{"title":"The heterogeneous relationship of owner-occupied and investment property with household portfolio choice","authors":"Marco Felici, Franz Fuerst","doi":"10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101964","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101964","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The dual nature of property as both a consumption and investment good presents a challenge for household portfolios. Prior theoretical literature predicts a constraint imposed by property on investment decisions, and empirical studies support this notion. However, previous research often overlooks investigating the heterogeneity of this constraint and fails to differentiate between owner-occupied and investment property. Building on a stochastic control model, we analyse the UK’s Wealth and Assets Survey panel and find that along the distribution of how household allocate their wealth a one percentage point (pp) increase in the share of owner-occupied property in the total portfolio is associated with a 0.07 pp decrease in the share of stocks in liquid assets. However, this association varies significantly based on the value of the owner-occupied property share. For low values of the owner-occupied property share, the association with stockholdings is negligible. As the share of owner-occupied property increases, the negative association with stockholdings becomes more pronounced: when the owner-occupied property share reaches 90%, a further 1 pp increase corresponds to a 0.14 pp decrease in the share of stocks in liquid assets. By contrast, buy-to-let property shows no significant relationship with stockholdings, supporting the idea that the constraint on portfolio decisions is primarily driven by the role of property as a consumption good.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing Economics","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101964"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50203880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Measures of vertical inequality in assessments","authors":"Daniel McMillen , Ruchi Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101950","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101950","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Standard measures of vertical inequality suggest that assessments are regressive in the sense that high-priced properties are often assessed at lower rates than low-priced properties. We show that some of this regressivity is due to the regression-based estimation procedures used by many jurisdictions to calculate assessments. A review of existing measures of assessment regressivity suggests that severe biases associated with regression-based procedures make them much less useful than the traditional price-related differential (PRD) as a measure of vertical inequality. To supplement existing measures of vertical inequality, we propose approaches using </span>Gini coefficients, Suits index, and kernel density tests to provide information on the relationship between the assessment and sale price distributions. We compute the measures using data on sales prices and assessments for 48 large central city counties. The results suggest that the PRD remains a useful approach for measuring vertical inequality due to its simplicity and familiarity, while distribution-based procedures are helpful because they are not as sensitive to small numbers of very high-priced sales. Together, the approaches provide a more complete picture of how assessment rates vary across the full distribution of sales prices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing Economics","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101950"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46877712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Airbnb rent premium and the crowding-out of long-term rentals","authors":"Robert J. Hill, Norbert Pfeifer, Miriam Steurer","doi":"10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101935","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101935","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Concerns about crowding out of long-term rentals have led many cities to impose limits on the days that properties can be let via Airbnb or similar platforms in a given year. However, so far, there has been little research into the effect of such measures. Using micro-level data on long-term rental and Airbnb contracts for Sydney, Australia, we first estimate how much more landlords can earn on Airbnb compared to the long-term rental market. We use three different methods to control for differences in the quality of Airbnb and long-term rentals (hedonic regression, switching model, and matching approach) and find that, on average the weekly Airbnb rent is nearly double that in the long-term market. This Airbnb rent premium reflects the higher costs borne by Airbnb landlords. Consistent with a spatial equilibrium, landlords require a higher Airbnb rent premium in postcodes with a higher average time since the last review (a proxy for the Airbnb vacancy rate). Similarly, we find that Airbnb rent premia and time-since-last-review are lower in cheaper postcodes. It is therefore important to recognize that the impact of day restrictions is likely to be felt more in the cheaper rather than more touristic areas of a city.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing Economics","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101935"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44467425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elias Oikarinen , Steven C. Bourassa , Martin Hoesli , Janne Engblom
{"title":"Revisiting metropolitan house price-income relationships","authors":"Elias Oikarinen , Steven C. Bourassa , Martin Hoesli , Janne Engblom","doi":"10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101946","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101946","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We explore long-term patterns of the house price-income relationship across the 70 largest U.S. metropolitan areas. In line with a standard spatial equilibrium model, our empirical findings indicate that regional house price-income ratios are typically not stable, even over the long run. In contrast, panel regression models that relate house prices to aggregate personal income and allow for regional heterogeneity yield stationary long-term relationships in most areas. The house price-income relationship varies significantly across locations, underscoring the importance of using estimation techniques that allow for spatial heterogeneity. The substantial regional differences are closely related to the elasticity of housing supply.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing Economics","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101946"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50193907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Adam B Pollack , Douglas H Wrenn , Christoph Nolte , Ian Sue Wing
{"title":"Potential Benefits in Remapping the Special Flood Hazard Area: Evidence from the U.S. Housing Market","authors":"Adam B Pollack , Douglas H Wrenn , Christoph Nolte , Ian Sue Wing","doi":"10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101956","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101956","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A typical U.S. homebuyer's understanding of whether a property faces flood risk is based on whether the property is located inside the National Flood Insurance Program's (NFIP) Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). The SFHA boundary, however, may bias homebuyers’ perceptions of flood risk relative to unobserved true risk because the SFHA is an incomplete, and sometimes inaccurate, representation of flood hazards. Using a national dataset of property transactions, flood hazard data from the First Street Foundation, state-level measures of flood disclosure laws, and a spatially restricted triple-difference design, we distinguish capitalization effects of policy-driven (SFHA) versus quasi-objective (First Street) indicators of flood hazard. We identify these effects by assessing thousands of local spatial interactions between property SFHA designations, measures of quasi-objective flood hazard, and being in a state that mandates flood history disclosures. Being inside the SFHA generates a risk discount, but the signal is muted relative to underlying hazard exposure. Further, the SFHA signal can result in inefficient discounts for properties erroneously mapped in the SFHA. Disclosure requirements about flood history accentuate price effects for hazardous properties and result in more adequate risk internalization. In the absence of