Charlie Rioux , Megan E. Waldron , Delaney C. Fulp , Christina M. Personette , McKenna K. Nhem
{"title":"Sensory profile of the highly sensitive personality","authors":"Charlie Rioux , Megan E. Waldron , Delaney C. Fulp , Christina M. Personette , McKenna K. Nhem","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113710","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113710","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Highly Sensitive Personality (HSP) captures sensitivity towards external and internal stimuli and emotional reactivity to overstimulation while the Adult Sensory Profile is a clinical tool that gauges four behavioral patterns that occur in response to overstimulation: low registration, sensation seeking, sensory sensitivity, and sensation avoiding. The Sensory Profile could contribute a more nuanced understanding of the HSP's threshold of sensitivity, behavioral patterns, and sensory needs. Accordingly, this study aimed to examine associations between the HSP and Sensory Profile. 565 United States adults (age 18–94) were recruited via Prolific using the representative sample option, stratifying based on Census sex, age, and ethnicity. Participants completed the HSP scale and the Sensory Profile. Correlations, path analyses, and descriptive statistics showed that participants who scored high on the HSP total scale scored higher on low registration, sensory sensitivity and sensation avoiding. Different sensory tendencies were identified across HSP facets (low sensory threshold, ease of excitation, aesthetic sensitivity), suggesting that highly sensitive people may display different processing patterns and coping mechanisms depending on their HSP subtype. Using the Adult Sensory Profile could better inform support for highly sensitive individuals when their sensory processing type is not complementary to a desired aspect in their life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 113710"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Neurophysiological correlates of sensory processing sensitivity: Altered alpha oscillations during auditory change detection","authors":"Cheng-Ying Yu , Ching-Chi Chiu , Chih-Mao Huang , Hsinjie Lu , Chia-Hsiung Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113676","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113676","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sensory processing sensitivity (SPS) is a personality trait marked by deeper cognitive processing and heightened awareness of environmental subtleties. While prior neuroimaging studies have linked SPS to enhanced top-down processing, its role in bottom-up change detection remains unclear. In this study, 518 healthy adults completed the Highly Sensitive Person (HSP) Scale, from which 26 individuals in the top 10% (high SPS) and 25 in the bottom 10% (low SPS) were recruited for an event-related potential (ERP) experiment. Participants underwent a passive auditory oddball paradigm while ERPs were recorded. Mismatch negativity (MMN) was analyzed in both time and time-frequency domains. Both groups exhibited robust MMN responses, with no significant differences in peak amplitude or latency. However, in the time-frequency analysis, high–SPS individuals showed significantly reduced alpha power to deviant stimuli compared with low–SPS individuals (<em>p</em> = 0.002, effect size <em>r</em> = 0.508). Moreover, reduced alpha power correlated with higher scores on HSP Scale, even after controlling for Extraversion and Emotional Stability (partial <em>r</em> = −0.446, <em>p</em> = 0.029). These findings provide electrophysiological evidence for altered bottom-up sensory processing in SPS, complementing prior research on top-down mechanisms and supporting models proposing fundamental differences in neural sensitivity architecture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 113676"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Corporate Bullshit Receptivity Scale: Development, validation, and associations with workplace outcomes","authors":"Shane Littrell","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113699","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113699","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>From boardrooms and brown bags to emails and earnings calls, business culture often seems overrun by “corporate bullshit,” a <em>semantically empty and often confusing style of communication in organizational contexts that leverages abstruse corporate buzzwords and jargon in a functionally misleading way</em>. At best, corporate bullshit can sometimes seem harmless. At worst, it can disrupt organizational and employee effectiveness in numerous ways including obstructing clear communication, increasing employee disengagement, tarnishing a company's reputation, and exposing businesses to potential financial and legal risks. Here, results from four studies (total <em>N</em> = 1018) report the construction and validation of the Corporate Bullshit Receptivity Scale (CBSR), a novel measure of individual differences in susceptibility to corporate bullshit. Results show that corporate bullshit receptivity is distinct from a general affinity for corporate speech, negatively associated with measures of analytic thinking, and positively related with other bullshit-related constructs in theoretically-consistent ways. Importantly, corporate bullshit receptivity is positively associated with several workplace perception variables and is a robust negative predictor of work-related decision-making. Overall, the findings establish the CBSR as a valid and reliable tool to aid researchers and practitioners in examining the causes, correlates, and consequences of receptivity to bullshit in organizations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 113699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Examining measurement invariance across gender in the BFAS-40","authors":"Andrew Samo, Brent A. Stevenor, Samuel T. McAbee","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113695","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113695","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examined