Research PolicyPub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2026.105410
Xiaoyong Dai , Mengqi Wang , Kaihua Chen
{"title":"Discriminatory R&D policy mix for small and large firms: Policy sequencing and behavioral responses","authors":"Xiaoyong Dai , Mengqi Wang , Kaihua Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2026.105410","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2026.105410","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the interaction between the allocation of R&D subsidies and tax incentives, and how policy sequencing shapes the behavioral outcomes of the policy mix, particularly for small and large firms. We analyze a Chinese R&D tax incentive program that provides tax incentives to firms with R&D intensity above a specified threshold. We document discriminatory policy sequencing: large firms typically receive larger subsidies before qualifying for tax incentives, whereas small firms receive larger subsidies after becoming eligible for tax incentives. This sequencing is associated with heterogeneous behavioral responses. Large firms tend to maintain their R&D levels just above the threshold, whereas small firms continue to increase R&D spending after surpassing the eligibility threshold and receiving tax incentives. The empirical findings indicate a policy misalignment: financially constrained small firms rely more on subsidies to cover upfront R&D costs, whereas large firms strategically respond to the tax incentive threshold even without initial R&D subsidies. Our study highlights the importance of aligning policy-instrument sequencing with firms' specific needs and conditions to design and implement more effective R&D policy mixes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"55 3","pages":"Article 105410"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145979537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2026.105419
Bastian Krieger , Anne Rainville
{"title":"The effects of public procurement requirements and voluntary standards on environmental product innovation","authors":"Bastian Krieger , Anne Rainville","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2026.105419","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2026.105419","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public procurement requirements and voluntary standards are increasingly used to foster environmental product innovations. However, quantitative evidence on their individual and joint effects is absent, and their conceptualization remains at an early stage. This paper makes two contributions. First, it introduces the distinction between rigid threshold and flexible benchmark uses of voluntary standards in public tenders, theorizing their opposing effects on environmental product innovations. Second, using data from 5127 firms in the 2021 German Innovation Survey, it provides the first quantitative analysis of their individual and joint effects across varying degrees of environmental significance. Results show that public procurement requirements and voluntary standards individually increase the probability of firms introducing more radical/disruptive environmental product innovations with high environmental significance. However, their interaction reveals a negative effect – discomplementarity – likely driven by a rigid standard use, which offsets the effectiveness of procurement requirements. For more incremental environmental product innovations with low environmental significance, only voluntary standards exhibit a positive effect. These findings suggest that voluntary standards might limit the capability of public procurement to foster more radical/disruptive environmental product innovations, while supporting more incremental innovations when used independently.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"55 3","pages":"Article 105419"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146038616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2025.105402
Andrea Fosfuri , Jay Prakash Nagar
{"title":"Timing is key: Navigating venture capital funding for science-based startups","authors":"Andrea Fosfuri , Jay Prakash Nagar","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105402","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105402","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Science-based startups, which develop technologies at the frontier of scientific knowledge, play a crucial role in innovation ecosystems. However, despite their potential for groundbreaking innovation, these startups may face frictions in securing venture capital (VC) funding. This paper investigates whether science-based startups systematically take longer to secure VC funding compared to startups that are less rooted in science. We develop a formal model that highlights a misalignment between scientists, who often prioritize technological advancement, and VCs, who seek market validation. This misalignment is particularly relevant in early funding rounds, where startups have stronger outside options. Drawing on PitchBook data for startups founded between 1990 and 2015, we find that science-based startups often struggle to attract timely investment, which may limit their ability to scale and commercialize new technologies. This is reflected in a negative correlation between longer times to VC funding and subsequent startup performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"55 3","pages":"Article 105402"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145898051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-01-12DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2025.105395
Philipp Baaden , Stefanie Bröring , Michael Rennings , Philip Shapira
{"title":"Researcher positions and the emergence of interdisciplinary scientific fields – The case of synthetic biology","authors":"Philipp Baaden , Stefanie Bröring , Michael Rennings , Philip Shapira","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105395","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105395","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interdisciplinary scientific fields emerge at the intersections of existing disciplines, driving innovations that are well-suited to address grand societal challenges. While the literature generally recognizes the role of individual researchers in advancing these fields, less is known about how the researchers' positions impact the emergence of an interdisciplinary scientific field. Using synthetic biology as a case, this study analyzes publication and research grant data to explore how researchers contribute to and shape these evolutionary processes.</div><div>We conceptualize four types of researchers as drivers in the formation of interdisciplinary fields: (1) impactful, (2) innovation-oriented, (3) socially-central, and (4) interdisciplinary researchers. Employing a dynamic partitioning approach based on personal characteristics, and leveraging findings from a random forest regression analysis, we examine how distinct groups and features of researchers contribute to the evolution of synthetic biology.