Sustainable Production and Consumption最新文献

{"title":"Life cycle assessment of apple production and consumption under different sales models in China","authors":"Juanjuan Cheng ,&nbsp;Jin Yu ,&nbsp;Dejun Tan ,&nbsp;Qian Wang ,&nbsp;Zhengyang Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China is the largest producer and consumer of apples and plays a vital role in the fruit sector worldwide. However, few studies have examined the environmental impacts of apples from production to consumption in China concerning apple losses. Adopting reasonable initiatives in the apple industry from a whole life-cycle perspective can guide sustainable decision-making and support the formulation of policies for achieving carbon neutrality. This study utilized the ReCiPe2016 methodology because it covers a broad spectrum of possible environmental impacts. The aim of the paper was to conduct a comprehensive life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of apples from production to consumption in China and the associated apple losses along the supply chain. The results showed that producing 1 kg of apples produced the global warming potential of 0.842 kg CO₂-eq. Nitrogen fertilizer was the most critical environmental hotspot in the apple production phase and contributed more than 60 % in 11 of the 18 environmental impact categories. The environmental impacts in the apple consumption phase generally increased with transport distance. However, short-distance air transport (domestic market) had a higher impact than long-distance truck transport (international market). Among the five consumption scenarios in the domestic market, packaging had a higher environmental impact (1.767-17.926 mPt), exceeding transportation (0.729-14.949 mPt); conversely, in the international market, packaging (10.968 mPt) had a lower impact than transportation (12.181 mPt). Additionally, the study found that more complex sales models resulted in higher apple loss rates, requiring more adequate apple production to meet demand and thereby increasing environmental pollutant emissions. China can take measures such as reducing nitrogen fertilizer usage, designing sustainable packaging, discouraging air transportation, and concerning apple losses to address these challenges. These actions are essential for improving the environmental performance of the apple supply chain in China. Therefore, there is an urgent need to make some recommendations for different stakeholders in the whole life cycle, from production to consumption, to achieve sustainable development. Our work can contribute to offering a blueprint for unlocking unknown knowledge for the apple industry, ultimately catalyzing the realization of sustainable production and consumption in apple systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 100-116"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143445251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Tracking Africa's trajectory toward sustainability: An assessment of environmental and socioeconomic impacts","authors":"Edgar Towa ,&nbsp;Albert Kwame Osei-Owusu ,&nbsp;Livia Cabernard","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>African countries face heightened vulnerability to climate change and socioeconomic issues. Understanding production, consumption, and trade impacts is crucial for enhancing Africa's environmental resilience and social prosperity. This study uses multiregional input-output analysis to assess the environmental (biodiversity loss, climate change, particulate matter, water stress) and socioeconomic (employment, value-added) impacts across 51 African countries from 1995 to 2022. The study finds that Africa contributes disproportionately to global environmental impacts relative to its gross domestic product (GDP). From production and consumption perspectives, Africa accounts for over 13 % of the global biodiversity loss, particulate matter, and water stress impacts, generating only 3 % of the global value added. Between 1995 and 2022, absolute impacts increased alongside population and GDP, while per capita impacts and intensity decreased. Eastern Africa ranks highest in biodiversity loss (Madagascar), climate change (Kenya), and particulate matter (Ethiopia); Western Africa (Nigeria) leads in employment; and Northern Africa (Egypt) in water stress and value-added. The impacts embodied in Africa's trade with the rest of the world exceed those related to intra-African trade. African regions exhibit notably higher impact intensities than importing regions. The study recommends targeted sustainable development policies for Africa, advocating for shifting supply chains to alleviate environmental and social burdens through responsible sourcing practices, both regionally and by importing nations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 157-169"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143479224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Anticipatory sustainability assessment framework for material development demonstrated on material selection for bio-based benzoxazine synthesis","authors":"Jan-Marten Sprenger ,&nbsp;Gideon Abels ,&nbsp;Katharina Haag ,&nbsp;Mohammad Fahad Zaki Khan ,&nbsp;Katharina Koschek","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conventional life cycle assessment (LCA) methodologies, including recent prospective approaches for emerging technology assessment, are still facing challenges in managing uncertainty and stakeholder involvement. These limitations highlight the need for streamlined, integrative, proactive, and yet holistic approaches. This work fills the gap with the development of the Sustainable Tool for Anticipatory and Participative