{"title":"Critical, Empathetic, and Mindful Relations (CEMR): A Relationship-Building Theory","authors":"Sothy Eng","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70041","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Critical, Empathetic, and Mindful Relations (CEMR) integrates three interdependent capacities to strengthen relationships: (a) critical understanding (of structure), the ability to reflect on and interrogate sociocultural influences; (b) empathy (toward others), the capacity to attune to and validate the emotional experiences of others without judgment; and (c) mindfulness (of self), the practice of present-centered awareness that enables emotional regulation and non-reactive engagement. These capacities operate across three dimensions: societal, interpersonal, and personal. Originally developed through classroom pedagogy, CEMR provides teachable and transferable mechanisms such as storytelling, lounge time, breathing exercises, and turn-taking dialog that promote connection. I apply CEMR to parenting to show how these capacities help families navigate stress, digital distraction, and performance-driven norms, while also extending relevance to romantic partnerships, educational settings, and workplace interactions. Grounded in social capital theory and informed by student narratives, CEMR bridges structure with daily practices, offering a skills-based model for advancing family science.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"517-529"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145897321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Moises Esteban-Guitart, David Subero, Antonio Membrive, Ola Estrad
{"title":"How to Study Family Learning Practices Mediated by Digital Platforms: A Scoping Review","authors":"Moises Esteban-Guitart, David Subero, Antonio Membrive, Ola Estrad","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70063","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70063","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The dynamic and personalized nature of today's media ecosystem complicates the documentation and analysis of digital home learning environments. In response, innovative research methods have emerged, which we broadly categorize as passive (e.g., quantitative studies) or active participatory methods. This article focuses on active approaches, specifically internally oriented (e.g., artifacts created by participants) and externally oriented (e.g., interviews, focus groups) methods, that prioritize participants' voices and agency. We present a scoping review of 61 studies to explore current research practices in this field. Our review highlights the diversity and growth of participatory methods, including hybrid approaches that combine elements of both active and passive strategies. We identify and describe five techniques linked to internally oriented participatory methods. Finally, we discuss the strengths, opportunities, and ethical considerations associated with these methods, offering insights into how researchers can more effectively engage with families and learners in digital home learning contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"750-763"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jftr.70063","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148285510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Parental Racial–Ethnic Socialization in the Early Years: A Scoping Review","authors":"Amaesha Durazi, Rashmita S. Mistry","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70051","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70051","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This review synthesizes parental racial–ethnic socialization (RES) research focused on families with children of color, highlighting conceptual and measurement advances and gaps for early childhood through early adolescence (ages 0–12). Although most RES studies center on adolescents, young children notice race, experience racism, and require developmentally attuned approaches. A systematic search identified 75 empirical articles. The literature is predominantly quantitative, relies largely on mother reports, and focuses on low- to middle-income Black and Latine families. Preparation for bias appears less consistent in childhood, with parents weighing a variety of factors. Emerging work emphasizes parent–child alignment, socio-emotional and relational dimensions, internal parental mechanisms such as beliefs and attitudes, and socio-political context. Future research should diversify samples, develop measures tailored to childhood, and employ qualitative, mixed-method, and observational approaches to capture implicit and process-oriented RES. A socio-cognitive developmental lens is essential for understanding how RES unfolds across childhood.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"702-736"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148285611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anna Lundberg, Monika Lindbekk, Anna Sonander, Rustamjon Urinboyev
{"title":"Vernacularizing the Best Interests of the Child: Comparative Insights From Three Legal Systems","authors":"Anna Lundberg, Monika Lindbekk, Anna Sonander, Rustamjon Urinboyev","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70043","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70043","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study investigates how the Best Interests of the Child principle in the UN Children's Rights Convention (Article 3) has been adapted in custody disputes in Egypt, Sweden, and Uzbekistan. Although the Convention on the Rights of the Child offers a common normative benchmark, divergent legal cultures shape its domestic meaning: Egypt is governed by religious and state legal norms intersecting with global child rights standards. Sweden represents a Western legal culture emphasizing children's participation in custody disputes. Uzbekistan is influenced by Soviet, Islamic, and Western traditions. Understanding these variations is essential for a transnational child-rights dialogue. A comparative