Nurse Researcher最新文献_第8页

Being reflexive in research and clinical practice: a practical example. 研究和临床实践中的反思性:一个实际的例子。

IF 1.2

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1833

Wendy English, M. Gott, Jackie Robinson

{"title":"Being reflexive in research and clinical practice: a practical example.","authors":"Wendy English, M. Gott, Jackie Robinson","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1833","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000Reflexivity is an invaluable skill for nurses and researchers, as it assists in closing the gap between research and practice and improves nursing practice. However, there is some doubt about how well reflexivity is implemented in nursing. There has also been little published showing how reflexivity can be applied in research and nursing.\u0000\u0000\u0000AIM\u0000To provide an example of reflexivity in research to demonstrate that knowledge and experiences are transferable to nursing practice.\u0000\u0000\u0000DISCUSSION\u0000Reflexivity is an important tool for research and nursing in finding the meeting points or interface of research and practice. This article provides an example of being reflexive that identified how the research skills of 'listening to understand' and 'finding meaning' filtered into nursing practice.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000Reflexivity helped to generate knowledge about research skills filtering across a research project into clinical practice. Being reflexive as a researcher and a nurse can transform the care of patients and families.\u0000\u0000\u0000IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE\u0000This article provides an example of how reflexivity can be applied to research and nursing practice. It also suggests reframing the gap between research and practice as an interface between the two. This could encourage nurses to think of research skills and knowledge as transferable into real-time nursing practice.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48856217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

The changing paradigm of research delivery during a pandemic - a reflective account. 疫情期间研究交付模式的变化——反思性叙述。

IF 1.2

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2022-05-12 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1832

C. Whitehouse, C. Harris, P. Charlton, Naomi Hare

{"title":"The changing paradigm of research delivery during a pandemic - a reflective account.","authors":"C. Whitehouse, C. Harris, P. Charlton, Naomi Hare","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1832","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1832","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000As clinical pressures evolved amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the importance of research activity came to the forefront of health and care service requirements.\u0000\u0000\u0000AIM\u0000To illustrate through reflection the experiences of clinical research teams based in the UK during the pandemic.\u0000\u0000\u0000DISCUSSION\u0000The article describes operational experiences in different settings and reflects on important themes and implications for future practice. The authors use a reflective model to share perspectives of leading research delivery roles in geographically and organisationally different settings. A patient's perspective was included from the outset of the reflective process. Delegates at an interactive masterclass conference in April 2021 also contributed their experiences. Seven themes characterise the research teams' response to the pandemic: prioritising, team-building, protection, limitation of autonomy, reduced bureaucracy, collaboration and transformation of process. Balance through compassionate leadership underpinned by ethically grounded decision-making was a theme throughout.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000Implicitly held, tacit knowledge progressed to explicit knowledge, formalising the research teams' responses to the pandemic partly into codified learning. The authors characterise the experience as an 'operational balancing act', whereby significant innovations were integrated into working practices and research delivery.\u0000\u0000\u0000IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE\u0000The pandemic demonstrated what research progress is possible when all resources are diverted to one novel virus. The value of research teams was elevated through treatment and vaccine trials and the contribution of those involved to patient care. This reinforces an invigorated commitment to resources as well as new acceptance of and belief in research as a core care activity across and throughout systems and organisations at all levels.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42010619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Perspectives on reporting non-verbal interactions from the contemporary research focus group. 当代研究焦点小组对报告非语言互动的看法。

IF 1.2

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2022-04-07 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1828

Iseult M. Wilson, Nikki Daniels, P. Gillen, K. Casson

{"title":"Perspectives on reporting non-verbal interactions from the contemporary research focus group.","authors":"Iseult M. Wilson, Nikki Daniels, P. Gillen, K. Casson","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1828","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1828","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000The main defining attribute that delineates focus groups from other methods of collecting data is that data are generated through participants communicating with each other rather than solely with the group moderator. The way in which interactions take place across group interviews and focus groups varies, yet both are referred to as focus groups, resulting in a broad umbrella term for its numerous manifestations.\u0000\u0000\u0000AIM\u0000To reflect on how focus groups are adopted and reported, including the use of the term 'focus group'.\u0000\u0000\u0000DISCUSSION\u0000The authors recognise that the term 'focus group' is sometimes used synonymously with 'group interview' but argue that this practice must be challenged. They suggest using terms that indicate the type of space and synchronicity of the focus group, prefixed with 'in-person' or 'conventional' to identify traditional focus groups. They also suggest separating virtual group interviews into 'synchronous' and 'asynchronous', based on whether the participants and researchers can engage with each other in real time.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000There is a need for qualitative researchers to reach a consensus about the nature of focus groups and group interviews, as well as where their differences and similarities lie.\u0000\u0000\u0000IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE\u0000The authors hope to encourage nurse researchers to think about these issues when labelling, planning, analysing and reporting studies involving focus groups.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43989834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Public involvement in participatory research: the experiences of peer interviewers from Roma, Gypsy and Traveller communities. 公众参与参与式研究：来自罗姆人、吉普赛人和游民社区的同伴访谈者的经验。

