{"title":"Reflection and reflexivity in I-O psychology: A graduate student’s perspective","authors":"Meghan Kane, Hannah A. Crandell, Boram Kim","doi":"10.1017/iop.2022.103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.103","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction In the focal article, Hyland (2023) writes, “my hope is that this article will spark a collective conversation about the role that reflection and reflexivity can play in our field” (pp. 5–6). As three current graduate students in an I-O psychology PhD program, we want to extend this discussion of reflection and reflexivity into a call to action for ourselves and our fellow I-O graduate students to play an active role in generating this necessary change. According to SIOP’s Income and Employment report (2020), 45% of I-O graduates pursue a career in academia, whereas 56% of I-O graduates pursue an applied career. Therefore, graduate school is the ideal time to foster the relationship between academic and applied scholars, and integrate the ideal reflection and reflexivity skills that all I-O scholars should possess in order to best address the identity crisis of I-O Psychology. In this commentary, we highlight the personal, epistemological, and disciplinary questions Hyland asks I-O psychologists to consider from the lens of a graduate student so that reflection and reflexivity occurs from the beginning of where an I-O psychologist’s career begins.","PeriodicalId":47771,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"117 - 120"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43073766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Maira E. Ezerins, Timothy J. Vogus, Allison S. Gabriel, Lauren S. Simon, Charles Calderwood, Christopher C. Rosen
{"title":"From environmental niches to unique contributions: Reconsidering fit to foster inclusion across neurotypes","authors":"Maira E. Ezerins, Timothy J. Vogus, Allison S. Gabriel, Lauren S. Simon, Charles Calderwood, Christopher C. Rosen","doi":"10.1017/iop.2022.98","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.98","url":null,"abstract":"Much research has focused on the challenge of fit between people and organizations (Kristof, 1996). Given the prevalence of unemployment and underemployment, the challenge of both finding fit between oneself and one’s organization, and being seen as fitting in, is especially acute for neurodivergent job candidates and employees. Building on LeFevre-Levy and colleagues (2023), in the current commentary, we emphasize how despite the growing acceptance of the social model of disability and increasingly positive views of neurodivergent strengths (e.g., den Houting, 2019), research and practice need to move beyond finding niches within neurotypical systems where neurodivergent people can exist and thrive to systems that are collaboratively constructed across neurotypes. This means extending opportunities beyond well-publicized, specialized neurodiversity hiring initiatives that in total employ fewer than 1,500 globally (Bernick, 2021). Doing so requires better understanding the underpinnings of “misfit” for neurodivergent individuals and identifying what makes for the right workplace conditions to redress it. To advance this discussion, we articulate how the “double empathy problem” (Milton, 2012) and the heterogeneity of neurodivergent populations (Bury et al., 2019) requires rethinking traditional—and, most frequently, neurotypical—approaches to fit in research and practice.","PeriodicalId":47771,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"41 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41993761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"IOP volume 16 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/iop.2023.21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2023.21","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47771,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"f1 - f4"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42840908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Examining personality testing in selection for neurodiverse individuals","authors":"Lauren J. Wegmeyer, Andrew B. Speer","doi":"10.1017/iop.2022.102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.102","url":null,"abstract":"Examining personality testing","PeriodicalId":47771,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"61 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42136784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jeremiah T. McMillan, Benjamin S Listyg, Jeh Cooper
{"title":"Neurodiversity and talent measurement: Revisiting the basics","authors":"Jeremiah T. McMillan, Benjamin S Listyg, Jeh Cooper","doi":"10.1017/iop.2022.96","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.96","url":null,"abstract":"LeFevre-Levy et al. (2023) lay out a compelling argument in support of furthering research for navigating neurodiversity in organizational settings. We contend that one notable gap in this area is the development of evidenced-based practices for the effective identification, measurement, and use of job-relevant psychological constructs for staffing decisions. This gap is significant considering organizations currently bemoan a talent shortage or “ talent war","PeriodicalId":47771,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"31 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47619932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How can work from home support neurodiversity and inclusion?","authors":"Hanna Kalmanovich-Cohen, Steven J. Stanton","doi":"10.1017/iop.2022.93","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.93","url":null,"abstract":"be a potential pathway forward that confers a","PeriodicalId":47771,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"20 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42550420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andres Käosaar, K. Szabó, Alexandra Kandah, Wei-Cheng Chang
