Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance最新文献_第10页

How (not) to be held accountable in research: A reply to my critics. 如何(不)在研究中承担责任:对批评我的人的回复。

IF 3.4 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2193694

Hans Radder

引用次数: 0

How (not) to be held accountable in research: The case of the Dutch integrity code. 如何(不)在研究中被问责:荷兰诚信守则的案例。

IF 3.4 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2115888

Hans Radder

引用次数: 2

In Defense of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity: Response to Radder. 捍卫荷兰研究诚信行为准则:对Radder的回应。

IF 3.4 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2167599

Jeroen de Ridder, Lex Bouter, Tamarinde Haven, Rik Peels, Joeri Tijdink, Maurice P Zeegers

引用次数: 1

Authorship commerce: Bylines for sale. 作者商业:署名出售。

IF 3.4 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1982705

Francesco Chirico, Katrina Andrea Bramstedt

引用次数: 3

For the "good of the lab": Insights from three focus groups concerning the ethics of managing a laboratory or research group. 为了 "实验室的利益"：三个焦点小组对实验室或研究小组管理伦理的见解。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2023-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-30 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1983799

David B Resnik, Edith Lee, Bill Jirles, Elise Smith, Kathy Barker

{"title":"For the \"good of the lab\": Insights from three focus groups concerning the ethics of managing a laboratory or research group.","authors":"David B Resnik, Edith Lee, Bill Jirles, Elise Smith, Kathy Barker","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2021.1983799","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08989621.2021.1983799","url":null,"abstract":"To obtain some exploratory, qualitative data on ethical issues and values in managing a research laboratory, we conducted three focus groups with experienced investigators and laboratory managers. After validating the focus group transcripts for accuracy, two coders used deductive and inductive coding to develop themes from the text. Participants regarded ethics as important in managing a laboratory (or research group) for various reasons, ranging from conducting research with integrity to exhibiting leadership and promoting an ethical research climate. Participants identified many different types of ethical issues that arise in managing a research laboratory, including issues involving the management people, financial and material resources, projects, and data. An overarching ethical dilemma identified by participants was balancing the desire for productivity against apparently competing values, such as treating people fairly and promoting the wellbeing of individuals. Participants also indicated that graduate and post-graduate education and training did not prepare them to deal with the ethical, financial, interpersonal, and other issues related to managing a research laboratory, and that communication and leadership are crucial to managing a research laboratory ethically.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":"30 4","pages":"199-218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8964830/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9266373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The use of text-matching software's similarity scores. 使用文本匹配软件的相似度评分。

IF 3.4 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1986018

Stewart Manley

{"title":"The use of text-matching software's similarity scores.","authors":"Stewart Manley","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2021.1986018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1986018","url":null,"abstract":"Popular text-matching software generates a percentage of similarity - called a \"similarity score\" or \"Similarity Index\" - that quantifies the matching text between a particular manuscript and content in the software's archives, on the Internet and in electronic databases. Many evaluators rely on these simple figures as a proxy for plagiarism and thus avoid the burdensome task of inspecting the longer, detailed Similarity Reports. Yet similarity scores, though alluringly straightforward, are never enough to judge the presence (or absence) of plagiarism. Ideally, evaluators should always examine the Similarity Reports. Given the persistent use of simplistic similarity score thresholds at some academic journals and educational institutions, however, and the time that can be saved by relying on the scores, a method is arguably needed that encourages examining the Similarity Reports but still also allows evaluators to rely on the scores in some instances. This article proposes a four-band method to accomplish this. Used together, the bands oblige evaluators to acknowledge the risk of relying on the similarity scores yet still allow them to ultimately determine whether they wish to accept that risk. The bands - for most rigor, high rigor, moderate rigor and less rigor - should be tailored to an evaluator's particular needs.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":"30 4","pages":"219-245"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9319094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Institutional approaches to preventing questionable research practices. 防止有问题的研究实践的制度方法。

IF 3.4 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1986017

Jesse D Troy, Frank Rockhold, Gregory P Samsa

引用次数: 1

A dramatized method for teaching undergraduate students responsible research conduct. 大学生负责任科研行为的戏剧化教学方法。

IF 3.4 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1981871

Kuei-Chiu Chen, Laurel L Hester

{"title":"A dramatized method for teaching undergraduate students responsible research conduct.","authors":"Kuei-Chiu Chen, Laurel L Hester","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2021.1981871","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1981871","url":null,"abstract":"Worldwide, undergraduate science and pre-medical students are encouraged to participate in authentic active learning lab work and undergraduate research experiences. Unfortunately, these experiences rarely include training in science or research ethics. Although several governmental and scientific organizations have called for increased training in responsible research conduct, relatively few studies report on the effectiveness of different pedagogical approaches. Too often science ethics socialization and training is limited to conversations with individual mentors. This paper describes how viewing an interactive theatrical presentation of several research misconduct scenarios was associated with an increase in first-year students' self-assessed understanding of the topics addressed: proper treatment of data images, respect for animal protocols, authorship considerations, and plagiarism issues. There was no decrease in self-reported responsible conduct of research (RCR) knowledge for students surveyed 10 weeks, as compared to 2 weeks, after the science ethics presentations. RCR test question scores showed only a slight decrease in correct answers from 2 to 10 weeks. Theatrical presentation is an inexpensive yet engaging approach that provides students with a chance to actively consider the importance of RCR and the complexities of contexts surrounding ethics decisions before starting a research career.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":"30 3","pages":"176-198"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9319091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Research integrity guidelines and safeguards in Brazil. 巴西的研究诚信准则和保障措施。

IF 3.4 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1979969

Anna Catharina Vieira Armond, Péter Kakuk

{"title":"Research integrity guidelines and safeguards in Brazil.","authors":"Anna Catharina Vieira Armond, Péter Kakuk","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2021.1979969","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1979969","url":null,"abstract":"Brazilian research output has been growing annually, and so have its domestic and international research collaborations. Accordingly, it is essential to harmonize research integrity guidance and regulations to ensure research quality. Therefore, this study aims to collect and analyze guidance documents on research integrity from Brazilian research performing organizations (RPO). Research integrity guidance documents, regulations, and policies were retrieved from 60 randomly selected universities in Brazil. The search was conducted via the universities' websites and confirmed by e-mail. The documents were analyzed based on inductive content analysis. Relevant documents from 20 RPOs were identified. 28% of the included institutions have developed their own guidelines or adopted some guidance document on research integrity. Best practices, misconduct and misbehaviors, principles, and institutional policies regarding sanctions differ between universities. The RPOs where research integrity guidance documents could be identified are concentrated mainly in the southeastern and southern areas. The number and distribution heterogeneity highlights the need to increase awareness and create regulatory documents on research integrity in Brazilian universities. Further Research Performing and Funding Organizations' initiatives are needed to foster research integrity in Brazil and harmonize it with international standards.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":"30 3","pages":"133-149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9634353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Dissecting the tension of open science standards implementation in management and organization journals. 剖析开放科学标准在管理与组织期刊实施中的张力。

IF 3.4 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1981870

Przemysław G Hensel

引用次数: 4