Psychological Research最新文献_第3页

A differential impact of action–effect temporal contiguity on different measures of response inhibition in the GoNo-Go and Stop-signal paradigms 行动效果的时间连续性对 GoNo-Go 和停止信号范式中反应抑制的不同测量的不同影响

Psychological Research Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-01931-2

{"title":"A differential impact of action–effect temporal contiguity on different measures of response inhibition in the GoNo-Go and Stop-signal paradigms","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s00426-024-01931-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-01931-2","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Response inhibition refers to suppressing a prepotent motor response and is often studied and discussed as an act of cognitive control. Much less attention was given to the potential contribution of motor control processes to response inhibition. Accumulated empirical findings show that a perceptual effect temporally contiguous with a response improves motor control performance. In the current study, we followed this work by manipulating action–effect temporal contiguity to enhance motor performance and investigated its impact on response selection and inhibition. In two experiments, we integrated a Go/No-Go (GNGT; Experiment 1) and a Stop-signal (SST; Experiment 2) task with the Effect–Motivation task, previously used to capture the facilitating impact of action–effect temporal contiguity on response times (RTs). Replicating previous findings, RTs were shorter following temporally contiguous compared to Lagged action–effect in Go trials in both the GNGT (Experiment 1) and SST (Experiment 2). Notably, an Immediate action–effect improved response inhibition in the GNGT (Experiment 1) but did not modulate Stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) in the SST (Experiment 2). Unexpectedly, the error rate on Go trials was higher in the Immediate effect condition in Experiment 2. We interpret the findings to suggest that an action’s (Immediate) perceptual effect may promote response inhibition performance by enhancing selective association between the Go stimuli and the Go response and not by improving cognitive control ability. The findings also imply that an Immediate action–effect may hamper action control (e.g., by increasing general readiness to respond), at least when action control does not benefit from automatic stimulus–response association.</p>","PeriodicalId":501681,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140056369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Behavioral impulse and time pressure jointly influence intentional inhibition: evidence from the Free Two-Choice Oddball task 行为冲动和时间压力共同影响有意抑制：来自自由双选奇数任务的证据

Psychological Research Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-023-01905-w

Mengsi Xu, Jiayu Wen, Zhiai Li, Zhenhong Wang, Junhua Zhang

{"title":"Behavioral impulse and time pressure jointly influence intentional inhibition: evidence from the Free Two-Choice Oddball task","authors":"Mengsi Xu, Jiayu Wen, Zhiai Li, Zhenhong Wang, Junhua Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00426-023-01905-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01905-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intentional inhibition is a crucial component of self-regulation, yet it is under-researched, because it is difficult to study without external stimuli or overt behaviors. Although Free-Choice tasks have been developed, it remains unclear how two key design features (i.e., behavioral impulse and time pressure) affect their sensitivity to intentional inhibition. To investigate this, the present study developed a Free Two-Choice Oddball task, which generated both an inhibition rate index and a response time (RT) index. Two experiments were conducted to systematically manipulate the ratio of the reactive standard to oddball trials and reaction time limit, inducing diverse behavioral impulses and different time pressures. The following findings were obtained from the critical Free-Choice trials. In the equal ratio condition, participants demonstrated comparable RTs for both the standard and oddball responses. In the moderate-ratio condition, participants exhibited longer RTs for the oddball than standard responses under low- but not high-time pressure. In the high-ratio condition, while RTs for the oddball responses were longer than those for the standard responses under both the high- and low-time pressures, participants displayed a decreased inhibition rate under the high-time pressure compared to the low-time pressure. Finally, participants exhibited a reduced inhibition rate in the high-ratio condition compared to the moderate-ratio condition. Together, these findings suggest that Free-Choice tasks can reflect intentional inhibition under specific conditions, and intentional inhibition is susceptible to both behavioral impulse and time pressure, while also establishing the theoretical and methodological foundations for subsequent research.</p>","PeriodicalId":501681,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research","volume":"550 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138816489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Repetition costs in task switching are not equal to cue switching costs: evidence from a cue-independent context 任务转换中的重复成本不等于线索转换成本：来自线索无关情境的证据

