{"title":"Comparing imagined contact approaches to reducing prejudice and anxiety towards Black people.","authors":"Jennifer F Beatty-Wright,Patrick L Hill","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.70076","url":null,"abstract":"Intergroup anxiety can undermine positive intergroup relations. This Registered Report presents two preregistered online studies testing a mental contrasting intervention to reduce intergroup anxiety towards Black individuals. Previous work aimed to inoculate anxiety by having participants imagine a threatening intergroup experience followed by a positive one, compared to only imagining positive interactions. In Study 1 (N = 300), White US adults were randomly assigned in a 2 × 2 design to imagine either a negative-then-positive interaction (intervention) or positive-only interactions with an outgroup (Black) or ingroup (White) member. State anxiety was measured immediately before and after the second imagined interaction, followed by prejudice and contact intentions. Study 2 (N = 149) replicated the outgroup conditions and tested whether imagining a neutral-then-positive interaction reduced anxiety relative to imagining positive-only interactions. Contrary to preregistered predictions, Study 1 showed higher intergroup anxiety in the intervention condition and a significant condition × time interaction. These effects did not replicate in Study 2. Across both studies, the intervention did not significantly reduce prejudice or increase contact intentions. Overall, the preregistered tests did not support the hypothesis that this intervention reduces intergroup anxiety or related outcomes, constraining claims regarding its robustness and generalizability.","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"25 11 1","pages":"e70076"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147585829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kelly Kirkland, Christoph Klebl, Christian T. Elbæk, Jolanda Jetten
{"title":"Perceptions of anomie in society shape support for wealth redistribution","authors":"Kelly Kirkland, Christoph Klebl, Christian T. Elbæk, Jolanda Jetten","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.70067","url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the factors that influence support for wealth redistribution is essential to address growing economic divides around the world. We propose that perceptions of anomie—the belief that society's social and political fabric is crumbling—can influence support for redistribution in opposing ways. When people see society as deteriorating, they may seek drastic change, increasing support for redistribution. Conversely, viewing society as descending into anomie may also foster a belief that the government will mismanage redistributed wealth, thereby reducing support. Study 1 examined these relationships in a U.S. sample, confirming the presence of these two opposing pathways, and Study 2 then replicated the findings in the UK. Study 3 tested this model experimentally, introducing the ‘anomie paradigm’ to explore how perceptions of anomie cause shifts in psychology. Here, participants were exposed to a fictitious society characterized by high or low anomie. The high (relative to low) anomie condition increased support for redistribution through a desire for change but simultaneously decreased support via concerns over government misuse. These findings highlight how perceptions of societal breakdown can shape redistributive preferences through co‐occurring psychological processes with opposing implications for policy support.","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147536412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Charlie R. Crimston, Joshua Rottman, Karri Neldner, Matti Wilks, Tarli Young
{"title":"Deconstructing the moral circle: Obligations as the driver of moral expansion","authors":"Charlie R. Crimston, Joshua Rottman, Karri Neldner, Matti Wilks, Tarli Young","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.70073","url":null,"abstract":"Who do we believe deserves rights, and when do we feel personally obligated to protect them? Expanding the moral circle has been seen as a hallmark of moral progress, yet existing research has rarely examined how different kinds of moral judgements, recognizing rights versus endorsing obligations, shape this process. The present research disentangles these judgements across human and non‐human entities to better understand how they predict prosocial decision‐making. Across three studies ( <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 1256), we consistently found that people were more willing to grant moral rights than to endorse moral obligations, particularly for human targets. Yet only obligations emerged as a reliable predictor of prosocial intentions across both high‐ and low‐cost behaviours. Study 3 extended these findings by distinguishing between positive and negative forms of moral judgement, showing that while negative rights and obligations were attributed more broadly, positive obligations most strongly motivated helping, especially towards non‐human entities. Together, these findings demonstrate that rights may expand the moral circle symbolically, but obligations, particularly positive obligations, supply the motivational force that is most closely tied to prosociality. This distinction offers new theoretical insight into moral cognition and highlights practical avenues for fostering prosocial engagement in a time of expanding but often inconsistent moral concern.","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"229 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147524006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Re-imagining space: Conceptualizing new psychological interventions against segregationist attitudes and behaviours","authors":"Maria Ioannou","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70066","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.70066","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Drawing on theories, concepts and empirical evidence from the fields of human geography, social and environmental psychology, this paper argues for space-based interventions as new psychological interventions aiming to address segregationist attitudes and behaviours among co-located groups. The main premise of this argument is that engaging in spatial experiences that cause people to challenge their existing notions of place will impact socio-spatial processes that propagate segregationist practices. These processes concern how people view and attach to their place and how they regard antagonistic groups vis-à-vis place. In presenting space-based interventions, I first explain why space and place are relevant to intergroup interventions aiming at co-existence and why, therefore, a ‘spatial shift’ in this realm holds promise. I then engage with three different types of space-based activities stipulating their envisioned outcomes: (a) to know more about (the history of) a place; (b) to know the Other in relation to place; and (c) crossing physical and mental boundaries. I conclude with a critical reflection on factors that could impede space-based interventions or undermine their effect, and how the potential of these interventions to engage the body and induce ‘ruptures’ could ameliorate these constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"65 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.70066","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147502351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rose Meleady, Hannah K. Peetz, Shelley McKeown, George Leckie, Jo Broadwood
