Journal of Endovascular Therapy最新文献

{"title":"Deep Learning Prediction for Distal Aortic Remodeling After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection.","authors":"Min Zhou, Xiaoyuan Luo, Xia Wang, Tianchen Xie, Yonggang Wang, Zhenyu Shi, Manning Wang, Weiguo Fu","doi":"10.1177/15266028231160101","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028231160101","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to develop a deep learning model for predicting distal aortic remodeling after proximal thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) using computed tomography angiography (CTA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 147 patients with acute or subacute TBAD who underwent proximal TEVAR at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. The boundary of aorta was manually segmented, and the point clouds of each aorta were obtained. Prediction of negative aortic remodeling or reintervention was accomplished by a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a point cloud neural network (PC-NN), respectively. The discriminatory value of the established models was mainly evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the test set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up time was 34.0 months (range: 12-108 months). During follow-up, a total of 25 (17.0%) patients were identified as having negative aortic remodeling, and 16 (10.9%) patients received reintervention. The AUC (0.876) by PC-NN for predicting negative aortic remodeling was superior to that obtained by CNN (0.612, p=0.034) and similar to the AUC by PC-NN combined with clinical features (0.884, p=0.92). As to reintervention, the AUC by PC-NN was significantly higher than that by CNN (0.805 vs 0.579; p=0.042), and AUCs by PC-NN combined with clinical features and PC-NN alone were comparable (0.836 vs 0.805; p=0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CTA-based deep learning algorithms may assist clinicians in automated prediction of distal aortic remodeling after TEVAR for acute or subacute TBAD.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>Negative aortic remodeling is the leading cause of late reintervention after proximal thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD), and possesses great challenge to endovascular repair. Early recognizing high-risk patients is of supreme importance for optimizing the follow-up interval and therapy strategy. Currently, clinicians predict the prognosis of these patients based on several imaging signs, which is subjective. The computed tomography angiography-based deep learning algorithms may incorporate abundant morphological information of aorta, provide with a definite and objective output value, and finally assist clinicians in automated prediction of distal aortic remodeling after TEVAR for acute or subacute TBAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9120854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Early Results of the Newly-Designed Flowdynamics Dense Mesh Stent for Residual Dissection After Proximal Repair of Stanford Type A or Type B Aortic Dissection: A Preliminary Single-Center Report From a Multicenter, Prospective, and Randomized Study.","authors":"Chen Lu, Haiyue Wang, Peng Yang, Yu Liu, Yu Zhang, Zhenyuan Xu, Yi Xie, Jia Hu","doi":"10.1177/15266028231163057","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028231163057","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Negative remodeling of the distal aorta due to residual dissection significantly impacts the long-term outcomes of dissection patients after proximal repair of acute aortic dissection. Branched/fenestrated aortic stents are technically demanding, and studies of the first generation of multilayer flow modulators for tackling this clinical scenario are few and limited. The single-center results from a multicenter, prospective, and randomized controlled study aimed to verify the safety and effectiveness of a newly-designed flowdynamics dense mesh stent for treating residual dissection after proximal repair.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Patients with nonchronic residual dissection involving visceral branches were prospectively enrolled in 3 centers (ChiCTR1900023638). Eligible patients were randomly assigned to the flowdynamics dense mesh stent (FDMS) group and control group. Follow-up visits were arranged at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after recruitment. The primary endpoints were all-cause and aortic-related mortality. The secondary endpoints included visceral branch occlusion, reintervention, and severe adverse events. Morphological changes were analyzed to exhibit the therapeutic effect. Our center participated in the multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial, and the preliminary single-center experience was reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Thirty-six patients were enrolled in our center, and the baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable. Thirty-four patients completed the 12 month follow-up. Freedom from all-cause and aortic-related death were 94.4% and 100%. All visceral branches remained patent in the FDMS group. Increased area of the true lumen (1.03±0.38 vs 0.48±0.63 cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; at the plane below renal arteries, p=0.006; 1.27±0.80 vs 0.32±0.50 cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; at the plane 5 cm below renal arteries, p&lt;0.001) and decreased area of the false lumen at the plane below renal arteries (-1.03±0.84 vs -0.15±1.21 cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, p=0.023) were observed in the FDMS group compared with those parameters in the control group. The FDMS group showed a significant increase in true lumen volume (p&lt;0.001) and a significant decrease in false lumen volume (p=0.018).