Journal of Management Studies最新文献_第6页

Committed Actors, Institutional Complexity, and Pathways to Compromise: The Emergence of Islamic Banking in Germany 坚定的行动者、复杂的体制和妥协之路：德国伊斯兰银行的兴起

IF 7 1区管理学

Journal of Management Studies Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13061

Ali Aslan Gümüşay, Renate E. Meyer, Markus A. Höllerer

{"title":"Committed Actors, Institutional Complexity, and Pathways to Compromise: The Emergence of Islamic Banking in Germany","authors":"Ali Aslan Gümüşay, Renate E. Meyer, Markus A. Höllerer","doi":"10.1111/joms.13061","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joms.13061","url":null,"abstract":"The formation of the first Islamic bank in Germany in 2015 came with considerable tensions at the interface of the religious logic, on the one hand, and the state logic, on the other. With the Islamic religious logic being novel to the German field of banking and finance, innovative templates were established to deal effectively with the resulting tensions and conflicts. Drawing on qualitative data, we investigate how the bank, with its strong commitment to Islam, navigated such novel institutional complexity and the challenges stemming from the jurisdictional overlap. We identify four distinct compromise mechanisms in this institutionally complex situation, in which a committed actor prioritizes one logic over another: explaining, convincing, conceding and suspending. Importantly, as options, these mechanisms are situated in a cascading order of preference for the focal actor. More generally, our research posits that in any encounter between institutional logics in which the specific instantiation of a logic stems from a foreign interinstitutional system, the resulting novel institutional complexity may necessitate the development of innovative templates which, at the same time, may imply ‘stretching’ an institutional logic and, in consequence, impact the compatibility of its jurisdictional claims.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"62 1","pages":"408-445"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joms.13061","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140148234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The AI of the Beholder: Intra‐Professional Sensemaking of an Epistemic Technology 观察者的人工智能：认识论技术的专业内感知决策

IF 10.5 1区管理学

Journal of Management Studies Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13065

Harry Scarbrough, Yaru Chen, Gerardo Patriotta

{"title":"The AI of the Beholder: Intra‐Professional Sensemaking of an Epistemic Technology","authors":"Harry Scarbrough, Yaru Chen, Gerardo Patriotta","doi":"10.1111/joms.13065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13065","url":null,"abstract":"New technologies are equivocal, triggering sensemaking responses from the individuals who encounter them. As an ‘epistemic technology’ AI poses new challenges to the expertise and jurisdictions of professionals. Such challenges may be interpreted quite differently, however, depending on the specialized role identities which develop within the wider professional domain. We explore the sensemaking responses of these intra‐professional groupings to the challenges posed by AI through an empirical study of professionals playing different roles (front‐line, hybrid and field‐level) in the field of radiology within NHS England. We found that these intra‐professional groupings sought to make sense of AI through a triadic view focused on the interplay of professional, client and technology. This sensemaking, arising from different jurisdictional contexts, led individual professionals to perceive that their agency was diminished, complemented or enhanced as a result of the introduction of AI. Our findings contribute to the literature on professions and AI by showing how intra‐professional differences affect sensemaking responses to AI as a jurisdictional contestant.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.5,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140148216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

How do New Ventures Thrive in Ecosystem Venturing: The Impacts of Alliance Strategy and Technology Interdependence 新创企业如何在生态系统风险投资中茁壮成长？联盟战略和技术相互依存性的影响

IF 7 1区管理学

Journal of Management Studies Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13063

Xiafei Chen, Yi Yang, Jiang Wei

{"title":"How do New Ventures Thrive in Ecosystem Venturing: The Impacts of Alliance Strategy and Technology Interdependence","authors":"Xiafei Chen, Yi Yang, Jiang Wei","doi":"10.1111/joms.13063","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joms.13063","url":null,"abstract":"New ventures in an innovation ecosystem can not only receive benefits, but also face challenges. It is important to examine defence mechanisms that new ventures can employ for their healthy development in the innovation ecosystem. Based on resource dependence theory, combining with arguments from innovation ecosystems literature, this paper proposes that new ventures’ technological alliances with core competitors of ecosystem investors can be used as a social defence in ecosystem venturing. Furthermore, we investigate the moderator effects of technological interdependence – technological similarity and technological complementarity on the impacts of such a defence mechanism. Using longitudinal information of 4903 investor-investee dyads in ecosystem venturing, we find that (1) technological alliances with core competitors of the ecosystem investor has a positive relationship to venture performance, and (2) such relationship is negatively moderated by technological complementarity. Our findings provide important implications for research on innovation ecosystems and resource dependence theory.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"62 2","pages":"565-596"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joms.13063","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140072626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Representing, Re‐presenting, or Producing the Past? Memory Work amongst Museum Employees 代表、再现还是制作过去？博物馆员工的记忆工作

IF 10.5 1区管理学

Journal of Management Studies Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13059

Jeremy Aroles, Kevin Morrell, Edward Granter, Yin Liang

引用次数: 0

Entrepreneurial Orientation and Underconformity to Female Board Representation Norms 创业导向与不符合女性董事会代表规范的情况

IF 7 1区管理学

Journal of Management Studies Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13062

