Developing World Bioethics最新文献

{"title":"Anti-abortion strategizing and the afterlife of the Geneva Consensus Declaration","authors":"Lynn Morgan","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12374","DOIUrl":"10.1111/dewb.12374","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Geneva Consensus Declaration, introduced by the Trump-Pence administration in 2020 and signed by thirty-two countries, claims that there is no international right to abortion. Although the Declaration was subsequently repudiated by the Biden administration, it did not die. This paper traces the afterlife of the Geneva Consensus Declaration as part of an ongoing antiabortion strategy to form a global coalition. Its supporters hope to mobilize signing nations to remove sexual and reproductive rights from the agendas of multilateral agencies including the United Nations and Organization of American States. The Geneva Consensus Declaration puts antiabortion politics above all other considerations, creating common cause among governments that oppose reproductive and sexual rights by undermining multilateral governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50590,"journal":{"name":"Developing World Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10051354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reasons for and insights about HPV vaccination refusal among ultra-Orthodox Jewish mothers","authors":"Rivka Zach,&nbsp;Miriam Ethel Bentwich","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12372","DOIUrl":"10.1111/dewb.12372","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) is a pivotal tool for preventing a significant cause of cervical cancer. One particular culturally recognized context associated with negative attitudes toward the HPV vaccine is the religiousness of parents. However, relatively speaking, there remains a scarcity of studies that have focused specifically on religious groups, especially non-Christian groups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To better understand the basis for members of an ultra-Orthodox Jewish community to object to the HPV vaccine and how such objections can and cannot be reduced, thereby improving cultural competence—namely, the cultural understanding and ethical addressing of HPV vaccination refusal.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This qualitative study conducted semi-structured interviews with ten Israeli ultra-Orthodox mothers who are opposed to administering the HPV vaccine to their daughters. The content analysis addressed these results and extracted the major issues arising from these particular interviews.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Four main novel insights were found pertaining to the negative stance toward HPV vaccination among mothers in an ultra-Orthodox Jewish community: (a) lack of knowledge about the HPV vaccine is not part of the reasoning against it; (b) rabbinical authority might have a lesser influence than expected for the moderation of HPV vaccine refusal; (c) complicated viewpoints regarding childhood vaccination may be the larger non-moderating context for HPV vaccination refusal; and (d) cultural competence is important for the ability to change the negative attitudes toward HPV vaccination.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The study may improve cultural competence regarding HPV vaccination and contribute to decreasing objections to the HPV vaccine in ultra-Orthodox communities.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50590,"journal":{"name":"Developing World Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dewb.12372","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33490256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ethical considerations in using a smartphone-based GPS app to understand linkages between mobility patterns and health outcomes: The example of HIV risk among mobile youth in rural South Africa","authors":"Thulile Mathenjwa,&nbsp;Busi Nkosi,&nbsp;Hae-Young Kim,&nbsp;Luchuo Engelbert Bain,&nbsp;Frank Tanser,&nbsp;Douglas Wassenaar","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12376","DOIUrl":"10.1111/dewb.12376","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Smartphones with Global Positioning System (GPS) apps offer simple and accurate tools to collect data on human mobility. However, their associated ethical challenges remain to be assessed. We used the Emanuel framework to assess the ethical concerns of using smartphone GPS to record mobility patterns of young adults in rural South Africa for a larger study on mobility and HIV risk (Sesikhona). We conducted four focus groups (FGDs) with individuals eligible for the Sesikhona study. FGD data were coded using the Emanuel framework. Participants perceived use of smartphone GPS to study human mobility and HIV risk as valuable. They raised concerns about invasion of privacy and confidentiality. Also mentioned were risk/benefit ratio, informed consent and ongoing respect. Concerns expressed provided a useful evidence-base for the development of a guide to inform future participants about ethical issues arising in the use of GPS technology to track mobility and health-related issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":50590,"journal":{"name":"Developing World Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dewb.12376","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33490804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The use and ethical assessment of medical photos taken by physicians","authors":"Seyhan Demir Karabulut","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12375","DOIUrl":"10.1111/dewb.12375","url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the increased use of technology, the use of medical photography has also increased, especially for secondary purposes. Secondary use only results in a benefit for clinicians and is considered a one-way process. This, in turn, raises several potential ethical issues, despite the numerous benefits of medical photography. The descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with 82 physicians who took medical photos, in Ankara, Turkey. The mean age of the participants was 44.7 years. Of the participants, 95.1% reported using their personal mobile phones for photographing and 84.1% reported taking medical photos for “use in clinical trainings (clinical seminars, student and patient trainings, etc.)”