J. Kale Monk, Tyler B. Jamison, Erin D. Basinger, Matthew A. Ogan, Bryan Abendschein, Karen E. Talley
{"title":"Constructing Meaning in Digital Lives: A Theory-Driven and Practical Approach to Using Online Forums in Family Science","authors":"J. Kale Monk, Tyler B. Jamison, Erin D. Basinger, Matthew A. Ogan, Bryan Abendschein, Karen E. Talley","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70057","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70057","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Online forums offer family scholars a unique opportunity to learn how people make sense of complex issues related to family, identity, and relationships. These digital spaces often mirror or even amplify offline dynamics, as users interact to disclose sensitive information, construct narratives, offer validation, or address uncertainty. Online forums provide an authentic glimpse into a group or phenomenon through easily accessible, naturally-occurring interactions, including from hard-to-reach populations. Guided by symbolic interactionism, we offer practical guidance for researchers interested in this approach. We draw from existing literature to outline strategies for identifying relevant forums, collecting data ethically, and analyzing data using qualitative methods. In addition to providing several examples of published work using forums as a data source, we provide a case example of a published study using data from Reddit to demonstrate potential steps for interested scholars to follow in conducting online forums research. We explore potential study design challenges that researchers should consider, including the lack of consistent demographic data, difficulties in conducting follow-ups, and the risk of social desirability bias, even in anonymous settings. We also highlight ethical considerations inherent in this type of research. Overall, family scientists can expand their methodological toolkit and gain deeper insights into the lived experiences of individuals and families in the digital age by considering online forums as a rich data source.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"652-667"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147695409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Critical Identity Theory: Integrating Intersectional Family Perspectives With Symbolic Interactionism","authors":"Kari Adamsons, Raymond E. Petren","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70048","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70048","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Identity theory (IT) has a rich history in family science research; however, neither IT itself nor research using identity theory have focused on diversity or systems of inequality. We suggest that the propositions and assumptions of identity theory are highly compatible with more current critical theories, such as intersectionality. In the current paper, we integrate components from intersectionality theory into identity theory to develop a Critical Identity Theory (CIT). We introduce the importance of belonging, two forms of identities (role identities and sociocultural identities), and four levels within which identities are negotiated (sociocultural, institutional, relational, and individual). The remainder of the theory's propositions and assumptions are organized around the processes involved in the creation and negotiation of identities and identity enactment. Implications of the theory for future research, theorizing, policy, and practice are discussed.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"551-568"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147447236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chuen Wei Alvin Seah, Tin Mei Yeo, Zoe Jane-Lara Hildon, Yong-Shian Shawn Goh, Xin Hui Jasmine Chua, Jun Yi Claire Teo, Wenru Wang
{"title":"A Comprehensive Mapping of Intergenerational Caregiving: A Scoping Review of Dyadic and Family Caregiving","authors":"Chuen Wei Alvin Seah, Tin Mei Yeo, Zoe Jane-Lara Hildon, Yong-Shian Shawn Goh, Xin Hui Jasmine Chua, Jun Yi Claire Teo, Wenru Wang","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70067","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70067","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Families remain central to later-life support, yet evidence on intergenerational caregiving is fragmented across dyads, generations, and cultural contexts. This scoping review maps how caregiving is organized and negotiated across structural, associational, affectual, functional, consensual, and normative dimensions. Following PRISMA-ScR and Arksey and O’Malley's framework, seven databases and Google Scholar were searched. Eligible studies reported empirical findings on care exchanged between family members of different generations, sampled at dyadic, triadic, or family levels, and published in English since 2000. Data were charted to Intergenerational Solidarity dimensions and intergenerational ambivalence and synthesized using a framework approach. Forty-nine studies met criteria, largely qualitative and Western. Proximity and co-residence structured caregiving intensity, while distance prompted mediated contact, remittances, rotational arrangements, and formal services. Care flows were multidirectional and networked, moderated by affectual climate and consensual governance. Policy should recognize caregiving as networked and multidirectional, while research must broaden samples and adopt longitudinal designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"764-783"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jftr.70067","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148285513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From Family to Death: Murder-Suicide Incidents in an Interdisciplinary Perspective","authors":"Haoran