Psychological Research Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-023-01904-x

Elena Benini, Iring Koch, Andrea M. Philipp

{"title":"Repetition costs in task switching are not equal to cue switching costs: evidence from a cue-independent context","authors":"Elena Benini, Iring Koch, Andrea M. Philipp","doi":"10.1007/s00426-023-01904-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01904-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent task-switching studies highlighted the presence of feature binding processes. These studies documented that even a task-irrelevant feature (the context, henceforth) may be bound with the task and the response in each trial. When the context repeated in the following trial, it supposedly retrieved the bound features, causing benefits when the task and the response repeated and costs otherwise (i.e. full repetition benefits). In the present study, we aim to rule out an alternative explanation for such full repetition benefits in task switching. These benefits were observed in studies that used a cue-related context so that full repetition conditions always implied a cue repetition. Therefore, these full repetition benefits may be ascribed to the priming of cue encoding, instead of the binding of the context. In the present study, we implemented a similar context manipulation but used univalent target stimuli and did not present any cue. Hence, the varying context was never cue-related. We still found full repetition benefits but only when the context appeared before the target and not when they appeared simultaneously. Thus, full repetition benefits can be observed in the absence of priming of cue encoding. However, the context must occupy a prominent position (i.e. at the beginning of the trial). These results, therefore, reinforce the hypothesis that full repetition benefits stem from binding processes that take place on a trial-by-trial basis and involve both task-relevant (the task and the response) and task-irrelevant features (the context).</p>","PeriodicalId":501681,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138745676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Commentary on Frank et al., (2003): where does learning through motor imagery lie on the perceptual–motor continuum? 对弗兰克等人（2003）的评论：通过运动想象学习在知觉-运动连续体中处于什么位置？

Psychological Research Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-023-01910-z

Robert M. Hardwick

引用次数: 0

Overlearned sequence and perceived time: possible involvement of attention 过度学习序列和感知时间：注意力的可能参与

Psychological Research Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-023-01898-6

Shamini Warda, Azizuddin Khan

引用次数: 0

Action imagery as active inference: a commentary on Rieger et al. (2023) 作为主动推理的行动意象：对里格等人（2023）的评论

Psychological Research Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-023-01900-1

Maarten A. Immink, Andrew W. Corcoran

引用次数: 0

A commentary on Eaves et al. with a special focus on clinical neurorehabilitation 对伊夫等人的评论，特别关注临床神经康复

Psychological Research Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-023-01901-0

Corina Schuster-Amft, Frank Behrendt

{"title":"A commentary on Eaves et al. with a special focus on clinical neurorehabilitation","authors":"Corina Schuster-Amft, Frank Behrendt","doi":"10.1007/s00426-023-01901-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01901-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We very much appreciate the theoretical foundations and considerations of AO, MI, and their combination AO + MI by Eaves et al. In their exploratory review, the authors highlight the beneficial effects of the combined use of AO and MI, with a particular focus on synchronous AO and MI. From a neurorehabilitation perspective, different processes may apply to patients, particularly after a stroke. As suggested by Eaves et al., the cognitive load might prevent the use of synchronous AO + MI and the asynchronous application of AO and MI might be indicated. Furthermore, some aspects should be considered when applying AO + MI in rehabilitation: screening for the patients’ cognitive capabilities and MI ability, and a familiarisation programme for AO and MI, before starting with an AO + MI training. With their review, Eaves et al. propose a number of research questions in the field of neurorehabilitation that urgently need to be addressed: the use of asynchronous vs. synchronous AOMI, observation and imagination with or without errors, or use of different MI perspectives and modes in different learning stages. This commentary provides some additional suggestions on patients’ MI ability and cognitive level, MI familiarisation and detailed reporting recommendations to transfer Eaves et al. findings into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":501681,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research","volume":"282 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138577415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0