多少才够?在描述性定量研究中证明样本量。

IF 1 Q3 NURSING
Ruth Alison Mursa, Christopher Patterson, Gemma McErlean, Elizabeth Halcomb
{"title":"多少才够?在描述性定量研究中证明样本量。","authors":"Ruth Alison Mursa, Christopher Patterson, Gemma McErlean, Elizabeth Halcomb","doi":"10.7748/nr.2025.e1958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Descriptive quantitative researchers often use surveys to collect data about a group or phenomenon. Determining the required sample size in descriptive surveys can pose a challenge as there is no simple 'formula' by which to calculate an appropriate sample. However, when a sample is too small the study may fail to answer the research question and too many responses can create resource implications.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore considerations regarding the justification of adequate sample size in descriptive quantitative research.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Several considerations may assist quantitative descriptive researchers in examining the appropriateness and justification of sample size. Response rates can guide decision-making around the proportion of the target population who respond. Additionally, consideration of any validated tools, the spread or responses and types of analysis can guide sampling decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The strategies in this article provide a considered approach to justifying sample size in descriptive quantitative research. Factors such as response rates and analytical considerations provide a transparent means of justifying an adequate sample.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Providing clear justification for the sample size within descriptive quantitative research demonstrates a robust research approach and optimises resource use.</p>","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How many is enough? Justifying sample size in descriptive quantitative research.\",\"authors\":\"Ruth Alison Mursa, Christopher Patterson, Gemma McErlean, Elizabeth Halcomb\",\"doi\":\"10.7748/nr.2025.e1958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Descriptive quantitative researchers often use surveys to collect data about a group or phenomenon. Determining the required sample size in descriptive surveys can pose a challenge as there is no simple 'formula' by which to calculate an appropriate sample. However, when a sample is too small the study may fail to answer the research question and too many responses can create resource implications.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore considerations regarding the justification of adequate sample size in descriptive quantitative research.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Several considerations may assist quantitative descriptive researchers in examining the appropriateness and justification of sample size. Response rates can guide decision-making around the proportion of the target population who respond. Additionally, consideration of any validated tools, the spread or responses and types of analysis can guide sampling decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The strategies in this article provide a considered approach to justifying sample size in descriptive quantitative research. Factors such as response rates and analytical considerations provide a transparent means of justifying an adequate sample.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Providing clear justification for the sample size within descriptive quantitative research demonstrates a robust research approach and optimises resource use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Researcher\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Researcher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2025.e1958\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2025.e1958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:描述性定量研究人员经常使用调查来收集关于一个群体或现象的数据。在描述性调查中确定所需的样本量可能是一项挑战,因为没有简单的“公式”来计算适当的样本量。然而,当样本太小时,研究可能无法回答研究问题,太多的回答可能会产生资源影响。目的:探讨描述性定量研究中适当样本量的合理性。讨论:几个考虑可能有助于定量描述研究人员检查样本大小的适当性和合理性。响应率可以根据响应的目标人群的比例来指导决策。此外,考虑任何经过验证的工具、响应的传播和分析的类型都可以指导抽样决策。结论:本文中的策略提供了一种经过深思熟虑的方法来证明描述性定量研究中的样本量。诸如回复率和分析考虑等因素提供了证明适当样本的透明手段。对实践的启示:在描述性定量研究中为样本量提供明确的理由,证明了一种强有力的研究方法,并优化了资源利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How many is enough? Justifying sample size in descriptive quantitative research.

Background: Descriptive quantitative researchers often use surveys to collect data about a group or phenomenon. Determining the required sample size in descriptive surveys can pose a challenge as there is no simple 'formula' by which to calculate an appropriate sample. However, when a sample is too small the study may fail to answer the research question and too many responses can create resource implications.

Aim: To explore considerations regarding the justification of adequate sample size in descriptive quantitative research.

Discussion: Several considerations may assist quantitative descriptive researchers in examining the appropriateness and justification of sample size. Response rates can guide decision-making around the proportion of the target population who respond. Additionally, consideration of any validated tools, the spread or responses and types of analysis can guide sampling decisions.

Conclusion: The strategies in this article provide a considered approach to justifying sample size in descriptive quantitative research. Factors such as response rates and analytical considerations provide a transparent means of justifying an adequate sample.

Implications for practice: Providing clear justification for the sample size within descriptive quantitative research demonstrates a robust research approach and optimises resource use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Researcher
Nurse Researcher NURSING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Additionally, the website provides a range of Internet links to the latest research news, conference information, jobs and grants, and other resources. We hope that this site becomes an invaluable interactive resource for both novice and experienced researchers. If you have any comments or suggestions to improve the site, or details of additional websites that could be usefully added, please let us know. We very much welcome your ideas so that we can provide the kind of online resource that will best help you to develop your research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信