Research PolicyPub Date : 2024-11-28DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2024.105156
Norrin Halilem, Balla Diop
{"title":"“Meet me at the backdoor”: A multiple case study of academic entrepreneurs bypassing their technology transfer offices","authors":"Norrin Halilem, Balla Diop","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105156","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105156","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article investigates the underexplored phenomenon of technology transfer office (TTO) bypassing in academic entrepreneurship. While TTOs are established to centralize and support intellectual property-based commercialization, a significant portion of entrepreneurial projects avoid the TTO. Relying on both economic (transaction cost theory) and ethical (Tyler's justice model) considerations, this study explores the motivations and contextual factors behind a researcher's decision to commercialize an invention using means other than the TTO. This multiple case study employs an in-depth exploratory qualitative approach to investigate five academic entrepreneurs across different disciplines in Canadian universities who chose to bypass their TTO, often in contravention of institutional policies. Our findings reveal a complex interplay among individual motivations, institutional policies, and market realities. We identified four paths of awareness and strategic intent in this process ranging from unintentional non-compliance to tactical avoidance which challenge a simplistic perception of TTO bypassing as merely unintentional rather than deliberate. The study also reveals four overlapping contexts that promote TTO bypassing: confidence in personal expertise, previous negative experience of using the TTO, peer-influenced skepticism, and external partner challenges. Furthermore, the findings show that the reasons for bypassing include both economic and ethical motivations which steer academic entrepreneurs toward alternative, privately managed commercialization paths. The article concludes with some implications for university managers and policymakers related to how to address the multifaceted motivations for TTO bypassing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 2","pages":"Article 105156"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142723764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2024-11-23DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2024.105151
Raja Roy
{"title":"Governance of knowledge development in a public-private partnership: NASA's efforts to design the Space Shuttle","authors":"Raja Roy","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105151","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105151","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>What conceptual opportunities for the theory of innovation governance are uncovered by analyzing the knowledge development required to design the first reusable spacecraft, the Space Shuttle, through a public-private partnership? Using data collected from various sources, this study provides insights into how NASA, a public agency, governed knowledge development while engaging private actors in anticipation of creating a long-running shuttle program. First, <em>within</em> each phase of the design process, knowledge was developed through knowledge generation, knowledge filtration, and knowledge combination and involved a division of labor. Second, knowledge reinforcing—whereby the knowledge developed in the previous phase was innovated upon using new knowledge—occurred <em>between</em> phases. In summary, the paper highlights how public-private partnerships govern knowledge development by managing division of labor and reinforcing knowledge. These insights pave the way for future investigations at the intersection of governance mechanisms and innovation processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 2","pages":"Article 105151"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142723763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2024-11-16DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2024.105148
Daniel Z. Mack , Guoli Chen , Po-Hsuan Hsu , Yen Teik Lee , Gerard George
{"title":"Interfaces, social information processing, and diversity cascades: How board diversity influences invention output","authors":"Daniel Z. Mack , Guoli Chen , Po-Hsuan Hsu , Yen Teik Lee , Gerard George","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105148","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105148","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although recent studies report a positive relationship between board diversity and firms' invention output, less is known about the mechanisms by which they operate, given that boards are typically far removed from on-the-ground invention activities. Drawing from research on interfaces and social information processing, we propose a theory of diversity cascades across the organizational hierarchy. Specifically, we posit that board diversity has a positive––albeit indirect––influence on firms' invention output. This relationship is mediated by the diversity of top management teams and inventor diversity, as board diversity cascades from the top to lower ranks of an organization. This indirect effect is strengthened by the presence of inside executive directors who span the board-TMT interface, especially in terms of demographic diversity. We find support for our hypotheses by investigating a longitudinal sample of S&P 1500 firms and their patenting activities over the period 2000–2018.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 1","pages":"Article 105148"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142664231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2024-11-14DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2024.105142
Daniel P. Gross , Bhaven N. Sampat