doctrinal and contextual analysis of national statutes, preparatory materials, and policy guidelines across the three jurisdictions was conducted. Analytical categories were developed inductively to trace how institutional mandates, professional discretion, and socio-cultural factors inform judicial reasoning. Across all sites, explicit references to the Best Interests of the Child principle were found, yet underlying rationales diverged. Egyptian decisions foregrounded paternal guardianship and religion-inflected welfare; Uzbek reasoning balanced Soviet-era developmentalism with Islamic and international norms; Swedish practice emphasized procedural fairness and children's voiced preferences, reflecting limited legislative guidance. The Best Interests of the Child operates as a shared legal vocabulary but is locally reconstructed through the interaction of normative, institutional, and cultural forces. Universalist child-rights approaches, therefore, require sensitivity to legal pluralism when informing policy or reform. These conclusions advise international monitoring bodies and reform initiatives to account for contextual factors rather than relying on doctrinal uniformity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"479-491"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jftr.70043","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146215711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Cooperative Rearing and Low Fertility Persistence: A Two-Constraint Theoretical Framework","authors":"Zhen Zhang, Qiang Li","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70062","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70062","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Despite expanded family policy spending across high-income countries, fertility remains low. Quasi-experimental evidence shows that cash and tax transfers tend to shift fertility mainly among lower socioeconomic status (SES) groups, with smaller or null effects among socioeconomically advantaged groups. We propose a two-constraint framework that distinguishes financial constraints (children are unaffordable) from organizational constraints (care is difficult to coordinate with work, mobility, and daily life). Using the evolutionary anthropological lens of cooperative rearing, we specify four organizational functions needed to translate fertility intentions into births: proximity to trusted helpers, schedule-compatible temporal coverage, relational durability, and insurance against disruptions. A theory-based integrative review suggests that policies that expand cooperative capacity—through childcare hours and continuity, schedule predictability, and proximity-supporting infrastructure—are more likely than cash alone to affect parity progression when affordability is not the primary constraint. We interpret fertility-related policy as autonomy-enhancing and well-being-enhancing family infrastructure rather than demographic engineering and derive falsifiable propositions for future research.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"628-638"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147744025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Disguising the Familiar: Considering Internal Confidentiality in Individual Interviews With Partners and Families","authors":"Susie Bower-Brown, Clare Stovell","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70047","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70047","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article draws attention to the ethical and methodological complexities of internal confidentiality in family research and provides field-specific recommendations. Conducting individual (rather than joint) interviews with partners or multiple members of the same family is common but poses significant challenges around internal confidentiality, defined as participants' ability to recognize each other in research reports. Family research's focus on close relationships, diverse family forms, and children heightens the risks and consequences of breaching internal confidentiality, yet explicit consideration of this issue is lacking in the methodological and family literatures. Drawing on firsthand experience with two research projects, this article outlines the challenges of preserving internal confidentiality, the benefits of individual interviews, and key recommendations. We recommend that researchers develop flexible strategies for addressing internal confidentiality, and our guidelines offer practical solutions, from research design to data reporting. By addressing the complexities of internal confidentiality, we aim to prevent harm to participants and enhance the integrity of family studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"639-651"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jftr.70047","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147478241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. Kale Monk, Tyler B. Jamison, Erin D. Basinger, Matthew A. Ogan, Bryan Abendschein, Karen E. Talley
{"title":"Constructing Meaning in Digital Lives: A Theory-Driven and Practical Approach to Using Online Forums in Family Science","authors":"J. Kale Monk, Tyler B. Jamison, Erin D. Basinger, Matthew A. Ogan, Bryan Abendschein, Karen E. Talley","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70057","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70057","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Online forums offer family scholars a unique opportunity to learn how people make sense of complex issues related to family, identity, and relationships. These digital spaces often mirror or even amplify offline dynamics, as users interact to disclose sensitive information, construct narratives, offer validation, or address uncertainty. Online forums provide an authentic glimpse into a group or phenomenon through easily accessible, naturally-occurring interactions, including from hard-to-reach populations. Guided by symbolic interactionism, we offer practical guidance for researchers interested in this approach. We draw from