disclosures, however, we find either no or a weak risk signal for houses outside the SFHA that face flood hazard. Our results highlight potential benefits of updating SFHA boundaries to include all houses that may experience flooding, and argue in favor of requiring flood-related disclosures from sellers to improve the market's ability to internalize flood risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing Economics","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101956"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48103157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Unequal treatment in the rental housing markets of four Chinese megacities","authors":"Ziming Liu , Jens Rommel","doi":"10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101945","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101945","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Unequal treatment of tenants in housing markets can create significant economic and social costs. Yet, it has attracted limited attention outside the Western world. In an online correspondence study based on 1,167 email applications to landlords at a major Chinese real estate website, we investigate whether there is unequal treatment in rental housing markets in the four megacities Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen. We find that applications with Uighur-sounding names are approximately seven percentage points less likely to receive a response from landlords and 9.6 percentage points less likely to be offered a showing compared to applications with Han Chinese names. Additional information on white-collar work or a long-term residence perspective in the city does not eliminate differences in landlords’ responses to names, therewith rejecting the idea of statistical discrimination on income or residence permits. We discuss possible extensions of the experimental design and conclude that the unequal treatment of different ethnic groups may pose an important future challenge to housing market regulation in urban China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing Economics","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101945"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42489641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marina Gindelsky , Jeremy Moulton , Kelly Wentland , Scott Wentland
{"title":"When do property taxes matter? Tax salience and heterogeneous policy effects","authors":"Marina Gindelsky , Jeremy Moulton , Kelly Wentland , Scott Wentland","doi":"10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101951","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101951","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Taxes create incentives; yet, the potency of these incentives may depend on the salience and household perception of the tax itself. We investigate this issue in the context of property taxes, exploring how accurately households perceive their property tax liabilities and what factors determine misperception. Leveraging a unique national dataset, created by linking Zillow's ZTRAX data to internal data from the American Community Survey, we first compare survey responses for how much households <em>think</em> they pay in property taxes to how much they <em>actually</em> pay based on municipal administrative records from ZTRAX. While homeowner tax perceptions are not substantially biased on average, we observe significant inaccuracy and systematic bias across different household(er) characteristics, institutional settings, and across states. Given that the vast majority of studies in the property tax capitalization literature use data concentrated in one state or locality, we also explore whether variation in tax misperceptions across states can help explain the heterogeneity in property tax effects on home prices. Results from a meta-analysis show that studies conducted in states with higher property tax misperceptions are significantly less likely to find property tax policy changes are fully capitalized into home prices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing Economics","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101951"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50193898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Can landlords siphon housing allowances? New theory and evidence on housing allowance algorithms from a natural experiment","authors":"Wasay Majid","doi":"10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101948","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101948","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper provides new evidence on the incidence and theoretical predictions of housing allowances. It offers a comprehensive reexamination of allowance algorithms, to shed light on their objectives and impacts, while also addressing empirical modelling considerations and identifying limitations in literature. Notably, it offers readers a comparative analysis by investigating US vouchers as a reference point. Theoretically, I find housing allowances are typically neither a price nor income equivalent. Housing allowance schemes,mostly being universal in functional form across countries, manifest as <em>personal subsidies</em><span> inverse to resources i.e., some benefit amount minus income deduction. I discover that New Zealand's Accommodation Supplement (AS) manifests as a negative income and wealth<span><span> tax benefit which, over time, is regressive to rents and incomes. Empirically, I estimate the effects of an increase in costs and demand for the AS on rents exploiting a panel of housing markets geocoded using census tracts at Area Unit (AU) level. The rent model extends, using Geographically Weighted Panel Regression (GWR) to control for any time-variant neighborhood </span>spillover effects on rents. Costing NZ$ 5.225 billion over 2006–2013, AS for renters was not demand deterministic and had no significant direct impact on the revenues of low-income landlords. An increase in subsidy demand coincides with possible overcrowding whereas has no impact on increasing rental supply or a move into renting.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing Economics","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101948"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50193953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Credit supply, homeownership and mortgage debt","authors":"Ahmet Ali Taşkın , Fırat Yaman","doi":"10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101947","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101947","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We analyze the effect of credit supply<span> on households’ homeownership and home equity outcomes. Banking deregulation together with states’ autonomy to limit deregulation provides an exogenous shift in credit supply which shows variation across states and time. We find that a shift from full to no regulation increases the probability of homeownership by one percentage point, and of having a mortgage by two percentage points, explaining up to 43% of the increase in homeownership and the share of households with mortgages. Mortgage debt increases by up to 20%. Household leverage and debt exposure measured as debt to income ratio increase slightly for households outside of MSAs.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing Economics","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101947"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41589613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Does homeownership hinder labor market activity? Evidence from housing privatization and restitution","authors":"Štěpán Mikula , Josef Montag","doi":"10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101949","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101949","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We study whether homeownership hinders labor force participation and increases unemployment. Using a unique dataset from the city of Brno, Czech Republic, we exploit housing reforms that followed the Velvet Revolution, and the subsequent fall of communism, as a source of exogenous assignment of homeownership. Across several estimation approaches, we do not find any evidence of homeownership hindering labor market activity. The estimated effects on labor force participation are around zero and our estimates for unemployment suggest that homeownership reduces it by four to six percentage points. Homeownership thus appears to benefit labor market performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing Economics","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101949"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50193906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}