{"title":"The Government Patent Register: A new resource for measuring U.S. government-funded patenting","authors":"Daniel P. Gross , Bhaven N. Sampat","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105142","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105142","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We introduce new historical administrative data identifying U.S. government-funded patents since the early twentieth century. In addition to the funding agency, the data report whether the government has title to the patent (“title” patents) or funded a patent assigned to a private organization (“license” patents). The data include a large number of “license” patents that cannot be linked to government funding from patent text or other sources. Combining the historical data with modern administrative sources, we present a public, consolidated data series measuring U.S. government-funded patents — including funding agencies — through 2020, and we provide code to extend this series in the future. We use the data to document long-run patterns in U.S. government-funded patents and federal patent policy, propose ways in which these data can be used in future research, and discuss limitations of the data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 1","pages":"Article 105142"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142664232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2024-11-13DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2024.105149
Daniel Garcia-Macia , Julia Korosteleva
{"title":"Tracing productivity growth channels in the UK","authors":"Daniel Garcia-Macia , Julia Korosteleva","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105149","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105149","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>What drove the UK productivity slowdown post-Global Financial Crisis, and how is the post-Covid recovery expected to differ? This paper traces the sources of TFP growth in the UK over the last two decades through the lens of a structural model of innovation, using registry data on the universe of firms. The dominant innovation source in the pre-GFC decade were improvements by incumbent firms on their own products, whereas creation of new varieties by entrants took a leading role post-GFC. In the Covid recovery, survey data (as of July 2021) suggested that creative destruction (i.e., innovation replacing other firms' products) was expected to gain importance. Innovation remains key for the UK economy to secure sustainable productivity growth. Once the recovery is underway, growth policies should prioritize labor and capital reallocation across firms, in addition to R&D support and human capital investment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 1","pages":"Article 105149"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142664230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2024-11-12DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2024.105145
Jason Campbell , Steven Levkoff
{"title":"Assessing the productivity and abatement effects of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendment","authors":"Jason Campbell , Steven Levkoff","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105145","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105145","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How does environmental regulation affect productivity <em>and</em> emissions? Measuring these disparate effects is important for effective eco-policy design, but these channels have been difficult to disentangle. We leverage a new methodology to model the joint production of output and multiple pollutants at the plant level. Exploiting variation from the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendment, our novel and versatile Generalized By-production approach allows us to conduct the first evaluation of the policy that explicitly models efficiencies of output (electricity), as well as efficiencies of NO<sub>x</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> reductions for coal-fired power plants. Our analysis highlights not only the production-pollution trade-off plants face, but also complementary effects of pollution abatement <em>across</em> pollutants. We show that the 1990 announcement of the policy induced anticipatory responses despite the regulation not requiring strict compliance until 1995. Plants forced to comply with the policy’s Phase I SO<sub>2</sub> reductions (i.e. assigned nonattainment designation), on average, suffered greater efficiency losses in productivity and showed larger improvements in both pollutant reductions, relative to lightly regulated (attainment) plants. Regulation-induced impacts vary by plant vintage, state environmental quality, and eco-friendly behaviors. Crucially, improvements in pollutant reductions outweigh the countervailing contractions in electricity generation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 1","pages":"Article 105145"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142664229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2024-11-12DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2024.105147
Shumin Qiu , Claudia Steinwender , Pierre Azoulay
{"title":"Who stands on the shoulders of Chinese (Scientific) Giants? Evidence from chemistry","authors":"Shumin Qiu , Claudia Steinwender , Pierre Azoulay","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105147","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105147","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China’s rise in science has the potential to push forward the knowledge frontier, but mere production of knowledge does not guarantee that others are able to build on it. We ask whether chemistry research originating from China offers broad shoulders for follow-on scientists to stand on. We show that even after carefully controlling for the quality of Chinese research, Chinese scientists’ articles receive on average 28% fewer citations from US researchers, relative to scientists from other countries. Only Chinese researchers with unusually deep networks in the US can overcome, at least in part, the citation discount.