</div><div>Our findings indicate that researchers with a background in biological sciences have a higher citation impact on the field and highlight the critical role of early- and mid-career researchers in shaping the field's early innovation potential, as measured by patent citations. Furthermore, our analysis shows that interdisciplinary collaborations are–unsurprisingly–important for an emerging interdisciplinary field, as indicated by researchers' social centrality. However, researchers with more distant academic backgrounds relative to the emerging interdisciplinary scientific field tend to be more interdisciplinary than those with a higher proximity.</div><div>These insights advance our understanding of how researchers' positions shape emerging scientific fields, offering insights into which researchers contribute to field formation and enhancing our knowledge of the micro-level dynamics of interdisciplinary scientific field formation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"55 3","pages":"Article 105395"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145979536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-01-23DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2026.105423
Douglas Cumming , Hisham Farag , Santosh Koirala , Danny McGowan
{"title":"How disruptive is financial technology?","authors":"Douglas Cumming , Hisham Farag , Santosh Koirala , Danny McGowan","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2026.105423","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2026.105423","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We study whether Financial Technology (Fintech) disrupts the banking sector by intensifying competition for scarce deposits funds and raising deposit rates. Using difference-in-difference estimation around the exogenous removal of marketplace platform investing restrictions by US states, we show the cost of deposits increase by approximately 5.9% within small financial institutions. However, these price changes are effective in preventing a drain of liquidity. Size and geographical diversification through branch networks can mitigate the effects of Fintech competition by sourcing deposits from less competitive markets. The findings highlight the unintended consequences of the growing Fintech sector on banks and offer policy insights for regulators and managers into the ongoing development and impact of technology on the banking sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"55 3","pages":"Article 105423"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146038619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-02-02DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2026.105426
Andreas P. Distel , Christoph Grimpe , Marion Poetz
{"title":"From evidence to impact: The use of scientific research in policy documents","authors":"Andreas P. Distel , Christoph Grimpe , Marion Poetz","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2026.105426","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2026.105426","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine the use of scientific research in the development of policy documents within the context of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for diagnosing, treating, and managing diabetes. Using natural language processing, we identify “hidden citations” (i.e., textual credit without formal citations) and “token citations” (i.e., formal citations without textual credit) to scientific research within CPGs to understand how scientific evidence is selected and integrated. We find that both types of citations are pervasive, calling into question the use of formal citations alone in understanding the societal impact of scientific research. Using data on scholarly citations and expert ratings, we find that hidden citations are positively associated with the actual impact of the research on patients and caregivers while token citations associate positively with scientific impact. Qualitative insights gathered from interviews with senior guideline writers further illustrate the reasons for certain functions of scientific research, which involve balancing scientific rigor with practical demands in the guideline writing process, the need for local adaptations, political dynamics on the organizational level, and individual preferences towards certain types of studies or the use of experiential knowledge. Our work underscores the critical role of research utilization in translating scientific evidence into policy, showing that policymaker decisions shape societal impact as much as the engagement efforts of scientists, and extends institutional accounts of symbolic and substantive knowledge use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"55 3","pages":"Article 105426"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146188545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-01-08DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2025.105403
Cylien Gibert , Quentin Plantec
{"title":"The living lab and the cursed catalyst: Navigating the legitimacy challenges of innovation intermediaries for sustainable innovation","authors":"Cylien Gibert , Quentin Plantec","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105403","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105403","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sustainability challenges, such as water resource management, increasingly demand frontier technologies and the coordination of diverse stakeholders. Living labs have surged globally—often backed by public funding—as pivotal intermediaries in these contexts. Although their effectiveness is debated, little attention has been paid to how they address the challenges of implementing sustainability-oriented innovations that leverage advanced science and engage multiple stakeholders. Focusing on the project level, where operational complexities are most apparent, we examine the ‘MOSIS’ initiative to enhance water management along the Senegal River using a science-based Earth Observation system. This project involves academia, industry, governments, international organisations, and a living lab. Recognised at CoP26 and considered by the World Bank for broader scaling, MOSIS exemplifies the integration of cutting-edge technologies and multi-stakeholder coordination. We identify three roles—technological expert, stakeholder orchestrator, and end-user empowerer—each corresponding to one dimension of legitimacy (instrumental, relational, and moral). When combined, these roles create synergies that endow the living lab with strong active legitimacy, but also trigger dis-synergies that obscure the categorical cues required for passive cognitive legitimacy. We term this predicament the “Cursed Catalyst”: a situation whereby an intermediary's success yields an unbalanced legitimacy portfolio that, unless proactively rebalanced by efforts to strengthen cognitive legitimacy, ultimately constrains its perceived impact on sustainable innovation and jeopardises its long-term survival. These findings have significant implications for research policy and funding bodies, which rely on living labs to accelerate the transfer of frontier science into real-world sustainability contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"55 3","pages":"Article 105403"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145941049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-01-19DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2025.105409
