Medicine Health Care and Philosophy最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Against age limits for men in reproductive care 反对限制男性接受生育护理的年龄
IF 2.1 2区 哲学
Medicine Health Care and Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-024-10203-0
Steven R. Piek, Andrea Martani, Guido Pennings
{"title":"Against age limits for men in reproductive care","authors":"Steven R. Piek, Andrea Martani, Guido Pennings","doi":"10.1007/s11019-024-10203-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-024-10203-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Almost all countries and fertility clinics impose age limits on women who want to become pregnant through Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART). Age limits for aspiring fathers, however, are much less common and remain a topic of debate. This article departs from the principle of reproductive autonomy and a <i>conditional positive</i> right to receive ART, and asks whether there are convincing arguments to also impose age limits on aspiring fathers. After considering three consequentialist approaches to justifying age limits for aspiring fathers, we take in a concrete normative stance by concluding that those are not strong enough to justify such cut-offs. We reinforce our position by drawing a comparison between the case of a 39-year-old woman who wants to become a single mother via a sperm donor on the one hand, and on the other hand the same woman who wants to have a child with a 64-year-old man who she loves and who is willing to care for the child as long as he is able to. We conclude that, as long as appropriate precautions are taken to protect the welfare of the future child, couples who want to receive fertility treatment should never be limited on the basis of the age of the (male) partner. An absence of age limits for men would respect the reproductive autonomy of both the man <i>and</i> the woman.</p>","PeriodicalId":47449,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140799470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Institutional design and moral conflict in health care priority-setting 医疗保健优先事项设定中的制度设计和道德冲突
IF 2.1 2区 哲学
Medicine Health Care and Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-024-10201-2
Philip Petrov
{"title":"Institutional design and moral conflict in health care priority-setting","authors":"Philip Petrov","doi":"10.1007/s11019-024-10201-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-024-10201-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Priority-setting policy-makers often face moral and political pressure to balance the conflicting motivations of <i>efficiency</i> and <i>rescue/non-abandonment</i>. Using the conflict between these motivations as a case study can enrich the understanding of institutional design in developed democracies. This essay presents a cognitive-psychological account of the conflict between efficiency and rescue/non-abandonment in health care priority-setting. It then describes three sets of institutional arrangements—in Australia, England/Wales, and Germany, respectively—that contend with this conflict in interestingly different ways. The analysis yields at least three implications for institutional design in developed democracies: (1) indeterminacy at the level of moral psychology can increase the probability of indeterminacy at the level of institutional design; (2) situational constraints in effect require priority-setting policy-makers to adopt normative-moral pluralism; and (3) the U.S. health care system may be in an <i>anti-priority-setting equilibrium</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":47449,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140571854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vision, body and interpretation in medical imaging diagnostics 医学影像诊断中的视觉、身体和解读
IF 2.1 2区 哲学
Medicine Health Care and Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-024-10200-3
Renzhen Chen, Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis
{"title":"Vision, body and interpretation in medical imaging diagnostics","authors":"Renzhen Chen, Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis","doi":"10.1007/s11019-024-10200-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-024-10200-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores the profound impact of visualism and visual perception in the context of medical imaging diagnostics. It emphasizes the intricate interplay among vision, embodiment, subjectivity, language, and historicity within the realm of medical science and technology, with a specific focus on image consciousness. The study delves into the role of subjectivity in perception, facilitating the communication of opacity and historicity to the perceiving individual. Additionally, it scrutinizes the image interpretation process, drawing parallels to text interpretation and highlighting the influence of personal biases and individuality in medical practice. By revisiting Husserl’s conceptualization of “image consciousness” and introducing the notion of “image theme”, the paper seeks to establish a theoretical framework for making sense of images within the context of technological interpretation. A key objective is to enhance the phenomenology of technology through a systematic analysis of medical imaging diagnosis, contributing to an expanded epistemological foundation for medical practice. The article recognizes that the construction of medical knowledge incorporates subjective elements, especially within a historical context. The interpretation of images involves both instrumental and expert interpretation, with human subjectivity playing a crucial role. The article asserts that human creativity and conscious engagement are indispensable in interpreting all medical images.