{"title":"Joint collective action increases support for social change and mitigates intergroup polarisation: A registered report","authors":"Feiteng Long , Zi Ye , Lijuan Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104732","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104732","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past decade, a surge in protests and social movements worldwide has offered promise for positive social change while also introducing divisions and tensions into society. In the current research, we examined the impact of joint collective action involving both advantaged and disadvantaged group members, as well as collective action solely involving disadvantaged group members, on public support for social change and intergroup polarisation. Two experimental studies (Studies 1a and 1b; <em>N</em> = 575) provided initial insights, revealing that joint collective action (vs. collective action by the disadvantaged) facilitated support for social change and mitigated intergroup polarisation. Building upon these initial findings, we propose two studies (Studies 2 and 3; projected <em>N</em> ∼ 1132) in the form of a registered report, aiming to delve into the psychological mechanisms underlying the observed effects (i.e., morality threat and perceived respect) and replicate these findings in varied protest contexts (i.e., gender and race relations). Additionally, we aim to examine if the (leadership vs. supportive) role of advantaged allies in joint collective action would have different impacts on disadvantaged group members' responses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 104732"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143077780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"More likely or more wrong? - Disentangling the prototype effect of discrimination perception","authors":"Paul-Michael Heineck, Roland Deutsch","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104731","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104731","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extensive evidence suggests that perceptions of discrimination are influenced by a mental prototype of what constitutes discriminatory behavior, the so-called prototype effect of discrimination perception. However, the underlying psychological processes and thus the extent to which statistical expectations and moral evaluations contribute to this prototype effect remain underexplored. In a series of four experiments, we investigated how expectations about discrimination and moral judgments about the wrongness of discrimination modulate the prototype effect. Our findings suggest that statistical expectations strongly influence the prototype effect independently of moral wrongness. In contrast, moral wrongness, while theoretically plausible, had a much smaller empirical impact on the prototype effect under our experimental conditions. These results suggest that the prototype effect in discrimination perception is driven by expectations, while the role of moral evaluations is at least secondary and requires additional research. This insight has important implications for understanding discrimination perception and offers new directions for research into the cognitive processes underlying discrimination judgments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 104731"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143077781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Do we really think our politicians should be intellectually humble?","authors":"Jonah Koetke, Karina Schumann","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104729","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104729","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, researchers have investigated how intellectual humility (IH) might help reduce political polarization among everyday U.S. Americans. In the current work, we examine whether people think politicians should exhibit IH and how this might depend on context. In preregistered Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 477), participants read about and reported their ideal level of IH for a fictional ingroup or outgroup politician in contexts that were either cooperative or competitive. Across both contexts, participants thought outgroup politicians should have higher IH than ingroup politicians. They also thought ingroup (and to a lesser extent outgroup) politicians should have higher IH in cooperative than competitive contexts. In preregistered Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 843), we randomly assigned participants to read about a fictional ingroup or outgroup politician who expressed high or low IH in different contexts. We found that perceptions of IH played a significant role in perceptions of competence, warmth, and intention to vote for the politician. However, the impact of IH was larger for outgroup politicians than ingroup politicians, with the exception of voting intentions. We also asked participants to report their ideal and perceived level of IH for then-presidential candidates Joe Biden and Donald Trump. We found an intergroup bias in that participants perceived the ingroup candidate as having higher IH than the outgroup candidate. Importantly, perceptions of IH significantly predicted voting intentions for these politicians. Overall, this work points to the importance and nuanced role of IH in political person perception.