The Airbnb rent premium and the crowding-out of long-term rentals

IF 1.4 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Robert J. Hill, Norbert Pfeifer, Miriam Steurer
{"title":"The Airbnb rent premium and the crowding-out of long-term rentals","authors":"Robert J. Hill,&nbsp;Norbert Pfeifer,&nbsp;Miriam Steurer","doi":"10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Concerns about crowding out of long-term rentals have led many cities to impose limits on the days that properties can be let via Airbnb or similar platforms in a given year. However, so far, there has been little research into the effect of such measures. Using micro-level data on long-term rental and Airbnb contracts for Sydney, Australia, we first estimate how much more landlords can earn on Airbnb compared to the long-term rental market. We use three different methods to control for differences in the quality of Airbnb and long-term rentals (hedonic regression, switching model, and matching approach) and find that, on average the weekly Airbnb rent is nearly double that in the long-term market. This Airbnb rent premium reflects the higher costs borne by Airbnb landlords. Consistent with a spatial equilibrium, landlords require a higher Airbnb rent premium in postcodes with a higher average time since the last review (a proxy for the Airbnb vacancy rate). Similarly, we find that Airbnb rent premia and time-since-last-review are lower in cheaper postcodes. It is therefore important to recognize that the impact of day restrictions is likely to be felt more in the cheaper rather than more touristic areas of a city.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing Economics","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101935"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Housing Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051137723000220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Concerns about crowding out of long-term rentals have led many cities to impose limits on the days that properties can be let via Airbnb or similar platforms in a given year. However, so far, there has been little research into the effect of such measures. Using micro-level data on long-term rental and Airbnb contracts for Sydney, Australia, we first estimate how much more landlords can earn on Airbnb compared to the long-term rental market. We use three different methods to control for differences in the quality of Airbnb and long-term rentals (hedonic regression, switching model, and matching approach) and find that, on average the weekly Airbnb rent is nearly double that in the long-term market. This Airbnb rent premium reflects the higher costs borne by Airbnb landlords. Consistent with a spatial equilibrium, landlords require a higher Airbnb rent premium in postcodes with a higher average time since the last review (a proxy for the Airbnb vacancy rate). Similarly, we find that Airbnb rent premia and time-since-last-review are lower in cheaper postcodes. It is therefore important to recognize that the impact of day restrictions is likely to be felt more in the cheaper rather than more touristic areas of a city.

Airbnb的租金溢价和长期租赁的挤出
对长期租赁被挤出的担忧导致许多城市限制了在特定年份通过Airbnb或类似平台出租房产的天数。然而,到目前为止,对这些措施的效果的研究很少。利用澳大利亚悉尼长期租赁和Airbnb合同的微观数据,我们首先估计了与长期租赁市场相比,房东在Airbnb上能赚多少钱。我们使用三种不同的方法来控制Airbnb和长期租赁质量的差异(特征回归、切换模型和匹配方法),发现平均而言,Airbnb的周租金几乎是长期市场的两倍。Airbnb的租金溢价反映了Airbnb房东承担的更高成本。与空间平衡一致,房东要求自上次审查以来平均时间更长的邮政编码中的Airbnb租金溢价更高(代表Airbnb空置率)。同样,我们发现,自上次审查以来,Airbnb的租金溢价和时间在更便宜的邮政编码中更低。因此,重要的是要认识到,白天限制的影响可能更多地体现在一个城市中价格较低而非旅游较多的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Journal of Housing Economics provides a focal point for the publication of economic research related to housing and encourages papers that bring to bear careful analytical technique on important housing-related questions. The journal covers the broad spectrum of topics and approaches that constitute housing economics, including analysis of important public policy issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信