Material Development (Mat-STAP) as a novel assessment approach. Inspired by the streamlined LiSET assessment tool, the SURF-UK sustainability framework and the principles of Green Chemistry, Mat-STAP provides an anticipatory, and semi-quantitative assessment framework for holistic and integrative decision-making in material development. The methodology focuses on framing, process visualisation, high-level sustainability indicators, and a simplified assessment matrix to promote understanding, collaboration, and transparency. The present work starts with a conventional LCA of bio-based benzoxazine and glass fibre composites as a substitute of steel, demonstrating its lack of significance for early technology assessment during innovative material development. Mat-STAP is then applied to a case study on the synthesis of bio-based benzoxazines for composite applications, to evaluate the potential of different bio-based phenolic feedstocks for a sustainable benzoxazine biopolymer. Allyl phenol followed by phloretic acid emerge as the most promising candidates. Mat-STAP aims to bridge a gap between the conventional LCA and innovative material development, offering a proactive and collaborative assessment methodology to identify application-specific sustainable solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 90-99"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143430088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Integrating life cycle assessment and ecodesign to improve product effectiveness and environmental performance: A novel approach","authors":"Filipe Mattos Batista de Moraes ,&nbsp;Luiz Kulay ,&nbsp;Andrea Trianni","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The sanitizing products market has grown significantly, accelerated by the Covid-19 pandemic, which increased both production and environmental impacts, highlighting the need for sustainable alternatives. However, “green products” are often perceived as less effective than conventional ones. This study introduces a novel approach integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) with ecodesign to optimize both environmental performance and product effectiveness. The approach was validated through a case study of a large Brazilian chemical industry producing sanitizers. A degreaser floor cleaner was selected for cradle-to-grave assessment, considering raw materials, manufacturing, transport, use, and end-of-life stages. While previous research has focused on LCA and ecodesign separately, this work combines the two to address these dual objectives. Environmental performance was evaluated using a single indicator encompassing and weighing five impact categories: Primary Energy Demand, Water Consumption, Global Warming Potential, Ozone Formation Potential, and Eutrophication. Ecodesign principles guided the redesign of the cleaning product, and its effectiveness was assessed through use tests, for the proposal of 8 improvement scenarios. After redesigning with three optimization strategies (formula, dilution rate, and use method), the solutions led up to 72 % environmental impact reduction. Five of the scenarios also improved product effectiveness, i.e. cleansing. A matrix integrating both environmental and effectiveness scores was developed to select the optimal solutions. This approach could be extended to other industries to support decision-makers in the stages of product development, manufacturing, use and end-of-life, by simultaneously enhancing sustainability and effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 76-89"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143419233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Joint assessment of the environmental impacts and resource criticality of French food consumption scenarios in 2050 from a regionalised life cycle perspective","authors":"Lazare Deteix,&nbsp;Thibault Salou,&nbsp;Eléonore Loiseau","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Five prospective scenarios combining changes in diets, supply chains, and agricultural practices have been proposed for French food consumption in 2050, including a business-as-usual (BAU) situation. This study aims to perform a joint assessment of their environmental impacts and resource criticality according to a regionalised life cycle perspective.</div><div>Food consumption is modelled through 46 representative products. The life cycle inventories (LCI) of these products were parameterized to be consistent with each scenario, considering factors such as diets, agricultural practices, origin and volume of food imports, and energy mixes. The IMPACT World+ method is used to compute regionalised impacts, and Supply Risk Potential (SRP) indices are quantified for mineral resources, land, water and agricultural products based on the Joint Research Centre criticality method.</div><div>The results reported that three of the four scenarios have lower environmental impacts than the BAU scenario for all impact categories. For climate change, impacts could be reduced by between 25 % and 45 %. Similar results were observed for resource criticality. These results were mainly explained by the change in diets, with lower levels of overall consumption, and less animal products in proportion.</div><div>Phosphate and potassium fertilisers use, strongly influenced by agricultural practices, was the primary contributors to mineral resources criticality. Depending on the share of meat products in diets, pastures contributed significantly to land SRP. In the same way, meat consumption influenced agricultural SRP through animal feed. Finally, water SRP was mainly driven by hydropower production for electricity.