. Among physicians who took photos for research purposes, 29.3% reported obtaining only verbal consent. In addition, 53.7% of physicians reported storing medical photos on their personal computers. It seems that there is no consensus among physicians regarding taking, storing, and using medical photos, and these results cause ethical problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":50590,"journal":{"name":"Developing World Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33487840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Organ transplantation in Nepal: Ethical, legal, and practical issues","authors":"Alok Atreya,&nbsp;Manish Upreti,&nbsp;Ritesh George Menezes,&nbsp;Ambika Dawadi,&nbsp;Nuwadatta Subedi","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12371","DOIUrl":"10.1111/dewb.12371","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Nepal, live donor organ transplantation is only 14 years old with the first successful kidney transplant made in 2008 and a successful liver and bone marrow transplant made in 2016. However, transplantation of cadaveric cornea dates back to 1998. There are still no cases of animal-to-human organ transplantation in Nepal. There are stringent laws to regulate human body organ transplantation in Nepal which are amended from time to time. However, there is a racket of human traffickers who lure rural people from this low-income country into the illegal organ trade. Furthermore, there is a substantial lack of awareness of organ donation among the general public. This article focuses on the stipulations of ethical, legal, and practical issues of obtaining organs procured from living and brain-dead donors that support the process of transplantation in Nepal. In addition, the article also explores the legal and practical issues of organ trafficking and organ donation awareness in Nepal on the basis of factual data and findings from other studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50590,"journal":{"name":"Developing World Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10174541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The paucity of clinical ethics committees in Peru","authors":"Carlos Shiraishi-Zapata","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12373","DOIUrl":"10.1111/dewb.12373","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50590,"journal":{"name":"Developing World Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9199153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Bottom-up advocacy strategies to abortion access during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned towards reproductive justice in Brazil","authors":"Helena Borges Martins da Silva Paro,&nbsp;Renata Rodrigues Catani,&nbsp;Rafaela Cordeiro Freire,&nbsp;Gabriela Rondon","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12368","DOIUrl":"10.1111/dewb.12368","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Brazil, abortion is only allowed in cases of rape, serious risk to a woman's life or fetal anecephaly. Legal abortion services cover less than 4% of the Brazilian territory and only 1,800 procedures are performed, in average, per year. During the COVID-19 pandemic, almost half of the already few Brazilian abortion clinics shut down and women had to travel even longer distances, reaching abortion services at later gestational ages. In this paper, we describe three bottom-up advocacy strategies that emerged from difficulties deepened during the COVID-19 pandemic at a single abortion service in Brazil, amidst anti-gender policies from the federal government. Telemedicine abortion, outpatient surgical abortion and the provision of abortion after 20 weeks' gestation are important strategies that may reduce inequalities that impact the most vulnerable populations, such as black and indigenous women, children, adolescents and women experiencing domestic violence.</p>","PeriodicalId":50590,"journal":{"name":"Developing World Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9677834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Un ensayo clínico no ético y la politización de la pandemia de COVID-19 en Brasil: El caso de Prevent Senior","authors":"Fernando Hellmann,&nbsp;Núria Homedes","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12370","DOIUrl":"10.1111/dewb.12370","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>El Senado Federal de Brasil creó una Comisión Parlamentaria de Investigación (CPI) para investigar las irregularidades del gobierno de Bolsonaro en la gestión de la pandemia de COVID-19. Uno de los casos que llamó la atención fue la investigación llevada a cabo por Prevent Senior, una empresa privada de seguros de salud, sobre el tratamiento temprano de COVID-19. Este artículo analiza la validez científica de la investigación y los problemas éticos relacionados con su implementación. Se basa en un análisis del informe del estudio clínico de Prevent Senior, de los registros de ensayos clínicos de Brasil y Estados Unidos, del informe de la CPI del Senado y de información difundida por los medios de comunicación. Este caso de fraude científico y sesgo político-ideológico ejemplifica cómo Prevent Senior, utilizando un protocolo cuestionable para mejorar su reputación y obtener el apoyo del gobierno, contribuyó a la construcción de la narrativa de “tratamiento temprano” para COVID-19, y muestra cómo sirvió de base para una política pública del gobierno que promovió el uso de medicamentos ineficaces.