Panayiotis C. Andreou , Neophytos Lambertides , Marina Magidou , Anna E. Maruska
{"title":"Measuring R&D activity through 10-K narrative disclosures","authors":"Panayiotis C. Andreou , Neophytos Lambertides , Marina Magidou , Anna E. Maruska","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105409","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105409","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study develops a textual R&D measure based on narrative disclosures in firms’ 10-K filings. Using a tailored lexicon and a core-contextual word-pairing approach, our measure captures qualitative narratives of firms’ R&D activities. We validate this measure using discriminant, construct, reliability, predictive, and external validity tests. The results show that the measure captures latent R&D activity and significantly improves the prediction of important outcomes, including patents, citations, and firm valuation, particularly for firms with missing or zero reported R&D data. We find that narrative R&D is positively associated with growth opportunities, suggesting a mechanism through which it influences firm valuation. Further, positive changes in narrative R&D are not associated with the R&D puzzle, suggesting that the measure facilitates more immediate market integration of innovation-related information than traditional metrics. The textual R&D measure provides a new perspective on the drivers of future innovation output and firm performance, shedding light on key factors that shape long-term competitiveness. Importantly, the textual measure helps to mitigate the limitations of traditional R&D metrics, particularly in cases where firms under-report R&D expenditures or engage in non-patentable forms of innovation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"55 3","pages":"Article 105409"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146038617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-01-19DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2026.105411
Stefan Buechele , Guido Buenstorf , Matthias Huegel , Johannes Koenig , Maria Theissen
{"title":"Is the dominance of graduates from top-tier universities among tenured faculty driven by prestige or output? Evidence from 50 years of university appointments in Germany","authors":"Stefan Buechele , Guido Buenstorf , Matthias Huegel , Johannes Koenig , Maria Theissen","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2026.105411","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2026.105411","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prior research has shown that a large fraction of tenured university faculty in the U.S. and other countries were trained at a small number of highly prestigious universities. The question remains whether this concentration is due to competitive advantages held by candidates from these universities, or whether it reflects the larger output of early-career researchers aspiring to faculty positions by these universities. To address this question, we analyze data covering the full population of doctoral graduates in Germany since the 1960s. Similar to studies of the U.S. system of higher education, we observe a strong concentration of professors trained at a small number of universities, with the top five universities accounting for 17.9% of all appointed university professors. However, we find no systematic evidence indicating that the prestige of the doctoral degree-granting university systematically affects individuals' odds of being appointed to professorships, as prestigious universities train disproportionate numbers of doctoral graduates. Despite increasing stratification tendencies within the German system of higher education, our results also do not indicate that the importance of the degree-granting university for the academic careers of its doctoral graduates has increased over the past 50 years. While doctoral graduates from top-tier traditional universities and top-tier technical universities appear to be more likely to secure faculty positions at universities of the same category, this pattern reflects a large share of doctoral graduates returning to their degree-granting university after initial appointments elsewhere.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"55 3","pages":"Article 105411"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146038615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Research PolicyPub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2025-12-19DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2025.105397
Ziyu Chen , Xiaohu Zhang , Frank van der Wouden
{"title":"Neighborhood clusters and citywide technological diversification","authors":"Ziyu Chen , Xiaohu Zhang , Frank van der Wouden","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105397","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.respol.2025.105397","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The clustering of economic activities is widely considered to be a key driver of economic competitiveness. However, little is known how technological activities are clustered within cities and how such neighborhood concentration is associated with citywide technological diversification, as the existing literature tends to treat cities as homogenous units, neglecting their neighborhood dynamics and heterogeneity. To fill this gap, we develop a novel measurement framework to identify neighborhood-level technology clusters within 260 Chinese cities, using 16 million geo-coded patents from 2003 to 2018. We then link this neighborhood-level clustering measure with the rate, direction, and complexity of citywide diversification in patenting activities. We measure technological diversification as the entry of a new revealed comparative advantage in a city's patenting portfolio and find that neighborhood-level clusters (1) contribute to an increasing rate of diversification at the city level; (2) channel diversification toward technologies related to existing specializations; (3) are associated with more complex diversification. Our results suggest that zooming in on the micro-dynamics of tech clusters provides a more nuanced view of their advantages than is typically assumed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"55 2","pages":"Article 105397"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145796613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}