作者学术影响力和手稿接受度：来自细胞出版社期刊同行评议的证据。

IF 4 1区哲学 Q1 MEDICAL ETHICS

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2025-06-23 DOI:10.1080/08989621.2025.2521083

Guangyao Zhang, Lili Wang, Yixian Yin, Xianwen Wang

{"title":"作者学术影响力和手稿接受度：来自细胞出版社期刊同行评议的证据。","authors":"Guangyao Zhang, Lili Wang, Yixian Yin, Xianwen Wang","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2025.2521083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Prior studies on peer review have largely focused on manuscript characteristics as the primary determinants of acceptance decisions. Although author academic influence is widely recognized in practice as a contributing factor, it has received limited attention in the academic literature, mainly due to data constraints.Methods: Using a unique dataset of manuscript submissions to Cell Press journals, we examine how author academic influence relates to peer review outcomes.Results: We find that author academic influence is positively associated with manuscript acceptance, with this effect particularly pronounced for junior researchers.Conclusions: Our analysis indicates that author academic influence functions as a signal of a manuscript's impact, thereby enhancing its likelihood of acceptance.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Author academic influence and manuscript acceptance: Evidence from peer review in cell press journals.\",\"authors\":\"Guangyao Zhang, Lili Wang, Yixian Yin, Xianwen Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08989621.2025.2521083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Prior studies on peer review have largely focused on manuscript characteristics as the primary determinants of acceptance decisions. Although author academic influence is widely recognized in practice as a contributing factor, it has received limited attention in the academic literature, mainly due to data constraints.Methods: Using a unique dataset of manuscript submissions to Cell Press journals, we examine how author academic influence relates to peer review outcomes.Results: We find that author academic influence is positively associated with manuscript acceptance, with this effect particularly pronounced for junior researchers.Conclusions: Our analysis indicates that author academic influence functions as a signal of a manuscript's impact, thereby enhancing its likelihood of acceptance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2521083\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2521083","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景：先前的同行评议研究主要集中在稿件特征作为接受决定的主要决定因素。虽然作者的学术影响力在实践中被广泛认为是一个促成因素，但在学术文献中受到的关注有限，主要是由于数据的限制。方法：使用提交给Cell Press期刊的稿件的独特数据集，我们研究了作者的学术影响力与同行评议结果的关系。结果：作者的学术影响力与论文接受度呈正相关，这种效应在初级研究人员中尤为明显。结论：我们的分析表明，作者的学术影响力是稿件影响力的一个信号，从而提高了稿件被接受的可能性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Author academic influence and manuscript acceptance: Evidence from peer review in cell press journals.

Background: Prior studies on peer review have largely focused on manuscript characteristics as the primary determinants of acceptance decisions. Although author academic influence is widely recognized in practice as a contributing factor, it has received limited attention in the academic literature, mainly due to data constraints.

Methods: Using a unique dataset of manuscript submissions to Cell Press journals, we examine how author academic influence relates to peer review outcomes.

Results: We find that author academic influence is positively associated with manuscript acceptance, with this effect particularly pronounced for junior researchers.

Conclusions: Our analysis indicates that author academic influence functions as a signal of a manuscript's impact, thereby enhancing its likelihood of acceptance.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance MEDICAL ETHICS-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

14.70%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance is devoted to the examination and critical analysis of systems for maximizing integrity in the conduct of research. It provides an interdisciplinary, international forum for the development of ethics, procedures, standards policies, and concepts to encourage the ethical conduct of research and to enhance the validity of research results. The journal welcomes views on advancing the integrity of research in the fields of general and multidisciplinary sciences, medicine, law, economics, statistics, management studies, public policy, politics, sociology, history, psychology, philosophy, ethics, and information science. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees.