Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation最新文献

{"title":"Impact of gut permeability on estimation of oral bioavailability for chemicals in commerce and the environment.","authors":"Gregory S Honda, Elaina M Kenyon, Sarah Davidson-Fritz, Roger Dinallo, Hisham El Masri, Evgenia Korol-Bexell, Li Li, Derek Angus, Robert G Pearce, Risa R Sayre, Christopher Strock, Russell S Thomas, Barbara A Wetmore, John F Wambaugh","doi":"10.14573/altex.2403271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2403271","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Performance of pharmacokinetic models developed using in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) methods may be improved by refining assumptions regarding fraction absorbed (Fabs) through the intestine, a component of oral bioavailability (Fbio). Although in vivo measures of Fabs are often unavailable for non-pharmaceuticals, in vitro measures of apparent permeability (Papp) using the Caco-2 cell line have been highly correlated with Fabs. We measured bidirectional Papp for over 400 non-pharmaceutical chemicals using the Caco-2 assay. A random forest quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) model was developed using these and peer-reviewed pharmaceutical data. Both Caco-2 data (R²=0.37) and the QSPR model (R²=0.29) were better at predicting human bioavailability compared to in vivo rat data (R²=0.23). After incorporation into a high throughput toxicokinetics (HTTK) framework for IVIVE, the Caco-2 data were used to estimate in vivo administered equivalent dose (AED) for bioactivity assessed in vitro, The HTTK-predicted plasma steady state concentrations (Css) for IVIVE were revised, with modest changes predicted for poorly absorbed chemicals. Experimental data were evaluated for sources of measurement uncertainty, which were then accounted for using the Monte Carlo method. Revised AEDs were subsequently compared with exposure estimates to evaluate effects on bioactivity:exposure ratios, a surrogate for risk. Only minor changes in the margin between chemical exposure and predicted bioactive doses were observed due to the preponderance of highly absorbed chemicals.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142480212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Software tools for systematic review literature screening and data extraction: Qualitative user experiences from succinct formal tests.","authors":"Cathalijn H C Leenaars, Frans Stafleu, André Bleich","doi":"10.14573/altex.2409251","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2409251","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systematic reviews (SRs) are an important tool in implementing the 3Rs in preclinical research. With the ever-increasing amount of scientific literature, SRs require increasing time-investments. Thus, using the most efficient review tools is essential. Most available tools aid the screening process, tools for data-extraction and / or multiple review phases are relatively scarce. Using a single platform for all review phases allows for auto-transfer of references from one phase to the next, which enables work on multiple phases at the same time. We performed succinct formal tests of four multiphase review tools that are free or relatively affordable: Covidence, Eppi, SRDR+ and SYRF. Our tests comprised full-text screening, sham data extraction and discrepancy resolution in the context of parts of a systematic review. Screening was performed as per protocol. Sham data extraction comprised free text, numerical and categorial data. Both reviewers kept a log of their experiences with the platforms throughout. These logs were qualitatively summarized and supplemented with further user experiences. We show value of all tested tools in the SR process. Which tool is optimal depends on multiple factors, comprising previous experience with the tool, but also review type, review questions and review team member enthusiasm.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142480213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Virtual Human Platform for Safety Assessment (VHP4Safety) project: Next generation chemical safety assessment based on human data.","authors":"Anne Kienhuis, Cyrille Krul, Jacqueline van Engelen, Chris T Evelo, Ellen Hessel, Jarno Hoekman, Nynke Kramer, Esmeralda Krop, Rosalinde Masereeuw, Ellen Moors, Simona O Negro, Aldert H Piersma, Raymond Pieters, Marc Teunis, Egon Willighagen, Juliette Legler","doi":"10.14573/altex.2407211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2407211","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Virtual Human Platform for Safety Assessment (VHP4Safety) project aims to build a Virtual Human Platform (VHP) to protect human health and revolutionize the safety assessment of chemicals and pharmaceuticals by transitioning from animal-based to human-based approaches. The goal of this article is to introduce the project and its interdisciplinary approach to co-creation with multiple academic, regulatory, industrial and societal partners covering the entire safety assessment knowledge chain. Three research lines drive the project: 1) building the VHP; 2) feeding the VHP with human data; and 