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50590,"journal":{"name":"Developing World Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33454617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Uma pesquisa clínica não ética e a politização da pandemia da COVID-19 no Brasil: o caso da Prevent Senior","authors":"Fernando Hellmann,&nbsp;Núria Homedes","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12369","DOIUrl":"10.1111/dewb.12369","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>O Senado Federal brasileiro criou uma Comissão Parlamentar de Inquérito (CPI) para investigar as irregularidades do governo Bolsonaro na gestão da pandemia da COVID-19. Um dos casos que chamou a atenção foi a pesquisa realizada pela Prevent Senior, uma seguradora privada de saúde, sobre o tratamento precoce da COVID-19. O artigo analisa a validade científica da pesquisa e os problemas éticos relacionados à sua implementação. Baseia-se na análise do relatório do ensaio clínico da Prevent Senior, dos registros do ensaio clínico em plataformas do Brasil e dos EUA, do relatório da CPI do Senado e nas informações divulgadas pela mídia. Esse caso de fraude científica e viés político-ideológico exemplifica como a Prevent Senior, usando um protocolo questionável para melhorar sua reputação e ganhar o apoio do governo, foi fundamental na construção da narrativa do “tratamento precoce” para a COVID-19, e mostra como serviu de base para uma política pública governamental que promoveu o uso de drogas ineficazes.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50590,"journal":{"name":"Developing World Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40352933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ethical Progress on the Abortion Care Frontiers on the African Continent","authors":"Udo Schuklenk","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12364","DOIUrl":"10.1111/dewb.12364","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Supreme Court of the United States of America has overridden 50 years of legal precedent and reversed constitutional protections1 for abortion in the country that were the result of the 1973 landmark Roe v Wade ruling. Pregnant women in the country do not enjoy a constitutional right to abortion any longer. Broadly speaking the result of this ruling results in a split of the country in terms of access to abortion care based on whether a woman lives in a Republican party controlled state or a Democratic party controlled state. The verdict has been widely condemned by associations of health care professionals, medical journals and the like, as much as it was celebrated by religious leaders like the Pope.2,3 None of that is terribly surprising.</p><p>Among secular bioethicists support for liberal access to abortion care has always been strong. The main ethical reasons for this have to do with respecting women's rights to control over their own bodies,4 as well as consequentialist ethical reasons that take cognizance of worse health care outcomes for the most vulnerable women in societies where restrictive access to abortion care regimes are in place.5 The liberalization of laws on abortion, on the other hand, has demonstrably led to improved health outcomes for these women.6 The ethical arguments on abortion have been debated endlessly by bioethicists, and there is little point in rehashing them here in any great detail.7</p><p>What is perhaps worth noting is that – unlike in the United States – access to abortion care has become in recent years easier in a number of countries on the African continent, including some of its very poorest. Much of this is the result of the so-called Maputo Protocol, or, more formally, the African Union's Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa.8 Since the Maputo Protocol came into effect in 2005, seven sub Saharan countries have taken steps to liberalise their abortion related legislation in order to bring their laws in line with the Protocol. To give just a few examples, since 2012 Benin is permitting abortion care even for economic and social reasons up to the 12^th week after conception. Cape Verde permits abortion on demand up to the 12^th week after conception, too. The Democratic Republic of Congo has taken to publishing the full text of the Protocol in the government gazette, thereby making it law.9 The result of this has been truly sweeping changes liberalizing the country's abortion regime. Sierra Leone's government introduced a bill in the country's parliament that would, if passed, decriminalize abortion, and expand access to contraceptives as well as other reproductive health services. While this won't change the country's staggeringly high maternal deaths’ rate of around 10% over night, that is a result of unsafe abortion practices, it is an important start to bring about much needed change.10</p><p>Much more needs to be done","PeriodicalId":50590,"journal":{"name":"Developing World Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2022-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dewb.12364","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40346061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}