中介机构如何管理知识以支持公共创新采购:以英国国防为例

IF 8 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Kostas Selviaridis , Elvira Uyarra
{"title":"中介机构如何管理知识以支持公共创新采购:以英国国防为例","authors":"Kostas Selviaridis ,&nbsp;Elvira Uyarra","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate how innovation intermediaries mobilise their knowledge management capacities to support public procurement of innovation (PPI). Prior research on PPI intermediation has highlighted various knowledge-intensive roles of intermediaries (e.g., as subject experts and trainers), but how exactly intermediaries are organised internally and how they operate to source, process, and transfer PPI-related knowledge remains elusive. We offer novel insights through a rich case study of intermediation in the UK defence context, where intermediaries are tasked with addressing gaps in innovation-oriented procurement knowledge and capabilities and help to improve procurement performance. We contribute to PPI intermediation literature by showing how intermediaries utilise their absorptive capacity and desorptive capacity to manage technical, commercial, and managerial knowledge in support of PPI implementation. We also extend the broader literature on innovation intermediaries by unveiling the organisational structures, processes, and routines underpinning the enactment of intermediary absorptive and desorptive capacities; and elucidating the distinctive nature of desorptive capacity in the context of innovation intermediation. We additionally demonstrate that intermediaries' absorptive capacity, rather than that of client organisations, creates value for intermediaries and their clients alike.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"54 10","pages":"Article 105335"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How intermediaries manage knowledge to support public procurement of innovation: The case of UK defence\",\"authors\":\"Kostas Selviaridis ,&nbsp;Elvira Uyarra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We investigate how innovation intermediaries mobilise their knowledge management capacities to support public procurement of innovation (PPI). Prior research on PPI intermediation has highlighted various knowledge-intensive roles of intermediaries (e.g., as subject experts and trainers), but how exactly intermediaries are organised internally and how they operate to source, process, and transfer PPI-related knowledge remains elusive. We offer novel insights through a rich case study of intermediation in the UK defence context, where intermediaries are tasked with addressing gaps in innovation-oriented procurement knowledge and capabilities and help to improve procurement performance. We contribute to PPI intermediation literature by showing how intermediaries utilise their absorptive capacity and desorptive capacity to manage technical, commercial, and managerial knowledge in support of PPI implementation. We also extend the broader literature on innovation intermediaries by unveiling the organisational structures, processes, and routines underpinning the enactment of intermediary absorptive and desorptive capacities; and elucidating the distinctive nature of desorptive capacity in the context of innovation intermediation. We additionally demonstrate that intermediaries' absorptive capacity, rather than that of client organisations, creates value for intermediaries and their clients alike.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Policy\",\"volume\":\"54 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 105335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733325001647\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733325001647","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们调查了创新中介机构如何调动他们的知识管理能力来支持创新的公共采购(PPI)。先前关于PPI中介的研究强调了中介机构的各种知识密集型角色(例如,作为学科专家和培训师),但中介机构内部究竟是如何组织的,以及它们如何运作以获取、处理和转移PPI相关知识,仍然是难以捉摸的。我们通过在英国国防背景下丰富的中介案例研究提供新颖的见解,中介机构的任务是解决创新导向采购知识和能力方面的差距,并帮助提高采购绩效。我们通过展示中介机构如何利用其吸收能力和解吸能力来管理技术、商业和管理知识,以支持PPI的实施,从而为PPI中介文献做出贡献。我们还通过揭示支持中介吸收和解吸能力制定的组织结构、流程和惯例,扩展了关于创新中介的更广泛的文献;并阐明了创新中介背景下解吸能力的独特性质。我们还证明,中介机构的吸收能力,而不是客户组织的吸收能力,为中介机构及其客户创造了价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How intermediaries manage knowledge to support public procurement of innovation: The case of UK defence
We investigate how innovation intermediaries mobilise their knowledge management capacities to support public procurement of innovation (PPI). Prior research on PPI intermediation has highlighted various knowledge-intensive roles of intermediaries (e.g., as subject experts and trainers), but how exactly intermediaries are organised internally and how they operate to source, process, and transfer PPI-related knowledge remains elusive. We offer novel insights through a rich case study of intermediation in the UK defence context, where intermediaries are tasked with addressing gaps in innovation-oriented procurement knowledge and capabilities and help to improve procurement performance. We contribute to PPI intermediation literature by showing how intermediaries utilise their absorptive capacity and desorptive capacity to manage technical, commercial, and managerial knowledge in support of PPI implementation. We also extend the broader literature on innovation intermediaries by unveiling the organisational structures, processes, and routines underpinning the enactment of intermediary absorptive and desorptive capacities; and elucidating the distinctive nature of desorptive capacity in the context of innovation intermediation. We additionally demonstrate that intermediaries' absorptive capacity, rather than that of client organisations, creates value for intermediaries and their clients alike.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信