British Journal of Social Psychology最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The psychology of Querfront tactics: How protesters perceive and navigate conflicting ideologies to mobilise collectively 抗议阵线战术的心理学:抗议者如何感知和驾驭冲突的意识形态以动员集体
IF 3 2区 心理学
British Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-10-10 DOI: 10.1111/bjso.70015
Ann-Cathrin Coenen, Felix J. Feist, Roland Imhoff, Milan Obaidi, Jonas R. Kunst
{"title":"The psychology of Querfront tactics: How protesters perceive and navigate conflicting ideologies to mobilise collectively","authors":"Ann-Cathrin Coenen,&nbsp;Felix J. Feist,&nbsp;Roland Imhoff,&nbsp;Milan Obaidi,&nbsp;Jonas R. Kunst","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70015","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.70015","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Social scientists have developed impactful frameworks to understand who unites in protest. Yet, when exceptional circumstances arise, people are sometimes astounded by the convergence of disparate groups protesting together for an apparently unifying cause. One recent example is the COVID-19 pandemic. A new movement protesting the containment measures rapidly evolved, gaining momentum only weeks after the measures' implementation. Strikingly, the movement included participants from, among others, the political far left and right—individuals who had protested each other only weeks earlier and would do so again after the pandemic was declared over. This context enabled a real-life investigation of how people navigated conflicting ideologies to mobilise collectively. Drawing on 11 naturalistic protest observations and template analysis of 30 interviews with 31 protesters, we find that most participants indeed experienced the movement as ideologically diverse. At the same time, protesters used three strategies to navigate ideological conflict: (1) highlighting superordinate identities and ally utility (i.e., usefulness in advancing shared goals); (2) defending allies through in−/out-group biases; and (3) embracing diversity. Our analysis demonstrates the combined explanatory power of social identity, social categorisation, and coalitional psychology frameworks in understanding emerging Querfront alliances, showing how protesters moved from identity construction to coalition calculus.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145260730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
People are more Sceptical of others' public virtue motivations than their own in separate (but not joint) evaluations 在单独(而非共同)的评估中,人们对他人的公共美德动机比对自己的更持怀疑态度。
IF 3 2区 心理学
British Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-10-02 DOI: 10.1111/bjso.70014
Kyle Fiore Law, Jordan Wylie, Gordon Kraft-Todd, Nathan Liang, Liane Young, Stylianos Syropoulos
{"title":"People are more Sceptical of others' public virtue motivations than their own in separate (but not joint) evaluations","authors":"Kyle Fiore Law,&nbsp;Jordan Wylie,&nbsp;Gordon Kraft-Todd,&nbsp;Nathan Liang,&nbsp;Liane Young,&nbsp;Stylianos Syropoulos","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70014","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.70014","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Public acts of virtue can promote prosocial norms yet are often met with moral scepticism – a phenomenon known as virtue discounting. What psychological processes might underlie people's propensity to both discount others' public virtue and also engage in it themselves? We examine one possible explanation: whether people expect their own public virtuous behaviour to be judged more favourably than others' similar actions. Across four pre-registered studies (<i>N</i> = 2511), we tested for self-serving asymmetries in moral expectations. In three between-subjects experiments, participants either anticipated how others would evaluate their own actions (meta-perceptions) or judged the actions of another person (third-party judgements). Study 1 found no asymmetry in moral goodness. But in Studies 2 and 3, participants expected their own public virtue to be judged as more principled (and more morally good, in Study 2), less reputation-driven, and more trustworthy. Study 3 showed these asymmetries held across multiple perspectives. In contrast, Study 4 used a within-subjects design and found that self-serving asymmetries disappeared when judgements were made side by side. Together, these findings clarify how self-enhancement shapes moral expectations under naturalistic conditions and extend research on moral self-enhancement beyond trait judgements to public virtue and its perceived motivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145208024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Is that an Asian thing?”: Co-constructing category-bound attributes in interaction “这是亚洲人的习惯吗?”:在交互中共同构建类别约束属性
IF 3 2区 心理学
British Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-27 DOI: 10.1111/bjso.70013
Tianhao Zhang