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 104729"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143049748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Students' daily activity and beliefs about the world before and after a campus shooting","authors":"Shelly Tsang , Kyle Barrentine , Shigehiro Oishi , Adrienne Wood","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104722","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104722","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How do students' beliefs about the world and their everyday exploratory behaviors change after a mass campus shooting? In the present longitudinal study, an on-campus shooting occurred in the middle of data collection, resulting in an unplanned pre-post quasi-experiment to investigate whether the association between world beliefs and behavior changed after a traumatic event. Over three two-week waves of data collection, with the shooting happening in the middle of the second wave, we measured students' general beliefs about the world (their <em>primal world beliefs</em>), daily physical movement, the activities they were doing, how typical those activities were, and how close participants felt to the people they were with. Unsurprisingly, students exhibited less exploratory movement patterns immediately following the shooting. After the shooting, but not before, s<em>afe</em> world belief predicted how much people physically explored their environment, and <em>enticing</em> world belief predicted how varied a person's activities were. Primal world beliefs did not significantly change from before the shooting to after, demonstrating their stability. We speculate that the post-shooting campus environment was more ambiguous than the pre-shooting environment, allowing beliefs about the world to be more strongly associated with behavior.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 104722"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143049749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ease of retrieval of role attributes predicts role clarity which, in turn, predicts outcomes among stepparents","authors":"Erica B. Slotter, Hanna Campbell","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104730","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104730","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Stepfamilies are a common familial structure in the United States; however, members of stepfamilies are at risk for various adverse outcomes. The present research sought to examine the experiences of stepparents as one window into stepfamily functioning. Past research suggests that a lack of stepparent role clarity correlates with lower overall identity clarity and worse personal and relational well-being evaluations. The current work utilized an ease of retrieval manipulation to reduce stepparent role clarity across two studies of stepparents (total <em>N</em> = 545). Manipulated role clarity predicted reduced self-concept clarity, personal well-being evaluations, romantic relationship evaluations, and quality of stepparent-stepchild relationships. Furthermore, reduced role clarity mediated direct associations between the manipulation and outcomes of interest. Taken together, these findings demonstrate causal connections between stepparents knowing their role within their families and more positive personal and relational well-being outcomes, suggesting that role clarity might be one pathway to promoting stable, functional stepfamilies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 104730"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143049747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“You're leaving us?” Feeling ostracized when a group member leaves","authors":"James H. Wirth , Andrew H. Hales","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104708","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104708","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People leave groups. We examined the psychological consequences for the remaining group members; specifically, whether the departure of a member can produce feelings of ostracism (being excluded and ignored). We manipulated systematically the number of group members who left (zero, one, or two out of the two other group members) during a get to know you interaction (Study 1), a word creativity task (Study 2), and a virtual ball-toss game (Cyberball; Study 3). We measured participants' feelings of ostracism and associated outcomes overall and based on the relationships with each group member. Overall, participants felt worse when two group members left compared to one or no group members leaving. At the individual relationship level, we found evidence of partial ostracism as participants felt negative when evaluating their interaction with a group member who left. By using a multi-level approach, we found the everyday experience of a group member leaving produces a void, harming those left behind. We considered how this void could have implications for group dynamics theory and organizational practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 104708"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142990229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Gifts that keep on giving: Reflected appraisals from gifts and their role in identity and choice","authors":"Laurence Ashworth , Suzanne Rath , Nicole Robitaille","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104717","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104717","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gifts are one important way in which individuals come to own and consume the products that they do. The current work investigates a novel consequence of acquiring and consuming items in this way—recipients draw inferences about givers' views of them (reflected appraisals) which, in turn, can influence related aspects of recipients' identity. We report five studies that test our predictions, distinguish gifts' effects from acquisition alone, and test moderators designed to shed light on the predicted process and scope of gifts' influence on reflected appraisals and reflected appraisals influence on identity. We find evidence that gifts impact reflected appraisals across a range of gifts and identities, using both scenario-based studies and studies involving real gifts. We also provide evidence about when these reflected appraisals can influence recipients' identity and how this affects subsequent choice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 