{"title":"Memory, Institutions, and the Domestic Politics of South Korean–Japanese Relations","authors":"Eun A Jo","doi":"10.1017/S0020818322000194","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818322000194","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract How does collective memory shape politics in the domestic and international spheres? I argue that collective memory—an intersubjective understanding of the past—has no inherent meaning and its salience is entirely contextual. What it means politically depends on the historical trajectory through which it came to form and the political exigency for which it is mobilized in the present. I propose three strategies by which social actors mobilize collective memory: framing—negotiating how the past can be interpreted; accrediting—redefining which narrators are authorized to speak; and binding—enforcing the narrative bounds to which narrators must conform. Using this framework, I reassess the failure of South Korea–Japan reconciliation and find that it has as much to do with the mobilization of collective colonial memory in South Korea over the course of its democratization as with Japanese impenitence. Anti-Japanese memory reflects continued domestic political contestation about how South Korea remembers and identifies itself.","PeriodicalId":48388,"journal":{"name":"International Organization","volume":"76 1","pages":"767 - 798"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44361200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Great Revenue Divergence","authors":"Alexander Lee, Jack Paine","doi":"10.1017/S0020818322000200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818322000200","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article describes and explains a previously overlooked empirical pattern in state revenue collection. As late as 1913, central governments in the West collected similar levels of per capita revenue as the rest of the world, despite ruling richer societies and experiencing a long history of fiscal innovation. Western revenue levels permanently diverged only in the following half-century. We identify the twentieth-century great revenue divergence by constructing a new panel data set of central government revenue with broad spatial and temporal coverage. To explain the pattern, we argue that sustainably high levels of revenue extraction require societal demand for an activist state, and a supply of effective bureaucratic institutions. Neither factor in isolation is sufficient. We formalize this insight in a game-theoretic model. The government can choose among low-effort, legibility-intensive, and crony-favoring strategies for raising revenues. Empirically, our theory accounts for low revenue intake in periods of low demand (the nineteenth-century West) or low bureaucratic capacity (twentieth-century former colonies), and for eventual revenue spikes in the West.","PeriodicalId":48388,"journal":{"name":"International Organization","volume":"77 1","pages":"363 - 404"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43641571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reacting to the Olive Branch: Hawks, Doves, and Public Support for Cooperation","authors":"Michaela Mattes, Jessica L. P. Weeks","doi":"10.1017/S0020818322000170","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818322000170","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A popular view holds that foreign policy hawks have an advantage at bringing about rapprochement with international adversaries. This idea is rooted in domestic politics: voters respond more favorably to efforts at reconciliation when their own leader has a hawkish rather than a dovish reputation. Yet, domestic reactions are only part of the equation—to succeed, rapprochement must also evoke a favorable response by the adversary. In this research note, we argue that hawks who make conciliatory gestures may face international liabilities that could offset their domestic advantages. Foreign audiences should view doves who make overtures as more sincere and should therefore be more willing to support cooperation with foreign doves than with foreign hawks. We field a pair of survey experiments to examine whether Americans respond differently when foreign hawks versus foreign doves deliver the olive branch. We find that foreign doves fare better at eliciting cooperation because they are deemed more sincere, though the prospect of military vulnerability limits how willing Americans are to respond positively even to a dove who makes a gesture. Thus, while past research has shown that hawks are better positioned domestically to initiate rapprochement, our findings suggest that they have a harder time eliciting a favorable response from the adversary.","PeriodicalId":48388,"journal":{"name":"International Organization","volume":"76 1","pages":"957 - 976"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47442263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Attitudes and Action in International Refugee Policy: Evidence from Australia","authors":"Jill Sheppard, Jana von Stein","doi":"10.1017/S0020818322000133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818322000133","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Do citizens care whether their government breaches international law, or are other imperatives more influential? We consider this question in the human rights arena, asking whether and how it matters how abuses are framed. In a novel survey experiment, we