Xu","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70077","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70077","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This article reframes family murder-suicide as a process of family annihilation rather than an isolated crime. It presents a conceptual framework that links strain, shame, and threatened control with family structures, power relations, and stress. The conceptual framework explains how personal despair and coercive dominance converge within intimate partnerships and parent–child ties to produce lethal decisions. This framework accounts for hostile and altruistic patterns across intimate partner and parent–child relationships and highlights key risk periods such as relationship separation among intimate partners and caregiving crises involving children, older adults, and severely ill or dependent family members. The synthesis strengthens family theory on roles, power, and system vulnerability and improves risk prediction through attention to dual harm signals and family context. The framework informs policy, social service design, and multi-agency screening and shows the value of interdisciplinary collaboration for prevention.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"510-516"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148385877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Intersectional Theory of Planned Behavior: Transforming Financial Behavior Theory for Contemporary Families","authors":"Lena Gan, Nerissa LeBlanc Gillum, Sara Kay","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70046","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70046","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Existing financial behavior theories inadequately explain decision-making in culturally diverse families because they neglect how intersecting systems of power fundamentally shape psychological constructs. This article introduces the Intersectional Theory of Planned Behavior (I-TPB), transforming the Theory of Planned Behavior's core constructs—attitudes, norms, and perceived behavioral control—from universal psychological mechanisms into intersectionally constituted phenomena. Building on TPB's explanatory power while addressing its structural limitations, I-TPB theorizes financial behavior through three interlocking mechanisms: positional conditioning, relational contingency, and structural embedding. The proposed framework generates six theoretical propositions explaining systematic behavioral variations across intersectional positions, reframing behaviors deemed irrational under traditional TPB as structurally coherent responses rather than individual deficits. Theoretical applications across three diverse family cases demonstrate this intersectional behavioral coherence, showing how apparent inconsistencies reflect adaptive responses to documented institutional barriers. I-TPB offers a theoretically integrated framework for understanding financial behavior across diverse family structures that centers structural equity rather than individual pathology, advancing justice-oriented family science.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"530-550"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147447426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Forgiving Failures and Fallibility in Parenting: A Self-Forgiveness Framework for Managing Guilt and Shame Among Parents","authors":"Poulami Sengupta, Vidisha Rai, Atasi Mohanty","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70050","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70050","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This article proposes a conceptual framework of self-forgiveness for managing guilt and shame among parents of healthy children. Parenting is fraught with self-condemning emotions, diminishing the well-being of the parents and, by extension, their children. The article determines the appropriateness of self-forgiveness as a morally and practically viable strategy to manage such emotions by adapting Jacinto and Edward's (2011) model of self-forgiveness. Given the gendered nature of these emotional experiences and of the discourses that contribute to them, the framework caters to distinct needs of mothers and fathers. Four stages (recognition, recalibrating responsibility, expression and re-creating/expanding identities) are described in the framework to help parents determine the degree of justified responsibility, embrace their inevitable fallibility, and expand both their gender and parent identities. The insights from the article can inform group interventions to ease the emotional challenges of parenting following a structured module of self-forgiveness based on the proposed conceptual framework.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"600-611"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147506637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sarah E. Patterson, Adriana Reyes, Huijing Wu, Emily M. Agree, Sung S. Park, Amilcar Matos-Moreno, Gabriella Oudsema
{"title":"Expectations for Families to Care for Older Adults in the United States: Rapid Scoping Review 2011–2023","authors":"Sarah E. Patterson, Adriana Reyes, Huijing Wu, Emily M. Agree, Sung S. Park, Amilcar Matos-Moreno, Gabriella Oudsema","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70042","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70042","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As the population ages and families become increasingly diverse, more work is needed to understand expectations for families to care for older adults. In this review, we discuss the theoretical frameworks and conceptualizations used to study care expectations, summarize overarching findings about theories of care expectations and corresponding measurement, and propose future directions for research. We examined studies published between January 2011 and December 2023 that focused