Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance最新文献_第7页

How to embed ethics into laboratory research. 如何将伦理融入实验室研究。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-17 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2165916

Paola Buedo, Idalina Odziemczyk, Jolanta Perek-Białas, Marcin Waligora

{"title":"How to embed ethics into laboratory research.","authors":"Paola Buedo, Idalina Odziemczyk, Jolanta Perek-Białas, Marcin Waligora","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2023.2165916","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08989621.2023.2165916","url":null,"abstract":"Health-related innovation in biotechnology requires anticipating potential bioethical implications. In this article, we present a strategy to embed ethics in a group of early-stage researchers performing research in gene therapy and regenerative medicine in the laboratory phase. We conducted a series of focus group meetings with early-stage researchers who work in biotechnology laboratories. The objective was to reflect on the bioethical challenges of their own work and to promote the integration of research ethics with laboratory practice. The activity was assessed with questionnaires completed by the researchers before and after the meetings, and the analyses of the focus groups' content. As a result of the focus group series, all participants changed their perspectives about ethical issues regarding their planned research, developed the ability to reflect and debate on research ethics and had increased awareness of ethical issues in their own research activities. Half of them made changes in their research work. The study provides a concrete strategy to embed ethics and to strengthen responsibility in laboratory research. It is a strategy that allows to perform ethics reflection \"on site\" and in \"real time\" and complements the classic strategy of ethics assessment of the research protocol before starting the research procedure.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10835673/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10730833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Can ChatGPT be trusted to provide reliable estimates? ChatGPT 提供的估价可靠吗？

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-21 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2179919

Panagiotis Tsigaris, Jaime A Teixeira da Silva

引用次数: 0

Challenges for enforcing editorial policies on AI-generated papers. 对人工智能生成的论文执行编辑政策所面临的挑战。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-25 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2184262

Guangwei Hu

引用次数: 0

In defense of the ICMJE authorship guideline, a rejoinder to Curzer. 为 ICMJE 作者资格准则辩护，反驳 Curzer。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-25 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2178907

Bor Luen Tang

{"title":"In defense of the ICMJE authorship guideline, a rejoinder to Curzer.","authors":"Bor Luen Tang","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2023.2178907","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08989621.2023.2178907","url":null,"abstract":"Curzer (Curzer 2021. Authorship and justice: Credit and responsibility, Accountability in Research 28:1-22) has constructed cogent and important arguments against the ICMJE authorship criteria from various philosophical perspectives. Here, we provide differing opinions to Curzer's points, primarily from the perspective of biomedical sciences (for which the ICMJE authorship criteria are originally meant for). We could neither identify nor concur with Curzer's opinion of a \"disconnect\" between writer and researcher in contemporary biomedical science publications, or see definitive value in the notion that intellectual and non-intellectual contributors should be equally credited. Furthermore, we note that consequentialist argument for utility, Rawlsian justice, as well as Kantian deontology are all not in disagreement with the ICMJE criteria. In brief, while we find Curzer's arguments to be participant or people-centric, these are not particularly in line with either the philosophy or the practice of science. We posit that the key concept underlying the ICMJE authorship criteria, in which authorship entails a coupling of intellectual credit to accountability, should remain a cornerstone in the practice of scientific research.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10773545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Is requiring Research Integrity Advisors a useful policy for improving research integrity? A census of advisors in Australia. 要求研究诚信顾问是提高研究诚信的有效政策吗？澳大利亚顾问普查。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-27 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2239532

Adrian G Barnett, David N Borg, Paul Glasziou, Emma Beckett

{"title":"Is requiring Research Integrity Advisors a useful policy for improving research integrity? A census of advisors in Australia.","authors":"Adrian G Barnett, David N Borg, Paul Glasziou, Emma Beckett","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2023.2239532","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08989621.2023.2239532","url":null,"abstract":"Research Integrity Advisors are used in Australia to provide impartial guidance to researchers who have questions about any aspect of responsible research practice. Every Australian institution conducting research must provide access to trained advisors. This national policy could be an important part of creating a safe environment for discussing research integrity issues and thus resolving issues. We conducted the first formal study of advisors, using a census of every Australian advisor to discover their workload and attitudes to their role. We estimated there are 739 advisors nationally. We received responses to our questions from 192. Most advisors had a very light workload, with an median of just 0.5 days per month. Thirteen percent of advisors had not received any training, and some advisors only discovered they were an advisor after our approach. Most advisors were positive about their ability to help colleagues deal with integrity issues. The main desired changes were for greater advertising of their role and a desire to promote good practice rather than just supporting potential issues. Advisors might be a useful policy for supporting research integrity, but some advisors need better institutional support in terms of training and raising awareness.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9877572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The issue with special issues. 特刊问题。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2404435

Alison Abritis, Adam Marcus, Ivan Oransky

引用次数: 0

ChatGPT isn't an author, but a contribution taxonomy is needed. ChatGPT 不是作者，但需要一个贡献分类法。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2405039

