Peter McPartlan , Teomara Rutherford , Fernando Rodriguez , Justin F. Shaffer , Amanda Holton
{"title":"Modality motivation: Selection effects and motivational differences in students who choose to take courses online","authors":"Peter McPartlan , Teomara Rutherford , Fernando Rodriguez , Justin F. Shaffer , Amanda Holton","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100793","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100793","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We demonstrate how motivational and behavioral processes can explain which students may be more likely to select into online (OL) than face-to-face (F2F) courses and also less likely to perform well in OL courses. University students (<em>n</em> = 999) reported their reasons for OL course selection: university constraints, specific need for flexibility, general preference for flexibility, and learning preferences. Compared to F2F students, only OL students with certain self-selection reasons showed differences in motivation, behavior, and performance. Notably, OL students who said they had a specific need for flexibility created by the costs of competing responsibilities spent more time on non-academic activities (e.g., working, commuting), less time on academic activities (e.g., study groups), and ultimately performed worse when compared to F2F peers. These students were especially likely to be women, older, and part-time. We discuss implications for practice and for using demographic characteristics to control for selection effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100793"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100793","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84205523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kaire Kollom , Kairit Tammets , Maren Scheffel , Yi-Shan Tsai , Ioana Jivet , Pedro J. Muñoz-Merino , Pedro Manuel Moreno-Marcos , Alexander Whitelock-Wainwright , Adolfo Ruiz Calleja , Dragan Gasevic , Carlos Delgado Kloos , Hendrik Drachsler , Tobias Ley
{"title":"A four-country cross-case analysis of academic staff expectations about learning analytics in higher education","authors":"Kaire Kollom , Kairit Tammets , Maren Scheffel , Yi-Shan Tsai , Ioana Jivet , Pedro J. Muñoz-Merino , Pedro Manuel Moreno-Marcos , Alexander Whitelock-Wainwright , Adolfo Ruiz Calleja , Dragan Gasevic , Carlos Delgado Kloos , Hendrik Drachsler , Tobias Ley","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100788","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100788","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this paper is to explore the expectations of academic staff to learning analytics services from an ideal as well as a realistic perspective. This mixed-method study focused on a cross-case analysis of staff from Higher Education Institutions from four European universities (Spain, Estonia, Netherlands, UK). While there are some differences between the countries as well as between ideal and predicted expectations, the overarching results indicate that academic staff sees learning analytics as a tool to understand the learning activities and possibility to provide feedback for the students and adapt the curriculum to meet learners' needs. However, one of the findings from the study across cases is the generally consistently low expectation and desire for academic staff to be obligated to act based on data that shows students being at risk of failing or under-performing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100788"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76711434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aekaterini Mavri , Andri Ioannou , Fernando Loizides
{"title":"Cross-organisational Communities of Practice: enhancing creativity and epistemic cognition in higher education","authors":"Aekaterini Mavri , Andri Ioannou , Fernando Loizides","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100792","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100792","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this work is to investigate the impact of participation in cross-organisational Communities of Practice<span> (CoPs) on higher education learners studying Design, and specifically the ways in which CoPs can affect their creative outcomes and perceived epistemic cognition. CoPs are social groups that share common interests and goals in a particular field, and interact to build relevant knowledge and expertise. Cross-organisational CoPs can include members from diverse spheres, such as education and industry. Research on the design, implementation and evaluation of this type of CoP in HE remains limited.</span></p><p>Findings from this study indicate that CoPs can have significant positive effects on student knowledge gains, creative outcomes and perceptions of epistemic cognition. Key motivators triggering positive epistemic effects in learners included: authentic exchanges and interactions with members of the CoP, such as industry experts; creative constraints; prospective audiences for the end-products; and the potential impact on their future careers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100792"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100792","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77974097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Julie A. Edmunds, Dora Gicheva, Beth Thrift, Marie Hull
{"title":"High tech, high touch: The impact of an online course intervention on academic performance and persistence in higher education","authors":"Julie A. Edmunds, Dora Gicheva, Beth Thrift, Marie Hull","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100790","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100790","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Online courses are a growing part of the community college experience, but many students, particularly minority students or students who are more at-risk, face challenges in passing those courses. This paper presents results from an experimental study of an effort to redesign a set of core introductory online courses to include a set of technology tools and instructional practices designed to improve students' experiences in the online environment. Results from the study showed that treatment students were less likely to withdraw, and minority students, specifically, were more likely to pass the class and to persist to the next year of college.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100790"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100790","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89262551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Edith Bouton , Smadar Bar Tal , Christa S.C. Asterhan
{"title":"Students, social network technology and learning in higher education: Visions of collaborative knowledge construction vs. the reality of knowledge sharing","authors":"Edith Bouton , Smadar Bar Tal , Christa S.C. Asterhan","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100787","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100787","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite visions of social network technology (SNT) for collaborative knowledge construction, recent research in secondary schools suggest that students use these tools mainly for <em>knowledge sharing</em> of study-related artifacts. We extend these findings to higher education settings and report on two survey studies that map characteristics of students' self-directed use of SNTs for study purposes, in undergraduate university programs (<em>N</em><span> = 264) and teacher training colleges (</span><em>N</em><span> = 449). The combined findings confirm that students use SNTs extensively for uploading, linking and downloading study-related artifacts in peer-directed SNT groups. They regard these practices positively and believe they improve academic achievements. Sharing was predicted by positive attitudes toward sharing and collectivist value orientations, motivated overall by prosocial reasons and less frequent in competitive study programs. Use of shared materials was associated with performance-avoidance achievement goals and lower GPA. Findings, directions for future research and implications are discussed in the context of learning theories, as well the knowledge sharing literature.