IF 1.2

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2022-03-10 Epub Date: 2022-02-03 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1818

Louise Condon, Jolana Curejova, Donna Leeanne Morgan, Glenn Miles, Denise Barry, Deborah Fenlon

{"title":"Public involvement in participatory research: the experiences of peer interviewers from Roma, Gypsy and Traveller communities.","authors":"Louise Condon, Jolana Curejova, Donna Leeanne Morgan, Glenn Miles, Denise Barry, Deborah Fenlon","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1818","DOIUrl":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1818","url":null,"abstract":"Background: A vital component of research is patient and public involvement (PPI). The challenges of PPI increase when conducting cross-cultural research into sensitive subjects with marginalised ethnic minority groups.Aim: To present the authors' reflections on conducting peer interviews with members of Roma, Gypsy and Traveller communities.Discussion: The authors provide examples of reflections on collecting data from a participatory research project that explored Gypsies, Roma and Travellers' experiences of cancer in their communities. They derived the reflections from audio-recorded, post-interview debriefs with co-researchers from the same ethnic backgrounds as interviewees ('peer researchers'). The main challenges for the peer researchers were cultural, linguistic and pragmatic, all fundamentally related to exploring a sensitive health topic through the lens of ethnicity.Conclusion: Peer researchers recognised their role in building bridges between participants and the research team. They did this by establishing a relationship of trust, minimising distress, representing the views of their communities and obtaining data to meet the aims of the project. Peer researchers perform multiple roles to assist in cross-cultural data collection in participatory research.Implications for practice: This article highlights underexplored aspects of peer researchers' work that have implications for the planning and conduct of cross-cultural research with marginalised groups.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39581331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Top tips for using social media in research 在研究中使用社交媒体的最佳技巧

IF 1.2

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI: 10.7748/nr.30.1.6.s2

C. Stephen, L. Halcomb

引用次数: 0

The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a reflection on researchers' experiences of its benefits and challenges and the lessons learnt from using it. 实施研究综合框架：研究人员对其益处和挑战的经验反思，以及从使用该框架中吸取的教训。

IF 1.2

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1827

Annelysse Jorgenson, Reginaldo Adalberto Luz, Luize Fábrega Juskevicius, Maria Clara Padoveze, Lesley Price

{"title":"The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a reflection on researchers' experiences of its benefits and challenges and the lessons learnt from using it.","authors":"Annelysse Jorgenson, Reginaldo Adalberto Luz, Luize Fábrega Juskevicius, Maria Clara Padoveze, Lesley Price","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1827","url":null,"abstract":"Background: In healthcare implementation research, there is little discussion of researchers' experiences of using frameworks, including the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).Aim: To identify and discuss the benefits and challenges encountered and the lessons learnt from researchers' experiences of using the CFIR in different contexts and phases of research.Discussion: This article synthesises the reflections of nursing and public health researchers on their experiences of using the CFIR across four separate healthcare-associated infection prevention and control implementation studies. The CFIR's benefits and challenges, the resolutions to these challenges and the lessons learnt from the application of the framework were discussed.Conclusions: Identified benefits included the framework's adaptability and flexibility, and its provision of structure and shared language for research. Translation to another language and differentiating between domains and constructs were challenges.Implications for practice: Nurse researchers may find this article useful when considering use of the CFIR, or to anticipate and prepare to overcome the challenges highlighted when using the framework.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139425734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a reflection on researchers' experiences of its benefits and challenges and the lessons learnt from using it. 实施研究综合框架:反思研究人员对其益处和挑战的经验以及从使用该框架中吸取的教训。

IF 1.2

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1827

Annelysse Jorgenson, Reginaldo Adalberto Luz, Luize Fábrega Juskevicius, Maria Clara Padoveze, Lesley Price

{"title":"The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a reflection on researchers' experiences of its benefits and challenges and the lessons learnt from using it.","authors":"Annelysse Jorgenson, Reginaldo Adalberto Luz, Luize Fábrega Juskevicius, Maria Clara Padoveze, Lesley Price","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1827","url":null,"abstract":"Background: In healthcare implementation research, there is little discussion of researchers' experiences of using frameworks, including the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).Aim: To identify and discuss the benefits and challenges encountered and the lessons learnt from researchers' experiences of using the CFIR in different contexts and phases of research.Discussion: This article synthesises the reflections of nursing and public health researchers on their experiences of using the CFIR across four separate healthcare-associated infection prevention and control implementation studies. The CFIR's benefits and challenges, the resolutions to these challenges and the lessons learnt from the application of the framework were discussed.Conclusions: Identified benefits included the framework's adaptability and flexibility, and its provision of structure and shared language for research. Translation to another language and differentiating between domains and constructs were challenges.Implications for practice: Nurse researchers may find this article useful when considering use of the CFIR, or to anticipate and prepare to overcome the challenges highlighted when using the framework.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9521877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

