Nurse Researcher最新文献

Professionals in-place: the role of the practice-based research coordinator. 专业人员到位：基于实践的研究协调员的作用。

IF 1

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2025-05-15 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2025.e1964

Sally Goldspink, Andrea Tuckwell, Nieky van Veggel, Hilary Engward, Naim Abdulmohdi, Marie Alexander

{"title":"Professionals in-place: the role of the practice-based research coordinator.","authors":"Sally Goldspink, Andrea Tuckwell, Nieky van Veggel, Hilary Engward, Naim Abdulmohdi, Marie Alexander","doi":"10.7748/nr.2025.e1964","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2025.e1964","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The authors were members of a large, interorganisational research project conducted by a university and an English NHS trust. The project's success relied on building positive partnerships and networks over three years. Recognising the challenges of working across different organisations, the authors created a new role for a nurse: the 'in-place research coordinator' (IPRC).Aim: To introduce and explain the new role and provide examples of how the authors devised and applied it during their research.Discussion: The IPRC was a member of the NHS trust, so brought valuable organisational insights to the research team while gaining research experience through applying her professional knowledge and connections.Conclusion: The IPRC enabled this inter-organisational research to take place, and had measurable efficacy and impact.Implications for practice: The authors recommend that future collaborative inter-organisational research projects include an IPRC, with specific budgeting for the role and recruitment from practice.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144081389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Reflections on exploratory conversations about healthcare research: it is time for a real change. 关于医疗保健研究的探索性对话的思考：是时候做出真正的改变了。

IF 1

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2025-04-30 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2025.e1950

Joy Oghogho Watterson, Rupinder Kaur Bajwa, Louise Howe, Alison Cowley, Kathryn Fairbrother

{"title":"Reflections on exploratory conversations about healthcare research: it is time for a real change.","authors":"Joy Oghogho Watterson, Rupinder Kaur Bajwa, Louise Howe, Alison Cowley, Kathryn Fairbrother","doi":"10.7748/nr.2025.e1950","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2025.e1950","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical research practitioners, nurses, allied healthcare professionals, doctors and any other healthcare professionals delivering clinical research have seen firsthand the under-representation of ethnic minorities as participants in research. This means that people who take part in research often do not reflect the target disease population. This can lead to health inequalities and disparities in treatment outcomes.Aim: To explore ethnic minority communities' perspectives of clinical research and identify areas of research that may interest them.Discussion: The authors had exploratory conversations between October 2022 and March 2023 through patient and public involvement and engagement (PPI/E) consultations with Caribbean groups and Asian groups in their community centres and research delivery staff in Nottinghamshire. They found during these conversations that the community groups could benefit from a deeper understanding of clinical research, including its procedures and common misconceptions. They conceptualised the potential impacts of negative and positive research experiences.Conclusion: Researchers, funders and stakeholders can facilitate participation in research. Researchers must focus on addressing barriers to participation by fostering continuous collaboration, offering research education, feeding back on the progress of research, building trustworthy relationships and addressing concerns that people might have about research or their immediate health.Implications for practice: This exploratory conversation demonstrates that researchers could provide meaningful research experience that would facilitate research participation by involving people from diverse backgrounds to influence the research question, methodology and every aspect of the research process through coproduction, codesign and PPI activities.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144039447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Navigating evidence: a concise guide to types of literature review commonly used in healthcare research. 导航证据：一个简明的指南类型的文献综述通常用于医疗保健研究。

IF 1

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2025.e1963

Jacqueline Harley

{"title":"Navigating evidence: a concise guide to types of literature review commonly used in healthcare research.","authors":"Jacqueline Harley","doi":"10.7748/nr.2025.e1963","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2025.e1963","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Literature reviews evaluate the evidence currently available concerning a particular phenomenon of interest. They are essential tools that offer healthcare professionals insights into existing knowledge, identify gaps and guide future studies. There are different types of literature review, each of which has unique purposes, methodologies, strengths and limitations, and researchers must select the type most appropriate to their needs.Aim: To discuss the main features of common types of literature review, clarify their characteristics and guide healthcare professionals and researchers in making informed decisions.Discussion: It can be challenging to choose a type of literature review as it must align with the focus of your research. The type you choose will influence the depth of your analysis and the applicability of your findings to clinical practice. It is therefore crucial to understand the different types and their applications, so you can select the type most appropriate to your research, ensure it effectively addresses your research questions and contributes insights.Conclusion: Choosing the right type of literature review is crucial for effectively addressing research questions and advancing knowledge in healthcare. Understanding the distinct purposes and methodologies of different types of review will help you to make an informed choice that enhances the relevance and impact of your research, leading to stronger evidence and better outcomes.Implications for practice: Healthcare professionals will be able to ensure their research is methodologically sound and relevant in practice. This will ultimately lead to better-informed decisions and improved outcomes for patients.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143701836","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

How many is enough? Justifying sample size in descriptive quantitative research. 多少才够？在描述性定量研究中证明样本量。

