Public Opinion Quarterly最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Updating amidst Disagreement: New Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cues 分歧中的更新:党派线索的新实验证据
IF 3.4 1区 社会学
Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfac053
Anthony Fowler, William G. Howell
{"title":"Updating amidst Disagreement: New Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cues","authors":"Anthony Fowler, William G. Howell","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfac053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfac053","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 In this era of hyper-polarization and partisan animosity, do people incorporate the viewpoints of their political opponents? Perhaps not. An important body of research, in fact, finds that the provision of information about opponents’ policy views leads survey respondents to reflexively adopt the opposite position. In this paper, we demonstrate that such findings arise from incomplete experimental designs and a particular measurement strategy. In a series of experiments that vary information about both parties’ positions simultaneously and that solicit continuous, rather than discrete, policy positions, we find that partisans update their beliefs in accordance with the positions of Republican and Democratic leaders alike. Partisans are not perennially determined to disagree. Rather, they are often willing to incorporate opposing viewpoints about a wide range of policy issues.","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47326963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Increasing the Acceptance of Smartphone-Based Data Collection. 提高智能手机数据收集的接受度。
IF 3.4 1区 社会学
Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad019
Alexander Wenz, Florian Keusch
{"title":"Increasing the Acceptance of Smartphone-Based Data Collection.","authors":"Alexander Wenz,&nbsp;Florian Keusch","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To study human behavior, social scientists are increasingly collecting data from mobile apps and sensors embedded in smartphones. A major challenge of studies implemented on general population samples, however, is that participation rates are rather low. While previous research has started to investigate the factors affecting individuals' decision to participate in such studies, less is known about features of the study design which are under the researcher's control and can increase the acceptance of smartphone-based data collection methods. Guided by the Technology Acceptance Model, we varied study characteristics in a vignette experiment to examine their effect on individuals' willingness to download a research app on their smartphone. Data were collected from 1,876 members of the NORC AmeriSpeak Panel, a probability-based panel of the general population aged 18+ in the United States. Respondents were randomly assigned to eight vignettes and, after each vignette, were asked to rate their willingness to participate in the described hypothetical study. The results show that individuals are more willing to participate in smartphone-based studies where they have some control over the data collection process, by having the option either to temporarily switch off the data collection or to review the data before submission. Furthermore, they are more willing to participate in research to which they are invited via postal letter rather than receiving a postal letter plus a phone call from an interviewer who walks them through the app installation. Finally, unconditional incentives increase their willingness to engage with smartphone-based data collection over conditional incentives.</p>","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"87 2","pages":"357-388"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/22/nfad019.PMC10339101.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9823636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Income Source Confusion Using the SILC. 使用SILC混淆收入来源。
IF 3.4 1区 社会学
Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad025
Christopher Robert Bollinger, Iva Valentinova Tasseva
{"title":"Income Source Confusion Using the SILC.","authors":"Christopher Robert Bollinger,&nbsp;Iva Valentinova Tasseva","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We use a unique panel of household survey data-the Austrian version of the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (SILC) for 2008-2011-which have been linked to individual administrative records on both state unemployment benefits and earnings. We assess the extent and structure of misreporting across similar benefits and between benefits and earnings. We document that many respondents fail to report participation in one or more of the unemployment programs. Moreover, they inflate earnings for periods when they are unemployed but receiving unemployment compensation. To demonstrate the impact of income source confusion on estimators, we estimate standard Mincer wage equations. Since unemployment is associated with lower education, the reports of unemployment benefits as earnings bias downward the returns to education. Failure to report unemployment benefits also leads to substantial sample bias when selecting on these benefits, as one might in estimating the returns to job training.</p>","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"87 Suppl 1","pages":"542-574"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496567/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10252680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Public Opinion and Cyberterrorism. 舆论与网络恐怖主义。
IF 3.4 1区 社会学
Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad006
Ryan Shandler, Nadiya Kostyuk, Harry Oppenheimer