the measurement invariance across gender of a recently developed short form of the Big Five Aspects Scale (BFAS-40; Gallagher et al., 2023) in a large sample (<em>N</em> = 1468). A modern item response theory (IRT) method was used to identify anchor items, and measurement invariance (MI) was examined using multi-group exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). ESEM MI analyses demonstrated strict invariance across genders for the BFAS-40. Moreover, findings for practical significance of measurement invariance testing, indexed by <em>d</em><sub><em>MACS</em></sub> (Nye & Drasgow, 2011), indicated trivial differences between genders across items, with the strongest (though still trivial to small) effects observed for the Withdrawal, Compassion, and Politeness Aspects. Implications as well as limitations and future directions are discussed. Overall, this provides further evidence that the BFAS-40 is a valid and fair tool for measuring the Big Five Aspects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 113695"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Behind the mask of love: Associations among dark triad traits, attachment avoidance and anxiety, romantic beliefs, and intimacy expectations","authors":"Silvija Ručević, Josipa Antunović","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113692","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113692","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examined how Dark Triad traits (Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy), attachment orientations, and romantic beliefs predict intimacy expectations in romantic relationships, while considering potential moderating effects of age and gender. A community sample of 900 adults (56% women; age range = 18–74 years) in intimate relationship completed measures of Dark Triad traits, attachment anxiety and avoidance, idealized romantic beliefs, and expectations for intimacy. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that Machiavellianism was the strongest Dark Triad predictor of lower intimacy expectations, while narcissism showed a weak positive suppression effect after controlling for Machiavellianism, and psychopathy provided no unique contribution. Relational factors were stronger predictors, with avoidant attachment negatively and idealized romantic beliefs positively predicting intimacy expectations. Moderation analyses indicated that the negative link between Machiavellianism and intimacy expectations was significantly moderated by age and gender, such that older women high in Machiavellianism reported the lowest intimacy expectations, whereas younger women and men across all ages showed a more stable pattern. In contrast, narcissism and psychopathy exhibited no demographic moderation. Overall, these findings highlight that both personality traits and relational schemas shape intimacy expectations, but their effects are modest. The study underscores the importance of integrating cognitive, personality, and demographic factors to better understand maladaptive relationship dynamics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 113692"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146189751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Personality descriptions of lawyers: A 120-year big data analysis of English books","authors":"Liang Xu , Yiwen Wu , Zehua Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113685","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113685","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lawyers' personalities shape public expectations of the legal profession and influence perceptions of professional identity. This study examined how lawyers' personalities have been described in 14,953,356 English-language books over the past 120 years (1900–2019) using a corpus-based approach. We first compared the relative salience of the Big Five traits across historical periods, and then analyzed the polarity of these traits by contrasting lawyers with the general population. The results showed that conscientiousness was the most frequently discussed trait overall, while agreeableness dominated in the early twentieth century and openness became most prominent in recent decades; extraversion remained relatively stable, and neuroticism was rarely highlighted. Polarity analyses indicated that lawyers were more positively described in conscientiousness, openness, and extraversion, but more negatively in agreeableness and neuroticism. Notably, shifts in trait salience (such as the mid-twentieth-century rise of conscientiousness and the recent prominence of openness) may reflect broader social, cultural, and professional transformations, including post-war institutional changes, evolving cultural values, and innovations in legal education and practice. These findings provide a comprehensive view of how societal perceptions of lawyers' personalities have evolved, highlighting both enduring stereotypes and dynamic shifts over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 113685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146189752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Charlotta S. Jacobsen , Elisabeth Prestele , Eunike Wetzel
