Law and Human Behavior最新文献

{"title":"Impact of work pressure, job characteristics, and personality on job-related well-being in Dutch judges: A conceptual model.","authors":"Tineke Hagen, Elien De Caluwé, Stefan Bogaerts","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000657","DOIUrl":"10.1037/lhb0000657","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines the robustness of a conceptual model, testing the influences of work pressure and other factors on job-related mental health outcomes in Dutch judges, providing insights for the judiciary, and bringing together organizational psychology and judicial well-being research.</p><p><strong>Hypotheses: </strong>We predicted (a) that the conceptual model fits the data well and is robust and (b) that an increase in the job demands, work pressure, and work-home interference would be associated with more burnout; an increase in the job resources, autonomy, and social support would be associated with more work engagement and job satisfaction; higher neuroticism would be related to more burnout and to more workaholism; and higher extraversion would be related to more work engagement.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Dutch judges (<i>N</i> = 257; 165 females [64%]; mean age: 51 years old, range = 34-67 years old, <i>SD</i> = 7.90) completed questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(a) After modifications, the conceptual model was robust. (b) An increase in job demands (work pressure and work-home interference) was associated with more burnout (β = .20 and .23). Autonomy was not significantly associated with work engagement and job satisfaction (β = <.01 and .07). An increase in the job resource social support was positively associated with heightened work engagement and job satisfaction (β = .22 and .27). Higher neuroticism related to more burnout and workaholism (β = .17 and .19), whereas higher extraversion was related to more work engagement (β = .20 and .12). All results mentioned here reflect small to medium effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both job characteristics and personality factors influence burnout, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Implications for judges include vigilance regarding high work pressure and recognizing influences on mental health. Courts can play an important role in implementing strategies to reduce work pressure and in facilitating adequate job resources to improve judges' mental well-being. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"373-386"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147291422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Initial lineup rejections evolving into confident identifications at trial: The role of jury instructions in keeping the focus on the first test.","authors":"Jiaqi Huang, Maryam Izadshenas, John T Wixted","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000670","DOIUrl":"10.1037/lhb0000670","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Witnesses can confidently identify a defendant in court despite having rejected the defendant in a photo lineup during the initial police investigation. Even when informed of the witness's prior inconsistent statement, jurors often disregard it and convict based on the confident courtroom identification. We investigated this phenomenon and a strategy for minimizing it.</p><p><strong>Hypotheses: </strong>We predicted that laypeople hold the false belief that heightened emotional arousal can temporally block face-recognition memory, leading them to vote guilty despite the witness's initial lineup rejection. We also expected that a revised version of the recently introduced reflector variable instructions would help jurors understand an initial lineup rejection and reduce wrongful convictions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using mock-trial transcripts, Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 45, Prolific) asked mock jurors how they would explain the witness's inconsistent statements. Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 289, Prolific) manipulated the witness's initial identification outcome (immediate high-confidence identification vs. lineup rejection) and the type of jury instruction (reflector variable vs. control) to examine whether reflector variable instructions help mock jurors better discriminate between evidence of guilt and evidence of innocence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Study 1, participants tended to attribute testimonial inconsistencies to stress, suggesting that laypeople are generally unaware that memory contamination may cause these inconsistencies. In Study 2, the interaction between instruction type and initial identification outcome was significant (<i>OR</i> = 3.73, 95% CI [1.29, 10.78]). Under reflector variable instructions, mock jurors were more likely to render a guilty verdict following an immediate high-confidence identification than after a lineup rejection (<i>OR</i> = 3.89, <i>p</i> < .001), whereas no such difference emerged under control instructions (<i>OR</i> = 1.04, <i>p</i> = .91).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Witnesses cannot correctly explain their inconsistent memory decisions, and jurors cannot correctly interpret them. The new instructions emphasizing the importance of the initial memory test may be a useful starting point. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148438468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Attitudes and intentions toward prenuptial marriage contracts.","authors":"Nicolyn Charlot, Samantha Joel, Claire Houston","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000598","DOIUrl":"10.1037/lhb0000598","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Prenuptial marriage contracts can make the divorce process easier for separating couples and their children, yet few people enter them. To better understand public perceptions of these contracts, this research sought to identify predictors of attitudes and intentions toward prenuptial agreements and determine whether these outcomes can be manipulated.