{"title":"Public Opinion and Cyberterrorism.","authors":"Ryan Shandler,&nbsp;Nadiya Kostyuk,&nbsp;Harry Oppenheimer","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research into cyber-conflict, public opinion, and international security is burgeoning, yet the field suffers from an absence of conceptual agreement about key terms. For instance, every time a cyberattack takes place, a public debate erupts as to whether it constitutes <i>cyberterrorism</i>. This debate bears significant consequences, seeing as the ascription of a \"terrorism\" label enables the application of heavy-handed counterterrorism powers and heightens the level of perceived threat among the public. In light of widespread conceptual disagreement in cyberspace, we assert that public opinion plays a heightened role in understanding the nature of cyber threats. We construct a typological framework to illuminate the attributes that drive the public classification of an attack as cyberterrorism, which we test through a ratings-based conjoint experiment in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Israel (N = 21,238 observations). We find that the public (1) refrains from labeling attacks by unknown actors or hacker collectives as cyberterrorism; and (2) classifies attacks that disseminate sensitive data as terrorism to a greater extent even than physically explosive attacks. Importantly, the uniform public perspectives across the three countries challenge a foundational tenet of public opinion and international relations scholarship that divided views among elites on foreign policy matters will be reflected by a divided public. This study concludes by providing a definitive conceptual baseline to support future research on the topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"87 1","pages":"92-119"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10127534/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9363802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Affective Polarization in Comparative and Longitudinal Perspective. 比较与纵向视角下的情感极化。
IF 3.4 1区 社会学
Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad004
Diego Garzia, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Simon Maye
{"title":"Affective Polarization in Comparative and Longitudinal Perspective.","authors":"Diego Garzia,&nbsp;Frederico Ferreira da Silva,&nbsp;Simon Maye","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Existent research shows that affective polarization has been intensifying in some publics, diminishing in others, and remaining stable in most. We contribute to this debate by providing the most encompassing comparative and longitudinal account of affective polarization so far. We resort to a newly assembled dataset able to track partisan affect, with varying time series, in eighteen democracies over the last six decades. We present results based on two different operational measures of affective polarization: Reiljan's Affective Polarization Index, based on reported partisans only, and Wagner's weighted distance from the most liked party, based on the whole electorate. Our reassessment of affective polarization among partisans confirms that an intensifying trend is observable in a number of countries but it is, by no means, generalizable to all established democracies. Regarding the longitudinal assessment of affective polarization among the electorate, we confirm that US citizens have become more affectively polarized over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"87 1","pages":"219-231"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10127533/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9718987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Truth and Bias, Left and Right: Testing Ideological Asymmetries with a Realistic News Supply. 真相与偏见,左与右:用现实的新闻供给检验意识形态的不对称性。
IF 3.4 1区 社会学
Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad013
Bernhard Clemm von Hohenberg
{"title":"Truth and Bias, Left and Right: Testing Ideological Asymmetries with a Realistic News Supply.","authors":"Bernhard Clemm von Hohenberg","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The debate around \"fake news\" has raised the question of whether liberals and conservatives differ, first, in their ability to discern true from false information, and second, in their tendency to give more credit to information that is ideologically congruent. Typical designs to measure these asymmetries select, often arbitrarily, a small set of news items as experimental stimuli without clear reference to a \"population of information.\" This pre-registered study takes an alternative approach by, first, conceptualizing estimands in relation to all political news. Second, to represent this target population, it uses a set of 80 randomly sampled items from a large collection of articles from Google News and three fact-checking sites. In a subsequent survey, a quota sample of US participants (n = 1,393) indicate whether they believe the news items to be true. Conservatives are less truth-discerning than liberals, but also less affected by the congruence of news.</p>","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"87 2","pages":"267-292"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10371040/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9889896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Augmenting Surveys with Paradata, Administrative Data, and Contextual Data. 扩充调查与Paradata,行政数据,和上下文数据。
IF 3.4 1区 社会学
Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad026
Joseph W Sakshaug, Bella Struminskaya
{"title":"Augmenting Surveys with Paradata, Administrative Data, and Contextual Data.","authors":"Joseph W Sakshaug,&nbsp;Bella Struminskaya","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad026","url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decades, there has been growing interest in augmenting survey data with alternative data sources, such as paradata, administrative data, and contextual data. Paradata, for instance, refers to data related to the process of collecting survey data during the field period, which are not directly derived from respondents’ answers to survey questions, but rather are a byproduct of the data collection process (Couper 1998; Kreuter 2013). This may include data from call records, keystroke data in computer-administered surveys, interviewer observations, and more. Administrative data refers to externally created process data that are often linked to individual respondent records by matching personal information (Calderwood and Lessof 2009). For instance, social surveys may link respondents’ interview data (conditional on consent) to tax, insurance, voter registration, and other government databases. Finally, contextual data comprises external sources of information that measure various aspects of the respondent’s physical, social, or informational environment (Fortin-Rittberger et al. 2016). This could involve aggregate data on the demographic composition of a respondent’s neighborhood or organizational characteristics of their place of work, as well as data on respondents’ behaviors, environments, and social networks from wearables, sensors, apps, and digital traces from social media or web browsing. Survey researchers are increasingly utilizing these data sources to enhance their substantive and methodological research and address complex research questions that are difficult (or impossible) to answer using survey data alone. Paradata, for instance, are employed in survey production to monitor fieldwork, increase data collection efficiencies, investigate measurement errors, and assess and correct for nonresponse errors (Biemer et al. 2013; Wagner et al. 2012; Yan and Olson 2013). Likewise, linked administrative data are","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"87 Suppl 1","pages":"475-479"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/b5/nfad026.PMC10496571.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10252676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Privacy Attitudes toward Mouse-Tracking Paradata Collection. 对鼠标跟踪Paradata收集的隐私态度。