3) implementing the VHP. The project focusses on three case studies that incorporate human relevant scenarios not included in current animal-based safety assessment strategies. The VHP is built on tools and services, including pharmacokinetic and computational models, and integrates several data sources within each case study, including data on human physiology, epidemiology, toxicokinetic and -dynamic parameters, as well as data on chemical characteristics and exposures. In addition, the VHP integrates new data generated within the project using new approach methodologies representing key events within adverse outcome pathways. Implementation of the VHP is investigated using an innovation systems approach, engaging stakeholders and organizing training and education. Central to the VHP4Safety project is our co-creative approach, which facilitated by biannual designathons and hackathons that foster active involvement of all project participants from over 30 partner organizations. By integrating technological innovations with transparency and stakeholder collaboration, the VHP4Safety project will help shape the transition to the next generation safety assessment in which animal testing becomes redundant.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142480214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Characterization of the C17.2 cell line as testing system for endocrine disruption-induced developmental neurotoxicity.","authors":"Andrea Cediel-Ulloa, Roseline Awoga, Arif Dönmez, Ximiao Yu, Anda Gliga, Kristina Attoff, Anna Forsby, Joëlle Rüegg","doi":"10.14573/altex.2404131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2404131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hormone signaling plays an essential role during fetal life and is vital for brain development. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals can interfere with the hormonal milieu during this critical time-period, disrupting key neurodevelopmental processes. Hence, there is a need for the development of assays that evaluate developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) induced by an endocrine mode of action. Herein, we evaluated the applicability of the neural progenitor C17. 2 cell-line, as an in vitro test system to aid in the detection of endocrine disruption (ED) induced DNT. For this, C17.2 cells were exposed during 10 days of differentiation to agonists and antagonists of the thyroid hormone (Thr), glucocorticoid (Gr), retinoic acid (Rar), retinoic x (Rxr), oxysterols (Lxr), estrogen (Er), androgen (Ar), and peroxisome proliferator activated delta (Pparβ/δ) receptors, as well as to the agonist of the vitamin D (Vdr) receptor. Upon exposure and differentiation, neuronal morphology (neurite outgrowth and branching), and the percentage of neurons in culture were assessed by immunofluorescence. For this, the cells were incubated with Hoechst (nuclear staining) and stained for βIII-tubulin (neuronal marker). The C17.2 cells were responsive to the Rar, Rxr and Pparβ/δ agonists which decreased neurite outgrowth and branching. Additionally, exposure to the Gr agonist increased the number of cells differentiating into neurons, while exposure to the Rxr agonist had the opposite effect. With this approach, we have identified that the C17.2 cells are responsive to Gr, Rar, Rxr, and Pparβ/δ agonists, hence contributing to the development of test systems for hazard assessment of ED-induced DNT.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Performance of the DASF compared to other combinations of OECD NAMs for eye hazard identification of surfactants.","authors":"Nathalie Alépée, Karsten R Mewes, Takayuki Abo, Alessandra Cavarzan, Chelsea Odriscoll, Els Adriaens","doi":"10.14573/altex.2406031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2406031","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, the OECD has adopted three defined approaches (DAs) for eye hazard identification of non-surfactant liquids and solids (TG467) according to the three UN GHS categories (Cat.1, Cat.2, No Cat.). We are now expanding the applicability domain with a new DA for chemicals having surfactant (SF) properties (DASF). It is based on a combination of RhCE test methods (OECD TG492: EpiOcular™ EIT or SkinEthic™ HCE EIT) and a modification of the Short Time Exposure (STE, TG491) method. The aim of the current study was to compare the performance of the DASF with the performance of other NAMs currently included in the OECD TGs and with the classification based on the Draize eye test to identify potential additional DAs. The minimum performance criteria (75% Cat.1, 50% Cat.2, 70% No Cat.) used for the adoption of the DAs currently included in OECD TG467 were used for this purpose. The DASF identified 90.9% of Cat. 1 (N=23), 77.8% of Cat. 2 (N=9) and 76.0% of No Cat. (N=17) surfactants, meeting the minimum performance criteria. Some of the NAMs that are currently included in the OECD TGs seem promising methods to be part of a DA to identify Cat. 1 or No Cat. for eye hazard assessment of surfactants. However, the number of surfactants that have been tested to evaluate reliability and relevance was often too small. To date, the DASF is the only DA