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;This newly-designed FDMS for endovascular repair of residual dissection after the proximal repair is safe and effective at 12 months.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Clinical impact: &lt;/strong&gt;One-year results of the randomized controlled clinical trial indicated the short-term safety and promising effect of FDMS on treating non-chronic residual dissection after proximal repair. At the 12th-month follow-up, the true lumen expanded, the false lumen shrunk and all visceral arteries kept patent. As far as I'm concerned, this is the first randomized controlled study concerning utilizing multilayer flow mesh stent treating aortic dissection. Despite a preliminary single-center report, our results are supposed to provide hig","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9192572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Iliac Branch Devices in the Repair of Ruptured Aorto-iliac Aneurysms: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Angelos Karelis, Björn Sonesson, Enrico Gallitto, Nikolaos Tsilimparis, Claes Forsell, Nicola Leone, Roberto Silingardi, Thomas Mesnard, Jonathan Sobocinski, Giacomo Isernia, Timothy Resch, Mauro Gargiulo, Nuno V Dias","doi":"10.1177/15266028221149922","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028221149922","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the outcomes of preserving the internal iliac artery (IIA) with iliac branched devices (IBDs) during acute endovascular repair of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This is a multicenter retrospective review of all consecutive patients undergoing acute endovascular repair of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysm with an IBD at 8 aortic centers between December 2012 and June 2020. A control group was used where the IIA was intentionally occluded from the same study period. The main outcome measures were 30-day mortality, major adverse events, technical success, and clinical success. Secondary outcomes were buttock claudication, primary patency, primary-assisted and secondary patency of the IBD, occurrence of endoleak types I/III, and reintervention. Values are presented as numbers and percentages or interquartile range in parenthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight patients were included in the study: 24 with IBD and 24 with IIA occlusion. There was no difference in demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and aneurysm extent. Twenty (83%) of them were hemodynamically stable during the procedure as opposed to 14 (58%, p=.23) with the IIA occlusion. Technical success was achieved in all cases with a procedure time of 180 (133-254) minutes, 45 (23-65) of which were from IBD. There were 2 (8%) deaths during the first 30 days and 2 (8%) major complications unrelated to the IBD, whereas in the IIA occlusion, the figures were 10 (42%) and 7 (29%), respectively. No patient in the IBD group developed buttock claudication compared to 8 (57%, p<.0001) in the IIA occlusion group; 1 (4%) patient developed bowel ischemia on both groups, with 1 in the IIA occlusion group needing resection. The median follow-up duration was 17 months (interquartile range 2-39) for the IBD group, with a primary patency of 60±14% at 3 years that went up to 92±8% with reinterventions (8 reinterventions in 6 patients). When the first 90 days were disregarded, there were no differences in survival between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IBD is a valid alternative for maintaining the pelvic circulation for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms. The technical success and midterm outcomes are very satisfactory but require patient selection particularly regarding hemodynamic stability. The reintervention rate is considerable, mandating continuous follow-up.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>This multicenter study demonstrates that ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms do not necessarily require mandatory occlusion of hypogastric arteries. Iliac branch devices are shown to be a valid alternative in highly selected cases, with good midterm results, even if reinterventions are required in a significant proportion of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9126743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Endovascular Repair of Single-Branched Stent-Graft and Hybrid Procedure for Patients With Type B Acute Aortic Dissection Involving the Left Subclavian Artery.","authors":"Zhang Cheng, Yongmin Liu, Xiaohai Ma","doi":"10.1177/15266028221149920","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028221149920","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization has been used in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD), with inadequate proximal landing zone (PLZ). The outcomes of comparisons between TEVAR and hybrid procedure on patients with TBAD, with inadequate PLZ, are rarely reported. This study sought to compare and clarify the early and midterm outcomes between TEVAR and hybrid procedure in patients with TBAD, with inadequate PLZ.