existing literature to outline strategies for identifying relevant forums, collecting data ethically, and analyzing data using qualitative methods. In addition to providing several examples of published work using forums as a data source, we provide a case example of a published study using data from Reddit to demonstrate potential steps for interested scholars to follow in conducting online forums research. We explore potential study design challenges that researchers should consider, including the lack of consistent demographic data, difficulties in conducting follow-ups, and the risk of social desirability bias, even in anonymous settings. We also highlight ethical considerations inherent in this type of research. Overall, family scientists can expand their methodological toolkit and gain deeper insights into the lived experiences of individuals and families in the digital age by considering online forums as a rich data source.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"652-667"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147695409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Critical Identity Theory: Integrating Intersectional Family Perspectives With Symbolic Interactionism","authors":"Kari Adamsons, Raymond E. Petren","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70048","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70048","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Identity theory (IT) has a rich history in family science research; however, neither IT itself nor research using identity theory have focused on diversity or systems of inequality. We suggest that the propositions and assumptions of identity theory are highly compatible with more current critical theories, such as intersectionality. In the current paper, we integrate components from intersectionality theory into identity theory to develop a Critical Identity Theory (CIT). We introduce the importance of belonging, two forms of identities (role identities and sociocultural identities), and four levels within which identities are negotiated (sociocultural, institutional, relational, and individual). The remainder of the theory's propositions and assumptions are organized around the processes involved in the creation and negotiation of identities and identity enactment. Implications of the theory for future research, theorizing, policy, and practice are discussed.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"551-568"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147447236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chuen Wei Alvin Seah, Tin Mei Yeo, Zoe Jane-Lara Hildon, Yong-Shian Shawn Goh, Xin Hui Jasmine Chua, Jun Yi Claire Teo, Wenru Wang
{"title":"A Comprehensive Mapping of Intergenerational Caregiving: A Scoping Review of Dyadic and Family Caregiving","authors":"Chuen Wei Alvin Seah, Tin Mei Yeo, Zoe Jane-Lara Hildon, Yong-Shian Shawn Goh, Xin Hui Jasmine Chua, Jun Yi Claire Teo, Wenru Wang","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70067","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70067","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Families remain central to later-life support, yet evidence on intergenerational caregiving is fragmented across dyads, generations, and cultural contexts. This scoping review maps how caregiving is organized and negotiated across structural, associational, affectual, functional, consensual, and normative dimensions. Following PRISMA-ScR and Arksey and O’Malley's framework, seven databases and Google Scholar were searched. Eligible studies reported empirical findings on care exchanged between family members of different generations, sampled at dyadic, triadic, or family levels, and published in English since 2000. Data were charted to Intergenerational Solidarity dimensions and intergenerational ambivalence and synthesized using a framework approach. Forty-nine studies met criteria, largely qualitative and Western. Proximity and co-residence structured caregiving intensity, while distance prompted mediated contact, remittances, rotational arrangements, and formal services. Care flows were multidirectional and networked, moderated by affectual climate and consensual governance. Policy should recognize caregiving as networked and multidirectional, while research must broaden samples and adopt longitudinal designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"764-783"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jftr.70067","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148285513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From Family to Death: Murder-Suicide Incidents in an Interdisciplinary Perspective","authors":"Haoran Xu","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70077","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jftr.70077","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This article reframes family murder-suicide as a process of family annihilation rather than an isolated crime. It presents a conceptual framework that links strain, shame, and threatened control with family structures, power relations, and stress. The conceptual framework explains how personal despair and coercive dominance converge within intimate partnerships and parent–child ties to produce lethal decisions. This framework accounts for hostile and altruistic patterns across intimate partner and parent–child relationships and highlights key risk periods such as relationship separation among intimate partners and caregiving crises involving children, older adults, and severely ill or dependent family members. The synthesis strengthens family theory on roles, power, and system vulnerability and improves risk prediction through attention to dual harm signals and family context. The framework informs policy, social service design, and multi-agency screening and shows the value of interdisciplinary collaboration for prevention.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"18 3","pages":"510-516"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148385877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}