IF 1

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2025.e1958

Ruth Alison Mursa, Christopher Patterson, Gemma McErlean, Elizabeth Halcomb

{"title":"How many is enough? Justifying sample size in descriptive quantitative research.","authors":"Ruth Alison Mursa, Christopher Patterson, Gemma McErlean, Elizabeth Halcomb","doi":"10.7748/nr.2025.e1958","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2025.e1958","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Descriptive quantitative researchers often use surveys to collect data about a group or phenomenon. Determining the required sample size in descriptive surveys can pose a challenge as there is no simple 'formula' by which to calculate an appropriate sample. However, when a sample is too small the study may fail to answer the research question and too many responses can create resource implications.Aim: To explore considerations regarding the justification of adequate sample size in descriptive quantitative research.Discussion: Several considerations may assist quantitative descriptive researchers in examining the appropriateness and justification of sample size. Response rates can guide decision-making around the proportion of the target population who respond. Additionally, consideration of any validated tools, the spread or responses and types of analysis can guide sampling decisions.Conclusion: The strategies in this article provide a considered approach to justifying sample size in descriptive quantitative research. Factors such as response rates and analytical considerations provide a transparent means of justifying an adequate sample.Implications for practice: Providing clear justification for the sample size within descriptive quantitative research demonstrates a robust research approach and optimises resource use.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143617586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Theoretical sensitivity and reflexivity in grounded theory. 基础理论中的理论敏感性和反身性。

IF 1

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2025-03-13 Epub Date: 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2024.e1936

Adam Hughes, Wilfred McSherry

{"title":"Theoretical sensitivity and reflexivity in grounded theory.","authors":"Adam Hughes, Wilfred McSherry","doi":"10.7748/nr.2024.e1936","DOIUrl":"10.7748/nr.2024.e1936","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Grounded theory (GT) has become one of the foremost tools in qualitative nursing research. There are different approaches to GT but a feature common to all of them is theoretical sensitivity, which facilitates GT's iterative process. However, differences between the approaches in how to apply theoretical sensitivity and how much influence existing knowledge should play have contributed to tribalism.Aim: To critically evaluate the role of theoretical sensitivity and reflexivity in GT and the involvement they can have, as well as explore what steps researchers can take to improve their insight.Discussion: Theoretical sensitivity enables researchers to steer their studies to answer their research questions, gain insight into their study's findings and develop theory grounded in the data. However, reflection is required for researchers to understand their effect on the theories that emerge, prevent them from applying preconceived ideas and allow for the unfettered emergence of theory.Conclusion: Researchers who do not demonstrate insight into their own philosophical positions and influences risk being accused of bias; this may result in the perceived value of their theoretical outcomes being reduced. Applying a reflexive process may mitigate this, enabling them to understand and refine their methodological processes and produce high-quality GT research.Implications for practice: All researchers should consider using reflexivity when conducting research. Understanding influences and positionality in qualitative methodologies allows for transparency and improves the rigour of their outcomes.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":"11-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The impact of a nurse's dual role on implementing an effectiveness study. 护士的双重角色对实施有效性研究的影响。

IF 1

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2025-03-13 Epub Date: 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2024.e1939

Allison Soprovich, Lisa Wozniak, Kari Meneen, Dean Eurich

{"title":"The impact of a nurse's dual role on implementing an effectiveness study.","authors":"Allison Soprovich, Lisa Wozniak, Kari Meneen, Dean Eurich","doi":"10.7748/nr.2024.e1939","DOIUrl":"10.7748/nr.2024.e1939","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Reorganizing the Approach to Diabetes through the Application of Registries (RADAR) improved diabetes care and outcomes for First Nations people in Alberta, Canada. The nurse involved in the implementation of RADAR performed two roles in this model of care: research nurse and care coordinator.Aim: To describe the research nurse's dual role in the implementation and evaluation of RADAR.Discussion: The research nurse not only documented and collected data in hard-to-reach communities as part of effective research, she also provided remote care coordination to support community healthcare providers using a culturally tailored registry to facilitate population-level care. This dual role required many qualities of nursing leadership and transformation.Conclusion: The research nurse's two roles contributed to the success of the intervention and were critical to the successful implementation of the model, creating valuable real-world evidence across diverse populations and settings.Implications for practice: Nurses are well placed to perform research duties alongside engagement and implementation activities. This can enhance the effectiveness and evaluation of healthcare interventions, particularly in community-based interventions within First Nations communities.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":"19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142336886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Protocol club: a social learning framework for the research delivery workforce. 协议俱乐部：研究实施队伍的社会学习框架。

IF 1

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2025-03-13 Epub Date: 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2024.e1955

Hilarious de Jesus, Deirdre Brooking, Karen Dunne, Elisa Visentin

引用次数: 0

Using a hybrid Delphi/nominal group technique to develop a tool for appraising the quality of mixed-method grounded theory research. 使用德尔菲/名义小组混合技术，开发评估混合方法基础理论研究质量的工具。