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between January 2019 and December 2021, 93 patients with TBAD, with inadequate PLZ, who underwent TEVAR or hybrid procedure, were retrospectively evaluated in Beijing Anzhen hospital. Demographics, comorbidities, preoperative imaging features, periprocedural details, and follow-up outcomes were analyzed. Survival was analyzed according to Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TEVAR procedures were performed on 41 patients (TEVAR group) and hybrid procedures on 52 patients (hybrid group). Early events, 30 day mortality, and all-cause mortality, were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, patients receiving TEVAR had significantly shorter procedure time (p<0.001), hospital stay (p<0.001), and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (p=0.001) compared with those in the hybrid group. Patients receiving TEVAR had significantly lower midterm events (p=0.014) and re-intervention (p=0.015) compared with those in the hybrid group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study indicated that TEVAR with LSA revascularization for TBAD with inadequate PLZ is associated with a trend toward lower rates of midterm events, while the early and midterm mortalities were comparable with those in hybrid procedure.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>This study is novel as it compared the outcomes between thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and hybrid procedure in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD), with inadequate proximal landing zone, which has been rarely reported previously. We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because it is clinically relevant as it demonstrated that TEVAR with left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization for TBAD with inadequate proximal landing zone is associated with a trend toward lower rates of mid-term events, while the early and mid-term mortalities were comparable with those in the hybrid procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9154380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Enlarging Paravisceral Aortic Aneurysm Treated With In Situ Laser Fenestration of Physician-Modified Stent Graft for Preservation of Accessory Renal Arteries.","authors":"Adam Brown, Mathew Wooster","doi":"10.1177/15266028221147452","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028221147452","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In situ laser fenestration (LISF) was performed as a bailout procedure to ensure renal perfusion during complex aortic aneurysm repair.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 69 year-old male patient with previous repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm who presented with increasing lower back pain and an enlarging, 6-cm, perivisceral aortic aneurysm that required urgent repair. Given potential complications and risks of redo open repair, we performed endovascular repair via deployment of a 5-vessel fenestrated physician modified stent graft (PMEG) with stent placement to the celiac, superior mesenteric, right renal, and 2 of the larger 3 left renal arteries. The renal artery planned for sacrifice was found intraoperatively to be perfusing a large portion of the kidney. Subsequently, LISF was used to cannulate and salvage perfusion to the third renal artery. Completion aortogram demonstrated patency of all renal visceral vessels with no vessel leak. Follow-up CT angiogram 1 year later demonstrated aortic graft with all visceral stents patent, no endoleak, and a reduction in residual aneurysm sac.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even with careful planning and design of a physician modified stent graft, in situ laser fenestration provides an option to successfully create additional stents intraoperatively in order to preserve perfusion to critical visceral organs.