Medical Law Review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Looking back to look forward-the history of VAD laws in Australia and future law reform in the Australian territories. 回顾过去,展望未来--澳大利亚暴力侵害妇女行为法律的历史和澳大利亚领土未来的法律改革。
IF 1.7 4区 医学
Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad030
Kerstin Braun
{"title":"Looking back to look forward-the history of VAD laws in Australia and future law reform in the Australian territories.","authors":"Kerstin Braun","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad030","DOIUrl":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Taking one's own life or attempting to do so has long been decriminalised in Australia. Aiding, counselling, or inciting another person to kill him or herself, however, remains a criminal offence. Yet, all six Australian States have now introduced laws allowing assistance in dying under certain circumstances. This article traces the recent history of Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD) laws in Australia. It examines the introduction of the world's first assisted dying legislation in the Northern Territory in 1995 followed by the Federal Government's 1997 deprivation of the Territories' power to legislate on assisted dying invalidating said law. It further considers the fifty-seven failed Bills attempting to achieve law reform in this context in Australian jurisdictions between 1993 and 2017 with a view to identifying what factors may have contributed to the continuing lack of success. This article then outlines the rapid introduction of VAD laws in all six Australian States decriminalising VAD over the span of only 5 years. It ponders what may have changed to bring about this law reform. This article closes by contemplating potential future law reform in the Australian Territories, which have been reinstated with jurisdiction to legislate on VAD in December 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":" ","pages":"42-60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896628/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10202863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Healthcare Services for Asylum-Seekers: Untangling the European Social Charter. 为寻求庇护者提供医疗保健服务:解读《欧洲社会宪章》。
IF 1.7 4区 医学
Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad018
Yana Litins'ka
{"title":"Healthcare Services for Asylum-Seekers: Untangling the European Social Charter.","authors":"Yana Litins'ka","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad018","DOIUrl":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Asylum-seekers, like any population, need healthcare services, yet national laws sometimes restrict access to such services. The European Social Charter (revised) protects the right to health and medical services. However, the Charter has a complex application, and its scope is limited concerning foreigners. This article analyses to what extent the provisions of the Charter on the right to health and medical assistance apply to adult asylum-seekers. It shows that the Charter may apply to various degrees to asylum-seekers depending on several circumstances, such as the national definition of residence or regular work, grounds for seeking asylum, citizenship or lack thereof. Depending on these factors, some asylum-seekers may receive full healthcare services, whereas others may have only limited rights. The article shows that the migrant statuses created by national and EU law do not fit in the system of statuses in the Charter, which might produce legal hindrances to accessing health-related rights for asylum-seekers. The article also discusses the possible ways for the European Committee of Social Rights to further expand the scope of the Charter's application.</p>","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896629/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10135525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Post-trial access to investigational drugs in India: addressing challenges in the regulatory framework. 印度研究药物的试用后准入:应对监管框架的挑战。
IF 1.7 4区 医学
Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad028
Nidhi Mehrotra, Padmavati Manchikanti
{"title":"Post-trial access to investigational drugs in India: addressing challenges in the regulatory framework.","authors":"Nidhi Mehrotra, Padmavati Manchikanti","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad028","DOIUrl":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Through the New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019 (2019 Rules), India has developed the rules governing post-trial access (PTA) to new drugs or investigational new drugs. However, inconsistencies and interpretational challenges exist in the application of the 2019 Rules and the Indian Council of Medical Research Guidelines 2017. This conflation poses a real harm to the trial participants, specifically the ones with limited access to healthcare facilities. Since drug laws in India do not expressly deal with other forms of access like the 'Compassionate Use' or 'Expanded Access' mechanism, demarcating the scope and describing the strategies for PTA are the need of the hour. We propose possible strategies to address inadequacies in the regulatory regime and establish 'win-win' situations among all stakeholders. We further argue that India is well positioned to provide leadership by developing detailed PTA provisions and may set a potential path for the other clinical trial host countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":" ","pages":"20-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10057300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of the right to life in respect of deaths caused by negligence in the healthcare context. 在医疗保健方面因疏忽造成的死亡方面生命权的作用。
