Emily P. Bosche, Justin M. Ludwig, Karina Schumann
{"title":"You're not so bad after all: Apologies and guilt promote perceptions of moral restoration after wrongdoing","authors":"Emily P. Bosche, Justin M. Ludwig, Karina Schumann","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104879","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104879","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interpersonal offenses can negatively affect perceptions of a wrongdoer's moral image. People often view wrongdoers as having experienced a lapse in moral judgment and may expect their future moral behavior to be compromised. What can wrongdoers do to restore their moral image in the eyes of others after committing an offense? In the current research, we examined whether wrongdoers who apologize or feel guilty are judged as more likely to show moral restoration in the future. Across five experiments that used hypothetical and recalled offenses, we found that wrongdoers who apologized or felt guilty were perceived as more moral in the future than those who offered no response. These effects were mediated by observers' perceptions that the wrongdoer shared their moral values and was committed to self-improvement. Furthermore, apologies and internal reflections that conveyed private remorse and responsibility were particularly effective in promoting the belief that the wrongdoer and victim should reconcile. This work demonstrates that apologies play an important role in fostering perceptions of moral restoration in the aftermath of an offense.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 104879"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145904107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Chyei Vinluan , Maria G. Garay , Jennifer M. Perry , Linda X. Zou , Keith B. Maddox , Jessica D. Remedios
{"title":"Proximity to whiteness and the racial position of multiracial people in the United States","authors":"A. Chyei Vinluan , Maria G. Garay , Jennifer M. Perry , Linda X. Zou , Keith B. Maddox , Jessica D. Remedios","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104884","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104884","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the United States, Multiracial people with White ancestry may benefit from racial privilege not accessible to their monoracial minority counterparts. We examined this possibility by studying the racial position (Zou & Cheryan, 2017) of Multiracial-White groups (Study 1) and individuals (Study 2). In Study 1, Multiracial-White (specifically, Asian-White, Black-White, and Latino-White) groups were perceived as superior compared to their monoracial minority counterparts, and Asian-White and Latino-White groups were perceived as more American than monoracial Asian and Latino groups. In Study 2, racially ambiguous individuals were rated as higher in superiority and Americanness when they were described as having one White parent versus two minority parents. Furthermore, we examined perceptions of White phenotypicality as a possible mechanism underlying stereotypes that privilege Multiracial-White people. Indeed, racially ambiguous individuals were perceived as looking more phenotypically White when they were described as having one White parent versus two minority parents. Judgments of White phenotypicality partially mediated higher ratings of superiority and Americanness ascribed to individuals who identified as Multiracial-White (versus as monoracial minority). In sum, the present studies shed light on the mechanisms that may convey and sustain White privilege to Multiracial-White people.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 104884"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146014388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Dominance through the lens of a competitive worldview: The role of relationship expectancies","authors":"Dean Baltiansky, Daniel R. Ames","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104881","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104881","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Who behaves dominantly—and why? Much compelling prior research spotlights motivational sources. We focus here on beliefs, proposing that people are less likely to behave dominantly when they expect dominance to incur greater relationship costs. We posit that this situation-specific expectancy is shaped by a general competitive worldview, seeing the social world as a “competitive jungle.” In five preregistered studies, we tested whether those with a competitive worldview expected dominance to incur less relationship harm and whether expected relationship harm predicted dominance. In Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 275), part- and full-time workers completed widely used scales of dominance and worldviews, allowing us to test our predicted effects and alternatives. Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 289) shifted from scales to employee-recounted acts of real-world managerial dominance. Studies 3A and 3B (<em>N</em> = 1192) featured a novel paradigm for capturing behavioral dominance, with participants role-playing as managers and employees in an incentive-compatible design. Study 4 (<em>N</em> = 492) manipulated expectancies to test their impact on behavior. We found support for our predictions across our studies, showing that a competitive worldview shaped relationship expectancies and that those who expected less relational damage from dominance were more likely to endorse or enact dominant behavior. These results emerged controlling for various motivational measures (e.g., relationship concern) and other expectancies (e.g., expected compliance), supporting a belief-based account of dominance that complements past work on motivational sources. Exploratory analyses suggested that those behaving dominantly may underestimate relational harm whereas those eschewing dominance may sometimes overestimate it.