</p><p><strong>Hypotheses: </strong>Study 1 had no directional hypotheses. Study 2 replicated and extended Study 1. Consistent with Study 1 results, we hypothesized that beliefs about contracts (e.g., they are unromantic) would be stronger predictors of positive attitudes and intentions than other variables (e.g., age, education). We also predicted that participants who learned about prenuptial agreements would report more positive attitudes and intentions toward them than those who did not learn about them.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In Study 1, romantically attached participants (60.26% women, 65.89% White, <i>M</i>_age = 30.36) from an online sample reported on themselves, their relationships, and their attitudes, intentions, and beliefs regarding prenuptial agreements. Using an online sample, Study 2 (50.47% women, 68.14% White, <i>M</i>_age = 43.92) collected similar information. We also conducted an experiment in which we randomly assigned participants to read a news article about prenuptial agreements or an unrelated topic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Studies 1 and 2, demographic (age, education), individual (religiosity, attachment style), and relationship (satisfaction, length) characteristics were generally weak predictors of prenuptial agreement attitudes and intentions. In contrast, beliefs about the contracts accounted for considerably more variance, suggesting that attitudes and intentions toward these agreements are more strongly associated with perceptions of how they work, rather than with personal or relationship traits. Study 2 also demonstrated that a simple informational intervention was sufficient to shift views on prenuptial agreements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings have implications for policymakers seeking to increase the use of prenuptial contracting to reduce the negative consequences of divorce and divorce litigation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148438480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Identity-based prosocial motivation protects detained youth against institutional infractions.","authors":"Jennifer Skeem, Luyi Jian, Patrick Kennealy","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000662","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000662","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Emerging theory suggests that prosocial identity motivation (PIM)-youth's drive to disassociate from antisocial lifestyles and forge conventional identities aligned with prosocial values-may be crucial for promoting desistance among justice-involved adolescents. Yet, standardized tools to assess this construct are lacking, as is evidence of its protective value against continued antisocial behavior. We derived a measure of PIM from the Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument and tested whether it protects detained youth from serious and violent institutional infractions-behaviors that increase recidivism risk and deepen system penetration. We also examined whether the youth's overall risk level moderates this relationship.</p><p><strong>Hypotheses: </strong>We hypothesized that PIM would inversely predict both infraction types, offer predictive value beyond composite strength and risk scores, and demonstrate stronger protective effects for low- and moderate-risk youth compared to higher risk counterparts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using data on 846 male detained youth (<i>M</i>_age 17) assessed by reliable staff, we integrated Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument scores with official infraction records over an average 6-month period and applied Cox proportional hazard survival analyses to examine the protective effect of PIM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PIM significantly protected against serious, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.44, 0.60] and violent (HR = 0.53, 95% CI [0.45, 0.63]) infractions and provided incremental predictive utility beyond composite risk or strengths scores. Youth's risk level moderated the protective effect for serious infractions, with benefits observed for low- and moderate-risk youth but not their higher risk counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Youth's PIM protects against institutional infractions-an important first step toward desistance. These findings suggest that juvenile justice systems should move beyond solely addressing criminogenic needs among incarcerated youth to recognize identity transformation as a developmentally relevant pathway to behavior change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148438489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The prison reform paradox persists: Rehabilitation capacity, character judgments, and racial resentment predict prison reform attitudes.","authors":"Jamie S Hughes,James N Olson","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000673","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000673","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVEFor those who value both retributive justice and community safety, criminal justice reform poses a fundamental tension. Public preferences for severe punishment often exceed the formal sentence imposed, and this extralegal suffering is associated with higher recidivism, making communities less safe.HYPOTHESESWe hypothesized that framing rehabilitation as serving retributive justice goals, rather than reducing recidivism, would generate greater public support for prison reform and that information about prison cruelty and recidivism would interact with framing to affect reform attitudes, moral character judgments, and rehabilitation capacity beliefs.METHODWe employed a factorial between-participant design to assess how information regarding prisons (rehabilitation programs, cruel prison conditions, or recidivism statistics) and its framing (justice vs. utilitarian focused) affected support for reform. A no-message control