{"title":"“Is that an Asian thing?”: Co-constructing category-bound attributes in interaction","authors":"Tianhao Zhang","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.70013","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Using conversation analysis and discursive psychology, this paper examines how members of the Asian category co-construct shared experiences and attributes associated with the category in the U.S. context. Analysing sequences of interaction from podcasts advertised as centring around Asian American experiences, I identify a set of practices recurrently adopted by participants in generalising about commonalities shared by Asian members, which include mitigations, interrogatives, parenthetical inserts and various category-related repair practices. Through a detailed qualitative analysis, I demonstrate the delicate and methodical interactional work done by participants in managing the tension between constructing shared attributes/experiences and acknowledging differences within the Asian category, while also dealing with potential interactional issues associated with generalizing. This paper contributes to a better understanding of how shared meanings associated with social identities are collaboratively negotiated and (re)produced, in addition to offering a detailed account of the practices involved in category-based generalizing in interaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145146836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Moral evaluations of reporting transgressors are more favourable than people expect 报告违规者的道德评价比人们预期的更有利
IF 3 2区 心理学
British Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-26 DOI: 10.1111/bjso.70012
Yan Wang, Jialei Zhang, Xiaoli Ma, Longting Wang
{"title":"Moral evaluations of reporting transgressors are more favourable than people expect","authors":"Yan Wang,&nbsp;Jialei Zhang,&nbsp;Xiaoli Ma,&nbsp;Longting Wang","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.70012","url":null,"abstract":"<p>When close interpersonal ties involve unethical behaviour, should we report the misconduct? Through four studies, we investigate how social relationships shape moral evaluations of transgression reporting, potential reporters' expectations of evaluators' judgements, and, critically, the alignment between anticipated and actual assessments. We discovered that potential reporters who report (as opposed to those who do not report) transgressors are perceived as more morally upright in their behaviour, more ethical and warmer, regardless of whether the transgressors are close or distant (Study 1). Potential reporters anticipated that reporting (rather than not reporting) transgressors would prompt evaluators to judge them more favourably, irrespective of the relationship's closeness (Study 2). However, reporters expected lower evaluations of morality and warmth when reporting close versus distant transgressors (Study 2). Evaluators' actual evaluations of reporting transgressions proved more favourable than reporters anticipated, particularly concerning behavioural moral rightness, morality and warmth (Study 3). Reporters and evaluators differed in their moral valuations of loyalty versus justice, leading reporters to underestimate the positive impact that reporting close transgressors would have in evaluators' eyes (Study 4). These findings imply that evaluators are more supportive of reporting transgressors than reporters anticipate and that reporters overestimate the social costs associated with such actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145146804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to ‘Bread and Roses: Social re-presentations for Unconditional Basic Income in the Basque Country’ 更正“面包和玫瑰:巴斯克地区无条件基本收入的社会再现”。
IF 3 2区 心理学
British Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-08 DOI: 10.1111/bjso.70011
{"title":"Correction to ‘Bread and Roses: Social re-presentations for Unconditional Basic Income in the Basque Country’","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70011","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.70011","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Guerendiain-Gabás, I., Arnoso-Martínez, M., &amp; Gil de Montes, L. (2025). Bread and Roses: Social re-presentations for Unconditional Basic Income in the Basque Country. British Journal of Social Psychology, 64, e12909. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12909</p><p>In our article, we omitted reference to earlier work applying Staerkle's (2009) model of social order to the analysis of social representations of universal basic income. This approach has been previously developed in studies by Dupoirier et al. (2022, 2023).</p><p>Dupoirier, S., Demarque, C., Souville, M., Apostolidis, T., &amp; Lampropoulos, D. (2022). The sociorepresentational construction of Universal Basic Income in the French context: Effects of politico-ideological anchors. Papers on Social Representations, 31(1), 1–24.</p><p>Dupoirier, S., Demarque, C., Souville, M., Forissier, S., &amp; Lampropoulos, D. (2023). Roles of political orientation and social representations of social order on socio-representational construction towards Universal Basic Income in France. Basic Income Studies, 18(2), 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2022-0014</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.70011","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145008735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Remorse for discrimination: The role of group dominance in judging hate crimes against subordinate group members 对歧视的悔恨:群体优势在判断针对下属群体成员的仇恨犯罪中的作用