{"title":"A longitudinal multilevel analysis of individual- and contextual-level predictors of cross-ethnic friendships in the UK","authors":"Rose Meleady, Hannah K. Peetz, Shelley McKeown, George Leckie, Jo Broadwood","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70068","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.70068","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intergroup contact plays a central role in fostering positive intergroup attitudes; yet, factors promoting intergroup contact are less understood. Using three waves of data from a nationally representative UK household panel study (<i>N</i> = 18,807), we applied longitudinal multilevel models to examine how individual- and objective neighbourhood-level indicators jointly predict cross-ethnic friendships. At the individual level, higher openness and agreeableness, stronger neighbourhood belonging and a left-leaning political orientation were associated with more cross-ethnic friendships. At the contextual level, intergroup friendships were more common in neighbourhoods with more structural opportunity for contact (i.e., areas with a lower proportion of same-ethnic residents), and in areas with lower anti-immigration norms (as indicated by local Brexit ‘Leave’ vote share). Crucially, cross-level interactions highlighted the interplay of person and place: neighbourhood diversity fostered more cross-ethnic friendships, especially among those with strong neighbourhood belonging, suggesting that people who feel embedded in their community are more likely to translate diverse surroundings into meaningful intergroup ties. Differences between the ethnic majority and minority groups also emerged. For example, higher objective area-level racial hate crime incidence predicted more intergroup friendships among majority members, suggesting a possible repair response, but showed no association for minority members. Findings underscore the multilevel and group-specific pathways to sustained intergroup friendships.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"65 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.70068","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147471741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pierre Bouchat, José J. Pizarro, Jon Zabala, Darío Páez, Bernard Rimé
{"title":"Emotional synchrony predicts social cohesion effects following costly rituals","authors":"Pierre Bouchat, José J. Pizarro, Jon Zabala, Darío Páez, Bernard Rimé","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70064","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.70064","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This manuscript explores two explanatory models of participation in university hazing, a typical example of costly ritual: the Shared Pathway Model and the Emotional Synchronization Model. Two correlational (<i>N</i> = 85 and 76) and one longitudinal study (<i>N</i> = 120 + 258) based on self-reported measures were conducted in highly ecological contexts to assess the predictive value of the two explanatory models on social cohesion (i.e., social identification and identity fusion) and well-being (i.e., life satisfaction, self-esteem and loneliness). Across studies, emotional synchronization consistently predicted social cohesion and well-being, both immediately and up to 4 months post-ritual. In contrast, the Shared Pathway Model showed only weak associations with short-term social identification and failed to explain long-term effects. A meta-analysis confirmed these results. These findings offer novel empirical support for the role of emotional synchronization in explaining the enduring psychosocial effects of costly rituals. We discuss implications for ritual theory and suggest future research on why some rituals foster strong social bonds while others lead to exclusion or fail to generate cohesion.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"65 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147461632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sasha Y. Kimel, Jonas R. Kunst, Fatih Uenal, Viridiana Kim
{"title":"‘They're eating our pets!’: When disgust and perceived cruelty combine to heighten prejudice","authors":"Sasha Y. Kimel, Jonas R. Kunst, Fatih Uenal, Viridiana Kim","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70063","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.70063","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accusations that foreigners are ‘eating pets’ tap into deep fears of impurity and cruelty. Despite the dark history of such moralized disgust and evidence that purity- and harm-based emotions can intensify bias, little experimental work has directly tested how these processes jointly shape prejudice. Across two main-text experiments and one supplemental replication (<i>N</i> = 2710, United States), we tested whether hostility is greatest when cultural outgroups are portrayed as consuming meat that elicits both visceral (purity-related) disgust and moral concern. A pretest confirmed that dog meat evoked the highest moral concern, rat the highest contamination-related appraisals and cow was neutral, while Study 2 substituted monkey to test generalization. Prejudice and punitive intent were strongest for morally protected animals (dog, monkey), moderate for rat and lowest for cow. Visceral disgust showed more consistent association with bias, whereas compassion played a more limited role. Invoking disgust and perceived cruelty can become a potent trigger of hostility towards cultural outgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"65 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147439369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Crowd psychology and the