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>In situ laser fenestration will provide surgeons with a valuable intra-operative method to create additional stents when organ perfusion would otherwise be lost. As more surgeons develop this technical ability and more long-term outcomes are studied, this method has the possibility to not only be used for urgent and emergent cases but may one day be an acceptable variation to standard practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10485016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Outcomes and Patency of Endovascular Infrapopliteal Reinterventions in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.","authors":"Simone F Kleiss, Patricia A H van Mierlo-van den Broek, Cornelis G Vos, Bram Fioole, Gijs C Bloemsma, Debbie A B de Vries-Werson, Reinoud P H Bokkers, Jean-Paul P M de Vries","doi":"10.1177/15266028221147457","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028221147457","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Purpose: &lt;/strong&gt;Endovascular revascularization is the preferred treatment to improve perfusion of the lower extremity in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Patients with CLTI often present with stenotic-occlusive lesions involving the infrapopliteal arteries. Although the frequency of treating infrapopliteal lesions is increasing, the reintervention rates remain high. This study aimed to determine the outcomes and patency of infrapopliteal endovascular reinterventions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This retrospective, multicenter cohort study of 3 Dutch hospitals included patients who underwent an endovascular infrapopliteal reintervention in 2015 up to 2021 after a primary infrapopliteal intervention for CLTI. The outcome measures after the reintervention procedures included technical success rate, the mortality rate and complication rate (any deviation from the normal postinterventional course) at 30 days, overall survival, amputation-free survival (AFS), freedom from major amputation, major adverse limb event (MALE), and recurrent reinterventions (a reintervention following the infrapopliteal reintervention). Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine risk factors for AFS and freedom from major amputation or recurrent reintervention.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Eighty-one patients with CLTI were included. A total of 87 limbs underwent an infrapopliteal reintervention in which 122 lesions were treated. Technical success was achieved in 99 lesions (81%). The 30-day mortality rate was 1%, and the complication rate was 13%. Overall survival and AFS at 1 year were 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55%-79%) and 54% (95% CI, 37%-67%), respectively, and those at 2.5 years were 45% (95% CI, 33%-56%) and 21% (95% CI, 11%-33%), respectively. Freedom from major amputation, MALE, and recurrent reinterventions at 1 year and 2.5 years were 59% (95% CI, 46%-70%) and 41% (95% CI, 25%-56%); 54% (95% CI, 41%-65%) and 36% (95% CI, 21%-51%); and 68% (95% CI, 55%-78%) and 51% (95% CI, 33%-66%), respectively. A Global Limb Anatomic Staging System score of III showed an increased hazard ratio of 2.559 (95% CI, 1.078-6.072; p=0.033) for freedom of major amputation or recurrent reintervention.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;The results of this study indicate that endovascular infrapopliteal reinterventions can be performed with acceptable 30-day mortality and complication rates. However, outcomes and patency were moderate to poor, with low AFS, high rates of major amputations, and recurrent reinterventions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Clinical impact: &lt;/strong&gt;This multicenter retrospective study evaluating outcome and patency of endovascular infrapopliteal reinterventions for CLTI, shows that endovascular infrapopliteal reinterventions can be performed with acceptable 30-day mortality and complication rates. However, the short- and mid-term outcomes of the infrapopliteal reinterventions were moderate to poor, with low rates o","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11401340/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10492155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Entry Site Is Associated With Aortic Enlargement After Pre-emptive Endovascular Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection.","authors":"Tomoki Cho, Keiji Uchida, Shota Yasuda, Ryo Izubuchi, Shotaro Kaneko, Atsushi Matsumoto, Makoto Ikematsu, Sho Kakuta","doi":"10.1177/15266028231161224","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028231161224","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to examine the mid-term results corresponding to the entry site in patients who underwent pre-emptive thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 27 patients who underwent pre-emptive TEVAR for uncomplicated TBAD between September 2014 and December 2019. We divided the patients into 2 groups depending on the proximal landing zone (zone 2 group, zone ≥3 group) and retrospectively analyzed the risk of all-cause and aorta-related mortality, aortic events (rupture, open conversion, and secondary intervention), and aortic enlargement (≥5 mm).