condition was included. A U.S. quota sample (N = 1,110) recruited from Prolific Academic was randomly assigned to one of seven conditions and completed measures of prison reform, moral character, rehabilitation capacity, and perceived justice restoration.RESULTSBecause people tend to prioritize retributive over utilitarian concerns in criminal justice judgments, we expected justice-focused framing to increase reform support. Contrary to this expectation, beliefs about an incarcerated person's capacity for rehabilitation and levels of racial resentment were the strongest predictors of reform support. The proposed sequential mediation model was not supported, but a parallel model showed that viewing prisoners as having higher moral character increased beliefs in their ability to change, which, in turn, predicted greater reform support.CONCLUSIONSAttitudes toward prison reform were largely unaffected by brief messaging interventions. Because reform support was driven more by prior beliefs, effective advocacy may require long-term efforts to change perceptions about prisoner character and potential. This research highlights the challenge of resolving the tension between the desire for punishment and public safety in a polarized ideological climate. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":"142 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148408505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Investigating the predictive value of defendant race and jury racial composition on decision making in a criminal trial.","authors":"Evelyn M Maeder,Susan Yamamoto,Twila Wingrove","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000669","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000669","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVEWe tested the roles of defendant race (White/Black/Indigenous) and jury racial composition (all-White/racially heterogeneous) on individual verdicts, group verdicts, and verdict change in a simulated criminal trial.HYPOTHESESWe predicted that individual verdicts might demonstrate similarity-leniency among White jurors, with a reduction for those assigned to racially heterogeneous juries. For group verdicts, we expected that all-White juries might demonstrate bias toward racialized defendants. We predicted that participants in racially heterogeneous juries would be more likely to change their verdicts postdeliberation.METHODA total of 526 (students: N = 493, 65.5% women, Mage = 20.2; community members: N = 33, 60.6% women, Mage = 35.55) jury-eligible participants were assigned to 70 juries. White participants (N = 352) were assigned to all-White or racially heterogeneous juries; racialized participants (N = 174) were assigned to racially heterogeneous juries. Participants watched a trial video, provided individual verdicts, and then deliberated in groups for up to 60 min before reporting a final verdict or a hung jury.RESULTSWhite jurors were more likely to vote guilty, B = -.72, p = .042, OR = .49, 95% CI [.24, .97], and White defendants were more likely to be convicted than either Black, B = -1.38, p = .020, OR = .25, 95% CI [.08, .81], or Indigenous, B = -0.79, p = .044, OR = .46, 95% CI [.21, .98], defendants, before deliberation. A dramatic leniency shift (5.8% of juries, compared to 26.0% of predeliberation jurors, convicting) prevented us from conducting our planned analyses on group verdict. Half of the guilty verdicts came from all-White juries evaluating a White defendant, and no all-White jury convicted a racialized defendant. Verdict change was not significantly predicted by either defendant race or jury composition.CONCLUSIONSDeliberation elicited a leniency shift irrespective of defendant race. White jurors in all-White juries may have exhibited performative allyship, given the low cost of a potential wrongful acquittal in this simulation study. Findings have implications for jury research, in that our observed effects do not comport with real-world disparities between White and racialized defendants. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148408509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Do clinicians weight risk factors differently in men and women when formulating violence risk judgments?","authors":"Margaret Ardesia,Perry Callahan,Barry Rosenfeld","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000671","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000671","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVEViolence risk assessment has serious implications for legal decision making. Thus, it is critical to identify potential sources of bias that may disadvantage evaluees. The present study examined whether the strength of the relationship between violence risk factors and judgments of violence risk was moderated by patient sex when employing the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20, Version 3, a widely used instrument for assessing violence risk.HYPOTHESESWe hypothesized that seven static risk factors-Violence (H1), Other Antisocial Behaviors (H2), Problems With Relationships (H3), Substance Use (H5), Personality Disorder (H7), Traumatic Experiences (H8), and Violent Attitudes (H9)-would differ by patient sex in average presence ratings, and the strength of associations between risk factor presence and severity and violence risk judgments would be moderated by sex.METHODCivil psychiatric patients (N = 151) were rated using the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20, Version 3, by graduate students through interviews and records review. Risk factor presence and relevance and summary risk ratings were converted to a 3-point ordinal scale; a severity rating was calculated by multiplying Presence × Relevance.RESULTSMen scored higher on the presence of Violence (d = .43), Antisocial Behaviors (d = .52), Substance Use (d = .35), and Violent Attitudes (d = .67), whereas women scored higher on Traumatic Experiences (d = .62). Moderation analyses showed generally stronger associations between risk factors (both presence and severity) and violence risk