that has evaluated a sufficiently large number of surfactants and whose performance met the OECD acceptance criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142127268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Potential value of animal microphysiological systems.","authors":"Paul C Brown, Barry H Hooberman, Brianna L Skinner, Claudia Wrzesinski, Dayton M Petibone, Kevin A Ford, Kristi Muldoon-Jacobs, Kyung E Sung, Luis G Valerio, Nakissa N Sadrieh, Paul C Howard, Peter L Goering, Shelby A Skoog, Suzanne C Fitzpatrick, Tracy Chen, Tracy C MacGill, Donna L Mendrick","doi":"10.14573/altex.2311141","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2311141","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microphysiological systems (MPS) are designed to recapitulate aspects of tissue/organ physiology in vivo, thereby providing potential value in safety and efficacy assessments of FDA-regulated products and regulatory decision-making. While there have been significant advances in the development, use, and proposals of qualification criteria for human organ MPS, there remains a gap in the development using animal tissues. Animal MPS may be of value in many areas including the study of zoonotic diseases, assessment of the safety and efficacy of animal therapeutics, and possibly reduction of the use of animals in regulatory submissions for animal therapeutics. In addition, the development of MPS from various animal species enables comparison to animal in vivo data. This comparison, while not always critical for all contexts of use, could help gain confidence in the use and application of human MPS data for regulatory decision-making and for the potential identification of species-specific effects. The use of animal MPS is consistent with the replacement, reduction, and refinement (3Rs) principles of animal use by identifying toxic compounds before conducting in vivo studies and identifying the appropriate species for testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141918019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Development of a monoclonal antibody sandwich ELISA for the determination of antigen content and quality in diphtheria vaccines.","authors":"Laura Hassall, Daniel A Yara, Rebecca Riches-Duit, Peter Rigsby, Alexandre Dobly, Maxime Vermeulen, Antoine Francotte, Paul Stickings","doi":"10.14573/altex.2305251","DOIUrl":"10.14573/altex.2305251","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At present, quality control of diphtheria vaccines by both manufacturers and national control laboratories relies heavily on in vivo assays to confirm potency. As part of the VAC2VAC project we have developed a monoclonal antibody (mAb) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to measure the relative amount and quality of diphtheria toxoid (DTxd) in diphtheria-tetanus based vaccines and believe this test has the potential to play a key role in a control strategy no longer including an in vivo potency test. The mAb ELISA is highly specific, has good dilutional linearity, and is suitable for detecting DTxd in a range of different human vaccine products. We demonstrate the ability of the assay to discriminate between batches of different content and quality using vaccine batches that were prepared to contain differing amounts of DTxd or were altered by exposure to heat or oxidative stress. We also demonstrate successful transfer of the method to other laboratories and show that different diphtheria antigen materials may be able to serve as a reference antigen for local standardization of the method. The assay is ideally suited for incorporation into a consistency approach for routine diphtheria vaccine quality control testing and may be suitable to serve as the stability indicating test in replacement of the current in vivo potency test.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10008309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Challenges integrating skin sensitization data for assessment of difficult to test substances.","authors":"Allison Greminger, Joseph Frasca, Katy Goyak, Colin North","doi":"10.14573/altex.2201122","DOIUrl":"10.14573/altex.2201122","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Difficult to test substances, including poorly soluble, mildly irritating, or UVCBs (unknown or variable composition complex reaction products or biological materials), producing weak or borderline in vivo results, face additional challenges in in vitro assays that often necessitate data integration in a weight of evidence (WOE) approach to inform skin sensitization potential. Here we present several case studies on difficult to test substances and highlight the utility of the toxicological priority index (ToxPi) as a data visualization tool to compare skin sensitization biological activity. The case study test substances represent two poorly soluble substances, tetrakis (2-ethylbutyl) orthosilicate and decyl palmitate, and two UVCB substances, alkylated anisole and hydrazinecarboximidamide, 2-[(2-hydroxyphenyl)methylene]-, reaction products with 2 undecanone. Data from key events within the skin sensitization adverse outcome pathway were gathered from publicly available sources or