IF 1

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2025-03-13 Epub Date: 2024-11-14 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2024.e1947

Patricia Louise Lowe, Samantha Jakimowicz, Tracy Louise Levett-Jones, Adele Baldwin, Cindy Stern

{"title":"Using a hybrid Delphi/nominal group technique to develop a tool for appraising the quality of mixed-method grounded theory research.","authors":"Patricia Louise Lowe, Samantha Jakimowicz, Tracy Louise Levett-Jones, Adele Baldwin, Cindy Stern","doi":"10.7748/nr.2024.e1947","DOIUrl":"10.7748/nr.2024.e1947","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Among the many methodological approaches used to generate new knowledge in nursing research are mixed methods and grounded theory. However, it can be challenging for researchers to achieve and demonstrate the philosophically congruent integration required in mixed-method, grounded-theory research.Aim: To use a hybrid of Delphi and nominal group techniques to develop a tool to appraise the quality of mixed-method, grounded-theory research.Method: The extant literature informed the construction of an evidence-based checklist and explanatory notes that were discussed and voted upon by experienced mixed-method and grounded-theory researchers. The tool was progressively piloted in three projects employing varying grounded-theory approaches.Discussion: Experienced mixed-method and grounded-theory researchers discussed and voted on the construction of an evidence-based checklist and explanatory notes informed by the extant literature. The researchers piloted the tool in three rounds, with reference to previous studies that used various grounded-theory approaches.Conclusion: This study reports an effective strategy for gaining consensus to develop a tool demonstrating content, inter-rater and concurrent reliability.Implications for practice: Nurse researchers of various levels of expertise can use the tool developed in this study, which will accommodate future advances in mixed-method and grounded-theory research.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":"33-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Qualitative case studies in suicide research: a novice researcher's reflections. 自杀研究中的定性案例研究：一个新手研究者的思考。

IF 1

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2025.e1961

Taylor Yousiph, Christopher Patterson, Lorna Moxham

{"title":"Qualitative case studies in suicide research: a novice researcher's reflections.","authors":"Taylor Yousiph, Christopher Patterson, Lorna Moxham","doi":"10.7748/nr.2025.e1961","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2025.e1961","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The suicide process is a complex and uniquely individual phenomenon. The need to understand and bring meaning to individual experiences of suicide is burgeoning amidst the growing global impacts of suicide. Qualitative case-study research uses multiple forms of evidence to investigate a phenomenon in a certain context.Aim: To present critical reflections on the lead author's doctoral project, which uses a case-study design to investigate people who have experience of suicide and are educating preregistration nurses on clinical placement.Discussion: The lead author reflects critically on, and provides insights into, adopting the qualitative case-study methodology for suicide research, including: defining the role of the researcher; the appropriate use of methods of collecting data; and ensuring participants are safe. Reflexivity played an important role in ensuring the participants' and the lead author's well-being throughout the project, and the authors posit it as a central strategy in future research.Conclusion: Qualitative case-study research is a novel approach to suicide research that aligns with global suicide prevention frameworks and includes people's experiences in the formation of policies, design of interventions and education. Reflection should be a central strategy in such research.Implications for practice: Suicide research requires careful consideration and planning at every stage. Researchers must plan and evaluate participants' safety, the role of the researcher and data collection methods before, during and after the research.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143484299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Understanding literature reviews: a guide for enhancing nursing practice globally. 理解文献综述：提高全球护理实践的指南。

IF 1

Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI: 10.7748/nr.2025.e1949

Sarah Butler

{"title":"Understanding literature reviews: a guide for enhancing nursing practice globally.","authors":"Sarah Butler","doi":"10.7748/nr.2025.e1949","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2025.e1949","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Literature reviews are essential in nursing for integrating research into practice, informing clinical guidelines and shaping health policy. They comprehensively synthesise the available evidence, supporting nurses in making informed decisions that improve patient care. It is therefore crucial when researchers are selecting the method most appropriate for investigating their clinical questions that they understand the different types of literature review.Aim: To explore the characteristics, strengths and limitations of narrative, systematic and scoping reviews, as well as highlight their significance in nursing practice globally.Discussion: Narrative reviews provide broad, flexible overviews of topics; however, they lack methodological rigour, which can potentially result in bias. Systematic reviews provide high-quality, reliable evidence by using a structured approach to synthesising data from multiple studies; this makes them valuable for clinical decision-making and the development of guidelines. Scoping reviews map the scope of research onto emerging topics, identifying gaps and future research priorities, though they do not typically assess the quality of included studies.Conclusion: Literature reviews are vital tools for nurses worldwide. Understanding the differences between types of literature review enables nurses to effectively use the one most appropriate to their needs. This is essential for evidence-based practice, informs clinical and policy decisions, and supports high-quality patient care, as well as contributing to nurses' professional development.Implications for practice: Nurses who engage with literature reviews can stay informed about the latest research, improve patient outcomes and participate in the advancement of nursing knowledge globally.","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143059692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0