British Journal of Social Psychology最新文献

{"title":"Overcoming low status or maintaining high status? A multinational examination of the association between socioeconomic status and honour","authors":"Ángel Sánchez-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Conor O'Dea,&nbsp;Ayse K. Uskul,&nbsp;Alexander Kirchner-Häusler,&nbsp;Vivian Vignoles,&nbsp;Phatthanakit Chobthamkit,&nbsp;Rendy Alfiannoor Achmad,&nbsp;Sonny Andrianto,&nbsp;Andreas Agung Kristanto,&nbsp;Rahkman Ardi,&nbsp;Cokorda Bagus Jaya Lesmana,&nbsp;Vanessa A. Castillo,&nbsp;Trawin Chaleeraktrakoon,&nbsp;Alfred Chan Huan Zhi,&nbsp;Bovornpoch Choompunuch,&nbsp;Susan E. Cross,&nbsp;Son Duc Nguyen,&nbsp;Elaine Frances Fernandez,&nbsp;Fredrick Dermawan Purba,&nbsp;Marc Eric S. Reyes,&nbsp;Meral Gezici Yalçın,&nbsp;Ahmad Gimmy Prathama Siswadi,&nbsp;Charles Harb,&nbsp;Intan Hashimah Mohd Hashim,&nbsp;Shenel Husnu,&nbsp;Bonar Hutapea,&nbsp;The Huy Le Hoang,&nbsp;Keiko Ishii,&nbsp;Rozmi Ismail,&nbsp;Kenichi Ito,&nbsp;Luh Ketut Suryani,&nbsp;Tinnaphat Kaewyodthiwat,&nbsp;Konstantinos Kafetsios,&nbsp;Panagiota Karamaouna,&nbsp;Evangelia Kateri,&nbsp;Aqeel Khan,&nbsp;Nuannut Khieowan,&nbsp;Galang Lufityanto,&nbsp;Ma. Elizabeth J. Macapagal,&nbsp;Deviga a/p Marappan,&nbsp;Juan Matamoros-Lima,&nbsp;Rania Miniesy,&nbsp;Ahmad Mustaqim Yusoff,&nbsp;Jinkyung Na,&nbsp;Zafer Özkan,&nbsp;Stefano Pagliaro,&nbsp;Charis Psaltis,&nbsp;Dina Rabie,&nbsp;Mitchell Reinhart,&nbsp;Ahmad Ridfah,&nbsp;Rosa Rodriguez-Bailón,&nbsp;Mai Sumiyati Ishak,&nbsp;Manuel Teresi,&nbsp;Ma. Criselda Tengco-Pacquing,&nbsp;Kulvadee Thongpibul,&nbsp;Minh Thuy Thi Tri,&nbsp;Rika Vira Zwagery,&nbsp;Suci Wisayanti,&nbsp;Chang Yau Hoon,&nbsp;Yukiko Uchida","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12854","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.12854","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examined the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and endorsement of honour. We studied the SES-honour link in 5 studies (<i>N</i> = 13,635) with participants recruited in different world regions (the Mediterranean and MENA, East Asian, South-East Asian, and Anglo-Western regions) using measures that tap into various different facets of honour. Findings from these studies revealed that individuals who subjectively perceived themselves as belonging to a higher (vs. lower) SES endorsed various facets of honour more strongly (i.e. defence of family honour values and concerns, self-promotion and retaliation values, masculine honour beliefs, emphasis on personal and family social image, the so-called street code). We discuss implications of these findings for the cultural dynamics linked to SES.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143030730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Social psychology of context and in context: Understanding the temporal, spatial and embodied dimensions of contemporary geopolitics","authors":"Sandra Obradović,&nbsp;Orsolya Vincze,&nbsp;Gordon Sammut","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12851","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.12851","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Critical voices within social psychology have, for some time, emphasized that context matters for understanding psychological phenomena and processes. This special issue examines what a social psychology of context, and in context, can contribute to understanding contemporary geopolitics. We argue that, in examining the interplay between social psychology and contemporary geopolitics, we can understand how geopolitical contexts shape psychological processes and how psychology, in turn, informs our understanding of geopolitical phenomena. There are two thematic strands of the special issue; first, how psychological mechanisms influence perceptions and actions within geopolitical contexts, and second, how geopolitics shapes psychology as a discipline, including its theoretical frameworks and power dynamics. Papers examine three dimensions within which psychology and geopolitics meet—the temporal, spatial and embodied—representing history, geography and social relations, while emphasizing their interconnectedness. Drawing on critical geopolitics and social psychology, this introduction underscores the constructed, contested and political nature of time and space. By interlinking historical and social meaning with spatialization, this issue offers a deeper understanding of how individuals, groups and nations create and contest the psychological and geopolitical landscapes that shape contemporary life. The contributions highlight both the opportunities and challenges for social psychology in engaging with these critical intersections.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143020433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Your needs or mine? The role of allies' needs and their perceptions of disadvantaged groups' needs in motivating solidarity-based actions","authors":"Ahmed Faruk Sağlamöz,&nbsp;Maja Kutlaca,&nbsp;Ana C. Leite","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12855","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.12855","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We propose a new motivational model that integrates self-determination theory (with a focus on basic needs) with social-psychological research on allyship and solidarity to better understand when and why allies may engage in different actions to address social injustice. We theorize that normative (e.g., donations and protesting) and non-normative (e.g., blocking highways and disrupting events) solidarity-based actions are motivated by allies' basic needs (measured at the individual and group levels) as well as their perception of disadvantaged groups' basic needs (measured at the individual and group levels). We tested the model in two cross-sectional studies using two different contexts: English citizens' solidarity (i.e., allies from a high-status group) with Ukrainian refugees and students' solidarity (i.e., allies from a low-status group) with the striking university employees in the United Kingdom (<i>N</i>_total = 1232). In both studies, we found that the more allies' needs were satisfied, the more likely they were to engage in normative solidarity actions. In contrast, intentions to engage in non-normative solidarity actions were predicted by frustration of allies' needs. Perceptions of disadvantaged