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100787"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100787","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85504467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Investigating prompts for supporting students' self-regulation – A remaining challenge for learning analytics approaches?","authors":"Clara Schumacher , Dirk Ifenthaler","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100791","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100791","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>To perform successfully in higher education learners are considered to engage in self-regulation. Prompts in digital learning<span> environments aim at activating self-regulation strategies that learners know but do not spontaneously show. To investigate such interventions learning analytics approaches can be applied. This quasi-experimental study (</span></span><em>N</em><span> = 110) investigates whether different prompts based on theory of self-regulated learning (e.g., cognitive, metacognitive, motivational) impact declarative knowledge and transfer, perceptions as well as online learning behavior, and whether trace data can inform learning performance. Findings indicate small effects of prompts supporting the performance in a declarative knowledge and transfer test. In addition, the prompted groups showed different online learning behavior than the control group. However, trace data in this study were not capable of sufficiently explaining learning performance in a transfer test. Future research is required to investigate adaptive prompts using trace data in authentic learning settings as well as focusing on learners' reactions to distinct prompts.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100791"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100791","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82203034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Purposeful interpersonal interaction and the point of diminishing returns for graduate learners","authors":"Scott Mehall","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100774","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100774","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social constructivist based course designs in online learning are emphasized in higher education as a way to highlight and capitalize on the benefits of interpersonal interaction. Course designers have generally taken a “more is better” approach to interpersonal interaction; however, some evidence points to a point of diminishing returns for interpersonal interaction. Purposeful interpersonal interaction (PII) is a framework for identifying high quality interpersonal interactions which are demonstrated to lead to better student outcomes. This study attempted to shed insight on how PII relates to student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous environments by comparing courses in two graduate business programs. Results demonstrated that greater PII does generally lead to greater student satisfaction and perceived learning. Comparison of the programs also revealed that similar levels of satisfaction and learning can be achieved despite lesser levels of PII, giving evidence of a point of diminishing returns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 100774"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100774","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79321450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Embedded experts in online collaborative learning: A case study","authors":"Jennifer Lock , Petrea Redmond","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100773","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100773","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The affordance of online communication and collaboration technology provides a forum for preservice teachers, practicing teachers, and teacher educators to engage in authentic discourse where multiple perspectives can be shared. This qualitative case study explores the perceptions and experiences of embedded experts in a global learning community that occurred over a 12 year period. The study was designed using the Online </span>Collaborative Learning Framework developed by the authors in 2006. The goal of the study was to provide a nuanced understanding of embedded experts in online discussion that engage in real world issues related to today's diverse and digital classrooms. From the thematic analysis of the data, the following three implications emerged: Purposeful selection of technology; orientation and supports for the experts; and design of an organic environment that fosters the development of community including embedded experts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 100773"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100773","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82032345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Dialogicality in making sense of online collaborative interaction: A conceptual perspective","authors":"Maarit Arvaja , Raija Hämäläinen","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100771","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100771","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In higher education, learning activities increasingly take place in online collaborative groups. In this conceptual paper, we explore online collaborative interaction from the perspective of dialogicality. We aim to reconceptualize the notion of “productive interaction” and the typical focus of its research by turning attention to the dialogic features of collaborative interaction, especially the notions of alterity, dialogic attitude, and dialogic orientation. In relation to this, we offer a contextual perspective on collaborative interaction. Relying on data from an online university course, we conceptually analyze specified components of dialogicality. This article illustrates and explores the conceptual framework that connects different contexts in dialogic meaning-making. We also discuss our conceptual and empirical exploration from the pedagogical perspective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 100771"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100771","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83299616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kevin O'Neill, Natália Lopes, John Nesbit, Suzanne Reinhardt, Kanthi Jayasundera
{"title":"Modeling undergraduates' selection of course modality: A large sample, multi-discipline study","authors":"Kevin O'Neill, Natália Lopes, John Nesbit, Suzanne Reinhardt, Kanthi Jayasundera","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100776","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100776","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Scholarly understanding is limited with regard to what influences students' choice to take a particular course fully online or in-person. We surveyed 650 undergraduates at a public Canadian university who were enrolled in courses that were offered in both modalities during the same semester, for roughly the same tuition cost. The courses spanned a wide range of disciplines, from archaeology to computing science. Twenty-five variables were gauged, covering areas including students' personal circumstances, their competence in the language of instruction, previous experience with online courses, grade expectations, and psychological variables including their regulation of their time and study environment, work avoidance and social goal orientation. Two logistic regression models (of modality of enrolment and modality of preference) both had good fit to the data, each correctly classifying roughly 75% of cases using different variables. Implications for instructional design and enrolment management are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 100776"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100776","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38526962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}