</p>","PeriodicalId":47449,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","volume":"238 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140571850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Ethical Obligation for Research During Public Health Emergencies: Insights From the COVID-19 Pandemic. 公共卫生突发事件期间的研究伦理义务:COVID-19 大流行的启示。
IF 2.3 2区 哲学
Medicine Health Care and Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-28 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-023-10184-6
Mariana Barosa, Euzebiusz Jamrozik, Vinay Prasad
{"title":"The Ethical Obligation for Research During Public Health Emergencies: Insights From the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Mariana Barosa, Euzebiusz Jamrozik, Vinay Prasad","doi":"10.1007/s11019-023-10184-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11019-023-10184-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In times of crises, public health leaders may claim that trials of public health interventions are unethical. One reason for this claim can be that equipoise-i.e. a situation of uncertainty and/or disagreement among experts about the evidence regarding an intervention-has been disturbed by a change of collective expert views. Some might claim that equipoise is disturbed if the majority of experts believe that emergency public health interventions are likely to be more beneficial than harmful. However, such beliefs are not always justified: where high quality research has not been conducted, there is often considerable residual uncertainty about whether interventions offer net benefits. In this essay we argue that high-quality research, namely by means of well-designed randomized trials, is ethically obligatory before, during, and after implementing policies in public health emergencies (PHEs). We contend that this standard applies to both pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions, and we elaborate an account of equipoise that captures key features of debates in the recent pandemic. We build our case by analyzing research strategies employed during the COVID-19 pandemic regarding drugs, vaccines, and non-pharmaceutical interventions; and by providing responses to possible objections. Finally, we propose a public health policy reform: whenever a policy implemented during a PHE is not grounded in high-quality evidence that expected benefits outweigh harms, there should be a planned approach to generate high-quality evidence, with review of emerging data at preset time points. These preset timepoints guarantee that policymakers pause to review emerging evidence and consider ceasing ineffective or even harmful policies, thereby improving transparency and accountability, as well as permitting the redirection of resources to more effective or beneficial interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47449,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":"49-70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10904511/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139049553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emerging perspectives in the shared decision making debate. 共同决策辩论中的新观点。
IF 2.1 2区 哲学
Medicine Health Care and Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-024-10196-w
Bert Gordijn, Henk Ten Have
{"title":"Emerging perspectives in the shared decision making debate.","authors":"Bert Gordijn, Henk Ten Have","doi":"10.1007/s11019-024-10196-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11019-024-10196-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47449,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139730686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to: Precision medicine and the problem of structural injustice. 更正:精准医疗与结构性不公正问题。
IF 2.1 2区 哲学
Medicine Health Care and Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-023-10173-9
Sara Green, Barbara Prainsack, Maya Sabatello
{"title":"Correction to: Precision medicine and the problem of structural injustice.","authors":"Sara Green, Barbara Prainsack, Maya Sabatello","doi":"10.1007/s11019-023-10173-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11019-023-10173-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47449,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":"133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10904447/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10088237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How do roles impact suicidal agents' obligations? 角色如何影响自杀代理人的义务?