group's needs predicted engagement in both normative and non-normative actions. Notably, high-status allies' solidarity was driven by both individual and group-level needs, whilst low-status allies were only motivated by group-level needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.12855","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143020838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Threat to control promotes utilitarian moral judgement: The role of judgement type and length of control deprivation","authors":"Sindhuja Sankaran,&nbsp;Wiktor Soral,&nbsp;Karol Lewczuk,&nbsp;Mirosław Kofta","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12829","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.12829","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In three studies (total <i>N</i> = 622), the effects of threat to control on subsequent moral judgement were examined. After recalling a lack-of-control experience, participants evaluated the morality of a protagonist's decisions in a series of incongruent moral dilemmas. We found that a control-threatening reminder made moral judgements more utilitarian on the deontological–utilitarian dimension, which is consistent with the control motivation theory. However, this effect depended on the type of judgement and the duration of control deprivation. It emerged only when evaluating moral legitimacy, not overall moral acceptability, and only under brief control-threatening situations, not long ones. Thus, control threat made moral reasoning more utilitarian only when factors promoting more careful, exhaustive story processing were at play. Presumably, under these conditions, the non-specific motivation to regain control—by prompting effortful processing—allowed participants to weigh the moral pros and cons before reaching a final judgement.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142987241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"On the Measurement of Episodic Empowerment","authors":"Jonathan Bartholomaeus,&nbsp;Joe Mandrell,&nbsp;Peter Strelan","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12838","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.12838","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article reports the development and validation of the Episodic Empowerment Scale (EES): A manipulation check designed to measure a momentary psychological state. In Study 1, participants (<i>n</i> = 125) completed a selection of candidate items after being exposed to a low- or high-power manipulation. Exploratory factor analysis was used to reduce the number of items to a brief five-item measure. We then examined the validity, reliability, and stability of the EES. Study 2 (<i>n</i> = 143) compared the target sensitivity of the EES to a widely used measure of power. In Study 3 (<i>n</i> = 129), we investigated the discriminant content validity of the EES by testing its sensitivity to a non-target manipulation: positive and negative affect. Finally, in a large-scale replication, Study 4 (<i>n</i> = 479) established the measurement invariance of the EES across experimental conditions and the interaction between conditions and gender as well as replicating the findings from Study 1. Our results indicate that the EES is a brief, valid, and sensitive manipulation check. Findings are discussed within the broader context of validating self-report manipulation checks and the importance of employing robust psychometric techniques in experimental social psychology.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.12838","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142985977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Acts from the cracks: Representations and positions of the decolonial in the geopolitical (de)construction of power-entangled knowledge","authors":"Subas Amjad Ali,&nbsp;Mauro Sarrica,&nbsp;Gordon Sammut,&nbsp;Sara Bigazzi","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12835","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.12835","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines the geopolitical implications of knowledge production in psychology through two studies that respond to the growing body of work on the ‘Decolonisation of Knowledge’ and the ‘Decolonisation of Psychology’ over the past two decades. By adopting a constructivist approach, particularly through the lens of Social Representation Theory (SRT), these studies explore the ways in which geopolitical contexts shape decolonial activism within psychological and scientific discourse. The first study sheds light on the lexical divergences in the construction of knowledge within the domains of psychology. We reviewed 300 article abstracts related to decolonial studies using lexicometric analysis based on the Reinhart method (IraMuTeq). Four clusters were identified: <i>Educational Reform, Historical Temporalities, Social Actors,</i> and <i>Epistemological Discourse.</i> These clusters suggest differences in knowledge production within different geopolitical localities. The second study explores these variations by immersing itself in the perspectives and representations articulated by decolonial scholars. The second study is conducted using 12 semi-structured interviews with academics actively engaged in decolonial efforts. The aim of the two studies is to demonstrate regional variations in decolonial discourse and highlight the ongoing influence of geopolitical factors on scientific inquiry.