politics of co-production: Social control, democratic order and the consequences of theory","authors":"Clifford Stott","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70065","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.70065","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Social psychology has long claimed neutrality in its explanations of collective behaviour, yet its foundational theories of crowds have repeatedly been co-produced with institutions of authority and mobilized in the reactionary governance of social order. This article challenges the discipline's familiar origin myth—centred on benign laboratory demonstrations of social influence—by re-situating crowd psychology as one of social psychology's earliest and most politically consequential points of emergence. From nineteenth-century crowd theory, through mid-twentieth-century de-individuation research, to contemporary public-order doctrine, assumptions about the inherent irrationality and danger of collective action have been repeatedly reformulated in scientific form, their persistence reflecting institutional and ideological fit rather than explanatory adequacy. Against this background, the article repositions the Social Identity Approach and the Elaborated Social Identity Model (ESIM) not merely as theoretical corrections, but as a reorientation of how psychological knowledge is produced, authorized and used. Drawing on ethnographic participatory action research and sustained engagement with policing institutions in the United Kingdom, Europe, and the United States, it conceptualizes collective behaviour as interactional and normatively organized, with policing practices constitutive of crowd dynamics rather than external to them. The article argues that co-production is not a methodological innovation but a historically persistent condition of social psychology and that the ESIM represents a distinctive attempt to govern this condition reflexively by redirecting psychological knowledge towards legitimacy, restraint and the facilitation of democratic rights. The broader implication is that social psychology cannot plausibly claim political neutrality: its concepts travel into institutions and practices, shaping how collective action is anticipated, governed and policed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"65 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.70065","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147439903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Disentangling the meat paradox: A comparative review of meat-related conflicts across dietary behaviours","authors":"Benjamin Buttlar, Shiva Pauer","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70062","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.70062","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A growing field of research examines how people experience and resolve cognitive conflicts in their behaviours, particularly in relation to meat consumption. Despite the alleged importance of conflict in behaviour change, most research focuses on how conflict motivates individuals to change or maintain their conflicted behaviour but disregards that conflict may persist even after successful behaviour change. This oversight has contributed to seemingly contradictory conclusions by conflating different kinds of conflicts and has arguably constrained theory development. Our review thus delineates (a) how people with different dietary patterns in meat consumption are affected by meat-related ambivalence and dissonance, (b) differences in the characteristics (magnitude, frequency, moralization) of these conflicts, (c) boundary conditions of why conflict experiences arise, and (d) how these factors determine the downstream consequences of conflict. This allows us to derive several novel predictions, ranging from why conflict avoidance strategies may sometimes paradoxically increase the likelihood of experiencing conflict to the distinct roles of capability, opportunity, and motivation in shaping the behavioural consequences of conflict. By re-evaluating prevailing assertions in the literature on meat-related conflict, we offer numerous theoretical and practical implications regarding cognitive conflict and the psychology of meat consumption and avoidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"65 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.70062","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147394029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lewis Nitschinsk, Melinda Hewett, Audree Grand'Pierre, Michael Thai, Fiona Kate Barlow
{"title":"Why might members of racially minoritized groups seek anonymity when interacting with White people online? Codeswitching, emotional labour and burnout","authors":"Lewis Nitschinsk, Melinda Hewett, Audree Grand'Pierre, Michael Thai, Fiona Kate Barlow","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70060","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.70060","url":null,"abstract":"<p>People can alter the nature of online intergroup interactions by becoming anonymous. Across three studies (<i>N</i> = 1107), we surveyed Black (Studies 1–3) and White (Study 2) participants in majority-White nations. We argue that Black people living in these countries face substantial pressures in interracial interactions, and that responses associated with the performative pressures of contact might predict a desire for anonymity in interracial settings online. We operationalized these responses in three distinct yet related ways: codeswitching (adjusting language or behaviour), emotional labour (suppressing negative and displaying positive emotions) and experiencing burnout from intergroup contact. As proposed: (1) Black participants who engaged in more codeswitching and emotional labour, and who felt more burned out when interacting with White people, were more likely to seek anonymity in an interracial interaction; (2) Black participants were more likely than White participants to engage in codeswitching and emotional labour, to feel burned out from interracial contact, and, in turn, to seek anonymity in interracial interactions; and (3) stigma consciousness and perceived discrimination partly explained the relationship between codeswitching, emotional labour, and burnout and seeking anonymity. Our findings elucidate how group processes might affect whether members of racially minoritised groups might seek anonymity online.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"65 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.70060","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147374274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}