104717"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142990230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"When does an extinction procedure lead to mere exposure effects and extinction of evaluative conditioning?","authors":"Jasmin Richter , Jan R. Landwehr , Rolf Reber","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104715","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104715","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Repeatedly presenting a neutral stimulus (conditioned stimulus, CS) together with a positive or negative stimulus (unconditioned stimulus, US) typically changes liking of the CS. An important question is whether a subsequent extinction phase where the CS is presented without the US extinguishes such evaluative conditioning (EC) effects. In this regard, it is crucial to consider that an extinction procedure involves repeated exposure to the CS that is known to influence evaluations due to exposure-induced increases in processing fluency. However, it is unclear whether exposure-induced changes in CS liking occur during extinction and hence bias observed extinction effects. In three experiments (<em>N</em><sub>Experiment1</sub> = 301, <em>N</em><sub>Experiment2</sub> = 296, <em>N</em><sub>Experiment3</sub> = 560), with pictures and words as stimuli, we observed that repeated CS-only presentations after conditioning increased CS processing fluency. Moreover, CS-only presentations also increased CS liking, but only when participants had previously evaluated stimulus fluency. When controlling for mere exposure effects on liking, we observed extinction of EC only when participants evaluated the CSs both post-conditioning and post-extinction, replicating previous findings. We outline implications for EC methodology and applied research and discuss the findings in terms of memory-based judgment processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 104715"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142990265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mathias Van der Biest , Sam Verschooren , Frederick Verbruggen , Marcel Brass
{"title":"Don't judge a book by its cover: The effect of perceived facial trustworthiness on advice following in the context of value-based decision-making","authors":"Mathias Van der Biest , Sam Verschooren , Frederick Verbruggen , Marcel Brass","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104719","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104719","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Trustworthiness is crucial in social interactions that depend on other's information. For example, an interaction partner's trustworthiness determines whose advice we act on in learning contexts, whom we choose to invest in during economic decisions, or even whom we decide to cooperate with. However, how perceived trustworthiness influences advice following in value-based decision-making when the trustworthiness manipulation is independent of the quality of the advice remains poorly understood. In two experiments, participants played a modified version of The Door Game, selecting one out of two doors to find a reward based on advisor's advice. The advisors were computer-generated faces categorised as trustworthy or untrustworthy, with identical advice validity (66 %). In Experiment 1 (<em>N</em> = 124), participants initially followed advice from perceived trustworthy advisors more frequently, but this effect disappeared by the end of the experiment. In our preregistered replication (Experiment 2, <em>N</em> = 300), we observed a similar pattern, confirming the findings of Experiment 1. In a third preregistered experiment (<em>N</em> = 85), participants rated the trustworthiness of each face. We used these ratings as an independent variable to reanalyse the advice following rates from Experiments 1 and 2. The results were identical as with our categorical analyses. Moreover, a mediation analysis revealed that trustworthiness ratings mediated the relationship between perceived trustworthiness and advice following. Overall, our findings underscore the importance of social information such as perceived trustworthiness in value-based decision-making and its dynamic nature, which is potentially explained by changes in the decision-making strategy, or by rapid adjustments of our trust beliefs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 104719"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142990264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Liat Levontin , Zohar Gilad , Elizabeth Durango-Cohen , Pablo Durango-Cohen
{"title":"The impact factor: The effect of actual impact information and perceived donation efficacy on donors' repeated donations","authors":"Liat Levontin , Zohar Gilad , Elizabeth Durango-Cohen , Pablo Durango-Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104720","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104720","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research examined the utility of providing people with information about the actual impact of their donations. Results of a field survey (<em>N</em> = 1062) and three controlled experiments (<em>N</em> = 881) reveal the importance of actual impact information in promoting repeated donations and retaining repeated donors. Exposing participants to information about the actual impact of their donations—compared with exposing participants to anticipated impact information or no information—increased their perceived donation efficacy, which increased their willingness to give a repeated donation, as well as their repeated donation amounts. Notably, donors exposed to actual impact information tended to retain their contribution amounts, whereas donors in other conditions decreased their contribution amounts. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 104720"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142968135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}