Gun Problem or God Problem? Support for Teacher-Led Prayer in Public School and Solutions for School Shootings

IF 1.9 1区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Samuel L. Perry, Andrew L. Whitehead
{"title":"Gun Problem or God Problem? Support for Teacher-Led Prayer in Public School and Solutions for School Shootings","authors":"Samuel L. Perry,&nbsp;Andrew L. Whitehead","doi":"10.1111/jssr.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>School shootings are typically followed with debates about their underlying causes and possible prevention strategies. These discussions often include laments about the absence of religion from shared civic spaces, particularly within public schools. Building on research connecting Christian nationalism to a worldview that rejects structural/policy-based interventions to gun violence and promotes “righteous violence,” we theorize a link between support for public schools to allow for teacher-led Christian prayers and patterned solutions for school shootings. We analyze data from a recent, nationally representative survey of American parents. Compared to most parents who reject any teacher-led prayers, parents who support teacher-led Christian prayers are more likely to endorse pro-gun and infrastructural interventions (letting teachers and administrators carry guns, posting police and armed security, installing metal detectors) but not structural/policy-based interventions (banning assault weapons, mental health screening). Tests for moderating effects reveal few consistent patterns, though some associations vary across political ideology. Findings affirm a link between support for teacher-led Christian prayer in public schools and solutions to school shootings that are more directed toward increasing gun access for “good guys” (teachers, admin, police, security) and limiting access for “bad guys,” but only on school grounds (metal detectors, not mental health screening or bans).</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51390,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","volume":"64 3","pages":"361-368"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jssr.70000","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

School shootings are typically followed with debates about their underlying causes and possible prevention strategies. These discussions often include laments about the absence of religion from shared civic spaces, particularly within public schools. Building on research connecting Christian nationalism to a worldview that rejects structural/policy-based interventions to gun violence and promotes “righteous violence,” we theorize a link between support for public schools to allow for teacher-led Christian prayers and patterned solutions for school shootings. We analyze data from a recent, nationally representative survey of American parents. Compared to most parents who reject any teacher-led prayers, parents who support teacher-led Christian prayers are more likely to endorse pro-gun and infrastructural interventions (letting teachers and administrators carry guns, posting police and armed security, installing metal detectors) but not structural/policy-based interventions (banning assault weapons, mental health screening). Tests for moderating effects reveal few consistent patterns, though some associations vary across political ideology. Findings affirm a link between support for teacher-led Christian prayer in public schools and solutions to school shootings that are more directed toward increasing gun access for “good guys” (teachers, admin, police, security) and limiting access for “bad guys,” but only on school grounds (metal detectors, not mental health screening or bans).

枪支问题还是上帝问题?支持公立学校教师主导的祈祷和解决校园枪击事件
校园枪击事件通常会引发关于其潜在原因和可能的预防策略的辩论。这些讨论通常包括对公共空间中宗教缺失的哀叹,尤其是在公立学校中。基于将基督教民族主义与世界观联系起来的研究,该世界观拒绝对枪支暴力进行结构性/政策性干预,并提倡“正义暴力”,我们将支持公立学校允许教师主导的基督教祈祷与校园枪击事件的模式解决方案之间的联系理论化。我们分析了最近对美国父母进行的具有全国代表性的调查数据。与大多数拒绝任何教师主导的祈祷的家长相比,支持教师主导的基督教祈祷的家长更有可能支持支持枪支和基础设施干预(允许教师和行政人员携带枪支,派遣警察和武装保安,安装金属探测器),但不支持结构性/基于政策的干预(禁止攻击性武器,心理健康检查)。对调节效应的测试显示出很少一致的模式,尽管在不同的政治意识形态之间存在一些关联。调查结果证实,公立学校支持教师主导的基督教祈祷与解决校园枪击事件之间存在联系,这些解决方案更直接地指向增加“好人”(教师、行政人员、警察、安全人员)获得枪支的机会,并限制“坏人”获得枪支的机会,但仅限于在校园里(金属探测器,而不是心理健康筛查或禁令)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion is a multi-disciplinary journal that publishes articles, research notes, and book reviews on the social scientific study of religion. Published articles are representative of the best current theoretical and methodological treatments of religion. Substantive areas include both micro-level analysis of religious organizations, institutions, and social change. While many articles published in the journal are sociological, the journal also publishes the work of psychologists, political scientists, anthropologists, and economists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信