The Milbank Quarterly最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
A Comparative Analysis of International Drug Price Negotiation Frameworks: An Interview Study of Key Stakeholders 国际药品价格谈判框架的比较分析:主要利益相关者访谈研究
The Milbank Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12714
ISELIN DAHLEN SYVERSEN, KEVIN SCHULMAN, AARON S. KESSELHEIM, WILLIAM B. FELDMAN
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of International Drug Price Negotiation Frameworks: An Interview Study of Key Stakeholders","authors":"ISELIN DAHLEN SYVERSEN, KEVIN SCHULMAN, AARON S. KESSELHEIM, WILLIAM B. FELDMAN","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.12714","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12714","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:label/><jats:boxed-text content-type=\"box\" position=\"anchor\"><jats:caption>Policy Points</jats:caption><jats:list list-type=\"bullet\"> <jats:list-item>Health care systems around the world rely on a range of methods to ensure the affordability of prescription drugs, including negotiating prices soon after drug approval and relying on formal clinical assessments that compare newly approved therapies with existing alternatives.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>The negotiation framework established under the Inflation Reduction Act is far more limited than other frameworks explored in this study. Adding elements from these frameworks could lead to more effective price negotiation in the United States.</jats:list-item> </jats:list></jats:boxed-text>ContextIn 2022, Congress passed the Inflation Reduction Act, which allowed Medicare, for the first time, to begin negotiating the prices for certain high‐cost brand‐name prescription drugs. Many other industrialized countries negotiate drug prices, and we sought to compare and contrast key features of the negotiation process across several health systems. We focused, in particular, on the criteria for selecting drugs for price negotiation, procedures for negotiation, factors that influence negotiated prices, and how prices are implemented.MethodsWe included four G7 countries in our analysis (Canada, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom [England]), two Benelux countries (Belgium and the Netherlands), and one Scandinavian country (Norway) with long‐established frameworks for drug price negotiation. We also analyzed the Veterans Affairs Health System in the United States. For each system, we gathered relevant legislation, government publications, and guidelines to understand negotiation frameworks, and we reached out to key drug price negotiators in each system to conduct semistructured interviews. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded, and data were analyzed based on an internal assessment tool that we developed.FindingsAll eight systems negotiate the prices of brand‐name prescription drugs soon after approval and rely on formal clinical assessments that compare newly approved drugs with existing therapies. Systems in our study differed on characteristics such as whether the body performing clinical assessments is separate from the negotiating authority, how added health benefit is assessed, whether explicit willingness‐to‐pay thresholds are employed, and how specific approaches for priority disease areas are taken.ConclusionsHigh‐income countries around the world adopt different approaches to conducting price negotiations on brand‐name drugs but coalesce around a set of practices that will largely be absent from the current Medicare negotiation framework. US policymakers might consider adding some of these characteristics in the future to improve negotiation outcomes.","PeriodicalId":501846,"journal":{"name":"The Milbank Quarterly","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142248850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In the September 2024 Issue of the Quarterly 在《季刊》2024 年 9 月刊中
The Milbank Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12716
ALAN B. COHEN
{"title":"In the September 2024 Issue of the Quarterly","authors":"ALAN B. COHEN","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.12716","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12716","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":501846,"journal":{"name":"The Milbank Quarterly","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142248852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Orphan Drug Act at 40: Legislative Triumph and the Challenges of Success 孤儿药法案》40 周年:立法的胜利与成功的挑战
The Milbank Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12680
PETER SALTONSTALL, HEIDI ROSS, PAUL T. KIM
{"title":"The Orphan Drug Act at 40: Legislative Triumph and the Challenges of Success","authors":"PETER SALTONSTALL, HEIDI ROSS, PAUL T. KIM","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.12680","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12680","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000<div>\u0000<h3>Policy Points</h3>\u0000<p>\u0000</p><ul>\u0000<li>The Orphan Drug Act (ODA) was the result of patient advocacy and by many measures has been strikingly successful. However, approximately 95% of the more than 7,000 known rare diseases still have no US Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment.</li>\u0000<li>The ODA's success led to sustained criticism of high drug prices, often for products that have orphan drug indications. Critics misconstrue the ODA's intent and propose reducing its incentives instead of pursuing policies focused on addressing broader prescription drug price challenges that exist in both the orphan and nonorphan drug market.</li>\u0000<li>Patients and their families will continue to defend the purpose and integrity of the ODA and to drive investments into rare disease research and clinical development.</li>\u0000</ul><p></p></div>\u0000</div>","PeriodicalId":501846,"journal":{"name":"The Milbank Quarterly","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138693355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信