{"title":"The importance of reflective practices for decision makers: A possible part of the solution for helping the field","authors":"Andres Käosaar, K. Szabó, Alexandra Kandah, Wei-Cheng Chang","doi":"10.1017/iop.2022.107","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.107","url":null,"abstract":"This commentary expands on the focal article ’ s (Hyland, 2023) notion about the importance of reflective and reflexive practice in the field of industrial-organizational (I-O) psychology. Hyland states that reflective practices could be beneficial to everyone, bringing out that it could have benefits across all types of stakeholders in the field of I-O. Nevertheless, with the aim of developing the field, we feel that there is a specific group of I-O professionals that should be targeted first, rather than simultaneously getting everyone on board with reflective and reflexive practices. We argue that reflective practices within the field will be most effective when exhibited by stakeholders with decision-making rights and responsibilities. Although we agree that teaching reflective practices as part of official education would improve the professional (and personal) capacities of I-O psychologists and thus further develop the field, a focus on junior I-Os seems to omit key decision makers (e.g., executives, journal editors, and those in similar leadership positions) who actively shape the field now. We introduce the importance of reflectivity across generations of I-O professionals and discuss the benefits of extending the emphasis of reflective practices to key stakeholders, decision makers, and practitioners in addition to trainees.","PeriodicalId":47771,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"108 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41359038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Conceptualizing neurodiversity as individual differences in self-regulation","authors":"E. Richard","doi":"10.1017/iop.2022.109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.109","url":null,"abstract":"A core assumption of the neurodiversity movement is that neurological differences such as autism, ADHD, and dyslexia stem from naturally occurring variability in the brain and thought processes, rather than disease. This idea is quite in line with I-O psychology’s tendency to conceptualize individual differences as continuous and multidimensional. Although comparing the experiences of neurominority groups with those of other marginalized groups will undoubtedly prove informative in guiding diversity and inclusion efforts, there is also much to be gained by conceptualizing neurodiversity through an individual difference lens. In this commentary in response to LeFevre-Levy et al. (2023), I give examples of existing bodies of knowledge on work motivation and associated individual differences in self-regulation that show conceptual overlap with descriptions of neurodiversity. I then point to advantages of conceptualizing neurodiversity as a set of continuous individual differences as opposed to a limited number of discrete, diagnosis-based categories. Theory and research on self-regulation highlight the internal processes involved in managing one’s own attention, emotion, and volitional behavior—processes directly affected by neurodiversity. Further, research on work motivation has long recognized between-person differences in selfregulation and explored the interaction of these person-level variables with the situation or job context. Thus, the plethora of individual differences examined in the work motivation literature hold direct relevance to the work-related strengths and weaknesses attributed to different neurominority groups. Consider, for example, the following descriptions of one employee’s challenges with self-regulation:","PeriodicalId":47771,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"74 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49642354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reflection in I-O psychology: Herding sheep","authors":"B. Kennedy, Benita Stiles-Smith, S. Koreshi","doi":"10.1017/iop.2022.92","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.92","url":null,"abstract":"Modelling a process of reflection and reflexivity, Hyland (2023) has demonstrated a means by which I-O psychology can better produce innovative solutions for complex, multicausal, adaptive problems. Reflection and reflexivity call for identification of biases, assumptions, evaluation of Outcome, and adjustment of action. We agree that philosophy of science provides a systematic framework and that the challenge to consider what future we envision is timely. Nearly 50 years ago, Kerr ’ s (1975) now classic article pointed out the folly of rewarding A while hoping for B. If, as a discipline and profession, we are to realize the potential of I-O psychology to address complex human issues then perhaps this is the time to do something other than more of A. We agree that reflection and reflexivity are fit for that purpose and need to be embedded in curricula. As edu-cators and practitioners, our experience is that it not only can be incorporated into academic and professional preparation, but that doing so pays dividends. A common theme in the literature on critical reflection and reflexivity is uncovering assumptions: both those upon which we act but of which we are unaware and assumptions to which we subscribe but have not critically examined and simply accepted as some “ given","PeriodicalId":47771,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"96 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42234870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Annika L. Benson, Kelsie Colley, Joshua J. Prasad, Colin M. G. Willis, Tracy E. Powell-Rudy
{"title":"Contextualizing cases for neuroatypical inclusion in the workplace","authors":"Annika L. Benson, Kelsie Colley, Joshua J. Prasad, Colin M. G. Willis, Tracy E. Powell-Rudy","doi":"10.1017/iop.2022.108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.108","url":null,"abstract":"We believe that readers of the focal article by LeFevre-Levy et al. (2023) would benefit from aligning neurodiversity in the workplace and broader arguments for pursuing and researching organizational diversity in industrial-organizational (I-O) psychology. Often referred to as the “case for workplace diversity,” practitioners and scholars have offered various arguments in its defense. In this commentary, we adopt the labels from van Dijk et al. (2012) of (a) the business case, (b) the equality case, and (c) the values and virtues case to discuss the approaches for arguing why organizational diversity ought to be pursued. We briefly summarize each case and its consequences. The goal of this commentary is to connect the key points made by LeFevre-Levy et al. to each argument, clarify the values being promoted, and identify who may (and importantly may not) stand to benefit. We encourage the field to consider the implications of oversimplifying claims about neuroatypical individuals and their impact in organizations. In doing so, we hope to further contextualize the important points made by LeFevre-Levy et al.","PeriodicalId":47771,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"70 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45707138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}