Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance最新文献_第6页

The association of gender, experience, and academic rank in peer-reviewed manuscript evaluation. 同行评议稿件评价中性别、经验和学术等级的关系。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2440098

J A Garcia, J J Montero-Parodi, Rosa Rodriguez-Sanchez, J Fdez-Valdivia

{"title":"The association of gender, experience, and academic rank in peer-reviewed manuscript evaluation.","authors":"J A Garcia, J J Montero-Parodi, Rosa Rodriguez-Sanchez, J Fdez-Valdivia","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2440098","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2024.2440098","url":null,"abstract":"Background: We consider a research model for manuscript evaluation using a two-stage process. In the first stage, the current submission reminds reviewers of previous reviewing experiences, and then, reviewers aggregate these past review experiences into a kind of norm for assessing the scientific contribution and clarity of writing required for a manuscript. In the second stage, the reviewer's norms are imposed on the manuscript under review, and the reviewer's attention is drawn to discrepancies between the norm retrieved from previous similar peer review experiences and the reality for this submission.Methods: Five research hypotheses were integrated into this research model. In our study, we tested these five research hypotheses for statistical differences among reviewers by gender, experience, and academic rank using an online survey. There were 573 respondents.Results: We did not find significant differences among reviewers in their basic behavioral patterns. The only exception was that the low-rank reviewers agreed with the first hypothesis \"H1: Selective norm\" to a greater extent than the high-rank reviewers.Conclusions: The interaction between a reviewer's past review experiences and the actual scientific contribution and writing clarity of the manuscript under review can explain the lack of consistency among different reviews for the same manuscript.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142820105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Virtue ethics-based research integrity training intervention to change medical students' attitudes and perceptions of organizational ethical climate: A randomized controlled trial. 基于美德伦理的科研诚信培训干预，改变医学生对组织伦理氛围的态度和看法：随机对照试验。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2438102

Marin Viđak, Ružica Tokalić, Ivan Buljan, Ana Marušić

{"title":"Virtue ethics-based research integrity training intervention to change medical students' attitudes and perceptions of organizational ethical climate: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Marin Viđak, Ružica Tokalić, Ivan Buljan, Ana Marušić","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2438102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2024.2438102","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Universities are increasingly offering training in research integrity (RI) to enhance research quality and foster RI. Despite the importance of integrating scientific virtues into such training, there is a lack of assessment of virtue ethics-based RI training.Methods: This was a randomised controlled study assessing the impact of a virtue-based training for RI, performed at the University of Split School of Medicine in 2020-2021. We included first-year medical students who were randomly assigned to a control group, receiving a RI lecture, or the interventional group, receiving the same lecture plus a virtue-based training for RI. We measured changes in Ethical Climate Questionnaire (ECQ) scores as the primary outcome and the difference between perceived and desired ECQ scores as the secondary outcome.Results: Of 181 participants, 105 (55 control, 50 experimental) completed the study. The virtue-based training did not significantly change ethical climate perceptions between groups. Dominant climates were Company rules and procedures and Laws and professional codes. Overall, the preferred climates emphasized Team interest and Social responsibility.Conclusions: This study demonstrates the value of using ECQ to assess RI training and highlights the need for further research into the long-term effects of virtue-based training.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142820106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

On the (ab)use of special issues in scholarly journals. 论学术期刊中专刊的使用。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2439434

Salim Moussa

引用次数: 0

On the epistemological and methodological implications of AI co-authorship. 论人工智能合著的认识论和方法论含义。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2439443

Wei Zhu, Xuedong Tian

引用次数: 0

Retraction handling by potential predatory journals. 潜在掠夺性期刊的撤稿处理。

IF 2.8 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2434245

Shaoxiong Brian Xu, Tingyu Liu, Hassan Nejadghanbar, Guangwei Hu

{"title":"Retraction handling by potential predatory journals.","authors":"Shaoxiong Brian Xu, Tingyu Liu, Hassan Nejadghanbar, Guangwei Hu","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2434245","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2024.2434245","url":null,"abstract":"Retraction, as a post-publication quality control measure increasingly adopted by mainstream journals, has been observed in a few potential predatory journals (PPJs), but the extent and handling of retractions by PPJs in general remain unclear. This study investigated retraction practices among the 1,511 standalone PPJs on the updated Beall's List. Data from the Retraction Watch Database revealed that only 46 of the PPJs, including 18 indexed by the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection, had retracted a total of 645 publications as of 2022. The retraction handling performance of these PPJs was evaluated in terms of publicity of retraction policies, availability of retraction documents, visibility of retractions, and informativeness of retraction notices. Overall, the retracting PPJs performed poorly against these criteria and showed a trend of inadequate documentation of retraction policies and documents over time. A positive correlation was found between WoS inclusion and retraction handling performance of the PPJs except for the publicity of retraction policies. These findings suggest that retraction handling performance could serve as an additional important criterion of journal editorial practices and highlight the desirability of evaluating journal legitimacy in terms of post-publication quality control through retraction.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142774353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

New collaborative statement by bioethics journal editors on generative AI use. 《生物伦理学杂志》编辑关于生成人工智能使用的新合作声明。

IF 3.4 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-26 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2276169

Lisa M Rasmussen

引用次数: 0

Citation bias, diversity, and ethics. 引文偏见、多样性和道德规范。

IF 3.4 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-18 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2111257