IF 1.7 4区 医学
Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad037
Elizabeth Wicks
{"title":"The role of the right to life in respect of deaths caused by negligence in the healthcare context.","authors":"Elizabeth Wicks","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad037","DOIUrl":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article investigates the question of whether a death caused by negligence in the healthcare context is capable of violating the right to life under Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights. This provision imposes extensive positive obligations upon Contracting States, including an operational duty to take reasonable steps to save a life that they know, or ought to know, is at risk. This article addresses the question of exactly when such an operational duty arises, with particular focus on the healthcare context in which deaths caused by medical negligence have not traditionally been regarded as amounting to violations of the right to life. This article argues that two key factors in determining the existence of an operational duty to save life are the assumption of responsibility and nature of risk. It also argues for the need to take surrounding circumstances into account and for an increased use of the right to life in holding public bodies to account for deaths caused by negligence in the healthcare context.</p>","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":" ","pages":"81-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896627/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138441509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Margaret Brazier, Law and Healing: A History of a Stormy Marriage Margaret Brazier,《法律与治愈》:风雨婚姻史
IF 1.7 4区 医学
Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-12-23 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad042
Rebekah McWhirter
{"title":"Margaret Brazier, Law and Healing: A History of a Stormy Marriage","authors":"Rebekah McWhirter","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwad042","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139162912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Regulating non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal sex determination. 调节胎儿性别测定的无创产前检测(NIPT)。
IF 1.7 4区 医学
Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad014
Michelle Taylor-Sands, Chanelle Warton, Hilary Bowman-Smart
{"title":"Regulating non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal sex determination.","authors":"Michelle Taylor-Sands, Chanelle Warton, Hilary Bowman-Smart","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad014","DOIUrl":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can be used to determine the chromosomal sex of the fetus at an early stage in a pregnancy. The use of NIPT for fetal sex determination raises concerns about potential selective termination of pregnancy by prospective parents who desire a child of a particular sex. Although sex selection for medical reasons is generally accepted, non-medical sex selection (NMSS) has been the subject of considerable controversy. In this article, we explore the current regulatory landscape around reproductive genetic testing techniques that may lead to NMSS, both internationally and within Australia. Specifically, we contrast the approach to regulating preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) with the minimal regulation of NIPT in Australia as a case study for reform. We examine ethical concerns raised in relation to NMSS, which form the basis of the current moratorium on the use of PGT for NMSS. We then highlight some key differences between using PGT for NMSS and NIPT for fetal sex determination to determine whether access to the latter should be regulated and, if so, how. We conclude that there is insufficient evidence to restrict access to NIPT for fetal sex determination and, based on our Australian case study, recommend a facilitative approach to regulating NIPT that would support individuals to make informed reproductive decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":" ","pages":"521-537"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681358/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9898503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to: Daisy Cheung and Michael Dunn (eds), Advance Directives Across Asia: A Comparative Socio-legal Analysis. 更正:Daisy Cheung和Michael Dunn(编辑),《亚洲各地的预先指示:比较社会法律分析》。
IF 1.7 4区 医学
Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad036
{"title":"Correction to: Daisy Cheung and Michael Dunn (eds), Advance Directives Across Asia: A Comparative Socio-legal Analysis.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad036","DOIUrl":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad036","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":" ","pages":"643-644"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71487875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The frontiers of medical negligence and diagnosis: an interview-based analysis. 医疗过失和诊断的前沿:基于访谈的分析。
IF 1.7 4区 医学
Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad009
Annie Mackley, Kathleen Liddell, Jeffrey M Skopek, Isabelle Le Gallez, Zoë Fritz