One size does not fit all - overcoming barriers to participant recruitment in qualitative research. 一刀切--克服定性研究中参与者招募的障碍。

IF 1.2

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2022-03-10 Epub Date: 2022-01-06 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1809

Philip John Archard, Michelle O'Reilly

{"title":"One size does not fit all - overcoming barriers to participant recruitment in qualitative research.","authors":"Philip John Archard, Michelle O'Reilly","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1809","DOIUrl":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1809","url":null,"abstract":"Background: It can be challenging to recruit participants for qualitative research. Recruitment can be affected by factors such as systemic barriers, as well as potential participants being reluctant to enrol in research they view as time-consuming and burdensome - particularly research exploring sensitive topics.Aim: To analyse and describe the implementation of multiple recruitment strategies used to overcome the recruitment barriers in a qualitative study exploring the use of physical restraints during mechanical ventilation in intensive care.Discussion: Recruitment strategies that are helpful for one study may not be successful in another. Qualitative researchers may face many recruitment challenges specific to the contexts of their studies. Overcoming these challenges can be costly, time-consuming and often frustrating, so it is important that researchers develop qualities and skills that enable them to navigate these barriers.Conclusion: Nurse researchers must consider the contexts of their target populations and tailor their recruitment strategies to the populations' needs. They must also be flexible, innovative and persistent in their approach, despite the challenges they face.Implications for practice: This paper provides insights into the recruitment barriers faced during a qualitative study and possible solutions. These insights can guide nurse researchers facing similar challenges in qualitative research.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39666316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a reflection on researchers' experiences of its benefits and challenges and the lessons learnt from using it. 实施研究综合框架：研究人员对其益处和挑战的经验反思，以及从使用该框架中吸取的教训。

IF 1.2

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2022-03-10 Epub Date: 2022-03-03 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1827

Annelysse Jorgenson, Reginaldo Adalberto Luz, Luize Fábrega Juskevicius, Maria Clara Padoveze, Lesley Price

{"title":"The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a reflection on researchers' experiences of its benefits and challenges and the lessons learnt from using it.","authors":"Annelysse Jorgenson, Reginaldo Adalberto Luz, Luize Fábrega Juskevicius, Maria Clara Padoveze, Lesley Price","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1827","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1827","url":null,"abstract":"Background: In healthcare implementation research, there is little discussion of researchers' experiences of using frameworks, including the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).Aim: To identify and discuss the benefits and challenges encountered and the lessons learnt from researchers' experiences of using the CFIR in different contexts and phases of research.Discussion: This article synthesises the reflections of nursing and public health researchers on their experiences of using the CFIR across four separate healthcare-associated infection prevention and control implementation studies. The CFIR's benefits and challenges, the resolutions to these challenges and the lessons learnt from the application of the framework were discussed.Conclusions: Identified benefits included the framework's adaptability and flexibility, and its provision of structure and shared language for research. Translation to another language and differentiating between domains and constructs were challenges.Implications for practice: Nurse researchers may find this article useful when considering use of the CFIR, or to anticipate and prepare to overcome the challenges highlighted when using the framework.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139479188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

An introduction to Bayes' theorem and examples of its application to a diagnostic test and a clinical trial. 介绍贝叶斯定理及其在诊断测试和临床试验中的应用实例。

IF 1.2

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2022-03-10 Epub Date: 2022-02-17 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2022.e1816

Ha Thi Mai, Steven He, Evan Alexandrou, Steven Alfred Frost

{"title":"An introduction to Bayes' theorem and examples of its application to a diagnostic test and a clinical trial.","authors":"Ha Thi Mai, Steven He, Evan Alexandrou, Steven Alfred Frost","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1816","DOIUrl":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1816","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Bayesian approach to updating scientific knowledge involves using a probability distribution to describe a prior belief concerning an outcome of interest and combines this with some new information to create a posterior probability distribution to describe the updated current knowledge.Aim: To introduce the application of Bayes' theorem, using the conditional probability example of the Monty Hall problem and two examples of the clinical application of a Bayesian approach.Discussion: Bayesian approaches enable the incorporation of prior knowledge into the interpretation of research findings and summaries of evidence to date. Bayesian approaches are being incorporated into most clinical trials.Conclusion: Bayesian approaches to interpreting the results of a diagnostic test and a clinical trial highlight the utility of these approaches to clinical nursing and the application of evidence-based practice.Implications for practice: Stimulation of an understanding and interest in the Bayesian approach among nurse researchers should lead to its wider application in nursing research.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39931232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0