The Orphan Drug Act at 40: Legislative Triumph and the Challenges of Success

PETER SALTONSTALL, HEIDI ROSS, PAUL T. KIM
{"title":"The Orphan Drug Act at 40: Legislative Triumph and the Challenges of Success","authors":"PETER SALTONSTALL, HEIDI ROSS, PAUL T. KIM","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.12680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n<div>\n<h3>Policy Points</h3>\n<p>\n</p><ul>\n<li>The Orphan Drug Act (ODA) was the result of patient advocacy and by many measures has been strikingly successful. However, approximately 95% of the more than 7,000 known rare diseases still have no US Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment.</li>\n<li>The ODA's success led to sustained criticism of high drug prices, often for products that have orphan drug indications. Critics misconstrue the ODA's intent and propose reducing its incentives instead of pursuing policies focused on addressing broader prescription drug price challenges that exist in both the orphan and nonorphan drug market.</li>\n<li>Patients and their families will continue to defend the purpose and integrity of the ODA and to drive investments into rare disease research and clinical development.</li>\n</ul><p></p></div>\n</div>","PeriodicalId":501846,"journal":{"name":"The Milbank Quarterly","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Milbank Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy Points

  • The Orphan Drug Act (ODA) was the result of patient advocacy and by many measures has been strikingly successful. However, approximately 95% of the more than 7,000 known rare diseases still have no US Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment.
  • The ODA's success led to sustained criticism of high drug prices, often for products that have orphan drug indications. Critics misconstrue the ODA's intent and propose reducing its incentives instead of pursuing policies focused on addressing broader prescription drug price challenges that exist in both the orphan and nonorphan drug market.
  • Patients and their families will continue to defend the purpose and integrity of the ODA and to drive investments into rare disease research and clinical development.

孤儿药法案》40 周年:立法的胜利与成功的挑战
政策要点《孤儿药法案》(ODA)是患者倡导的结果,从许多方面来看都取得了巨大成功。然而,在已知的 7,000 多种罕见病中,仍有约 95% 的罕见病没有得到美国食品药品管理局批准的治疗方法。ODA 的成功导致了对高药价的持续批评,而高药价往往是针对孤儿药适应症产品的。批评者曲解了 ODA 的初衷,并建议减少其激励措施,而不是推行侧重于解决孤儿药和非孤儿药市场中存在的更广泛的处方药价格挑战的政策。患者及其家属将继续捍卫 ODA 的宗旨和完整性,并推动对罕见病研究和临床开发的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信