{"title":"Religious Belonging, Belief, and Practice in a Multi-Faith Context: A Comparison of Sole-Affiliation Adherents and Individuals With Multiple Religious Identities","authors":"Kuo-Hsien Su, Ke-Hsien Huang","doi":"10.1111/jssr.70022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.70022","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Using the Global East Survey of Religion and Spirituality, this paper explores the prevalence of multiple religious identities in Taiwan, where religion diffuses into social institutions and everyday life, leading to less exclusive affiliations. The findings indicate that a significant proportion of Taiwanese identify with multiple religions, primarily folk religion, Daoism, and Buddhism. This group displays distinctive patterns in religious beliefs and practices, particularly in their differentiation between religiously and culturally prescribed practices. While individuals with multiple religious identities are no more likely than those with a single religious identity to engage in religiously prescribed practices, they are significantly more active in culturally prescribed practices. We discuss how Taiwan's macro-level cultural environment, influenced by specific political developments, contributes to its robust yet non-secularizing modernization, offering theoretical implications in comparison to its OECD counterparts in East Asia.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51390,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","volume":"65 3","pages":"472-479"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148942970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Religious Diversity and Multi-Religiosity in Singapore","authors":"Corey Resweber, Bing Han, Fenggang Yang","doi":"10.1111/jssr.70058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.70058","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Can government-mandated exposure to religious diversity both reinforce exclusive identities and cultivate “multi-religiosity”? This study leverages the 2024 Global East Survey of Religion and Spirituality to investigate how Singapore's state-mandated and managed pluralism impacts the religious lives of its citizens. Challenging Abrahamic-centric measures that assume exclusivity in belief, belonging, and behavior, we utilize multidimensional measures inspired by East and Southeast Asian religions to capture the fluidity of religious life among Chinese, Malay, and Indian Singaporeans. The results reveal a striking, bifurcated form of multi-religiosity: Although religious belonging and practice remain highly isomorphic with race (supporting state-defined categories), religious believing exhibits high levels of cross-pollination. Although most Singaporeans identify with one of the major religions, a majority of people also report believing in two or more religions. Notably, 45% of Malays—a group often characterized by exclusive religious identity—report believing in multiple religions. We argue that this specific manifestation of multi-religiosity—characterized by rigid social belonging but fluid cognitive believing—is a result of the tension between state categorization and the lived experience of pluralism. These findings suggest that in hyper-diverse societies, traditional metrics fail to capture the cognitive bricolage that undergirds multi-religiosity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51390,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","volume":"65 3","pages":"497-504"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jssr.70058","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148942791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Multi-Religiosity Among Asian Americans and Non-Asian Americans","authors":"Fenggang Yang, Joey Marshall","doi":"10.1111/jssr.70066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.70066","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article reports key findings of a split-sample experiment comparing conventional measures of single-choice religion and new measures of multi-religiosity. Although conventional measures implicitly assume congruence among religious affiliation, belief, and practice within a single religion, the new measures are designed to capture multi-religiosity by accounting for belonging to, belief in, or practice of more than one religion. The findings show that although only about 6% of Americans affiliate with or routinely practice two or more religions, about 60% said they somewhat or very much believed in two or more religions. After combining Protestantism and Catholicism into a single Christian religion and restricting it to those who believe very much, 16.3% of respondents still report believing in two or more religions. Asian Americans are more likely to be multireligious than non-Asian Americans but less than people in East Asian societies. These findings call for further analyses and additional surveys to better understand the patterns revealed by the new measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51390,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","volume":"65 3","pages":"514-522"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jssr.70066","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148943700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ambiguous Boundaries of Religious Belief, Behavior, and Belonging in Japan: A Descriptive Analysis of Plural and Cultural Religiosity","authors":"Koki Shimizu, Yoshihide Sakurai","doi":"10.1111/jssr.70065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.70065","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research note analyzes the ambiguous boundaries of religious identity, belief, and ritual behavior in Japan, drawing on data from a nationally representative postal survey conducted in 2024 (<i>N</i> = 3947). The findings reveal widespread participation in Buddhist and Shinto rituals even among individuals who identify as nonreligious or atheist, as well as the prevalence of overlapping religious affiliations. Beliefs in gods and the afterlife also vary widely and do not align neatly with religious identity categories. These results highlight how religiosity in Japan is often expressed through culturally embedded practices and inherited traditions, rather than formal belief or institutional membership. A comparative review of other national surveys shows that minor changes in question wording can significantly affect reported religiosity. By documenting the plural and diffuse nature of Japanese religiosity, this study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of religion in East Asia and offers methodological insights for future cross-cultural surveys.</p>","PeriodicalId":51390,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","volume":"65 3","pages":"480-488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jssr.70065","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148943032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Exploring Religious Identities in 2020s China: Prevalence and Boundaries","authors":"Xiaozhao Yousef Yang, Nan Wu, Kaiwen Guo","doi":"10.1111/jssr.70044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study explores religious identities in China by drawing representative samples in 2024 from two ideal-typical regions, Manchuria and Guangdong. The results show that the majority (over 50%) chose “neither atheist nor religious believer,” but only 13% solely identified as atheists. At least one-third of the population identified with a religion, with Buddhism being the largest religious identity and a considerable proportion having syncretic identifications. There was a significantly higher prevalence of Christianity in Manchuria (4.5% or 11.4% depending on criteria) and a significantly higher prevalence of folk religion in Guangdong (4.7% or 7.8%). Tetrachoric correlations reveal tighter religious boundaries in Guangdong and more porous boundaries in Manchuria. In Guangdong, some religious identities were significantly associated with ethnocultural identities, whereas few such religious-ethnocultural associations exist in Manchuria. We also found an associative block among Christianity, Islam, Confucianism, and Daoism in both places, wherein individuals identifying with one of these religions were likely to have families from all four religions. In terms of identification, there is no evidence for Eastern religions being more syncretic than Christianity.