specifically generated. Incorporating the data for these case study test substances as well as data on chemicals of a known sensitization class (sensitizer, irritating non-sensitizer, and non-sensitizer) into ToxPi produced biological activity profiles which were grouped using unsupervised hierarchical clustering. Three of the case study test substances concluded to lack skin sensitization potential by traditional WOE produced biological activity profiles most consistent with non-sensi­tizing substances, whereas the prediction was less definitive for a substance considered positive by traditional WOE. Visualizing the data using bioactivity profiles can provide further support for WOE conclusions in certain circumstances but is unlikely to replace WOE as a stand-alone prediction due to limitations of the method including the impact of missing data points.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41240754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Beyond Animal Testing Index: Benchmarking tool for a world beyond animal testing.","authors":"Cyrille Krul, Annick De Moor, Koen Stegmeijer, Reinout Stoop, Judith Van Luijk, Jan-Bas Prins","doi":"10.14573/altex.2304161","DOIUrl":"10.14573/altex.2304161","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the original definition of replacement focuses on the replacement of the use of animals in science, a more contemporary definition focuses on accelerating the development and use of predictive and robust models, based on the latest science and technologies, to address scientific questions without the use of animals. The transition to animal free innovation is on the political agenda in and outside the European Union. The Beyond Animal Testing Index (BATI) is a benchmarking instrument designed to provide insight into the activities and contributions of research institutes to the transition to animal free innovation. The BATI allows participating organizations to learn from each other and stimulates continuous improvement. The BATI was modelled after the Access to Medicine Index, which benchmarks pharmaceutical companies on their efforts to make medicines widely available in developing countries. A prototype of the BATI was field-tested with three Dutch aca­demic medical centers and two universities in 2020-2021. The field test demonstrated the usability and effectiveness of the BATI as a benchmarking tool. Analyses were performed across five different domains. The participating institutes concluded that the BATI served as an internal as well as an external stimulus to share, learn, and improve institutional strategies towards the transition to animal free innovation. The BATI also identified gaps in the development and implementation of 3R technologies. Hence, the BATI might be a suitable instrument for monitoring the effectiveness of policies. BATI version 1.0 is ready to be used for benchmarking at a larger scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9964750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Developing prototypes of a modernized approach to assess crop protection chemical safety.","authors":"Richard A Currie, John Abbott, David A Dreier, Haitian Lu, Tharacad Ramanarayanan, Natalia Ryan, Odette A Watkins, Douglas C Wolf","doi":"10.14573/altex.2307181","DOIUrl":"10.14573/altex.2307181","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2019, the US EPA Administrator issued a directive directing the agency away from reliance on vertebrate tests by 2035, whilst maintaining high-quality human health and environmental risk assessments. There is no accepted approach to achieve this. The decade-long duration of the crop protection (CP) chemical R&D process therefore requires both the invention and application of a modernized approach to those CP chemical projects entering corporate research portfolios by the mid-2020s. We conducted problem formulation discussions with regulatory agency scientists which created the problem statement: “Develop, demonstrate, and implement a modern scientifically sound and robust strategy that applies appropriate and flexible exposure and effects characterization without chemical specific vertebrate tests to reliably address risk, uncertainties, and deficiencies in data and its interpretation with equivalent confidence as do the currently accepted test guidelines and meet the regulatory needs of the agencies”. The solution must provide the knowledge needed to confidently conclude human health and environmental protective risk assessments. Exploring this led to a conceptual model involving the creation and parallel submission of a new approach without reliance on chemical-specific vertebrate tests. Assessment in parallel to a traditional package will determine whether it supports some, or all, of the necessary risk management actions. Analysis of any deficiencies will provide valuable feedback to focus development of tools or approaches for subsequent iterations. When found to provide sufficient information, it will form the technical foun­dation of stakeholder engagement to explore acceptance of a new approach to CP chemical risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10148356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}