Health Psychology ReviewPub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-07-01DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2025.2513916
Mona Maier, Daniel Powell, Peter Murchie, Julia L Allan
{"title":"Systematic review of the effects of decision fatigue in healthcare professionals on medical decision-making.","authors":"Mona Maier, Daniel Powell, Peter Murchie, Julia L Allan","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2513916","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2513916","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Decision fatigue is the tendency towards making less effortful decisions as the cumulative mental burden of effortful decision-making increases. Health professionals working long shifts may be particularly vulnerable to decision fatigue. This preregistered systematic review (Prospero ID = CRD42021260081, no external funding) aims to synthesise the empirical evidence on decision fatigue in the healthcare context. Systematic searches across eight databases identified 14,740 records. <i>N</i> = 82 studies (72 quantitative, 1 qualitative, 1 review, 8 expert discussions) met the inclusion criteria (health professionals/trainees; medical decisions over time; healthcare context; any design). Study quality was assessed with the MMAT or relevant JBI checklist. Narrative synthesis revealed that 45% of cases that quantitatively assessed the decision fatigue hypothesis provided evidence of significant decision fatigue effects across diagnostic, test ordering, prescribing, and therapeutic decisions. Expert discussions confirmed healthcare professionals' recognition of decision fatigue as an important phenomenon. However, decision fatigue was inconsistently defined and inadequately operationalised, reflecting limitations in current theoretical understanding of the phenomenon. To address this, we propose a new definition for greater conceptual clarity and more consistent operationalisation in future research.' Future studies should prioritise the development and testing of different theoretical explanations for decision fatigue to improve understanding and facilitate the development of appropriate interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"717-762"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144545498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The impact of psychosocial interventions on women with gynaecological cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sonia Tomescu-Stachie, Andrew Merwood, Katy Sivyer, Snezana Nikolin Caisley, Miznah Al-Abbadey","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2525409","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2525409","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Women affected by gynaecological cancers are at an increased risk of psychological distress, diminished psychological wellbeing and quality of life (QoL). This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesised the impact of psychosocial interventions on these three outcomes. A total of 23 studies (<i>N</i> = 3345 participants), including 19 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs) were assessed using Cochrane RoB2 and ROBINS-I tools. Meta-regression random effect modelling analyses revealed reductions in psychological distress (<i>p</i> < .001) and improvements in psychological wellbeing (<i>p</i> = .003) and QoL (<i>p</i> < .001). Findings highlight the potential of interventions such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and psychoeducation to complement multidisciplinary approaches addressing patients' biopsychosocial needs. Psychoeducation's integration with other interventions enhanced patient self-management and coping. Multidisciplinary interventions demonstrated effects on outcomes related to body image and sexual health concerns. However, variability in study designs, intervention delivery, follow-up periods and high risk of bias underscore the need for robust research and standardised measures. Overall, the review reinforces the value of holistic, tailored interventions to meet the diverse needs of women affected by gynaecological cancers. Future research may consider refining intervention timing, delivery methods and cost-effectiveness while addressing disparities in access to ensure equitable care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"781-819"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144822903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Health Psychology ReviewPub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-19DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2025.2528822
Kathryn Burns Cunningham, Mary Wells, Thilo Kroll
{"title":"Back to basics in the field of loneliness: progressing conceptualisation and definition of the term - an umbrella concept analysis.","authors":"Kathryn Burns Cunningham, Mary Wells, Thilo Kroll","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2528822","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2528822","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The absence of a comprehensive, unified, conceptualisation of loneliness and the consequent lack of a clear and precise theoretical definition of loneliness impede research, policy and practice activities to understand and address this global public health issue. Our study aimed to establish the first such conceptualisation and develop the first such definition. To do so, we undertook a systematic conceptual review, specifically an umbrella concept analysis, including 42 documents summarising/synthesising the literature concerning the conceptualisation and/or theoretical