{"title":"State grandiose and vulnerable narcissism in relation to perfectionistic cognitions","authors":"Charlotta S. Jacobsen , Elisabeth Prestele , Eunike Wetzel","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113668","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113668","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Narcissism and perfectionism are both associated with a range of achievement-related and clinical outcomes and are correlated at the trait level. Despite these indications of a shared foundation, their association has yet to be analyzed at the state level, where it may reveal shared situational contingencies. To address this gap, the present study examined the constructs' state-level relationship in daily life. For that purpose, we conducted an ambulatory assessment study with <em>N</em> = 285 participants across 42 measurement occasions. Trait-level perfectionism and narcissism were assessed at baseline, while their state-level counterparts were assessed during the ambulatory assessment phase. As expected, trait narcissism and perfectionism were positively correlated. Using multi-level modeling, we analyzed within- and between-person associations of the state-level constructs. State grandiose narcissism was positively associated with perfectionistic striving cognitions and negatively with perfectionistic concern cognitions, whereas state vulnerable narcissism was positively related to perfectionistic concern cognitions. At the between-person level, average state grandiose narcissism was positively related to perfectionistic striving cognitions, while state vulnerable narcissism was positively related to perfectionistic concern cognitions. These associations are discussed in terms of potential underlying processes. Future research could further explore shared situational contingencies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 113668"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146189755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Know yourself, be yourself: Self-concept clarity as a mediator between parental psychological control and happiness orientations","authors":"Hezhi Chen , Zhijia Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113686","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113686","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Happiness orientations represent distinct pathways to well-being, including hedonic approach (pursuing pleasure), hedonic avoidance (avoiding pain), and eudaimonic (seeking meaning) orientations. While these overarching goals strongly shape life outcomes, their developmental origins remain insufficiently understood. The present research investigates parental psychological control as a key antecedent and tests self-concept clarity as the underlying mechanism. Results revealed that parental psychological control was associated with decreased hedonic approach and eudaimonic orientations and increased hedonic avoidance tendencies, and diminished self-concept clarity partly mediated these effects (Study 1). The experimental manipulation of self-concept clarity (Studies 2a–2b) causally decreased pain-avoidance motives and increased eudaimonic motives through enhanced state self-concept clarity. Although the manipulation also influenced pleasure-approach motives, this effect was not mediated by state self-concept clarity. Our findings emphasize the influence of self-knowledge in shaping how people pursue happiness and suggest that disruptions in identity development may lead to less healthy routes to well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 113686"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Bright systems, dark traits: High-performance work systems amplify narcissistic managers' derailment","authors":"Promila Agarwal , Elaine Farndale","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113700","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113700","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Managerial derailment is costly yet still poorly understood. Using multi-source BENCHMARKS ratings from 510 managers (including their peers, supervisors, and subordinates), we investigate whether high-performance work systems (HPWSs) moderate the relationship between narcissism and derailment. Trait activation theory provides the overarching person–situation logic, while narcissism status-pursuit models explain why HPWS cues are particularly trait-relevant. Results show that narcissism is positively associated with derailment, and under strong HPWSs, narcissistic managers receive markedly higher derailment ratings. We argue this occurs because HPWS constitutes a high-density bundle of status-relevant and ego-evaluative cues that (a) increases the detectability and consequences of interpersonal harm and (b) heightens ego threat and defensive reactions among narcissistic managers. The findings position HPWS not only as a performance-enhancing system, but also as a governance and diagnostic context that can accelerate the career consequences of maladaptive leader traits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 113700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Understanding procrastination and its association with psychopathology from reinforcement sensitivity and personality functioning perspectives","authors":"Ömer Taha Sözer","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113693","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.paid.2026.113693","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Procrastination is a highly prevalent phenomenon, with literature highlighting various individual, situational, and environmental factors associated with this tendency. Among individual factors, trait-based approaches are the most prominent, yet significant heterogeneity exists within these frameworks. The present study utilized the trait structures of the neuroscience-based Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) and the Level of Personality Functioning (LPFS), emerging from the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders in DSM-5, as the primary conceptual framework. A total of 476 participants completed self-report measures of o-BIS, reward interest, LPFS-BF, general procrastination scale (GPS-9), and GHQ-12. Hierarchical regression analyses showed that both reward sensitivity and personality functioning were significant predictors of procrastination, with personality functioning accounting for an additional 11% of variance beyond trait-based approaches. Furthermore, approximately 9% of the effect of personality functioning on psychological symptoms was mediated by procrastination. These findings emphasize the importance of considering the multidimensional nature of reward sensitivity and highlight approaches addressing different facets of personality. In addition to clinical implications, the study addresses limitations that may guide future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 113693"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}