Keisha S Ray, Perry Zurn, Jordan D Dworkin, Dani S Bassett, David B Resnik

{"title":"Citation bias, diversity, and ethics.","authors":"Keisha S Ray, Perry Zurn, Jordan D Dworkin, Dani S Bassett, David B Resnik","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2022.2111257","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08989621.2022.2111257","url":null,"abstract":"How often a researcher is cited usually plays a decisive role in that person's career advancement, because academic institutions often use citation metrics, either explicitly or implicitly, to estimate research impact and productivity. Research has shown, however, that citation patterns and practices are affected by various biases, including the prestige of the authors being cited and their gender, race, and nationality, whether self-attested or perceived. Some commentators have proposed that researchers can address biases related to social identity or position by including a Citation Diversity Statement in a manuscript submitted for publication. A Citation Diversity Statement is a paragraph placed before the reference section of a manuscript in which the authors address the diversity and equitability of their references in terms of gender, race, ethnicity, or other factors and affirm a commitment to promoting equity and diversity in sources and references. The present commentary considers arguments in favor of Citation Diversity Statements, and some practical and ethical issues that these statements raise.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":" ","pages":"158-172"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938084/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10799570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Industry effects on evidence: a case study of long-acting injectable antipsychotics. 工业对证据的影响:长效注射抗精神病药物的案例研究。

IF 3.4 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-07 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2082289

Lisa Cosgrove, Barbara Mintzes, Harold J Bursztajn, Gianna D'Ambrozio, Allen F Shaughnessy

引用次数: 0

A randomized trial alerting authors, with or without coauthors or editors, that research they cited in systematic reviews and guidelines has been retracted. 一项随机试验，提醒作者（无论有无共同作者或编辑）他们在系统综述和指南中引用的研究已被撤回。

IF 3.4 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-26 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2082290

Alison Avenell, Mark J Bolland, Greg D Gamble, Andrew Grey

{"title":"A randomized trial alerting authors, with or without coauthors or editors, that research they cited in systematic reviews and guidelines has been retracted.","authors":"Alison Avenell, Mark J Bolland, Greg D Gamble, Andrew Grey","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2022.2082290","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08989621.2022.2082290","url":null,"abstract":"Retracted clinical trials may be influential in citing systematic reviews and clinical guidelines. We assessed the influence of 27 retracted trials on systematic reviews and clinical guidelines (citing publications), then alerted authors to these retractions. Citing publications were randomized to up to three e-mails to contact author with/without up to two coauthors, with/without the editor. After one year we assessed corrective action. We included 88 citing publications; 51% (45/88) had findings likely to change if retracted trials were removed, 87% (39/45) likely substantially. 51% (44/86) of contacted citing publications replied. Including three authors rather than the contact author alone was more likely to elicit a reply (P = 0.03). Including the editor did not increase replies (P = 0.66). Whether findings were judged likely to change, and size of the likely change, had no effect on response rate or action taken. One year after e-mails were sent only nine publications had published notifications. E-Mail alerts to authors and editors are inadequate to correct the impact of retracted publications in citing systematic reviews and guidelines. Changes to bibliographic and referencing systems, and submission processes are needed. Citing publications with retracted citations should be marked until authors resolve concerns.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":" ","pages":"14-37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10796932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

A policy toolkit for authorship and dissemination policies may benefit NIH research consortia. 作者身份和传播政策工具包可能有利于美国国立卫生研究院的研究联合体。

IF 3.4 1区哲学

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2116318

Linda Brubaker, Jesse Nodora, Tamara Bavendam, John Connett, Amy M Claussen, Cora E Lewis, Kyle Rudser, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Jean F Wyman, Janis M Miller

{"title":"A policy toolkit for authorship and dissemination policies may benefit NIH research consortia.","authors":"Linda Brubaker, Jesse Nodora, Tamara Bavendam, John Connett, Amy M Claussen, Cora E Lewis, Kyle Rudser, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Jean F Wyman, Janis M Miller","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2022.2116318","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08989621.2022.2116318","url":null,"abstract":"Authorship and dissemination policies vary across NIH research consortia. We aimed to describe elements of real-life policies in use by eligible U01 clinical research consortia. Principal investigators of eligible, active U01 clinical research projects identified in the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools database shared relevant policies. The characteristics of key policy elements, determined a priori, were reviewed and quantified, when appropriate. Twenty one of 81 research projects met search criteria and provided policies. K elements (e.g., in quotations): \"manuscript proposals reviewed and approved by committee\" (90%); \"guidelines for acknowledgements\" (86%); \"writing team formation\" (71%); \"process for final manuscript review and approval\" (71%), \"responsibilities for lead author\" (67%), \"guidelines for other types of publications\" (67%); \"draft manuscript review and approval\" (62%); \"recommendation for number of members per consortium site\" (57%); and \"requirement to identify individual contributions in the manuscript\" (19%). Authorship/dissemination policies for large team science research projects are highly variable. Creation of an NIH policies repository and accompanying toolkit with model language and recommended key elements could improve comprehensiveness, ethical integrity, and efficiency in team science work while reducing burden and cost on newly funded consortia and directing time and resources to scientific endeavors.","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":" ","pages":"222-240"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9975116/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9502988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0