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.12835","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142985980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Right-wing authoritarianism and perceptions that minoritized groups pose a threat: The moderating roles of individual- and country-level religiosity and marginalization","authors":"Fahima Farkhari,&nbsp;Julian Scharbert,&nbsp;Lara Kroencke,&nbsp;Christin Schwarzer,&nbsp;Jonas F. Koch,&nbsp;Maarten H. W. van Zalk,&nbsp;Bernd Schlipphak,&nbsp;Mitja D. Back","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12830","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.12830","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) refers to an adherence to conventional values and authorities with the power to penalize groups that are perceived to challenge the cohesion of ingroup norms. Correspondingly, RWA has repeatedly been linked to negative perceptions of minoritized groups, such as refugees or religious minorities. To investigate whether and how sociocultural factors add to and moderate how RWA influences perceptions that minoritized groups pose a threat (i.e. threat perceptions), we examined (a) the value of RWA, religiosity and perceived societal marginalization in predicting these threat perceptions across countries, (b) potential moderating effects of individual- and country-level religiosity and marginalization on the RWA-threat link and (c) the robustness of cross-sectional findings when daily threat perceptions were assessed longitudinally. We used cross-sectional survey data from Germany <i>N</i> = 1896; Study (1) and Europe <i>N</i> = 3227; Study (2) and global cross-sectional and longitudinal daily diary data <i>N</i> = 3154 individuals; <i>N</i> &gt;52,447 assessments; <i>N</i> = 41 countries; Study (3). Our studies point to the significance of contextual conditions and the generalizability of cross-sectional findings to day-to-day assessments of threat perceptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.12830","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142985979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Studying Kurdishness in Turkey: A review of existing research","authors":"Yasemin Gülsüm Acar,&nbsp;Elif Sandal-Önal,&nbsp;Ercan Şen,&nbsp;Mete Sefa Uysal","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12842","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.12842","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Knowledge production on marginalized identities is frequently shaped by epistemic violence, which limits both the scope and methodologies of research. One example of this is the case of Kurdish identity in Turkey, where we find that methodological and epistemic problems are evident particularly in social psychological research. To summarize social psychological studies on Kurdishness, Kurdish identity and conflict in Turkey we've conducted a systematic review that includes a total of 63 studies on topics related to Kurdishness. We utilize qualitative content analysis (Schreier, 2012) to address: (1) whether samples in the studies in our review represent Kurds, (2) which topics the studies mostly focus on, (3) how Kurdish identity and Kurds as a group are conceptualized and (4) how the Kurdish issue is conceptualized. We discuss our findings in light of epistemic violence and methodological nationalism and identify the key gaps in the literature and offer a critical, inclusive understanding of the social psychological studies on Kurdish identity and state violence in Turkey.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.12842","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142985978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A qualitative and quantitative study of radical pro-environmental social change as anticipated future loss and threat: A gender perspective","authors":"Robert A. T. Avery,&nbsp;Asma Korichi,&nbsp;Catheline Vagli,&nbsp;Hugo Jean Elie Chkroun,&nbsp;Florian Raphaël Seefeld,&nbsp;Isabella Kaiser,&nbsp;Kenzo Giaccari,&nbsp;Lucie Defauw,&nbsp;Lucien Brey,&nbsp;Nelson Glardon,&nbsp;Noah Ajani,&nbsp;Tom Sorgius,&nbsp;Fabrizio Butera","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12841","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.12841","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Degrowth-oriented climate change mitigation policies offer inspiring possibilities for future societies. However, they require radical change to individual and collective behaviours; and research has not yet fully addressed how people may anticipate future loss and threat when confronted with such policies. This study proposes a twofold examination of anticipated reactions to pro-environmental degrowth-oriented minority influence. First, we conducted a qualitative study of 21 semi-structured interviews. Both thematic analysis and consensual approach methodologies were adopted to explore emerging trends in the perception of a minority call to reduce human overpopulation, consumption of natural resources, and infrastructural incursions into nature. Results revealed three recurring themes: loss of individual freedom, fear of extremism, and loss of comfort. Second, a quantitative study (<i>N</i> = 488) followed up these results by testing the hypothesis that anticipated loss would be associated to a gendered perception of threat. In line with our conjecture regarding the relationship between policy change, status quo preservation, and gender, moderation analysis showed that men reported more threat than women, the more perceptions of degrowth-oriented policies were anticipated as a loss. Implications for a future-forming approach of research and policy making are discussed considering perceiving radical pro-environmental change as a threatening loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142984754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"‘They attacked you just like that’: Negotiating racial epistemics in making claims about racism","authors":"Rahul Sambaraju","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12846","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.12846","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Social psychological research on race and racism has shown that claims about racism are not always accepted or received as valid reports. In this paper, I offer racial epistemics as one mechanism by which race-talk takes place. I examine how ascribing category-bound entitlements to experiential or other knowledge about racism is variously realised and complicated in the production of claims about racism. Through examining news media accounts where Black persons were invited to talk about their experiences of racism in India, I show that despite ascribing a privileged epistemic position to Black persons, recipients (interviewers and other panellists) could make salient epistemic entitlements to commonsense, specialised, or other forms of (racial) knowledge in collaboratively establishing, confirming or correcting, and challenging claims about racism in India. The findings are discussed in relation to the broader understanding of racism in social psychology. The data are in Indian English.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724322/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142967088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}