</div><div>The sensitivity analysis highlighted potential trade-offs between environmental damage and resource criticality for mineral resources and agricultural products (higher environmental impacts lead to lower SRP). Furthermore, the regionalisation of impacts can lead to variations of up to 50 % in impact results for a given scenario. Additional efforts are thus needed for considering local conditions and practices in agricultural LCIs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 37-50"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143418958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of implementation intentions for pro-environmental behavior adoption","authors":"Isabel Carrero ,&nbsp;Carmen Valor ,&nbsp;Raquel Redondo ,&nbsp;Irene Vilà","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many studies have indicated the difficulties that motivated consumers encounter to effectively carry out their intentions to behave sustainably. Goal planning, such as the formulation of implementation intentions, may be effective in facilitating the performance of sustainable actions. However, because past studies have produced mixed results, we do not know under which conditions goal planning is more effective for sustainable behavior adoption. Drawing from goal planning theories, we propose a comprehensive conceptual framework to explain the plausible moderators of the effectiveness of implementation intentions. We test this framework with a random-effects meta-analysis of the existing evidence (<em>k</em> = 31; <em>N</em> = 10,466) to estimate the overall effect of implementation intentions on the adoption of sustainable behavior. The findings show that implementation intentions have an overall large effect (<em>d</em> = 0.781), and moderate when only experimental studies are considered (<em>d</em> = 0.473). Implementation intentions are more effective for sustainable behaviors that require more effort, time or money and when individuals can adapt their plans to their circumstances. The conclusions of this study are relevant for improving both future research and the application of implementation intentions to scale up sustainable behavior adoption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 63-75"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143419068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Consumers' knowledge, perceptions, and preferences regarding bioplastics: Evidence from a survey in Japan","authors":"Yunmeng Cao ,&nbsp;Ayami Otsuka ,&nbsp;Heng Yi Teah ,&nbsp;Yuichiro Kanematsu ,&nbsp;Yasunori Kikuchi","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bioplastics are potential alternatives to conventional plastics because of their renewable and degradable characteristics. Although governments and industries have been promoting the adoption of bioplastics, consumer acceptance remains challenging for broader market penetration. This study aims to understand consumers' knowledge, perceptions, and preferences regarding bioplastics through an online survey in Japan. Cellulose nanofibre (CNF), an emerging plant-derived material, was used as a case to examine consumers' willingness to purchase bioplastic products. A binary logistic model was also applied to determine the personal attributes influencing consumers' intention to adopt bioplastic products. The findings revealed that (1) most respondents were unfamiliar with the term ‘bioplastics’ and held a biased understanding of their properties; (2) products with no direct skin contact, such as inks, shoes, and wrapping film, were more readily accepted; the products with skin contact or food additives, such as diapers, cosmetics, and sweets, were least accepted. (3) the willingness to purchase bioplastic products was positively influenced by environmental concerns (75.9 %), knowledge of bioplastics (69.2 %), preference for domestic materials (39.6 %), innovativeness of changing to green behaviour (35.3 %), attitudes towards plastics (33.7 %), policy awareness (32.7 %), and income (27.4 %). This study contributes to understanding the Japanese consumers' perspectives regarding bioplastics, which is a critical missing piece when tailoring a comprehensive policy for sustainable production and consumption of bioplastics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143378095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of raw silk production in China","authors":"Zhaoshan Wu ,&nbsp;Wenqiang Xu ,&nbsp;Xiongying Wu ,&nbsp;Xuemei Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The textile and apparel industry is an essential livelihood sector; nonetheless, its considerable resource and energy consumption throughout its life cycle substantially impacts human health and the environment. In this study, life cycle impact assessment was integrated with life cycle costing analysis to evaluate the environmental and economic impacts of raw silk production from cradle-to-gate. We aimed to identify key processes and materials in the production chain and pinpoint critical factors with substantial environmental and economic implications. The findings indicated that terrestrial ecotoxicity, freshwater ecotoxicity, marine ecotoxicity, human carcinogenic toxicity, and human non-carcinogenic toxicity were the primary environmental impact categories. Mulberry cultivation, accounting for 46 % of the total environmental impact, emerged as the principal environmental burden of raw silk production. Key materials affecting the environment included urea and potassium chloride in mulberry cultivation, electricity in silkworm farming, and steam and electricity in the silk reeling process. Economically, the total cost of raw silk production amounted