definition of loneliness. The novel definition developed is <i>the negative feeling(s) one experiences as a result of a (conscious or subconscious) personal perception that one's interpersonal needs are not satisfied by (the quantity and/or quality of) one's interpersonal (emotional, social, collective, professional and/or religious) relationships</i>. In the process, we identified the unidimensionality of loneliness and generated clarity regarding the opposite of loneliness ('unloneliness'). We call on researchers, policymakers and practitioners working in the field of loneliness, the wider field of interpersonal relationships or encountering loneliness in other fields of activity, across the globe, to employ the novel conceptualisation and theoretical definition as a foundation for activities to further progress understanding and addressing of loneliness. We also encourage consideration of unloneliness, when undertaking such activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"839-877"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144884059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Health Psychology ReviewPub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-07-16DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2025.2526666
Corinne Meinhausen, Katherine Fu, Richard D Urbina, Tanisha Gunby, Lauren A Perez, Patrick A Wilson, Christina M Luberto, Jennifer A Sumner
{"title":"Efficacy of interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms induced by traumatic medical events: a systematic review.","authors":"Corinne Meinhausen, Katherine Fu, Richard D Urbina, Tanisha Gunby, Lauren A Perez, Patrick A Wilson, Christina M Luberto, Jennifer A Sumner","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2526666","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2526666","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Serious medical events are increasingly recognised as potential triggers for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This systematic review evaluated the efficacy of interventions for medically induced PTSD. Nine electronic databases were searched from inception to November 2023 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024504055). Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials of interventions for adults diagnosed with, or exhibiting elevated symptoms of, PTSD related to life-threatening medical events. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Group differences at follow-up were assessed using independent <i>t</i>-tests for statistical significance, and Cohen's <i>d</i> was calculated to measure effect sizes. Eleven trials (sample sizes: 17-89) met inclusion criteria, with PTSD primarily resulting from cardiovascular events (<i>n</i> = 5) or cancer (<i>n</i> = 4). Interventions included trauma-focused psychotherapies (<i>n</i> = 8; e.g., Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing [EMDR]) and others (<i>n</i> = 3; e.g., supportive therapy). Most studies reported significant posttreatment differences and large effect sizes favouring the intervention group, with EMDR and other trauma-focused psychotherapies particularly well-supported. Common limitations included small sample sizes, use of self-reported outcomes, and high dropout rates. Results highlight the efficacy of several interventions for medically induced PTSD and the need for larger trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"820-838"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12341736/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144643859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The effectiveness of nudge-based interventions on self-monitoring behaviours among patients with cardiometabolic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jianing Yu, Yujia Fu, Haoyang Du, Qiwei Wu, Shunmin Zhang, Binyu Zhao, Erxu Xue, Yunyu Guo, Runjing Yang, Mengjie Zhu, Huafang Zhang, Jing Shao","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2532017","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2532017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiometabolic diseases are major global health concerns, leading to high morbidity and mortality. Self-monitoring is crucial for managing these conditions; however, the adherence to self-monitoring remains suboptimal. Nudge-based interventions, such as reminders and automatic prescription refills, have shown promise in improving self-monitoring behaviours. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of nudge-based interventions on self-monitoring behaviours and health outcomes in this population. Thirty-five randomised controlled trials from seven databases (earliest available date to March 2025) were included. Nudge strategies were categorised according to the choice architecture taxonomy by Münscher et al. Meta-analysis demonstrated that nudge-based interventions were associated with significant improvements in self-monitoring behaviours in cardiometabolic patients (Hedge's <i>g</i> = 0.56; 95% CI [0.44, 0.69]; <i>p</i> < 0.001) as well as reductions in HbA1c levels (MD = -0.50; <i>p</i> < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (MD = -4.47; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and diastolic blood pressure (MD = -2.02; <i>p</i> < 0.05) compared to the control group. Subgroup analyses indicated that the effect size of nudge interventions may vary by delivery mode, components, and intervention duration. Our findings suggest that integrating diverse behavioural nudges could optimise management strategies for these patients, enhancing both self-monitoring adherence and health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"878-905"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144700105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Health Psychology ReviewPub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-22DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2025.2534000