Y Suchikova, N Tsybuliak

{"title":"ChatGPT isn't an author, but a contribution taxonomy is needed.","authors":"Y Suchikova, N Tsybuliak","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2405039","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2405039","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The increasing use of AI tools, particularly large language models like ChatGPT, in academic research has raised significant questions about authorship and transparency. This commentary emphasizes the need for a standardized AI contributions taxonomy to clarify AI's role in producing and publishing research outputs, ensuring ethical standards and maintaining academic integrity.Approach: We propose adapting the NIST AI Use Taxonomy and incorporating categories that reflect AI's use in tasks such as hypothesis generation, data analysis, manuscript preparation, and ethical oversight. Findings: Establishing an AI contributions taxonomy for the production and publication of research output would address inconsistencies in AI disclosure, enhance transparency, and uphold accountability in research. It would help differentiate between AI-assisted and human-led tasks, providing more explicit attribution of contributions.Findings: Establishing an AI contributions taxonomy for the production and publication of research output would address inconsistencies in AI disclosure, enhance transparency, and uphold accountability in research. It would help differentiate between AI-assisted and human-led tasks, providing more explicit attribution of contributions.Practical implications: The proposed taxonomy would offer researchers and journals a standardized method for disclosing AI's role in academic work, promoting responsible and transparent reporting aligned with ethical guidelines from COPE and ICMJE.Value: A well-defined AI contributions taxonomy for the production and publication of research output would foster transparency and trust in using AI in research, ensuring that AI's role is appropriately acknowledged while preserving academic integrity.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Status of animal experimentation in nutrition and dietetic research: Policies of 100 leading journals and new approach methodologies. 营养与饮食研究中的动物实验现状：100 种主要期刊的政策和新方法。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2398104

Maximilian Andreas Storz, Elizabeth Dean

{"title":"Status of animal experimentation in nutrition and dietetic research: Policies of 100 leading journals and new approach methodologies.","authors":"Maximilian Andreas Storz, Elizabeth Dean","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2398104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2024.2398104","url":null,"abstract":"Given animal research is challenged with inadequacies, e.g., animal-to-human knowledge translation, ethical considerations, and cost:benefit, new approach methodologies (NAMs) have been proposed as a replacement. With reference to the field of nutrition and dietetics, our aim was to examine the policies of its leading journals regarding human-based vs. traditional animal-based research; and to explore emerging NAMs that provide alternatives to animal experimentation. We reviewed 100 leading journals from an established database (SCImago Journal Rankings) in the nutrition and dietetics category for the year 2022. Eighty-three journals met the inclusion criteria. NAMs were extracted from a range of established sources. 9.6% (n = 8) of journals state they do not publish animal-based studies; 4.8% (n = 4) consider animal studies with qualifications, whereas the remaining 85.5% (n = 71) publish animal studies without qualification. Across sources, NAMs commonalities were identified including in vitro, in chemico, and in silico methods; and individual and population-based studies. Of leading nutrition/dietetic journals, relatively few have shifted to strictly non-animal methods. Greater attention to the increasing range of NAMs may not only reduce the need for animal research in the field, but may provide superior human-relevant outcomes. Studies are needed to establish their potential superiority.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142300159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Web archives for data collection: An ethics case study. 用于数据收集的网络档案：伦理案例研究

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-09-08 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2396940

Deanna Zarrillo, Mat Kelly, Erjia Yan, Chaoqun Ni

{"title":"Web archives for data collection: An ethics case study.","authors":"Deanna Zarrillo, Mat Kelly, Erjia Yan, Chaoqun Ni","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2396940","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2024.2396940","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Web archives offer researchers a promising source for large-scale longitudinal data collection; however, their complex social and technical infrastructures create an array of ethical concerns. In addition, there is a notable lack of guidance available for researchers hoping to conduct0 ethical research using web archives.Methods: We present an ethical decision-making case study based on an ongoing research project using the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine to study faculty appointments and mobility at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs).Results: This paper contributes to information ethics discourse by expanding on the Association of Internet Researchers' recommendations for ethical decision-making, and mapping ethical considerations for each stage of the project within existing conceptual frameworks for research using web archives.Conclusions: By utilizing internet research guidance and web archive research frameworks in a case study approach, we hope to aid future researchers conducting internet research of a similar nature by serving as a useful reference.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Promoting research integrity in funding: Co-creating guidelines for research funding organizations. 促进科研诚信资助：共同制定研究资助组织准则。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2388232

Roshni Jegan, Krishma Labib, Kris Dierickx, Noémie Aubert Bonn, Joeri Tijdink, Ana Marušić, Daniel Pizzolato

{"title":"Promoting research integrity in funding: Co-creating guidelines for research funding organizations.","authors":"Roshni Jegan, Krishma Labib, Kris Dierickx, Noémie Aubert Bonn, Joeri Tijdink, Ana Marušić, Daniel Pizzolato","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2388232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2024.2388232","url":null,"abstract":"Research Funding Organizations (RFOs) play an important role in promoting research integrity (RI). Not only do they allocate resources to research institutions and researchers, but they also set and monitor research standards in their funded projects. In spite of their crucial role, there is a paucity of guidance on how RFOs can promote research integrity. As part of the EU-Funded SOPs4RI project, we aimed to address this gap by co-creating guidelines to help RFOs promote RI, engaging a diverse group of stakeholders. Based on a Delphi survey, reviews of evidence and stakeholder interviews, three guideline topics were identified: 1) the selection and evaluation of proposals; 2) monitoring of funded projects; and 3) prevention of unjustified interference. Four sets of co-creation workshops were conducted for each guideline topic, and the input revised and finalized. Understanding these debates could help RFOs from diverse cultural and organizational backgrounds who are developing their own RI guidelines. Therefore, in this paper, we summarize the key results and emphasize the final recommendations. Further, we provide the main points of discussion that occurred during the workshops and explain how they were addressed or resolved in the final guidelines and how they can help in future endeavors to improve funders' practices to foster RI.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142082492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0