to EUR 151.94 per kilogram, comprising internal costs of EUR 126.88 and external costs of EUR 25.06. Silk reeling was identified as the primary cost-driving process, accounting for 49.89 % of the total cost. Major cost contributors included steam and labor wages, which accounted for 43.68 % and 24.34 % of the total cost, respectively. Notably, the extensive use of steam in silk reeling, urea in mulberry cultivation, and electricity in silkworm farming substantially contributed to both economic and environmental burdens. To balance environmental sustainability with economic viability, it is recommended to reduce steam usage in silk reeling, minimize urea application in mulberry cultivation, optimize electricity consumption in silkworm farming, and enhance the comprehensive utilization of by-products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 11-23"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143378097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Farmers’ decisions on crop residues utilization, greenhouse gases reduction and subsidy of crop residue-based bioenergy: An agent-based life cycle model","authors":"Jiaqi Zhang ,&nbsp;Chengxiang Zhuge ,&nbsp;Qitong Huang ,&nbsp;Bin Wang ,&nbsp;Yu'e Li ,&nbsp;Peter Oosterveer","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.02.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To further advance the crop residue-based bioenergy (CRB) industry for climate change mitigation, it is crucial to better understand the influence of stakeholders' behaviours on greenhouse gases (GHG) mitigation potentials. However, the heterogeneity and social dynamics of stakeholders, particularly farmers, have received less attention. This study develops an Agent-based Environmental and Economic assessment (AEE) model that integrates agent-based model and life cycle thinking methods to simulate the CRB system. The AEE model was applied in Heilongjiang Province of China, to investigate how stakeholder decisions affect CRB's GHG reduction potential and government subsidies. Scenario analyses explore the effects of grain markets, subsidies, and collection distance on environmental and economic outcomes. The findings indicate that more farmers are willing to adopt crop residues collection than those currently practicing it, primarily due to logistical constraints. Key factors influencing adoption include farming income, age, farm size and crop types. CRB contributed to 70.6 % of overall GHG reductions with only 41.6 % of the subsidy, demonstrating higher mitigation efficiency. In conclusion, the government must address the deficiency in crop residues logistics to promote CRB development. Additionally, agricultural policies play a crucial role in ensuring CRB feedstock availability by guiding crop types selection. The results suggest that AEE model is adequate in simulating both micro and macro dynamics in the context of CRB, highlighting the robustness of integrating agent-based model and life cycle thinking methods to study complex issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 24-36"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143396168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Normative and empirical solutions to the upcycling dilemma","authors":"Anna Ruini ,&nbsp;Anja Maria Bundgaard ,&nbsp;Mette Alberg Mosgaard ,&nbsp;Søren Løkke ,&nbsp;Massimo Pizzol","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.01.022","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.01.022","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the pressure to transform our society into a circular economy, companies increasingly need to upcycle residual materials into new products by entering symbiotic partnerships. However, a dilemma arises when different companies in the same industrial symbiosis network desire to claim for themselves the benefits of such symbiosis and of the upcycling of materials. This study investigates how this upcycling dilemma can be solved, and which solution is obtained following different guidelines for Life Cycle Assessment, namely the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, the ISO standards, and the Product Environmental Footprint. Firstly, a qualitative assessment of the three guidelines is performed to evaluate their normative and empirical elements and their potential to drive change. Secondly, a quantitative assessment is performed by modelling three real-world cases according to each guideline. In each case a residual material from a “supplier” company is upcycled into a new product by a “user” company. Results show that the choice of guideline has a large impact on the results and the incentive created to enter the industrial symbiosis network. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol and the Product Environmental Footprint have several normative elements. Although simple to apply in theory, they leave space for interpretation and ambiguity and tend favour the user company. The ISO standards have empirical elements leading to case-dependent results and requiring a thorough understanding of the system under study to be effectively applied. All guidelines show an improvement when the assessment is performed at system level instead of focusing on one or the other company in isolation, even though such improvement is small in magnitude. The conclusion is that the idea of “sharing” environmental savings is unsound, as upcycling is only obtained in a joint effort, and the recommendation is to evaluate upcycling systemically.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"54 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143158705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}