ask Australians about their attitudes toward restrictive immigration policy, holding the underlying breaches constant but varying how they are framed. We find that people most strongly oppose policy that violates international law. Emphasizing moral considerations has smaller but still notable impacts on attitudes, whereas reputational frames have the weakest effects. We also find that translating attitudes into political action is challenging: most who learn of current policy's legal, moral, or reputational dimensions and in turn become more critical do not subsequently express greater interest in trying to do something about it. Nonetheless, there are interesting differences across frames. Appealing to international law or moral considerations is more effective at spurring mobilization than emphasizing reputational harm, though via different mechanisms. Framing this debate in international reputational terms consistently has the weakest impacts on interest in political action, and may be worse than saying nothing at all.","PeriodicalId":48388,"journal":{"name":"International Organization","volume":"76 1","pages":"929 - 956"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47322681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Power of Geographical Imaginaries in the European International Order: Colonialism, the 1884–85 Berlin Conference, and Model International Organizations","authors":"Joanne Yao","doi":"10.1017/S0020818322000182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818322000182","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines the emergence of early international organizations and efforts to export European institutional models to the periphery as part of the global expansion of a European international order. In particular, it focuses on the 1884–85 Berlin Conference as a pivotal moment in that expansion and the failed attempt to transplant the Treaty of Vienna model for transboundary river governance to the Congo River. Scholarship on the spread of institutions has highlighted the dangers of applying institutional models from one context to another, but there has been limited attention on why European institutional models are so compelling in the first place. Based on primary historical material, I show that despite some awareness among the diplomats at Berlin that the African context differed from the European one, this knowledge did not disrupt their underlying confidence in the Vienna model. I contend that the reason this model was so compelling was that it was built on two interrelated geographical imaginaries that constituted the diplomats’ understanding of the global and the political possibilities available to them. The first imaginary constituted the periphery as conceptually empty and ready to be remade by European models; the second constituted Europe as the generative site of universal models. Together, these taken-for-granted imaginaries made the diplomats’ practices of adopting the Vienna model seem natural and self-evident. These imaginaries continue to have implications for international politics today as we consider one-size-fits-all technocratic solutions and benchmarks for global progress.","PeriodicalId":48388,"journal":{"name":"International Organization","volume":"76 1","pages":"901 - 928"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44286980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Introduction","authors":"M. Shaw, Y. Shany, Y. Ronen","doi":"10.1017/s002081830001105x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s002081830001105x","url":null,"abstract":"Two volumes, ISSI Scientific Reports, SR-001: Analysis Methods for Multi-Spacecraft Data and SR-008: Multi-Spacecraft Analysis Methods revisited, were published to document the growing toolset using the multi-spacecraft dataset being collected by Cluster. Two volumes, ISSI Scientific Reports, SR-001: Analysis Methods for Multi-Spacecraft Data and SR-008: Multi-Spacecraft Analysis Methods revisited, were published to document the growing toolset using the multi-spacecraft dataset being collected by Cluster. Cluster was the first phased, multi-spacecraft mission, currently in its 19th year of full science operations, to maintain a close configuration of four spacecraft, evolving around an orbit covering many mid- to outer magnetospheric regions. Such a configuration allowed the estimation of plasma and field gradients, as well as wave vector determinations for the first time. A range of spatial scales were accessed through a sequence of orbital manoeuvres, predominantly from meso- to large scale spacecraft separation distances. Although covering a vast array of science targets, Cluster did not cover the small (sub-ion) spatial scales and did not access the low-Earth orbit (LEO) altitudes suitable for the upper ionosphere. approximately east-west 2014","PeriodicalId":48388,"journal":{"name":"International Organization","volume":"16 1","pages":"iv - iv"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/s002081830001105x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45984257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Classification models and SAR analysis on thromboxane A<sub>2</sub> synthase inhibitors by machine learning methods.","authors":"Y Ji, R Li, Y Tian, G Chen, A Yan","doi":"10.1080/1062936X.2022.2078880","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1062936X.2022.2078880","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thromboxane A<sub>2</sub> synthase (TXS) is