Journal of Risk and Uncertainty最新文献_第9页

Broad bracketing for low probability events 对低概率事件进行广泛的覆盖

IF 4.7 2区经济学

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11166-020-09343-4

Shereen J. Chaudhry, Michael Hand, H. Kunreuther

引用次数: 7

The development of risk aversion and prudence in Chinese children and adolescents 中国儿童和青少年风险厌恶和审慎的发展

IF 4.7 2区经济学

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11166-020-09340-7

Timo Heinrich, Jason M. Shachat

引用次数: 14

Natural disaster and risk-sharing behavior: Evidence from rural Bangladesh 自然灾害和风险分担行为:来自孟加拉国农村的证据

IF 4.7 2区经济学

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11166-020-09334-5

A. Islam, C. Leister, Minhaj Mahmud, P. Raschky

引用次数: 9

Dual choice axiom and probabilistic choice 二元选择公理和概率选择

IF 4.7 2区经济学

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11166-020-09332-7

P. Blavatskyy

引用次数: 2

Risk awareness and adverse selection in catastrophe insurance: Evidence from California’s residential earthquake insurance market 巨灾保险中的风险意识与逆向选择:来自加州居民地震保险市场的证据

IF 4.7 2区经济学

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11166-020-09335-4

Xiao Lin

引用次数: 10

Electronic cigarette risk beliefs and usage after the vaping illness outbreak 电子烟病爆发后的电子烟风险信念与使用

IF 4.7 2区经济学

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11166-020-09328-3

Kip Viscusi

引用次数: 7

The effects of traditional cigarette and e-cigarette tax rates on adult tobacco product use. 传统卷烟和电子烟税率对成人烟草制品使用的影响。

IF 4.7 2区经济学

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Pub Date : 2020-06-01 Epub Date: 2020-07-24 DOI: 10.1007/s11166-020-09330-9

Michael F Pesko, Charles J Courtemanche, Johanna Catherine Maclean

引用次数: 0

E-Cigarettes and Adult Smoking: Evidence from Minnesota. 电子烟和成人吸烟:来自明尼苏达州的证据。

IF 4.7 2区经济学

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Pub Date : 2020-06-01 Epub Date: 2020-07-16 DOI: 10.1007/s11166-020-09326-5

Henry Saffer, Daniel Dench, Michael Grossman, Dhaval Dave

{"title":"E-Cigarettes and Adult Smoking: Evidence from Minnesota.","authors":"Henry Saffer, Daniel Dench, Michael Grossman, Dhaval Dave","doi":"10.1007/s11166-020-09326-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-020-09326-5","url":null,"abstract":"E-cigarettes provide nicotine in a vapor form, which is considered less harmful than the smoke from combustible cigarettes because it does not contain the toxins that are found in tobacco smoke. E-cigarettes may be effective in helping smokers to quit or they might simply provide smokers a method of bypassing smoking restrictions. There is very little causal evidence to date on how e-cigarette use impacts smoking cessation among adults. Minnesota was the first to impose a tax on e-cigarettes. This tax provides a plausibly exogenous deterrent to e-cigarette use. We utilize data from the Current Population Survey Tobacco Use Supplements from 1992 to 2015 to assess how the Minnesota tax increase impacted smoking cessation among adult smokers. Estimates suggest that the e-cigarette tax increased adult smoking and reduced smoking cessation in Minnesota, relative to the control group, and imply a cross elasticity of current smoking participation with respect to e-cigarette prices of 0.13. Our results suggest that in the sample period about 32,400 additional adult smokers would have quit smoking in Minnesota in the absence of the tax. If this tax were imposed on a national level about 1.8 million smokers would be deterred from quitting in a ten year period. The taxation of e-cigarettes at the same rate as cigarettes could deter more than 2.75 million smokers nationally from quitting in the same period. The public health benefits of not taxing e-cigarettes, however, must be weighed against effects of this decision on efforts to reduce vaping by youth.","PeriodicalId":48066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","volume":"60 3","pages":"207-228"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11166-020-09326-5","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38392247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 37

News that Takes Your Breath Away: Risk Perceptions During an Outbreak of Vaping-related Lung Injuries. 让你屏息的新闻:与电子烟有关的肺损伤爆发期间的风险认知。

IF 4.7 2区经济学

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Pub Date : 2020-06-01 Epub Date: 2020-07-22 DOI: 10.1007/s11166-020-09329-2

Dhaval Dave, Daniel Dench, Donald Kenkel, Alan Mathios, Hua Wang

{"title":"News that Takes Your Breath Away: Risk Perceptions During an Outbreak of Vaping-related Lung Injuries.","authors":"Dhaval Dave, Daniel Dench, Donald Kenkel, Alan Mathios, Hua Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11166-020-09329-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-020-09329-2","url":null,"abstract":"We study the impact of new information on people's perceptions of the risks of e-cigarettes. In September 2019 the U.S. experienced an outbreak of e-cigarette, or vaping, associated lung injuries (EVALI). The EVALI outbreak created an information shock, which was followed by additional new information in a later CDC recommendation. We use data on consumer risk perceptions from two sets of surveys conducted before (HINTS survey data) and during the EVALI outbreak (Google Survey data). The empirical model examines changes in risk perceptions during the early crisis period when the CDC was warning consumers that they should avoid all vaping products and during a later period when the message was refined and focused on a narrower set of illegal vaping products that contain THC (the main psychoactive compound in marijuana). Econometric results suggest that the immediate impact of the first information shock was to significantly increase the fraction of respondents who perceived e-cigarettes as more harmful than smoking. As the outbreak subsided and the CDC recommendation changed to emphasize the role of THC e-cigarette products, e-cigarette risk perceptions were only partially revised downwards. Individuals who had higher risk perceptions showed a weaker response to the first information shock but were more likely to later revise their risk perceptions downwards. We conclude the paper by discussing the public policy issues that stem from having risk perceptions of e-cigarette relative to combustible cigarettes remain at these elevated levels where a substantial portion of consumers believe that e-cigarettes are more harmful than cigarettes.","PeriodicalId":48066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","volume":"60 3","pages":"281-307"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11166-020-09329-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39420590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 34

Do people have a bias for low deductible insurance? 人们对低免赔额保险有偏见吗?

IF 4.7 2区经济学

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11166-022-09368-x

H. Kunreuther, M. Pauly

引用次数: 3