{"title":"The frontiers of medical negligence and diagnosis: an interview-based analysis.","authors":"Annie Mackley, Kathleen Liddell, Jeffrey M Skopek, Isabelle Le Gallez, Zoë Fritz","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad009","DOIUrl":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While errors in medical diagnosis are common and often litigated, the different dimensions of diagnosis-formation, communication, recording-have received much less legal attention. When the process of diagnosis is differentiated in this way, new and contentious legal questions emerge that challenge the appropriateness of the Bolam/Bolitho standard. To explore these challenges, we interviewed 31 solicitors and barristers and asked them: (i) whether Montgomery should apply to information about alternative diagnoses; and (ii) whether the Bolam/Bolitho standard should be rejected in 'pure diagnosis' cases. Our qualitative analysis of the interviews sheds light not only on the two questions posed, but also on three cross-cutting themes. First, Bolam/Bolitho is criticised on two grounds that are often conflated: its paternalism for patients and its deference to medical professionals. Second, adopting different standards for different aspects of treatment and diagnosis may be justified in principle, but it can sometimes be difficult or not make sense in practice. Third, new conceptions of patients, doctors, and courts are being articulated in terms of rights or responsibilities over risks. In mapping these issues at the frontiers of medical negligence, this empirical study identifies potential pressure points for future legal developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":" ","pages":"485-500"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681357/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9551500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The (mis)use of fetal viability as the determinant of non-criminal abortion in the Netherlands and England and Wales. 在荷兰、英格兰和威尔士,(错误地)使用胎儿生存能力作为非刑事堕胎的决定因素。
IF 1.7 4区 医学
Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad015
Samantha Halliday, Elizabeth Chloe Romanis, Lien de Proost, E Joanne Verweij
{"title":"The (mis)use of fetal viability as the determinant of non-criminal abortion in the Netherlands and England and Wales.","authors":"Samantha Halliday, Elizabeth Chloe Romanis, Lien de Proost, E Joanne Verweij","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad015","DOIUrl":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Time plays a fundamental role in abortion regulation. In this article, we compare the regulatory frameworks in England and Wales and the Netherlands as examples of the centrality accorded to viability in the determination of the parameters of non-criminal abortion, demonstrating that the use of viability as a threshold renders the law uncertain. We assess the role played by the concept of viability, analysing its impact upon the continued criminalization of abortion and categorization of abortion as a medical matter, rather than a reproductive choice. We conclude that viability is misconceived in its application to abortion and that neonatal viability (relating to treatment of the premature infant) and fetal viability (related to the capacity to survive birth) must be distinguished to better reflect the social context within which the law and practice of abortion operate. We show how viability thresholds endanger pregnant people.</p>","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":" ","pages":"538-563"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681352/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9551499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Interpersonal influences on decision-making capacity: a content analysis of court judgments. 人际关系对决策能力的影响:法院判决的内容分析。
IF 1.8 4区 医学
Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwad017
Kevin Ariyo, Nuala B Kane, Gareth S Owen, Alex Ruck Keene
{"title":"Interpersonal influences on decision-making capacity: a content analysis of court judgments.","authors":"Kevin Ariyo, Nuala B Kane, Gareth S Owen, Alex Ruck Keene","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad017","DOIUrl":"10.1093/medlaw/fwad017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For many purposes in England and Wales, the Court of Protection determines whether a person has or lacks capacity to make a decision, by applying the test within the Mental Capacity Act 2005. This test is regularly described as a cognitive test with cognitive processes discussed as internal characteristics. However, it is unclear how the courts have framed interpersonal influence as negatively impacting upon a person's decision-making processes in a capacity assessment context. We reviewed published court judgments in England and Wales in which interpersonal problems were discussed as relevant to capacity. Through content analysis, we developed a typology that highlights five ways the courts considered influence to be problematic to capacity across these cases. Interpersonal influence problems were constructed as (i) P's inability to preserve their free will or independence, (ii) restricting P's perspective, (iii) valuing or dependence on a relationship, (iv) acting on a general suggestibility to influence, or (v) P denying facts about the relationship. These supposed mechanisms of interpersonal influence problems are poorly understood and clearly merit further consideration. Our typology and case discussion are a start towards more detailed practice guidelines, and raise questions as to whether mental capacity and influence should remain legally distinct.</p>","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":" ","pages":"564-593"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681350/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9599365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信