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51390,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","volume":"65 3","pages":"505-513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148943392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Introduction: Measuring Religiosity and Multi-Religiosity in East and West","authors":"Fenggang Yang","doi":"10.1111/jssr.70081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.70081","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The introduction to the spotlight set of research notes that are based on the Global East Survey of Religion and Spirituality briefly explains why we believe it is necessary to develop new measures of religiosity, the process of developing the questionnaire, and the key findings in this set of research notes, including the common phenomenon of multi-religiosity among Asians, Asian Americans, and non-Asian Americans.</p>","PeriodicalId":51390,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","volume":"65 3","pages":"467-471"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jssr.70081","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148942752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hyun Woo Kim, Francis Jae-Ryong Song, Kwang Suk Yoo
{"title":"Understanding Neither Atheists Nor Religious: Religious Nones and Multiple Religious Believing in South Korea","authors":"Hyun Woo Kim, Francis Jae-Ryong Song, Kwang Suk Yoo","doi":"10.1111/jssr.70047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.70047","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Using data from the 2024 Global East Survey of Religiosity and Spirituality collected across multiple East Asian countries, this study examines how religious identities and beliefs function as loosely coupled phenomena, particularly in South Korea. The analysis reveals substantial gaps between declared identities and actual beliefs, with multiple religious believing emerging as the dominant pattern. Individuals hold heterogeneous beliefs that diverge from their stated identities, particularly those identifying as neither atheist nor religious, who show receptivity to various teachings without exclusive affiliation. Buddhist identity shows the strongest association with multiple religious believing, encompassing Catholicism, Confucianism, and folk religion while excluding Protestantism. These patterns suggest that South Korean religiosity operates through flexible religious portfolios rather than exclusive commitments, reflecting a unique form of syncretism. The study underscores the importance of analytically distinguishing identity, belief, and practice when measuring religiosity, particularly where indigenous traditions function more as cultural repertoires than as institutional memberships.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51390,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","volume":"65 3","pages":"489-496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148942167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Religion and Black/White Residential Segregation: The Influence of Religious and Regional Context","authors":"David Sikkink, Michael Emerson","doi":"10.1111/jssr.70024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.70024","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research on religious tradition and residential segregation focuses on “open” versus “closed” civic orientations, but ignores the structural effects of religious fields as well as other relevant differences, such as Catholic immigrant parishes and the communal role of Black Protestantism in response to racial hostility in large northern cities during the Great Migration. We argue that the dominant religion in a regional religious field reinforces racial segregation in local areas. Using the county-level 2010 and 2020 US Religion Census, we find that Catholic and mainline Protestant number of adherents is positively related to Black/White residential segregation in the North. Southern mainline Protestantism, as a minority religious actor that played a key role in the Civil Rights movement, is negatively associated with segregation. In contrast, evangelical Protestantism is positively related to segregation in the South, where it has strongly shaped Southern orientations to race, and negatively related in northern regions, especially in the Midwest.</p>","PeriodicalId":51390,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","volume":"65 2","pages":"188-202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jssr.70024","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148269196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Religious Belief and Social Trust in the “Semi-Acquaintance Society”: Evidence From China","authors":"Licheng Xu, Wenxuan Li","doi":"10.1111/jssr.70038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The relationship between religious belief and social trust, often positively correlated in the Western context, presents a distinct puzzle within China's unique social landscape. Against the backdrop of China's ongoing transition into a “semi-acquaintance society,” this study introduces the concept of “trust in communities,” based on Anthony Giddens’ typology of “trust in persons” and “trust in systems.” Utilizing nationally representative survey data, this article empirically examines the effect of religious belief on social trust. Contrary to evidence from the Western context, our findings suggest a significantly lower level of generalized social trust among religious individuals in China compared to their nonreligious counterparts—a disparity that is most pronounced among Christians and those reporting the highest level of piety. Furthermore, the impact of religious belief is highly nuanced, varying across trust dimensions: Buddhists demonstrate a higher level of “trust in persons,” Muslims exhibit stronger “trust in communities,” and Catholics place greater trust in expert systems. These empirical findings suggest that religiosity in China does not simply compensate for the erosion of traditional trust but rather fosters a complex, belief-specific pattern of trust distribution.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51390,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","volume":"65 2","pages":"345-359"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148269230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The COVID-19 Pandemic and Wealth Inequality: An Analysis of Wealth Disparities by Religion and Race","authors":"Donka Mirtcheva Brodersen, Douglas Nguyen","doi":"10.1111/jssr.70019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.70019","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The COVID-19 pandemic not only cost the United States more than a million lives, but it also led to seismic labor market shifts and significant wealth changes. Previous literature has found that various factors such as government shutdown policies, business layoffs, and portfolio heterogeneity have increased wealth inequality during the pandemic. This article examines the impact of the pandemic on wealth inequality for population groups broken down by religion and race. Using 2019 and 2021 data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, we find that wealth differentials by religious denominations and race existed before and during the pandemic at the mean and along the wealth distribution, and the pandemic somewhat diminished wealth inequality in many of those groups. Our analysis helps create a more holistic understanding of wealth inequality before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, thus leading to better-informed research and government policies in the future.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51390,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","volume":"65 2","pages":"175-187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148268924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}