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 104881"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145995352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Status decoded: How actors and observers shape the meaning of stealth symbols","authors":"Jesse D'Agostino, Derek D. Rucker","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104883","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104883","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Status symbols are imbued with meaning that shape status inferences and yield status-related benefits. Yet, reaping such benefits depends on people's ability to decode actors' status signals. Some status signals are stealthy in form, easily missed due to their subtlety. The present research demonstrates one means to overcome this dilemma via the explicit acknowledgment of a subtle status symbol. We find both actors and observers can acknowledge, and thereby shape the meaning extracted from subtle status symbols in both similar and dissimilar ways. In terms of similarity, acknowledging a subtle status symbol—whether that acknowledgement comes from the actor or an observer—leads to greater ascriptions of status. In terms of dissimilarity, acknowledging a subtle status symbol by an actor leads to lower warmth, but the same acknowledgement by an observer does not. The upshot of the current work is twofold. First, it contributes to our understanding of how explicitly acknowledging a subtle status symbol affects the independent decoding of both status and warmth. Second, it demonstrates the need to differentiate between actors and observers in understanding how status symbols operate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 104883"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146006459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Toward a predictive model of moral concern","authors":"Bastian Jaeger , Matti Wilks , Caspar van Lissa","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104880","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104880","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>At the heart of many contentious debates (e.g., on abortion, immigration, or meat consumption, is the question of how much we ought to weigh the welfare and interests of different entities. Previous research has identified numerous characteristics that predict how much concern people show toward different entities, such as empathy or perceived similarity. However, many of these characteristics are correlated, making it difficult to disentangle their unique relation to moral concern, and there is little evidence on the <em>relative</em> importance of different characteristics. We aim to address these issues and move the field toward an integrative model of moral concern. We reviewed the literature to identify hypothesized predictors of moral concern. We will then use a machine learning approach to simultaneously test all identified predictors and build an integrative and parsimonious predictive model (<em>n</em> = 800 U.S. participants). Our findings will provide insights into (1) how accurately we can predict moral concern with the characteristics that were identified in previous research, and (2) which characteristics are most important for predicting moral concern.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 104880"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145980360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The limits of moral framing in promoting pro-environmentalism: A preregistered replication of Wolsko et al. (2016)","authors":"Marlene Voit, Mathias Twardawski, Moritz Fischer","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104871","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104871","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research consistently finds that conservatives express less concern about anthropogenic climate change and engage in fewer environmentally friendly behaviors compared to liberals. One potential reason for this gap is that climate communication often emphasizes values aligned with liberal ideologies, such as harm/care and fairness/reciprocity, while neglecting values that resonate more with conservatives, such as purity, authority, and loyalty. Previous studies have shown that framing pro-environmental messages to address these “conservative values” reduces the gap between liberals and conservatives in pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors. However, the literature on this framing effect is rather mixed, as other studies have failed to show corresponding results. This raises concerns about the robustness of framing as a tool to reduce political differences in pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors. Herein, we report the results of a conceptual replication in Germany (<em>N</em> = 269) and a direct replication in the U.S. (<em>N</em> = 743) of a previously successful framing intervention proposed by <span><span>Wolsko et al. (2016, Experiment 3)</span></span>. Across both studies, presenting pro-environmental appeals in terms of conservative values did not bridge the divide between liberals and conservatives regarding their pro-environmental attitudes and behavioral intentions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 104871"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145995353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Corrigendum to “A trust inoculation to protect public support of governmentally mandated actions to mitigate climate change” [Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 115 (2024) 104656]","authors":"Tobia Spampatti, Tobias Brosch, Evelina Trutnevyte, Ulf J.J. Hahnel","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104914","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104914","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"402 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147502278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Borja Paredes , Pablo Briñol , David Santos , Lorena Moreno , Joshua J. Guyer , Richard E. Petty