IF 3.4 1区 社会学
Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad034
Felix Henninger, Pascal J Kieslich, Amanda Fernández-Fontelo, Sonja Greven, Frauke Kreuter
{"title":"Privacy Attitudes toward Mouse-Tracking Paradata Collection.","authors":"Felix Henninger,&nbsp;Pascal J Kieslich,&nbsp;Amanda Fernández-Fontelo,&nbsp;Sonja Greven,&nbsp;Frauke Kreuter","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Survey participants' mouse movements provide a rich, unobtrusive source of paradata, offering insight into the response process beyond the observed answers. However, the use of mouse tracking may require participants' explicit consent for their movements to be recorded and analyzed. Thus, the question arises of how its presence affects the willingness of participants to take part in a survey at all-if prospective respondents are reluctant to complete a survey if additional measures are recorded, collecting paradata may do more harm than good. Previous research has found that other paradata collection modes reduce the willingness to participate, and that this decrease may be influenced by the specific motivation provided to participants for collecting the data. However, the effects of mouse movement collection on survey consent and participation have not been addressed so far. In a vignette experiment, we show that reported willingness to participate in a survey decreased when mouse tracking was part of the overall consent. However, a larger proportion of the sample indicated willingness to both take part and provide mouse-tracking data when these decisions were combined, compared to an independent opt-in to paradata collection, separated from the decision to complete the study. This suggests that survey practitioners may face a trade-off between maximizing their overall participation rate and maximizing the number of participants who also provide mouse-tracking data. Explaining motivations for paradata collection did not have a positive effect and, in some cases, even reduced participants' reported willingness to take part in the survey.</p>","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"87 Suppl 1","pages":"602-618"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496572/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10252675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Ethical Considerations for Augmenting Surveys with Auxiliary Data Sources. 使用辅助数据源扩大调查的伦理考虑。
IF 3.4 1区 社会学
Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad030
Bella Struminskaya, Joseph W Sakshaug
{"title":"Ethical Considerations for Augmenting Surveys with Auxiliary Data Sources.","authors":"Bella Struminskaya,&nbsp;Joseph W Sakshaug","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Survey researchers frequently use supplementary data sources, such as paradata, administrative data, and contextual data to augment surveys and enhance substantive and methodological research capabilities. While these data sources can be beneficial, integrating them with surveys can give rise to ethical and data privacy issues that have not been completely resolved. In this research synthesis, we review ethical considerations and empirical evidence on how privacy concerns impact participation in studies that collect these novel data sources to supplement surveys. We further discuss potential approaches for safeguarding participants' data privacy during data collection and dissemination that may assuage their concerns. Finally, we conclude with open questions and suggested avenues for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"87 Suppl 1","pages":"619-633"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/61/f3/nfad030.PMC10496569.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10260561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Women Experts and Gender Bias in Political Media. 女性专家与政治媒体中的性别偏见。
IF 3.4 1区 社会学
Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfad011
Adam L Ozer
{"title":"Women Experts and Gender Bias in Political Media.","authors":"Adam L Ozer","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Widely held gender stereotypes present obstacles for women experts, who are generally evaluated less positively than equally qualified men across a range of fields. While audiences may view women as better equipped to handle certain feminine-stereotyped issues, Role Congruency Theory suggests that expert authority in politics may be incongruent with traditional feminine gender roles, leading to a subsequent backlash. Building upon the latter theory, I hypothesize that when cued to consider the expertise of a news source, the (in)congruence of gender-stereotyped roles will activate gender biases which increase the gap in evaluations and trust of women and men. Using selection experiments, I assess the relationship between domain-relevant expertise and gender biases across a range of gender-stereotyped issues. I find that women experts are rewarded less for additional expertise and punished more severely for a lack of expertise, exacerbating gender-based biases relative to the control. I find that this pattern is consistent across both masculine- and feminine-stereotyped issues, including issues that disproportionately impact women, such as women's health care and the gender wage gap. The addition of competing partisan cues, however, overwhelms the influence of gender. The normative implications suggest women in the media often face an uphill battle to advocate for their interests on key issues that affect them even when they may have more direct relevant experience in addition to their qualifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"87 2","pages":"293-315"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10408780/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9972757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信