Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance最新文献_第10页

Leadership, management, and team practices in research labs: Development and validation of two new measures. 研究实验室的领导、管理和团队实践：两种新测量方法的开发与验证。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2412772

Alison L Antes, Tammy English, Erin D Solomon, Matthew Wroblewski, Tristan McIntosh, Cheryl K Stenmark, James M DuBois

{"title":"Leadership, management, and team practices in research labs: Development and validation of two new measures.","authors":"Alison L Antes, Tammy English, Erin D Solomon, Matthew Wroblewski, Tristan McIntosh, Cheryl K Stenmark, James M DuBois","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2412772","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2412772","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Effective leadership and management practices contribute to responsible, high-quality research and the well-being of team members. We describe the development and initial validation of a measure assessing principal investigators' leadership and management practices and a measure of research team practices.Methods: Using a cross-sectional survey design, 570 postdoctoral researchers funded by the National Institutes of Health reported on the perceived behaviors of their principal investigator (PI) and the research team. The PI leadership and management items factored into two dimensions: fostering relationships and directing research.Results: Correlations of these new scales with existing, validated measures of ethical leadership and general leader behavior provided evidence of convergent validity. Providing evidence for criterion-related validity, scores on the new measures predicted lab climate for research ethics, self-reported productivity, and job satisfaction. Research team practices provided additional predictive value beyond leadership and management behaviors.Conclusions: This study provides construct validity evidence for the new Leadership and Management in Science (LAMPS) Measure and the Research Team Practices (RTP) Measure. Qualitative responses to an open-ended item reinforced the importance of relationships and directive supervision for a positive environment. These measures can be useful tools for future research or may be useful for PIs seeking feedback about their practices.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":" ","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142479997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Incorporating replication in higher education: Supervisors' perspectives and institutional pressures. 将复制纳入高等教育：导师的观点和机构的压力。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2412054

Fahimeh Marefat, Mohammad Hassanzadeh, Farzaneh Hamidi

{"title":"Incorporating replication in higher education: Supervisors' perspectives and institutional pressures.","authors":"Fahimeh Marefat, Mohammad Hassanzadeh, Farzaneh Hamidi","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2412054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2024.2412054","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Even though replication research has gained traction within academia over the recent years, it is not often well-received as a stand-alone thesis topic by supervisors and university administrators.Methods: In this qualitative investigation, we delve into the perspectives of academic supervisors on the feasibility of replication as a thesis topic within the field of applied linguistics (AL). Drawing on Institutional Theory, administrative pressures facing supervisors on what to be considered permissible for a thesis were also explored. By conducting semi-structured e-mail interviews with a global cohort of AL supervisors and a thematic analysis of their responses, a nuanced landscape was brought to light.Results: Supervisors outlined numerous benefits associated with replication including fostering academic advancement as well as providing opportunities for reevaluating prior research. Nonetheless, they also pointed to several obstacles along the way, such as concerns over originality, constraints on time and resources, and the necessity for mentorship. Moreover, supervisors emphasized their pivotal role as decision-makers in accepting or rejecting replication for a thesis project, while acknowledging the partial influence of institutional pressures.Conclusions: Lastly, some implications and recommendations on allocating more resources to replication research are provided.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142395006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Modernizing authorship criteria and transparency practices to facilitate open and equitable team science. 作者资格标准和透明度做法的现代化，促进团队科学的公开和公平。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-10-06 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2405041

Zhicheng Lin

{"title":"Modernizing authorship criteria and transparency practices to facilitate open and equitable team science.","authors":"Zhicheng Lin","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2405041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2024.2405041","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The rapid acceleration of authorship inflation-increasing numbers of authors per publication in collaborative research-has rendered the traditional \"substantial contributions\" criterion for authorship and the lack of transparency in author contributions increasingly problematic.Methods and results: To address these challenges, a revamped approach to authorship is proposed, replacing the rigid requirement of \"substantial contributions\" with a more flexible, project-specific criterion of \"sufficient contributions,\" as determined and justified by the authors for each project. This change more accurately reflects and accommodates the proliferation of scientific collaboration (\"team science\" or \"group science\"). It broadens the scope and granularity of roles deserving of authorship by integrating the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) and Method Reporting with Initials for Transparency (MeRIT) systems. It mandates in-text documentation of who did what (e.g., who collected what data) and moves beyond the typical binary (all-or-none) classification by assigning a gradated contribution level to each author for each role. Contributions can be denoted using an ordinal scale-either coarse (e.g., lead, equal, and supporting) or fine-grained (e.g., minimal, slight, moderate, substantial, extensive, and full). To support the implementation of the revamped approach, an authorship policy template is provided.Conclusions: Adopting proportional, role-specific credit allocation and explicit documentation of contributions fosters a more transparent, equitable, and trustworthy scientific environment.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142382294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Cultural distance, gender and praise in peer review. 同行评审中的文化距离、性别和赞美。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2409310