IF 3 2区 心理学
British Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1111/bjso.70008
Andrés Gvirtz, Patrick F. Kotzur, Andrew L. Stewart, Felicia Pratto
{"title":"Remorse for discrimination: The role of group dominance in judging hate crimes against subordinate group members","authors":"Andrés Gvirtz,&nbsp;Patrick F. Kotzur,&nbsp;Andrew L. Stewart,&nbsp;Felicia Pratto","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70008","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.70008","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Power, especially in the court system, is a potent determinant of intergroup relationships. Blind justice being only an ideal, public opinion can influence whether harm to low power groups is considered criminal and should be prosecuted. Our experiments investigated the impact of social dominance orientation (SDO) on the perceived appropriateness of punishment for harm to subordinate group members by dominant group members. Further, we examined the moderating role of a remorseful apology. We argue that perpetrators who do not show remorse towards their less powerful victim might be judged less harshly by those scoring high in SDO. Apologizing for the harm indicates a desire for social cohesion, which should appeal more to those low on SDO. We tested our hypothesis across three potential hate crimes: a privacy violation against a gay man (Study 1, <i>N</i> = 87 US-Americans), a shooting of an unarmed Black man (Study 2, <i>N</i> = 91 US-Americans), and an assault against an innocent refugee (Study 3a, <i>N</i> = 179 and 3b, <i>N</i> = 157 Germans). In three of four studies, people who desired group dominance advocated harsher punishment of remorsefully apologizing perpetrators. Our research contributes to the understanding of punitive attitudes across group boundaries with far-reaching societal implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.70008","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144929606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rise of the alt-White? Examining the prevalence of perceived racial and gender discrimination among White men from 2014 to 2023 另类白人的崛起?研究了2014年至2023年白人男性中种族和性别歧视的普遍程度
IF 3 2区 心理学
British Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-08-28 DOI: 10.1111/bjso.70010
Kieren J. Lilly, Chantelle Kimberley, Zoe Bertenshaw, Joaquín Bahamondes, Chris G. Sibley, Danny Osborne
{"title":"Rise of the alt-White? Examining the prevalence of perceived racial and gender discrimination among White men from 2014 to 2023","authors":"Kieren J. Lilly,&nbsp;Chantelle Kimberley,&nbsp;Zoe Bertenshaw,&nbsp;Joaquín Bahamondes,&nbsp;Chris G. Sibley,&nbsp;Danny Osborne","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70010","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.70010","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The alt-right increasingly claims that White men are becoming targets of discrimination, yet few studies examine how, and for whom, perceived (reverse) discrimination manifests among White men. We address this oversight by examining rates of change in perceptions of ethnic and gender discrimination across 10 annual waves of a nationwide sample of White men (2014 to 2023; <i>N</i> = 20,486). Latent class growth analysis revealed that most White men (82.75% of participants) reported low and stable perceptions of discrimination over time, alleviating concerns of widespread discontent. However, we identified a Disenfranchised class (8.49%) that perceived moderate discrimination and a Radicalized class (8.76%) whose initially low levels of perceived discrimination increased markedly over time. These classes differed across socio-demographic variables, socio-political attitudes and well-being measures. We thus identify how, and for whom, perceptions of discrimination change over time among White men and how these changes undermine health and progressive social change.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.70010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144910268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The haves and the have-nots: Identifying typologies of change in relative deprivation using multi-trajectory latent class growth analysis 富人和穷人:利用多轨迹潜在阶级增长分析识别相对剥夺变化的类型
IF 3 2区 心理学
British Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-08-16 DOI: 10.1111/bjso.70009
Kieren J. Lilly, Chris G. Sibley, Danny Osborne
{"title":"The haves and the have-nots: Identifying typologies of change in relative deprivation using multi-trajectory latent class growth analysis","authors":"Kieren J. Lilly,&nbsp;Chris G. Sibley,&nbsp;Danny Osborne","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70009","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.70009","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Relative deprivation theory argues that individuals can perceive themselves to be deprived relative to other individuals (IRD) or that their ingroup is deprived relative to other groups (GRD). Few studies, however, investigate how these distinct ‘types’ of relative deprivation manifest over time. We address this oversight using multi-trajectory latent class growth analysis to identify distinct growth trajectories of relative deprivation across 13 annual waves of a nationwide longitudinal panel study (2011–2023; <i>N</i><sub>total</sub> = 75,073). We identified two discrete classes: the Content class (90.5% of the sample) and the Deprived class (9.5%). Whereas the Content class had low levels of IRD and GRD that declined over 12 years, the Deprived class had moderate levels of IRD that decreased but high levels of GRD that <i>increased</i> over time. Membership in these two classes differed across demographics, well-being and sociopolitical measures. The implications for relative deprivation theory are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.70009","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144853794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
