Public Opinion Quarterly最新文献_第8页

How Priming Fairness and Priming Constitutionality Impact the Effect of Partisan Self-Interest on Citizen Support for Election Reforms 启动公平与启动合宪性如何影响党派自身利益对公民选举改革支持的影响

1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad010

Daniel R Biggers, Shaun Bowler

引用次数: 0

Before the Party Hijacks: The Limited Role of Party Cues in Appraisal of Low-Salience Policies—Experimental Evidence 党的劫机前：党的线索在低突出政策评价中的有限作用——实验证据

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfac044

Clareta Treger

引用次数: 0

Lying for Trump? Elite Cue-Taking and Expressive Responding on Vote Method 为特朗普撒谎?精英对投票方式的暗示与表达性回应

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfac045

Enrijeta Shino, Daniel A. Smith, Laura Uribe

引用次数: 2

Does Social Desirability Bias Distort Survey Analyses of Ideology and Self-Interest? Evidence from a List Experiment on Progressive Taxation 社会期望偏差是否扭曲了意识形态和自我利益的调查分析？累进税清单实验的证据

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfac050

Tobias Heide-Jørgensen

{"title":"Does Social Desirability Bias Distort Survey Analyses of Ideology and Self-Interest? Evidence from a List Experiment on Progressive Taxation","authors":"Tobias Heide-Jørgensen","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfac050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfac050","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The relative importance of ideological orientations and material self-interest as determinants of political attitudes is still discussed. Using a novel list experiment on opposition to progressive taxation embedded in a large representative Danish online survey (N = 2,010), I study how social desirability concerns bias the conclusions survey researchers draw regarding the influence of self-interest (gauged by income) and ideology (measured by left-right self-identifications) on public opinion. I find that right-wingers are much less opposed to progressive taxation when attitudes are measured indirectly and unobtrusively by means of the list experiment relative to asking directly about their opinions. In fact, rightists are no more against progressive taxation than leftists and centrists. Furthermore, opposition to tax progressivity is considerably lower among low-income individuals when social desirability bias is addressed, thereby increasing the attitudinal gap between low- and high-income individuals. The implications of the findings are that survey research risks exaggerating the importance of ideological orientations and underestimating how much political views reflect material self-interest.","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45297533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Strategic Discrimination in the 2020 Democratic Primary 2020年民主党初选中的战略歧视

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfac051

Jon Green, Brian F. Schaffner, Sam Luks

引用次数: 3

Updating amidst Disagreement: New Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cues 分歧中的更新:党派线索的新实验证据

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfac053

Anthony Fowler, William G. Howell

引用次数: 1

Increasing the Acceptance of Smartphone-Based Data Collection. 提高智能手机数据收集的接受度。

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad019

Alexander Wenz, Florian Keusch

{"title":"Increasing the Acceptance of Smartphone-Based Data Collection.","authors":"Alexander Wenz, Florian Keusch","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad019","url":null,"abstract":"To study human behavior, social scientists are increasingly collecting data from mobile apps and sensors embedded in smartphones. A major challenge of studies implemented on general population samples, however, is that participation rates are rather low. While previous research has started to investigate the factors affecting individuals' decision to participate in such studies, less is known about features of the study design which are under the researcher's control and can increase the acceptance of smartphone-based data collection methods. Guided by the Technology Acceptance Model, we varied study characteristics in a vignette experiment to examine their effect on individuals' willingness to download a research app on their smartphone. Data were collected from 1,876 members of the NORC AmeriSpeak Panel, a probability-based panel of the general population aged 18+ in the United States. Respondents were randomly assigned to eight vignettes and, after each vignette, were asked to rate their willingness to participate in the described hypothetical study. The results show that individuals are more willing to participate in smartphone-based studies where they have some control over the data collection process, by having the option either to temporarily switch off the data collection or to review the data before submission. Furthermore, they are more willing to participate in research to which they are invited via postal letter rather than receiving a postal letter plus a phone call from an interviewer who walks them through the app installation. Finally, unconditional incentives increase their willingness to engage with smartphone-based data collection over conditional incentives.","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"87 2","pages":"357-388"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/22/nfad019.PMC10339101.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9823636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Income Source Confusion Using the SILC. 使用SILC混淆收入来源。

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad025

Christopher Robert Bollinger, Iva Valentinova Tasseva

引用次数: 2

Public Opinion and Cyberterrorism. 舆论与网络恐怖主义。

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad006

Ryan Shandler, Nadiya Kostyuk, Harry Oppenheimer

{"title":"Public Opinion and Cyberterrorism.","authors":"Ryan Shandler, Nadiya Kostyuk, Harry Oppenheimer","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad006","url":null,"abstract":"Research into cyber-conflict, public opinion, and international security is burgeoning, yet the field suffers from an absence of conceptual agreement about key terms. For instance, every time a cyberattack takes place, a public debate erupts as to whether it constitutes cyberterrorism. This debate bears significant consequences, seeing as the ascription of a \"terrorism\" label enables the application of heavy-handed counterterrorism powers and heightens the level of perceived threat among the public. In light of widespread conceptual disagreement in cyberspace, we assert that public opinion plays a heightened role in understanding the nature of cyber threats. We construct a typological framework to illuminate the attributes that drive the public classification of an attack as cyberterrorism, which we test through a ratings-based conjoint experiment in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Israel (N = 21,238 observations). We find that the public (1) refrains from labeling attacks by unknown actors or hacker collectives as cyberterrorism; and (2) classifies attacks that disseminate sensitive data as terrorism to a greater extent even than physically explosive attacks. Importantly, the uniform public perspectives across the three countries challenge a foundational tenet of public opinion and international relations scholarship that divided views among elites on foreign policy matters will be reflected by a divided public. This study concludes by providing a definitive conceptual baseline to support future research on the topic.","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"87 1","pages":"92-119"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10127534/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9363802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Affective Polarization in Comparative and Longitudinal Perspective. 比较与纵向视角下的情感极化。

IF 3.4 1区社会学

Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad004

Diego Garzia, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Simon Maye

引用次数: 4