on the United States. There was little theoretical agreement across studies, with intergenerational solidarity's concept of familism being most prevalent. Terminology and conceptualization of care expectations varied. Most survey items or scales used broad definitions of care and/or family, focused solely on adult children, or had only one item available. Future research should include the development of family theories and more nuanced measures of expectations, specifically by caregiver role/relationship, for specific tasks, and/or the health conditions of older adults receiving care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"668-701"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jftr.70042","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146032731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nick Frye-Cox, Zoee Johnson, Olivia Shores, Maria Boccia, Jennifer H. Murillo
{"title":"Couple Dynamics Following Brain Cancer Diagnosis: A Scoping Review","authors":"Nick Frye-Cox, Zoee Johnson, Olivia Shores, Maria Boccia, Jennifer H. Murillo","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70060","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70060","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this scoping review, we examine the psychosocial impacts and relationship experiences of brain cancer on patients and their romantic partners. We synthesize seven empirical studies published between 2000 and 2024 across the United States (<i>n</i> = 2) and Europe (<i>n</i> = 5). Studies were identified through systematic database searches (e.g., PubMed, PsycINFO) targeting adult romantic couples where one partner had been diagnosed with a brain tumor. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, four of which used qualitative methods, and the remaining three articles used quantitative methods. Substantive findings across studies fell into one of three themes: (a) patients and their partners reported compromised psychosocial outcomes; (b) couple coping and communication patterns varied from open discussion to complete avoidance; and (c) partners reported considerable caregiver strain. The review revealed important limitations such as inconsistent demographic reporting, need for methodological rigor (e.g., consistent reporting of demographics, dyadic data) and a lack of theoretical frameworks. Future research should prioritize theoretically grounded dyadic studies using appropriate statistical methods to advance understanding of how brain cancer impacts romantic relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"737-749"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jftr.70060","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148285537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Proposing a Role for Maternal Positive Empathy in the Caregiving Relationship","authors":"Matthew J. Marvin","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.70091","url":null,"abstract":"When mothers empathize with their children, they are motivated to respond in an attuned manner that prioritizes their children's well‐being. A substantial body of research links maternal empathy and attuned caregiving to adaptive socioemotional development in young children. However, this work almost exclusively focuses upon empathy for the child's negatively valenced internal states. This focus is despite the fact that there is no a priori reason to believe that adaptive outcomes associated with maternal empathy are solely due to empathy for the child's negative internal states. Positive affective processes within the mother–child relationship are increasingly recognized as supporting children's development in unique ways. In this article, I introduce maternal positive empathy, or the mother's empathy for the child's positively valenced internal states. I then set forth hypotheses regarding the role of maternal positive empathy in the caregiving relationship and the family system. Future directions for research and theory are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148877274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gavin B. Green, Josey Batura, Heather Kelley, Kay Bradford, Elizabeth Fauth
{"title":"Psychological Flexibility in Dementia Caregiving: The Adaptive Support Model","authors":"Gavin B. Green, Josey Batura, Heather Kelley, Kay Bradford, Elizabeth Fauth","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70054","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70054","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Dementia caregiving often involves sustained emotional disruption and ambiguous loss, yet many interventions focus on burden reduction without specifying the adaptive processes that sustain caregiving over time. We propose psychological flexibility as a central moderating process in how caregivers interpret stressors, mobilize resources, and sustain engagement in the face of chronic relational ambiguity. Drawing from the Family Adjustment and Adaptation Response (FAAR) model and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), we introduce the Adaptive Support Model (ASM), which conceptualizes psychological flexibility as moderating the relationships between caregiving demands, meaning-making processes, and adaptive outcomes. Higher psychological flexibility is expected to weaken associations between ambiguous loss, related distress, and maladaptive outcomes, while strengthening pathways toward values-aligned caregiving and bonadaptation. By integrating psychological flexibility into Family Stress and Resilience Theory, the Adaptive Support Model offers a testable conceptual framework and clinical roadmap for supporting sustainable, emotionally attuned dementia caregiving.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"612-627"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147630707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}