IF 2.1 2区 哲学
Medicine Health Care and Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-18 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-023-10177-5
Suzanne E Dowie
{"title":"How do roles impact suicidal agents' obligations?","authors":"Suzanne E Dowie","doi":"10.1007/s11019-023-10177-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11019-023-10177-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, I assess the role responsibility argument that claims suicidal agents have obligations to specific people not to kill themselves due to their roles. Since the plausibility of the role responsibility argument is clearest in the parent-child relationship, I assess parental obligations. I defend a view that says that normative roles, such as those of a parent, are contractual and voluntary. I then suggest that the normative parameters for some roles preclude permissible suicide because the role-related contract includes a promise to provide continuing care and emotional support. I propose that as we have established criteria for morally acceptable reasons for cancelling, voiding, or amending a contract, we can apply these to the role responsibility argument to establish grounds for releasing a parent from his role-related and contractual obligations. Failure to fulfil one's contractual roles may not be blameworthy, depending upon the circumstances. I propose the factors determining culpability in failure to fulfil one's role-related obligations are: intention, voluntariness, diminished responsibility, mental capacity, and foreseeability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47449,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":"15-30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10904411/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41239841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Personhood as projection: the value of multiple conceptions of personhood for understanding the dehumanisation of people living with dementia. 作为投射的人格:多重人格概念对于理解痴呆症患者非人化问题的价值。
IF 2.1 2区 哲学
Medicine Health Care and Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-21 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-023-10187-3
Paula Boddington, Andy Northcott, Katie Featherstone
{"title":"Personhood as projection: the value of multiple conceptions of personhood for understanding the dehumanisation of people living with dementia.","authors":"Paula Boddington, Andy Northcott, Katie Featherstone","doi":"10.1007/s11019-023-10187-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11019-023-10187-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examine the concept of personhood in relation to people living with dementia and implications for the humanity of care, drawing on a body of ethnographic work. Much debate has searched for an adequate account of the person for these purposes. Broad contrasts can be made between accounts focusing on cognition and mental faculties, and accounts focusing on embodied and relational aspects of the person. Some have suggested the concept of the person is critical for good care; others suggest the vexed debates mean that the concept should be abandoned. We argue instead that the competing accounts illuminate the very tensions in personhood which are manifest for all of us, but especially for people living with dementia, and argue that our account has explanatory power in shedding light on how precisely dehumanisation and constraints on agency may arise for people living with dementia, and for staff, within an institutional context.</p>","PeriodicalId":47449,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":"93-106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138832299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From a critique of the principle of autonomy to an ethic of heteronomy. 从对自治原则的批判到异质自治伦理。
IF 2.1 2区 哲学
Medicine Health Care and Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-11 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-023-10185-5
Florian Martinet-Kosinski
{"title":"From a critique of the principle of autonomy to an ethic of heteronomy.","authors":"Florian Martinet-Kosinski","doi":"10.1007/s11019-023-10185-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11019-023-10185-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Etymologically, autonomy is the ability to give oneself rules and follow them. It is an important principle of medical ethics, which can sometimes raise some tensions in the care relationship. We propose a new definition of ethics, the ethics of heteronomy: a self-normative, discursive and responsible autonomy. Autonomy cannot be considered without the responsibility each person must have towards others. In the care relationship, autonomy would be more the ability of each person to reach out to others than the ability to decide alone. The care relationship must be seen as an accompaniment of equals where each person allows the other to be rephrased. Autonomy would then no longer be absolute but relative to each situation. Being autonomous would become an ability for adaptation of the patient-doctor pair. The accompaniment allows the birth of a relationship of trust, giving the patient and the doctor the ability to touch and let themselves be touched, thus making each one progress in this reciprocal dialectic. The care relationship becomes the possibility of considering autonomy as a collective and not as an individual notion only. Paradoxically, by promoting the autonomy of the patient-doctor pair, they both develop their own autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47449,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":"71-80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139425736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The duty of care and the right to be cared for: is there a duty to treat the unvaccinated? 照顾的责任和被照顾的权利:是否有责任治疗未接种疫苗的人?
IF 2.1 2区 哲学
Medicine Health Care and Philosophy Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-05 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-023-10186-4
Zohar Lederman, Shalom Corcos
{"title":"The duty of care and the right to be cared for: is there a duty to treat the unvaccinated?","authors":"Zohar Lederman, Shalom Corcos","doi":"10.1007/s11019-023-10186-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11019-023-10186-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vaccine hesitancy or refusal has been one of the major obstacles to herd immunity against Covid-19 in high-income countries and one of the causes for the emergence of variants. The refusal of people who are eligible for vaccination to receive vaccination creates an ethical dilemma between the duty of healthcare professionals (HCPs) to care for patients and their right to be taken care of. This paper argues for an extended social contract between patients and society wherein vaccination against Covid-19 is conceived as essential for the protection of the right of healthcare providers to be taken care of. Thus, a duty of care is only valid when those who can receive vaccination actually receive it. Whenever that is not the case, the continuing functioning of HCPs can only be perceived as supererogatory and not obligatory.</p>","PeriodicalId":47449,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":"81-91"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10904556/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139098860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信