Melanie Bamert, Yves Schaffter, Fanny Bally, Daryl B O'Connor, Jennifer Inauen
{"title":"Assessment of stress and its relationship with health behaviour in daily life: a systematic review.","authors":"Melanie Bamert, Yves Schaffter, Fanny Bally, Daryl B O'Connor, Jennifer Inauen","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2534000","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2534000","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stress influences health behaviours critical for preventing non-communicable diseases. Although research on the stress-health behaviour relationship in daily life has grown, a synthesis of measures and findings is lacking. This systematic review examines stress measures used in intensive longitudinal studies in daily life, their reliability and associations with health behaviours. We included studies measuring self-reported (cognitive appraisal-based) or physiological stress in daily life alongside health behaviours including eating, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol consumption. We excluded studies on physical stress, mood, laboratory-induced stress, non-English publications, and animal studies. Study quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Tool. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched 2,333 records from PsycInfo, PubMed, and Web of Science, leading to 100 included studies with 18,122 participants. Narrative synthesis of results showed that self-reported stress measures dominated (94.5%), while physiological measures were underrepresented (5.5%). Stress was linked to unhealthier behaviours (30.2%), healthier behaviours (14.1%), or was not associated with health behaviour (55.7%), depending on conceptual, methodology, and sample characteristics. Notably, physiological stress predominantly correlated with healthier behaviours, while self-reported stress predominantly related to unhealthier behaviours. Low study quality limit comparability, highlighting the need for standardised reporting to improve future research on stress and health behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"906-936"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144974254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Health Psychology ReviewPub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-06-13DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2025.2516010
Elaine Toomey, Rory Coyne, Christina Derksen, Sean P Grant, Christopher M Jones, Marta Kijowska, Ilona McNeill, Felix Naughton, Aoife O'Mahony, Emma Norris
{"title":"Adoption of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines within health psychology and behavioural medicine journal policies: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Elaine Toomey, Rory Coyne, Christina Derksen, Sean P Grant, Christopher M Jones, Marta Kijowska, Ilona McNeill, Felix Naughton, Aoife O'Mahony, Emma Norris","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2516010","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2516010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientific journals play a crucial role in promoting open science. The Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines identify a range of standards that journals can adopt to promote the verifiability of the research they publish. We evaluated the adoption of TOP standards within health psychology and behavioural medicine journal policies, as this had not yet been systematically assessed. In a cross-sectional study on 19 health psychology and behavioural medicine journals, eight raters evaluated TOP standard adoption by these journals using the TRUST journal policy evaluation tool. Out of a total possible score of 29, journal scores ranged from 1 to 13 (median = 6). Standards related to use of reporting guidelines and data transparency were adopted the most, whereas standards related to pre-registration of study analysis plans and citation of code were adopted the least. TOP guidelines have to-date been poorly adopted within health psychology and behavioural medicine journal policies. There are several relatively straightforward opportunities for improvement, such as expanding policies around research data to also consider code and materials, and reducing ambiguity of wording. However, other improvements may require a collaborative approach involving all research stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"763-780"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144289695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Health Psychology ReviewPub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-06-03DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2025.2508987
Gabriela Nazar, María-Francisca Cabezas, Daniel Reyes-Molina, Patricia Castillo-Trecán, Felipe Díaz-Toro, Fanny Petermann-Rocha
