Life Satisfaction and Subsequent Physical, Behavioral, and Psychosocial Health in Older Adults.

The Milbank Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-02 DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.12497
Eric S Kim, Scott W Delaney, Louis Tay, Ying Chen, E D Diener, Tyler J Vanderweele
{"title":"Life Satisfaction and Subsequent Physical, Behavioral, and Psychosocial Health in Older Adults.","authors":"Eric S Kim,&nbsp;Scott W Delaney,&nbsp;Louis Tay,&nbsp;Ying Chen,&nbsp;E D Diener,&nbsp;Tyler J Vanderweele","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.12497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policy Points Several intergovernmental organizations (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Health Organization, United Nations) are urging countries to use well-being indicators (e.g., life satisfaction) in addition to traditional economic indicators when making important policy decisions. As the number of governments implementing this new approach grows, so does the need to continue evaluating the health and well-being outcomes we might observe from policies aimed at improving life satisfaction. The results of this study suggest that life satisfaction is a valuable target for policies aiming to enhance several indicators of psychosocial well-being, health behaviors, and physical health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Context: </strong>Several intergovernmental organizations (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Health Organization, United Nations) are urging countries to use well-being indicators (e.g., life satisfaction) in addition to traditional economic indicators when making important policy decisions. As the number of governments implementing this new approach grows, so does the need to continue evaluating the health and well-being outcomes we might observe from policies aimed at improving life satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated whether positive change in life satisfaction (between t<sub>0</sub> ;2006/2008 and t<sub>1</sub> ;2010/2012) was associated with better outcomes on 35 indicators of physical, behavioral, and psychosocial health and well-being (in t<sub>2</sub> ;2014/2016). Data were from 12,998 participants in the University of Michigan's Health and Retirement Study-a prospective and nationally representative cohort of US adults over age 50.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Participants with the highest (versus lowest) life satisfaction had better subsequent outcomes on some physical health indicators (lower risk of pain, physical functioning limitations, and mortality; lower number of chronic conditions; and higher self-rated health) and health behaviors (lower risk of sleep problems and more frequent physical activity), and nearly all psychosocial indicators (higher positive affect, optimism, purpose in life, mastery, health mastery, financial mastery, and likelihood of living with spouse/partner; and lower depression, depressive symptoms, hopelessness, negative affect, perceived constraints, and loneliness) over the 4-year follow-up period. However, life satisfaction was not subsequently associated with many specific health conditions (i.e., diabetes, hypertension, stroke, cancer, heart disease, lung disease, arthritis, overweight/obesity, or cognitive impairment), other health behaviors (i.e., binge drinking or smoking), or frequency of contact with children, family, or friends.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that life satisfaction is a valuable target for policies aiming to enhance several indicators of psychosocial well-being, health behaviors, and physical health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":501846,"journal":{"name":"The Milbank Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"209-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1468-0009.12497","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Milbank Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

Policy Points Several intergovernmental organizations (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Health Organization, United Nations) are urging countries to use well-being indicators (e.g., life satisfaction) in addition to traditional economic indicators when making important policy decisions. As the number of governments implementing this new approach grows, so does the need to continue evaluating the health and well-being outcomes we might observe from policies aimed at improving life satisfaction. The results of this study suggest that life satisfaction is a valuable target for policies aiming to enhance several indicators of psychosocial well-being, health behaviors, and physical health outcomes.

Context: Several intergovernmental organizations (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Health Organization, United Nations) are urging countries to use well-being indicators (e.g., life satisfaction) in addition to traditional economic indicators when making important policy decisions. As the number of governments implementing this new approach grows, so does the need to continue evaluating the health and well-being outcomes we might observe from policies aimed at improving life satisfaction.

Methods: We evaluated whether positive change in life satisfaction (between t0 ;2006/2008 and t1 ;2010/2012) was associated with better outcomes on 35 indicators of physical, behavioral, and psychosocial health and well-being (in t2 ;2014/2016). Data were from 12,998 participants in the University of Michigan's Health and Retirement Study-a prospective and nationally representative cohort of US adults over age 50.

Findings: Participants with the highest (versus lowest) life satisfaction had better subsequent outcomes on some physical health indicators (lower risk of pain, physical functioning limitations, and mortality; lower number of chronic conditions; and higher self-rated health) and health behaviors (lower risk of sleep problems and more frequent physical activity), and nearly all psychosocial indicators (higher positive affect, optimism, purpose in life, mastery, health mastery, financial mastery, and likelihood of living with spouse/partner; and lower depression, depressive symptoms, hopelessness, negative affect, perceived constraints, and loneliness) over the 4-year follow-up period. However, life satisfaction was not subsequently associated with many specific health conditions (i.e., diabetes, hypertension, stroke, cancer, heart disease, lung disease, arthritis, overweight/obesity, or cognitive impairment), other health behaviors (i.e., binge drinking or smoking), or frequency of contact with children, family, or friends.

Conclusions: These results suggest that life satisfaction is a valuable target for policies aiming to enhance several indicators of psychosocial well-being, health behaviors, and physical health outcomes.

老年人的生活满意度与随后的身体、行为和心理健康。
若干政府间组织(经济合作与发展组织、世界卫生组织、联合国)正在敦促各国在作出重要政策决定时,除使用传统经济指标外,还使用福祉指标(如生活满意度)。随着实施这种新方法的政府越来越多,我们也有必要继续评估旨在提高生活满意度的政策对健康和福祉的影响。本研究的结果表明,生活满意度是一个有价值的政策目标,旨在提高社会心理健康、健康行为和身体健康结果的几个指标。背景:几个政府间组织(经济合作与发展组织、世界卫生组织、联合国)正在敦促各国在作出重要政策决定时,除传统经济指标外,还使用福祉指标(如生活满意度)。随着实施这种新方法的政府越来越多,我们也有必要继续评估旨在提高生活满意度的政策对健康和福祉的影响。方法:我们评估了生活满意度的积极变化(2006/2008年至2010/2012年)是否与35项身体、行为和心理健康和福祉指标的更好结果相关(t2;2014/2016年)。数据来自密歇根大学健康与退休研究的12998名参与者,这是一项前瞻性的、具有全国代表性的50岁以上美国成年人队列研究。研究结果:生活满意度最高(相对于最低)的参与者在一些身体健康指标上有更好的后续结果(更低的疼痛风险、身体功能限制和死亡率;慢性病人数较少;更高的自我评价健康)和健康行为(更低的睡眠问题风险和更频繁的身体活动),以及几乎所有的社会心理指标(更高的积极影响,乐观,生活目标,掌握,健康掌握,财务掌握,以及与配偶/伴侣生活的可能性;在4年的随访期间,抑郁、抑郁症状、绝望、负面影响、感知约束和孤独感更低。然而,生活满意度随后与许多特定的健康状况(即糖尿病、高血压、中风、癌症、心脏病、肺病、关节炎、超重/肥胖或认知障碍)、其他健康行为(即酗酒或吸烟)或与儿童、家人或朋友接触的频率无关。结论:这些结果表明,生活满意度对于旨在提高社会心理健康、健康行为和身体健康结果等指标的政策来说是一个有价值的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信