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the patients was 53 (47-65) years. The median duration from the onset of uncomplicated TBAD to TEVAR was 43 (30-99) days, and the median follow-up duration was 48 (36-57) months. The maximum preoperative diameter of the dissected aorta was 40 mm in the zone 2 group and 35 mm in the zone ≥3 group (p=0.134). There was no case of hospital death or spinal cord ischemia; however, there was 1 (3.7%) case of perioperative stroke in the zone 2 group. Multivariate analysis of the risk factors for aortic enlargement following pre-emptive TEVAR for uncomplicated TBAD revealed that only zone 2 landing was an independent risk factor. The estimated Kaplan-Meier curve showed a higher rate of aortic enlargement in the zone 2 group at 4 years after pre-emptive TEVAR (46.4% vs 0%, log-rank test; p=0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study on TBAD, we found that zone 2 landing was associated with aortic enlargement after pre-emptive TEVAR. In cases where the distance from the left subclavian artery to a major entry point was short, there were more cases of aortic dilatation.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>The effectiveness of entry closure for type B aortic dissection was demonstrated in the INSTEAD XL trial. The cause of aortic enlargement after pre-emptive endovascular treatment for type B aortic dissection remains controversial. In the present study, zone 2 landing was a risk factor for aortic enlargement after pre-emptive thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) for uncomplicated type B dissection. Patients with zone 2 landing should be closely followed up after pre-emptive TEVAR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9122565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Clinical Impact of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in the Management of Thoracic Aortic Diseases.","authors":"Fernando Molano, Carlos Eduardo Rey Chaves, Danny Conde, Felipe Girón, Ricardo E Núñez-Rocha, Daniela Ayala, Juliana González, Felipe Cortés, Diana Cortés, Ernesto Fajardo, Vladimir Barón","doi":"10.1177/15266028221148381","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028221148381","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been described to be superior to an open surgical approach, and previous studies have found superiority in TEVAR by reducing overall morbidity and mortality rates. This study aimed to describe the outcomes of TEVAR for patients with thoracic aortic disease at a high complexity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Descriptive study, developed by a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. Patients aged above 18 years who underwent TEVAR between 2012 and 2022 were included. Patient demographics, perioperative data, surgical outcomes, morbidity, and mortality were described. Statistical and multivariate analyses were made. Statistical significance was reached when p values were <0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 66 patients were included. Male patients were 60.61% and the mean age was 69.24 years. Associated aortic diseases were aneurysms (68.18%), ulcer-related (4.55%), intramural-related hematoma (7.58%), trauma-related pathology (1.52%), and aortic dissection (30.30%). The mean hospital stay was 18.10 days, and intensive care unit was required for 98.48%. At 30 days, the mortality rate was 10.61% and the reintervention rate was 21.21%. Increased intraoperative blood loss (p=0.001) and male sex (p=0.04) showed statistical relationship with mortality. Underweight patients have 6.7 and 11.4 times more risk of complications and endoleak compared with higher body mass index values (p=0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.82-7.21) and (p=0.02, 95% CI=1.31-12.57), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair seems to be a feasible option for patients with thoracic aortic pathologies, with adequate rates of mortality and morbidity. Underweight patients seem to have an increased risk of overall morbidity and increased risk for endoleak. Further prospective studies are needed to prove our results.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>Obesity and BMI are widely studied in the surgical literature. According to our study, there is a paradox regarding the outcomes of patients treated with TEVAR in terms of postoperative complications and mortality related to the body mass index. And shouldn't be considered as a high-risk feature in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality in this procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11408976/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10485017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Statistical Shape Model of Infrarenal Aortic Necks in Patients With and Without Late Type Ia Endoleak After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.","authors":"Willemina A van Veldhuizen, Richte C L Schuurmann, Roy Zuidema, Anna C M Geraedts, Frank F A IJpma, Rogier H J Kropman, George A Antoniou, Marc R H M van Sambeek, Ron Balm, Jelmer M Wolterink, Jean-Paul P M de Vries","doi":"10.1177/15266028221149913","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028221149913","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hostile aortic neck characteristics, including short length, severe suprarenal and infrarenal angulation, conicity, and large diameter, have been associated with increased risk for type Ia endoleak (T1aEL) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). This study investigates the mid-term discriminative ability of a statistical shape model (SSM) of the infrarenal aortic neck morphology compared with or in combination with conventional measurements in patients who developed T1aEL post-EVAR.