{"title":"The effects of retirement on cognitive functioning based on a systematic review of longitudinal studies.","authors":"Gabriela Nazar, María-Francisca Cabezas, Daniel Reyes-Molina, Patricia Castillo-Trecán, Felipe Díaz-Toro, Fanny Petermann-Rocha","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2508987","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2508987","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As cognitive decline is a progressive process, it is crucial to determine the environmental influences that contribute to its onset and advancement. The transition into retirement may be a pivotal moment impacting cognitive functioning. This study aimed to synthesise evidence on the effects of retirement on cognitive functioning through a systematic review of longitudinal studies. A systematic search was conducted in the CINAHL and APA PsycArticles databases, as well as in SciELO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, for studies published since 2013, following PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-two studies were selected. A narrative synthesis of the main characteristics and results of the included studies enabled the identification of overarching trends as well as confounding and moderating variables in the relationship between retirement and cognitive functioning. Overall, the findings suggested that retirement was associated with lower cognitive functioning, an increased rate of decline, and a higher risk of dementia. Sociodemographic variables, cognitive domains assessed, mental job demands, and occupational groups were found to modify this relationship. Possible mechanisms such as reduced cognitive stimulation, increased stress, and role disengagement are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"689-716"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144209917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Digital Psychological Interventions for Adults in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ying Li, Yinong Liu, Xinyi Liu, Tao Zhang, Zihan Guo, Lizu Lai, Junrong Zhao, Yifei Cheng, Zhihong Ren","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2493903","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2493903","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the effect of digital psychological interventions on anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms in adults affected by the pandemic. A systematic search across five digital databases, from 1 January 2020 to 6 March 2024, identified 36 studies encompassing 8,662 participants. Compared with all control conditions, random-effects meta-analyses indicated that digital psychological interventions significantly reduced anxiety (<i>g</i> = -0.374; 95% CI, -0.529 to -0.218), depression (<i>g</i> = -0.568; 95% CI, -0.776 to -0.360), and stress (<i>g</i> = -0.452; 95% CI, -0.608 to -0.295). Smaller effect sizes were observed when compared with active controls than with inactive controls. Notable heterogeneity across three outcomes was observed. Publication bias was noted in depression symptoms. Several moderators were identified compared with inactive controls, including participant type for anxiety (<i>p<sub>subgroup</sub></i> = 0.005), and region for depression symptoms (<i>p<sub>subgroup</sub></i> = 0.000). Larger sample sizes (<i>b</i> = 0.0004; <i>p</i> = 0.028) related to stronger effects on depression symptoms. Publication year positively correlated with effects on stress (<i>b</i> = 0.1573; <i>p</i> = 0.032). This study supports the efficacy of digital psychological interventions in alleviating anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms for adults during the pandemic, offering insights for developing targeted mental health strategies in future public health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"598-614"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144016067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Health Psychology ReviewPub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-05-19DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2025.2503743
Christina April Kent, Patricia Holch, Brendan Gough, Lynda Wyld, Georgina L Jones
{"title":"Experiences of women who self-report Breast Implant Illness (BII): a qualitative evidence synthesis.","authors":"Christina April Kent, Patricia Holch, Brendan Gough, Lynda Wyld, Georgina L Jones","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2503743","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2503743","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has been postulated, but not empirically validated, that breast implants may cause a range of systemic symptoms, recently aggregated into a syndrome termed Breast Implant Illness (BII). Research literature has focused on exploring these symptoms and possible aetiologies, however, it has not been formally recognised as a medical condition. The psychosocial experience of women who self-report BII is not well understood. This review aimed to synthesise findings from qualitative literature relating to BII. A systematic review and evidence synthesis of qualitative research was conducted and analysed using thematic synthesis. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINHAL, Scopus, PsycINFO and secondary sources. Findings from nine studies were included, representing the experiences of women who had breast implants for reconstructive and cosmetic reasons. Four themes were identified: the decline in women's psychosocial wellbeing, the search for answers to their ill health, a lack of solicitude from healthcare professionals and industry, and surgery viewed as both the problem and solution. Women reported an array of distressing challenges that affected their overall quality of life. Findings highlight the need for psychosocial support and enhancing the integration of patient-entered perspectives. Further research is warranted to understand how these women can be better supported.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"659-688"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144102886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}