judgments for men compared to women in models predicting Case Prioritization and Imminent Violence. No significant interaction effects emerged in models predicting Serious Physical Harm.CONCLUSIONSBoth the presence and severity of several hypothesized risk factors had less influence on violence risk judgments for women. One interpretation of these findings is that clinicians place less emphasis on these risk factors in making overall risk judgments (i.e., a potential sex bias), although other possible explanations exist. The implications of these results are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148408508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The predictive utility of youth psychopathic traits on subsequent psychopathy and offending.","authors":"Scarlet J Cho,Elizabeth Cauffman","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000674","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000674","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVETools for measuring psychopathy have been widely used as predictive assessments of future offending in correctional settings. Yet, research concerning juvenile psychopathy has yielded mixed results as to its use as a long-term predictive measure of future psychopathy and offending. The present study assesses the predictive utility of two measures of juvenile psychopathy on subsequent psychopathic traits, self-reported offending, and arrests across 7 key years of development.HYPOTHESESWe hypothesized that both measures of juvenile psychopathic traits would predict future psychopathy, offending, and official arrests but that this predictive utility would significantly diminish from adolescence to young adulthood.METHODThis study used data from Pathways to Desistance, a longitudinal study of 1,170 male youth adjudicated for a serious crime (aged 14-17 at baseline; M = 16.6) who were interviewed across 11 intervals over a 7-year period. A series of mixed-effects models predicted subsequent psychopathy, self-reported offending, and official arrests across 7 years from two measures of juvenile psychopathy: the Psychopathy Checklist-Youth Version and the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory. Interactions with time were assessed to probe whether predictive utility attenuated across the study period.RESULTSFirst, psychopathy scores at the first study follow-up predicted future psychopathy scores, but this effect significantly weakened across time. Total psychopathic traits and domain scores significantly predicted greater self-reported offending, but this predictive effect diminished over time (with the exception of the interpersonal domain). Initial psychopathy scores also predicted higher odds of official arrest, which did not attenuate over time.CONCLUSIONSWhile some predictive utility of juvenile psychopathy measures was evidenced, the ability of these measures to predict outcomes across time significantly declined. These findings call into question whether psychopathic traits measured in adolescence should be used to make predictions about long-term recidivism risk. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148408510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Juries are different: Racial and ethnic differences in trust across legal institutions.","authors":"Melanie B Fessinger,Hannah J Rath,Daryl A Wout","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000665","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000665","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVEWe explored how White, Black, and Hispanic people rated their trust in juries, whether these patterns differed from their trust in courts, what potential mechanisms might explain any observed differences, and what potential outcomes might be associated with them.HYPOTHESESWe expected White participants to have the most trust in juries (Hypothesis 1) and Black participants to have the least trust in juries (Hypothesis 2). We expected Hispanic participants to have more trust in juries than Black participants (Hypothesis 3). However, given inconsistencies in the existing literature, we did not make definitive predictions for Hispanic compared to White participants; they may have less trust in juries than White people (Hypothesis 4a) or may not significantly differ from White people (Hypothesis 4b).METHODParticipants were 1,220 adults (406 White, 410 Black, 404 Hispanic) recruited from Prolific Academic (Mage = 39.31, 53% female) who rated their trust in juries (α = .97; Bornstein et al., 2020) and trust in courts (α = .87; Tyler & Sevier, 2014) and answered exploratory measures about potential mechanisms or consequences related to trust.RESULTSPatterns for trust in juries were distinct from those for trust in courts. White and Black participants reported higher trust in juries than Hispanic participants, but White participants reported higher trust in courts than Black and Hispanic participants. There was also an indirect effect on trust in juries through perceived representativeness, in which Black and Hispanic participants perceived juries as less representative of their own racial or ethnic group and, in turn, had less trust in juries.CONCLUSIONSResults extend the existing literature on institutional trust by demonstrating unique racial and ethnic patterns on trust in juries. They also underscore the role of perceived representativeness, highlighting the importance of increasing the diversity of juries. Such efforts can increase trust in juries and have downstream effects on legal behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148408507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Supplemental Material for Identity-Based Prosocial Motivation Protects Detained Youth Against Institutional Infractions","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000662.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000662.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":"224 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148393978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}