SMEs so low, particularly in developing countries? It empirically demonstrates that SMEs’ tax behaviour is influenced by psychological factors, identifying the existence of corporate tax morale that <i>prima facie</i> runs counter to both the legal fiction that holds that SMEs are separate legal entities and the standard tax policy assumption that VAT is a full neutral tax for businesses.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"53 1","pages":"51-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.70051","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147683828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
MATTHEW WATKINS, JOHN HARRINGTON, RUBY REED-BERENDT, ANNE-MAREE FARRELL
{"title":"Territory, values, and health law in a devolved United Kingdom: examining the role of the gift in opt-out organ donation","authors":"MATTHEW WATKINS, JOHN HARRINGTON, RUBY REED-BERENDT, ANNE-MAREE FARRELL","doi":"10.1111/jols.70031","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jols.70031","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Devolution since 1998 has seen administrations in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales gain distinct powers over a range of policy fields, with health prominent among them. This poses two pressing questions for socio-legal scholarship that we address in this article: to what extent are changing territorial arrangements significant for the substance of United Kingdom (UK) health law and the values by which it is oriented, and what role is played by devolved health law in redefining territories and values within the UK? Informed by perspectives from human geography and policy studies, and drawing on our own qualitative empirical research, we examine recent lawmaking processes in relation to organ donation reform. ‘Opt-out’ or ‘presumed consent’ schemes, adopted in sequence in each of the UK countries, appear to challenge the centrality of voluntary altruism, extolled as a fundamentally British value in Richard Titmuss’ post-war work on social policy. Our findings confirm that there has been a reterritorialization of values under devolution, with greater emphasis on sub-state identities. However, they also indicate the persistence of a common space of policy learning across the UK and an enduring concern with altruism in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"53 1","pages":"75-99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.70031","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147683765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}