Guangyao Zhang, Lili Wang, Xianwen Wang

引用次数: 0

Not me-search, you-search: Ethical considerations for research involving marginalized outgroups. 不是我搜索，而是你搜索：涉及边缘化外群体研究的伦理考虑。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2408287

Hannah R Snidman, Katarina S Swaringen, Lindsay Rice

{"title":"Not me-search, you-search: Ethical considerations for research involving marginalized outgroups.","authors":"Hannah R Snidman, Katarina S Swaringen, Lindsay Rice","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2408287","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2024.2408287","url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study explored experiences of quantitative researchers who work with marginalized populations.Methods/materials: Participants were recruited from the Society for Personality and Social Psychology forum, and asked questions regarding their struggles and best practices while working with marginalized populations in which they are or are not a member.Results: Responses included concerns regarding bidirectional trust, community norms, perceived bias, diversity and participant recruitment and compensation. We explore the benefits of qualitative understandings of bias (i.e. positionality, reflexivity), salient concerns reported by quantitative researchers, and our recommendations for the ethical inclusion of these practices across quantitative work.Conclusions: This paper contributes to understanding of current struggles and best practices while conducting research among marginalized populations. Additionally, we encourage quantitative researchers to engage in reflexive research practices, particularly for the benefit of marginalized group research. We extend the insider-outsider researcher discussion to quantitative researchers.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142373507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Research funders play an important role in fostering research integrity and responsible internationalization in a multipolar world. 在多极世界中，研究资助者在促进研究诚信和负责任的国际化方面发挥着重要作用。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-14 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2165917

Tommy Shih

引用次数: 0

How to write a good embedded ethics letter. 如何写好嵌入式道德信。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-16 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2179920

Timothy Daly

引用次数: 0

How to combine rules and commitment in fostering research integrity? 如何将规则与承诺相结合，促进研究诚信？

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-20 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2191192

Krishma Labib, Joeri Tijdink, Klaas Sijtsma, Lex Bouter, Natalie Evans, Guy Widdershoven

{"title":"How to combine rules and commitment in fostering research integrity?","authors":"Krishma Labib, Joeri Tijdink, Klaas Sijtsma, Lex Bouter, Natalie Evans, Guy Widdershoven","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2023.2191192","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08989621.2023.2191192","url":null,"abstract":"Research integrity (RI) is crucial for trustworthy research. Rules are important in setting RI standards and improving research practice, but they can lead to increased bureaucracy; without commensurate commitment amongst researchers toward RI, they are unlikely to improve research practices. In this paper, we explore how to combine rules and commitment in fostering RI. Research institutions can govern RI using markets (using incentives), bureaucracies (using rules), and network processes (through commitment and agreements). Based on Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action, we argue that network processes, as part of the lifeworld, can legitimize systems - that is, market or bureaucratic governance modes. This can regulate and support RI practices in an efficient way. Systems can also become dominant and repress consensus processes. Fostering RI requires a balance between network, market and bureaucratic governance modes. We analyze the institutional response to a serious RI case to illustrate how network processes can be combined with bureaucratic rules. Specifically, we analyze how the Science Committee established at Tilburg University in 2012 has navigated different governance modes, resulting in a normatively grounded and efficient approach to fostering RI. Based on this case, we formulate recommendations to research institutions on how to combine rules and commitment.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":" ","pages":"917-943"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9132936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Perception of organizational climate by university staff and students in medicine and humanities: A qualitative study. 大学医学和人文科学专业师生对组织氛围的感知：定性研究。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-09 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2173586

Marin Viđak, Vicko Tomić, Ivan Buljan, Ružica Tokalić, Ana Marušić

{"title":"Perception of organizational climate by university staff and students in medicine and humanities: A qualitative study.","authors":"Marin Viđak, Vicko Tomić, Ivan Buljan, Ružica Tokalić, Ana Marušić","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2023.2173586","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08989621.2023.2173586","url":null,"abstract":"Organizational climate and culture are important for research organizations because they foster research integrity and responsible conduct of research, reduce questionable research practices, and improve job satisfaction. The aim of our study was to explore how employees and students perceive organizational climate and its consequences in the university setting. We conducted semi-structured interviews with senior students and employees (teaching and non-teaching staff) from two different university schools: School of Medicine and Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. Participants were asked questions regarding perceived climate, working environment, and the role of the institution. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis approach. Three themes were identified. The first theme addressed the difference in the perception and understanding of organizational climate. The second theme dealt with institutional issues emanating from organizational climate. The third theme described the behavior of stakeholders in the formation of organizational climate. Organizational climate is important concept in academic organizations as it influences both employees, particularly early career researchers, and students. Institutional leadership can strongly influence organizational climate, which can in turn affect job and job satisfaction. Due to the importance of personal morality on everyday decision-making, virtue-based research integrity training could be useful in improving academic institutions' organizational climate.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":" ","pages":"847-873"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10680300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Why and how to incorporate issues of race/ethnicity and gender in research integrity education. 为什么以及如何将种族/民族和性别问题纳入研究诚信教育。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-31 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2239145

Lisa M Rasmussen

引用次数: 0