a promising drug target for cardiovascular diseases and cancer. In this work, we conducted a structure-activity relationship (SAR) study on 526 TXS inhibitors for bioactivity prediction. Three types of descriptors (MACCS fingerprints, ECFP4 fingerprints, and MOE descriptors) were utilized to characterize inhibitors, 24 classification models were developed by support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and deep neural networks (DNN). Then we reduced the number of fingerprints according to the contribution of descriptors to the models, and constructed 16 extra models on simplified fingerprints. In general, Model_4D built by DNN algorithm and 67 bits MACCS fingerprints performs best. The prediction accuracy of the model on the test set is 0.969, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) is 0.936. The distance between compound and model (d<sub>STD-PRO</sub>) was used to characterize the application domain of the model. In the test set of Model_4D, d<sub>STD-PRO</sub> of 91.5% compounds is lower than the corresponding training set threshold (threshold<sub>0.90</sub> = 0.1055), and the accuracy of these compounds is 0.983. In addition, the important descriptors were summarized and further analyzed. It showed that aromatic nitrogenous heterocyclic groups were beneficial to improve the bioactivity of TXS inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48388,"journal":{"name":"International Organization","volume":"28 1","pages":"429-462"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79080166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Smuggling and Border Enforcement","authors":"Diana Kim, Y. Tajima","doi":"10.1017/S002081832200011X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081832200011X","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article analyzes the efficacy of border enforcement against smuggling. We argue that walls, fences, patrols, and other efforts to secure porous borders can reduce smuggling, but only in the absence of collusion between smugglers and state agents at official border crossings. When such corruption occurs, border enforcement merely diverts smuggling flows without reducing their overall volume. We also identify the conditions under which corruption occurs and characterize border enforcement as a sorting mechanism that allows high-skilled smugglers to forge alternative border-crossing routes while deterring low-skilled smugglers or driving them to bribe local border agents. Combining a formal model and an archival case study of opium smuggling in Southeast Asia, we demonstrate that border enforcement has conditional effects on the routes and volumes of smuggling, depending on the nature of interactions between smugglers and border agents. By drawing attention to the technological and organizational aspects of smuggling, this article brings scholarship on criminal governance into the study of international relations, and contributes to debates on the effects of border enforcement and border politics more generally.","PeriodicalId":48388,"journal":{"name":"International Organization","volume":"76 1","pages":"830 - 867"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49415429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"In Memoriam: Robert L. Powell","authors":"J. Fearon, David A. Lake, Anne Meng, Jack Paine","doi":"10.1017/s0020818322000091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818322000091","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48388,"journal":{"name":"International Organization","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43646163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Where You Work Is Where You Stand: A Firm-Based Framework for Understanding Trade Opinion","authors":"H. Lee, Yu-Ming Liou","doi":"10.1017/S0020818322000108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818322000108","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract What determines public support for trade liberalization? Scholars of international political economy have generally focused on the effects of openness on employment via individuals’ skill level, sector, or occupation. Recent developments in trade economics suggest that the characteristics of individual citizens’ employing firms may also shape their attitudes on trade policy. In this paper, using under-explored survey data combining trade opinion with measures of employer productivity (from the 2008 Japanese General Social Survey), we present evidence that employees of more productive, more globalized firms are much more supportive of trade openness than employees of less productive, domestically oriented firms, even when accounting for skill level and sectoral and occupational characteristics. Moreover, we find evidence that the effects of these characteristics described in the literature are conditioned by globalized firm employment. Last, we find that the effect of globalized firm employment is conditioned by employees’ relative position within their firms. Those who are more likely to benefit directly from firm success—such as permanent employees and managers—hold the most pro-trade preferences. These findings suggest that economic interests affect individual policy preferences in more nuanced ways than previously recognized.","PeriodicalId":48388,"journal":{"name":"International Organization","volume":"76 1","pages":"713 - 740"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41330140","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}