Comparative Analysis of Mortality and Amputation Rates in Patients Undergoing Atherectomy for Infra-Popliteal Peripheral Arterial Disease: Insight From the VQI.

IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1177/15266028231208895
Yasser Jamil, Michael G Nanna, Cassius Iyad Ochoa Chaar, Carlos Mena-Hurtado, Robert Ramak Attaran
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Mortality and Amputation Rates in Patients Undergoing Atherectomy for Infra-Popliteal Peripheral Arterial Disease: Insight From the VQI.","authors":"Yasser Jamil, Michael G Nanna, Cassius Iyad Ochoa Chaar, Carlos Mena-Hurtado, Robert Ramak Attaran","doi":"10.1177/15266028231208895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Infra-popliteal peripheral arterial disease (IPPAD) poses challenges due to high restenosis and occlusion rates. The BASIL-2 trial demonstrated the superiority of endovascular treatment compared with surgical bypass in patients with IPPAD. However, the association between different endovascular modalities and clinical outcomes has not been conclusive.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Combining plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) with atherectomy is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with POBA alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent POBA vs POBA+atherectomy for IPPAD from the Vascular Quality Initiative database were identified. To mitigate potential selection bias, we employed propensity score matching (PSM) to balance the distribution of confounding variables for mortality identified on multivariable logistic regression. Subsequently, we compared patient characteristics and long-term outcomes between the 2 treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among patients who underwent endovascular intervention for IPPAD, 19 979 individuals (80.8%) were treated with POBA alone, while 4747 (19.2%) were treated with both POBA+atherectomy after PSM. Propensity score matching ensured minimal differences in baseline characteristics, such as indication for lower extremity revascularization (LER) and history of LER. After PSM, patients receiving POBA+atherectomy experienced higher rates of technical success and lower perioperative complications, such as renal complications and hematoma, compared with POBA alone. During long-term follow-up, patients who underwent atherectomy had lower rates of major amputation and major adverse limb events (MALE) but slightly lower freedom from reintervention. Nonetheless, there were no differences in mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining POBA with atherectomy appears to be a safe approach in patients with IPPAD, with lower rates of long-term amputation and MALE at the cost of a higher risk of reintervention.Clinical ImpactThe use of adjunctive atherectomy is associated with improved long-term outcomes in patients with infra-popliteal disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1182-1193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028231208895","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Infra-popliteal peripheral arterial disease (IPPAD) poses challenges due to high restenosis and occlusion rates. The BASIL-2 trial demonstrated the superiority of endovascular treatment compared with surgical bypass in patients with IPPAD. However, the association between different endovascular modalities and clinical outcomes has not been conclusive.

Hypothesis: Combining plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) with atherectomy is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with POBA alone.

Methods: Patients who underwent POBA vs POBA+atherectomy for IPPAD from the Vascular Quality Initiative database were identified. To mitigate potential selection bias, we employed propensity score matching (PSM) to balance the distribution of confounding variables for mortality identified on multivariable logistic regression. Subsequently, we compared patient characteristics and long-term outcomes between the 2 treatment groups.

Results: Among patients who underwent endovascular intervention for IPPAD, 19 979 individuals (80.8%) were treated with POBA alone, while 4747 (19.2%) were treated with both POBA+atherectomy after PSM. Propensity score matching ensured minimal differences in baseline characteristics, such as indication for lower extremity revascularization (LER) and history of LER. After PSM, patients receiving POBA+atherectomy experienced higher rates of technical success and lower perioperative complications, such as renal complications and hematoma, compared with POBA alone. During long-term follow-up, patients who underwent atherectomy had lower rates of major amputation and major adverse limb events (MALE) but slightly lower freedom from reintervention. Nonetheless, there were no differences in mortality.

Conclusion: Combining POBA with atherectomy appears to be a safe approach in patients with IPPAD, with lower rates of long-term amputation and MALE at the cost of a higher risk of reintervention.Clinical ImpactThe use of adjunctive atherectomy is associated with improved long-term outcomes in patients with infra-popliteal disease.

接受腘下外周动脉疾病动脉粥样硬化切除术的患者死亡率和截肢率的比较分析:来自VQI的见解。
引言:腘下外周动脉疾病(IPPAD)由于高再狭窄率和闭塞率而带来挑战。BASIL-2试验证明了在IPPAD患者中,血管内治疗与外科搭桥术相比的优越性。然而,不同的血管内治疗方式与临床结果之间的联系还没有定论。假设:与单纯的旧球囊血管成形术(POBA)相比,将旧球囊血管成型术与斑块切除术相结合可改善临床结果。方法:从血管质量倡议数据库中确定接受POBA与POBA+斑块切除术治疗IPPAD的患者。为了减轻潜在的选择偏差,我们采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡多变量逻辑回归中确定的死亡率的混杂变量的分布。随后,我们比较了两个治疗组的患者特征和长期疗效。结果:在接受IPPAD血管内介入治疗的患者中,19例 979名患者(80.8%)单独接受POBA治疗,4747名患者(19.2%)在PSM后同时接受POBA+斑块切除术治疗。倾向性评分匹配确保了基线特征的最小差异,如下肢血运重建(LER)的指征和LER病史。PSM后,接受POBA+斑块切除术的患者与单独接受POBA相比,技术成功率更高,围手术期并发症(如肾脏并发症和血肿)更低。在长期随访中,接受斑块切除术的患者发生重大截肢和重大肢体不良事件(MALE)的比率较低,但再次干预的自由度略低。尽管如此,死亡率没有差异。结论:对于IPPAD患者,将POBA与斑块切除术相结合似乎是一种安全的方法,长期截肢和MALE的发生率较低,但再次干预的风险较高。临床影响:腘下疾病患者使用辅助性动脉粥样硬化切除术可改善长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信