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The dataset composed of EVAR patients who developed a T1aEL during follow-up and a control group without T1aEL. Principal component (PC) analysis was performed using a parametrization to create an SSM. Three logistic regression models were created. To discriminate between patients with and without T1aEL, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 126 patients (84% male) were included. Median follow-up time in T1aEl group and control group was 52 (31, 78.5) and 51 (40, 62.5) months, respectively. Median follow-up time was not statistically different between the groups (p=0.72). A statistically significant difference between the median PC scores of the T1aEL and control groups was found for the first, eighth, and ninth PC. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values for the SSM-based versus the conventional measurements-based logistic regression models were 79%, 70%, and 0.82 versus 74%, 73%, and 0.85, respectively. The model of the SSM and conventional measurements combined resulted in sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 81%, 81%, and 0.92.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An SSM of the infrarenal aortic neck determines its 3-dimensional geometry. The SSM is a potential valuable tool for risk stratification and T1aEL prediction in EVAR. The SSM complements the conventional measurements of the individual preoperative infrarenal aortic neck geometry by increasing the predictive value for late type Ia endoleak after standard EVAR.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>A statistical shape model (SSM) determines the 3-dimensional geometry of the infrarenal aortic neck. The SSM complements the conventional measurements of the individual pre-operative infrarenal aortic neck geometry by increasing the predictive value for late type Ia endoleaks post-EVAR. The SSM is a potential valuable tool for risk stratification and late T1aEL prediction in EVAR and it is a first step toward implementation of a treatment planning support tool in daily clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11402265/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9086075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Contrast Medium in Infra-Inguinal Endovascular Interventions for Patients With Chronic Threatening Lower Limb Ischemia and Renal Impairment: A Multicentric Trial.","authors":"Mohamed Ali, Mohamed Noureldin, Omar El Kashef, Hossam Zaghlol","doi":"10.1177/15266028231159241","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15266028231159241","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the safety and effectiveness of using carbon dioxide (CO₂) contrast in both supra- and infra-genicular endovascular interventions in patients with renal impairment.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This is a multicentric prospective observational study conducted over a period of 3 years from 2017 to 2020; the study included 114 patients presented with chronic threatening limb ischemia (CTLI) and renal impairment (lowest serum creatinine levels ≥1.3 mg/dL) for whom endovascular procedures were done using CO₂ as a contrast medium. Endovascular angiography was guided by CO₂ either exclusively (zero contrast) or with the aid of small amount of supplementary iodinated contrast media (ICM) injections. The qualitative assessment of the angiographic images in both supra- and infra-genicular fields were reported and scaled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qualitative diagnostic images were excellent in 86.5% in the supra-genicular and 66.5% in infra-genicular images. There were no significant changes in mean serum creatinine levels from baseline to first and fifth days post procedural (mean 1.8 mg/dL vs mean 1.9 mg/dL and mean 1.7 mg/dL).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CO₂ is a non-nephrotoxic alternative to traditional ICM that could be safely used and well tolerated during endovascular interventions for peripheral arterial disease in patients with renal impairment. Primary safety and efficacy endpoints were achieved in 100% of cases. The use of automated injector system provides adequate delivery, optimizes the dose, and avoids air contamination. For infra-genicular segment opacification, we recommend super-selective injections and some changes in angiographic techniques from contrast preparation to image post-processing.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>Co₂ is a non-nephrotoxic alternative to traditional ICM that could be safely used and well tolerated during peripheral endovascular interventions in patients with renal impairment. The use of automated injector system would provide adequate delivery, optimizes the dose and avoids air contamination. For infra-genicular segment opacification, its recommended to use selective injection as close to the target artery as possible and some changes in angiographic techniques from contrast preparation to image post-processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9180512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}