边境信任:识别风险并评估真人秀节目的可信度

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW
LAURA SMITH-KHAN, INGRID PILLER, HANNA TORSH
{"title":"边境信任:识别风险并评估真人秀节目的可信度","authors":"LAURA SMITH-KHAN,&nbsp;INGRID PILLER,&nbsp;HANNA TORSH","doi":"10.1111/jols.12505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Every day, officers working at international airports investigate potential risks to state safety and security. But how do they decide who they can trust, and also ensure that the broader public trusts <i>them</i> to conduct this work? This article explores these questions through an examination of the reality television show <i>Border Security: Australia's Front Line</i>. Through critical discourse analysis of a collection of 108 televised airport encounters, we explore the aspects of communication, behaviour, and identity made salient in officers’ evaluations of passengers’ credibility and critically examine the assumptions underlying them. Further, we consider how power and role divisions are implicated in the construction of passenger and officer credibility, both <i>within</i> border encounters and in discourses <i>about</i> them. Our analysis makes a novel contribution to the literature on credibility assessments in intercultural communication, demonstrating how an institutional and social ‘culture of disbelief’ is constructed vis-à-vis certain groups through seemingly banal border work.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"51 4","pages":"513-538"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trust at the border: identifying risk and assessing credibility on reality television\",\"authors\":\"LAURA SMITH-KHAN,&nbsp;INGRID PILLER,&nbsp;HANNA TORSH\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jols.12505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Every day, officers working at international airports investigate potential risks to state safety and security. But how do they decide who they can trust, and also ensure that the broader public trusts <i>them</i> to conduct this work? This article explores these questions through an examination of the reality television show <i>Border Security: Australia's Front Line</i>. Through critical discourse analysis of a collection of 108 televised airport encounters, we explore the aspects of communication, behaviour, and identity made salient in officers’ evaluations of passengers’ credibility and critically examine the assumptions underlying them. Further, we consider how power and role divisions are implicated in the construction of passenger and officer credibility, both <i>within</i> border encounters and in discourses <i>about</i> them. Our analysis makes a novel contribution to the literature on credibility assessments in intercultural communication, demonstrating how an institutional and social ‘culture of disbelief’ is constructed vis-à-vis certain groups through seemingly banal border work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and Society\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"513-538\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jols.12505\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jols.12505","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

每天,在国际机场工作的官员都要调查国家安全和安保方面的潜在风险。但是,他们如何决定可以信任谁,又如何确保广大公众信任他们开展这项工作?本文通过对电视真人秀节目《边境安全》(Border Security:澳大利亚前线》来探讨这些问题。通过对 108 次机场遭遇电视采访的批判性话语分析,我们探讨了官员在评价乘客可信度时所强调的沟通、行为和身份等方面,并批判性地审视了这些评价所依据的假设。此外,我们还考虑了权力和角色分工是如何在边境冲突中以及在有关边境冲突的话语中影响到乘客和官员可信度的构建的。我们的分析为跨文化交际中可信度评估方面的文献做出了新的贡献,展示了如何通过看似平淡的边境工作来构建针对某些群体的制度和社会 "不信文化"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trust at the border: identifying risk and assessing credibility on reality television

Every day, officers working at international airports investigate potential risks to state safety and security. But how do they decide who they can trust, and also ensure that the broader public trusts them to conduct this work? This article explores these questions through an examination of the reality television show Border Security: Australia's Front Line. Through critical discourse analysis of a collection of 108 televised airport encounters, we explore the aspects of communication, behaviour, and identity made salient in officers’ evaluations of passengers’ credibility and critically examine the assumptions underlying them. Further, we consider how power and role divisions are implicated in the construction of passenger and officer credibility, both within border encounters and in discourses about them. Our analysis makes a novel contribution to the literature on credibility assessments in intercultural communication, demonstrating how an institutional and social ‘culture of disbelief’ is constructed vis-à-vis certain groups through seemingly banal border work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Established as the leading British periodical for Socio-Legal Studies The Journal of Law and Society offers an interdisciplinary approach. It is committed to achieving a broad international appeal, attracting contributions and addressing issues from a range of legal cultures, as well as theoretical concerns of cross- cultural interest. It produces an annual special issue, which is also published in book form. It has a widely respected Book Review section and is cited all over the world. Challenging, authoritative and topical, the journal appeals to legal researchers and practitioners as well as sociologists, criminologists and other social scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信