{"title":"Attitudes guiding social behavior as a function of perceived knowledge: The moderating role of epistemic vs. hedonic mindsets","authors":"Borja Paredes , Pablo Briñol , David Santos , Lorena Moreno , Joshua J. Guyer , Richard E. Petty","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104857","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104857","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current research introduces a new variable (epistemic vs. hedonic mindset) that helps elucidate the conditions under which a previously established phenomenon reverses: the moderating impact of perceived knowledge on attitude-behavior correspondence (ABC). Four studies (plus four more additional studies reported in the supplementary material), in the domain of person perception and consumer choice show that higher perceived knowledge enhances ABC under an epistemic mindset, but it can reverse under a hedonic mindset. An epistemic mindset involves focusing on making accurate impressions whereas a hedonic mindset focuses people on enjoyment and having fun. Beyond manipulating mindset, perceived knowledge was also either measured or manipulated across the studies (including one pre-registered experiment), holding constant the actual amount of information participants received about the attitude object. Under a hedonic mindset, greater ABC was observed under low (vs. high) perceived knowledge, reversing a classic effect for the first time. However, under an epistemic mindset, attitudes were predicted and found to guide behavior significantly more with high (vs. low) perceived knowledge. This outcome provides a conceptual replication of the traditional effect shown in the attitude strength literature. These effects were driven by changes in the meaning (positive or negative) associated with knowledge in each mindset as shown by both measuring and manipulating the proposed mediator. This research advances the literature on knowledge, attitudes, person perception, and consumer judgment by introducing a new variable in this domain capable of specifying the conditions that facilitate when an important phenomenon occurs in one direction or the other and explaining why these effects occur.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104857"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145611768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Huiwen Xiao, Ziqiang Xin, Luxiao Wang, Xin Sun, Can Tao
{"title":"Social identity transition promotes trust toward strangers and unrelated outgroups","authors":"Huiwen Xiao, Ziqiang Xin, Luxiao Wang, Xin Sun, Can Tao","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104853","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104853","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although previous literature has revealed the effect of a static single identity or multiple identities on trust, little research has considered the effects of dynamic changes of an individual's social identity (in the form of social identity transitions) on trust. Social identity transition, which involves an individual disengaging from one social group and engaging in another, frequently occurs throughout people's lives and may influence trust. Therefore, the current study used secondary data, a survey, and an adapted twice-randomized minimal group paradigm to measure and manipulate social identity transition to explore its effects on trust toward strangers, outgroups, and ingroups. Study 1, based on CFPS 2020 data, found that trust toward strangers and unrelated outgroups was higher in individuals who had experienced the <em>HuKou</em> identity transition than in those who had not. Study 2 provided the correlational evidence for the positive predictive role of social identity transition from student group to working group on trust toward strangers and unrelated outgroups. Studies 3–5, experimentally manipulating social identity transition, demonstrated that social identity transition increased trust toward strangers and unrelated outgroups via dual identity perception. Study 6 compared social identity transition with dual identity and found both enhanced trust toward unrelated outgroups. These studies suggested that the essence of social identity transition lies in individuals' perceived dual identities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104853"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145545909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Registered report stage I: Is it unpleasant to predict kindergarten teacher = man? Testing the emotional response to the anticipation of confirmation or violation of gendered stereotypes","authors":"Rotem Berkovich , Niv Reggev","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104854","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104854","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social interactions are fundamentally shaped by our expectations of others' behavior, and one of the most powerful influences on these expectations is gender stereotypes. Previous research has explored the implications of affirming or violating these stereotypes, tacitly overlooking the impact of the expectations themselves. Here, we aim to investigate (1) the potential emotional responses that arise from the <em>anticipation</em> of affirmation or violation and (2) how these anticipatory states influence emotional reactions to stereotype-related targets. Specifically, we hypothesize that anticipating affirmation (/violations) of gendered expectations will elicit pleasant (/unpleasant) emotions <em>regardless of the actual outcome</em>, and that these anticipatory states will exert a similar influence on the emotional responses to stereotype-related targets. To explore those hypotheses, we will measure the intensity of emotional reactions to emotion-evoking images presented after an anticipatory cue regarding gender-stereotypical expectations (Study 1) or after encountering a cue and an affirming or violating social target (Study 2). To minimize response bias, we will employ evidence accumulation models to provide an indirect, easily interpretable, unbiased, and reliable measurement of emotion intensity. The results are expected to highlight the hitherto neglected aspect of outcome anticipation in person perception. Specifically, the results will highlight whether merely expecting stereotype-violating information triggers unpleasant emotions, potentially contributing to the persistence of prejudice and also tap into why and when individuals prefer (un)certainty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104854"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145569961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}