Fatemeh Askarzadeh, Krista Lewellyn, Stav Fainshmidt, William Q. Judge

{"title":"Entrepreneurial Orientation and Underconformity to Female Board Representation Norms","authors":"Fatemeh Askarzadeh, Krista Lewellyn, Stav Fainshmidt, William Q. Judge","doi":"10.1111/joms.13062","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joms.13062","url":null,"abstract":"Despite mounting societal demands for increased female representation on corporate boards, some firms underconform to institutional expectations, exhibiting significantly lower female board representation than their country peers. We argue that a firm's entrepreneurial orientation is positively viewed by stakeholders, providing its corporate leaders with greater latitude to deviate from governance norms. Drawing from social role theory regarding beliefs about the association between entrepreneurial success and typical male traits, we propose that this substitutive legitimacy drives corporate leaders of firms with an entrepreneurial orientation to underconform due to a desire to maintain their firm's orientation. However, the history of female leadership in the firm and disclosure about environmental and social activities moderate the effect of entrepreneurial orientation on underconformity to female board representation norms. A generalized estimating equations analysis of 8410 firm-year observations in 16 countries from 2012 to 2018 supports our predictions. Our study offers a novel explanation of heterogeneity in female board representation, informs theory of organizational non-conformity to institutional norms, and highlights potentially unintended consequences of entrepreneurial orientation.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"62 2","pages":"539-564"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140032716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Caught in a Landslide? Exploring how Far the Increasing Focus on Big Data Benefits or Damages Theoretical Development in Management Studies 陷入山崩？探究对大数据的日益关注对管理学理论发展的利弊得失

IF 7 1区管理学

Journal of Management Studies Pub Date : 2024-02-25 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13058

Caroline Gatrell

引用次数: 0

Critical Management Studies: A Critical Review 批判性管理研究：批判性评论

IF 7 1区管理学

Journal of Management Studies Pub Date : 2024-02-25 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13047

André Spicer, Mats Alvesson

引用次数: 0

Generating, Grading, and Ghosting: How Organizing Experts Shapes Expertise 生成、分级和幽灵：组织专家如何塑造专业知识

IF 7 1区管理学

Journal of Management Studies Pub Date : 2024-02-22 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13056

Pedro Monteiro

{"title":"Generating, Grading, and Ghosting: How Organizing Experts Shapes Expertise","authors":"Pedro Monteiro","doi":"10.1111/joms.13056","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joms.13056","url":null,"abstract":"Experts increasingly refine their expertise into specialties as they labour in and around organizations. Yet, previous research assumes that experts are organized in the workplace in ways that passively accommodate or mirror pre-existing specialties and focuses on organizational structures that codify the content of experts’ knowledge as an encroachment. Drawing on a qualitative field study in an aeronautical organization's engineering unit, this paper examines the organizational structures that chart the area of experts’ knowledge, i.e., their specialties. The findings show that organizational structures are generative, defining the contours of existing expertise and catalysing the formation of new ones (generating). However, organizational structures also encode criteria that implicitly rank some forms of expertise over others, thereby reinforcing status hierarchies (grading), and misalignment across organizational structures renders some forms of expertise invisible (ghosting). By showing the active role of organizational structures in shaping expertise rather than simply housing it, this paper contributes to our understanding of expertise development as well as status dynamics and access to resources among experts. Further, the paper reveals how misalignments across multiple organizational structures may impact the management of knowledge and human capital.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"62 1","pages":"381-407"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joms.13056","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139945896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Organizations, Institutions, and Symbols: Introduction to a Point-Counterpoint Conversation 组织、机构和象征：点对点对话导言

IF 7 1区管理学

Journal of Management Studies Pub Date : 2024-02-21 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13060

Daniel Muzio, Elena Dalpiaz, Dennis Jancsary, Christine Moser, Stephan Leixnering, Markus Höllerer, Nelson Phillips, Martin Kornberger, Renate Meyer

引用次数: 0

Cross-Sector Partnerships to Address Societal Grand Challenges: Systematizing Differences in Scholarly Analysis 跨部门合作应对社会大挑战：学术分析差异系统化

IF 7 1区管理学

Journal of Management Studies Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI: 10.1111/joms.13053

Lea Stadtler, M. May Seitanidi, Helena H. Knight, Jennifer Leigh, Amelia Clarke, Marlene Janzen Le Ber, Jill Bogie, Priyanka Brunese, Oda Hustad, Ioannis Krasonikolakis, Eleni Lioliou, Adriane MacDonald, Jonatan Pinkse, Sarita Sehgal

{"title":"Cross-Sector Partnerships to Address Societal Grand Challenges: Systematizing Differences in Scholarly Analysis","authors":"Lea Stadtler, M. May Seitanidi, Helena H. Knight, Jennifer Leigh, Amelia Clarke, Marlene Janzen Le Ber, Jill Bogie, Priyanka Brunese, Oda Hustad, Ioannis Krasonikolakis, Eleni Lioliou, Adriane MacDonald, Jonatan Pinkse, Sarita Sehgal","doi":"10.1111/joms.13053","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joms.13053","url":null,"abstract":"Research on how cross-sector partnerships (CSPs) contribute toward addressing societal grand challenges (SGCs) has burgeoned, yet studies differ significantly in what scholars analyze and how. These differences matter as they influence the reported results. In the absence of a comprehensive framework to expose the analytical choices behind each study and their implications, this diversity challenges interpretation and consolidation of evidence upon which novel theory and practical interventions can be developed. In this study, we conduct a systematic review of scholarly analysis in CSP management studies to develop a framework that contextualizes the SGC-related evidence and reveals scholars’ analytical choices and their implications. Conceptually, we advance the term ‘SGC interventions’ to illuminate the black box leading to SGC-related effects, thus helping to differentiate between transformative versus mitigative interventions in scholars’ analytical focus. Moreover, the framework stresses the logical interplay between the framing of the SGC-related problem and the reporting of the intervention's effects. Through this, we juxtapose what we call problem-centric versus solution-centric SGC analysis and so differentiate between their analytical purpose. We discuss the framework's implications for advancing an SGC perspective in scholarly analysis of CSPs and outline avenues for future research.","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"61 7","pages":"3327-3357"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joms.13053","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139945982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0