No time like the future? Towards a generative, prospective and possibilities-focussed ‘futures social psychology’ 没有时间像未来?走向生成性的、前瞻性的和以可能性为中心的“未来社会心理学”
IF 3 2区 心理学
British Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-08-05 DOI: 10.1111/bjso.70007
Annayah M. B. Prosser, Lucia Bosone, Julian W. Fernando, Gavin Brent Sullivan
{"title":"No time like the future? Towards a generative, prospective and possibilities-focussed ‘futures social psychology’","authors":"Annayah M. B. Prosser,&nbsp;Lucia Bosone,&nbsp;Julian W. Fernando,&nbsp;Gavin Brent Sullivan","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70007","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.70007","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anticipating, considering and incorporating possible futures are central components of human social life. Our social actions, beliefs, values and interactions are all oriented towards, or away from, various future outcomes. Yet despite this, social psychology is yet to harness its unique contribution to our understanding of the future, not addressing the challenges that many other disciplines are confronting in this emerging discipline. In this editorial, we introduce our special issue on ‘futures social psychology’, and in doing so, we provide a starting point for scholars interested in furthering research in this area. We outline previous important discipline-specific and methodological contributions, connecting social psychological perspectives to the wider academic and practitioner landscape. We outline how our eleven special issue contributions advance discussion, theorizing and research methodology on topics such as sustainability, collective group continuity, prefigurative politics, AI sentience and degrowth policies. Finally, we encourage social psychologists of all topic and methodological persuasions to adopt a generative, prospective and possibilities-focussed approach to their work, to ensure that social psychology as a discipline can effectively meet the challenges of the future and maximize its impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144782205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘Are they just putting up with me’? How diversity approaches impact LGBTQ+ employees' sense of being tolerated at work “他们只是在容忍我吗?”多元化方法如何影响LGBTQ+员工在工作中被容忍的感觉
IF 3 2区 心理学
British Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1111/bjso.70006
Kshitij Mor, Seval Gündemir, Jojanneke van der Toorn
{"title":"‘Are they just putting up with me’? How diversity approaches impact LGBTQ+ employees' sense of being tolerated at work","authors":"Kshitij Mor,&nbsp;Seval Gündemir,&nbsp;Jojanneke van der Toorn","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70006","DOIUrl":"10.1111/bjso.70006","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research investigates whether and how workplace diversity approaches—identity-conscious versus identity-blind—are associated with LGBTQ+ employees' perceptions of tolerance. Whilst tolerance is widely regarded as an important virtue for the harmonious functioning of diverse societies, it can inadvertently harm minoritized individuals. In workplace settings, perceptions of tolerance may hinder the benefits of diversity by discouraging minoritized employees from sharing their perspectives and prompting individuals with relatively concealable stigmas, such as LGBTQ+ employees, to conceal their identities. Across two studies (<i>n</i> = 907), we examine the conditions under which tolerance perceptions may arise. Study 1 explores LGBTQ+ prospective employees' anticipated tolerance in organizations with identity-blind versus identity-conscious mission statements. Study 2 examines LGBTQ+ employees' workplace experiences, focussing on how organizational and leadership diversity approaches are related to perceptions of tolerance. Findings reveal that relatively identity-blind approaches are associated with increased feelings of being tolerated. Moreover, identity-conscious leadership strategies, when coupled with identity-conscious organizational approaches, further diminish perceptions of being merely tolerated. Our findings underscore an un-intended correlate of identity-blind diversity approaches, which may perpetuate tolerance-focussed climates and indirectly undermine inclusion for LGBTQ+ employees.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"64 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjso.70006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144751599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信