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 1","pages":"Article 105147"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142664228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Institutionalising the digital transition: The role of digital innovation intermediaries","authors":"Ana Colovic , Annalisa Caloffi , Federica Rossi , Margherita Russo","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105146","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105146","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine how digital innovation intermediaries, mandated to support the digital transition as part of digital policy agendas, engage in institutional work to facilitate the adoption and diffusion of digital technologies. Building on neoinstitutional theory and the socio-technical transitions literature, our investigation aims to uncover intermediaries' institutional work on cultural-cognitive, normative, and regulative institutions across three levels of intermediation: organisation-, network- and ecosystem level. Based on a large evidence base related to 18 publicly-funded digital innovation intermediaries in France, including primary and secondary sources, we uncover the various forms of institutional work intermediaries engage in while facilitating the digital transition. We find that intermediaries' institutional work focuses on disrupting symbolic systems, creating relational systems and artefacts, and creating and maintaining routines. Intermediaries carry out different kinds of institutional work at different levels of intermediation. Furthermore, different types of intermediaries focus on distinct levels of intermediation and different institutions. Implications for policy and management are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 1","pages":"Article 105146"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142664227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2024-11-10DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2024.105152
Carl Purcell , Jill Manthorpe , Juliette Malley
{"title":"Understanding the role of internal governance units in the process of social innovation: The case of Shared Lives Plus in England","authors":"Carl Purcell , Jill Manthorpe , Juliette Malley","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105152","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105152","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amid increasing demand for public services and stretched resources policymakers often promote ‘social innovation’ to address these tensions. However, critics argue that social innovation may just be a ‘fashionable concept’ or ‘buzzword’ in public policy discourse and that more empirical research is needed to help improve our understanding of the actors and mechanisms that drive effective social innovations. In response this article draws upon a case study of the development of Shared Lives as an alternative national model of adult social care in England over the past 40 years. Drawing on interviews with 50 individuals carried-out between late-2021 and early-2023, including those involved in four different local schemes, we highlight the positive role played by the organisation Shared Lives Plus, which we conceptualise as an ‘internal governance unit’ (IGU), in terms of establishing and maintaining a ‘community innovation infrastructure’. However, the example of Shared Lives also illustrates the difficult challenges IGUs can face in trying to move social innovations beyond an institutional ‘niche’.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 1","pages":"Article 105152"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142664030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2024-11-08DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2024.105136
Thanos Fragkandreas
{"title":"Case study research on innovation systems: Paradox, dialectical analysis and resolution","authors":"Thanos Fragkandreas","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105136","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105136","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper addresses a largely unnoticed methodological paradox regarding the scientific status of case study research on innovation systems (ISs). Case study research has been the methodological catalyst for the genesis and establishment of the ISs approach, as one of the most widely used theoretical and policy-relevant perspectives on innovation in the social sciences. However, many ISs scholars believe that this type of research is not scientific enough. To deepen our understanding of the case study paradox, this paper utilises the dialectical method (also known as dialectics); in particular, the analytical triad of thesis (affirmation), antithesis (negation), and synthesis (transformation). It is shown that a dialectical resolution to the case study paradox involves a three-phase process. First, the analysis introduces the <strong><em>deductive thesis</em></strong>, which, based on the hypothetico-deductive model of science, posits that case study research on ISs cannot investigate causality and generality. The second step formulates the <strong><em>retroductive antithesis</em></strong>, which, based on the retroductive model of science, holds that case study research inherently possesses the ability to infer causality and generality. The third and final phase transforms the contradiction between the deductive thesis and the retroductive antithesis into a new methodological perspective, the <strong><em>detroductive synthesis</em></strong>, wherein – depending on the model of scientific explanation – case study research is both incapable (deductive thesis) and capable (retroductive antithesis) of inferring causality and generality. Overall, the analysis enables IS scholars to conduct case study research in a paradox-free, stand-alone, causal-explanatory, and generalisable way. The paper ends by discussing thought-provoking implications for research practice, the peer-review process, and the evaluation of innovation policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 1","pages":"Article 105136"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142664233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}