Medical Law Review最新文献_第8页

Artificial intelligence and clinical decision support: clinicians' perspectives on trust, trustworthiness, and liability. 人工智能与临床决策支持:临床医生对信任、可信度和责任的看法。

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad013

Caroline Jones, James Thornton, Jeremy C Wyatt

{"title":"Artificial intelligence and clinical decision support: clinicians' perspectives on trust, trustworthiness, and liability.","authors":"Caroline Jones, James Thornton, Jeremy C Wyatt","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad013","DOIUrl":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad013","url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) could revolutionise health care, potentially improving clinician decision making and patient safety, and reducing the impact of workforce shortages. However, policymakers and regulators have concerns over whether AI and clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are trusted by stakeholders, and indeed whether they are worthy of trust. Yet, what is meant by trust and trustworthiness is often implicit, and it may not be clear who or what is being trusted. We address these lacunae, focusing largely on the perspective(s) of clinicians on trust and trustworthiness in AI and CDSSs. Empirical studies suggest that clinicians' concerns about their use include the accuracy of advice given and potential legal liability if harm to a patient occurs. Onora O'Neill's conceptualisation of trust and trustworthiness provides the framework for our analysis, generating a productive understanding of clinicians' reported trust issues. Through unpacking these concepts, we gain greater clarity over the meaning ascribed to them by stakeholders; delimit the extent to which stakeholders are talking at cross purposes; and promote the continued utility of trust and trustworthiness as useful concepts in current debates around the use of AI and CDSSs.","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":" ","pages":"501-520"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681355/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9507097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The appeal in Bell v Tavistock and beyond: where are we now with trans children's treatment for gender dysphoria? 贝尔诉塔维斯托克案及其他案件的诉求是:我们现在对跨性别儿童性别焦虑症的治疗进展如何?

IF 1.8 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad025

Kirsty L Moreton

引用次数: 0

R v Foster: Exemplifying the urgency of the decriminalisation of abortion. R v Foster:例证了堕胎合法化的紧迫性。

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad026

Elizabeth Chloe Romanis

引用次数: 0

Mortier v Belgium [2022] ECHR 764: Warning Signs for Assisted Dying Regulation? Mortier诉比利时【2022】欧洲人权法院第764号：辅助死亡法规的警告标志？

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad034

Chay M Burt

引用次数: 0

Jaime Lindsey, Reimagining the Court of Protection: Access to Justice in Mental Capacity Law Jaime Lindsey，《重新想象保护法庭:精神能力法中的司法途径》

4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad035

Jordan Briggs

引用次数: 0

Daisy Cheung and Michael Dunn (eds), Advance Directives Across Asia: A Comparative Socio-legal Analysis 张黛西和迈克尔·邓恩主编，《跨亚洲的预先指令:比较社会-法律分析》

4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad031

Daniel Bianchi

引用次数: 0

Xavier Symons, Why Conscience Matters: A Defence of Conscientious Objection in Healthcare 泽维尔·西蒙斯，《良心为何重要:为医疗保健中的良心反对辩护》

4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad033

James E Hurford

引用次数: 0

Intellectual property protection for traditional medical knowledge in China's context: a round peg in a square hole? 中国传统医学知识的知识产权保护:方孔里的圆钉?

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad006

Nan Xia

{"title":"Intellectual property protection for traditional medical knowledge in China's context: a round peg in a square hole?","authors":"Nan Xia","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwad006","url":null,"abstract":"This article is an examination of the extent to which traditional medical knowledge in China can be protected by intellectual property laws. The analysis begins by providing a global picture with regard to the historic origin of intellectual property, exploring the reasons why China does not have indigenous counterparts to the western system of intellectual property rights protecting its traditional knowledge (including traditional medical knowledge) and stating the problems of transplanting western intellectual property standards in China. A discussion follows on how China, under foreign pressure, has made efforts to comply with the changing standards mandated by various international, regional, and bilateral arrangements related to intellectual property, with examples of the development of China's patent law. China's approach towards the protection of traditional medical knowledge in various international fora related to intellectual property is explored. Finally, there is a specific examination of the compatibilities between the western system of intellectual property rights and traditional medical knowledge in China, at the national and community levels. This article argues that the system of intellectual property rights does not easily fit with China's traditional medical knowledge because of China's unique cultural traits, distinctive historical context and wide ethnic, religious, and local community diversity.","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":"31 3","pages":"358-390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10452053/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10075032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

When is the processing of data from medical implants lawful? The legal grounds for processing health-related personal data from ICT implantable medical devices for treatment purposes under EU data protection law. 什么时候处理医疗植入物的数据是合法的?根据欧盟数据保护法，为治疗目的处理来自ICT植入式医疗设备的健康相关个人数据的法律依据。

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwac038

Sarita Lindstad, Kaspar Rosager Ludvigsen

{"title":"When is the processing of data from medical implants lawful? The legal grounds for processing health-related personal data from ICT implantable medical devices for treatment purposes under EU data protection law.","authors":"Sarita Lindstad, Kaspar Rosager Ludvigsen","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwac038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwac038","url":null,"abstract":"Medicine is one of the biggest use cases for emerging information technologies. Data processing brings huge advantages but forces lawmakers and practitioners to balance between privacy, autonomy, accessibility, and functionality. ICT-connected Implantable Medical Devices plant themselves firmly between traditional medical equipment and software that processes health-related personal data, and these implants face many data management challenges. It is essential that healthcare providers and others can identify and understand the legal grounds they rely on to process data. The European Union is currently updating its framework, and the special provisions in the GDPR, the current ePrivacy Directive, and the coming ePrivacy Regulation all provide enhanced thresholds for processing data. This article provides an overview and explanation of the applicability of the rules and the legal grounds for processing data. We find that only a cumulative application of the GDPR and the ePrivacy rules ensure adequate protection of this data and present the legal grounds for processing in these cases. We discuss the challenges in obtaining and maintaining valid consent and necessity as a legal ground for processing and offer use case-specific discussions of the role of consent long-term and the lack of an adequate 'vital interest' exception in the ePrivacy rules.","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":"31 3","pages":"317-339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10452051/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10078089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

London Borough of Islington v EF [2022] EWHC 803 (FAM): falling through the great safety net of the inherent jurisdiction. 伦敦伊斯灵顿自治市诉EF【2022】EWHC 803（FAM）：落入固有管辖权的巨大安全网。

IF 1.7 4区医学

Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad016

Daniel Bedford, Philip Bremner

引用次数: 0